scholarly journals Quality-of-life analysis of the MITO-8, MaNGO, BGOG-Ov1, AGO-Ovar2.16, ENGOT-Ov1, GCIG study comparing platinum-based versus non-platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1189-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Piccirillo ◽  
G. Scambia ◽  
A. Bologna ◽  
S. Signoriello ◽  
I. Vergote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Life Analysis

Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3176-3182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Dirk Stengel ◽  
Guelten Oskay-Oezcelik ◽  
Alain G. Zeimet ◽  
Harald Sommer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Refractory

PurposeThe management of recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Single-agent topotecan is an established treatment option, and preliminary evidence suggests improved tumor control by combining topotecan with etoposide or gemcitabine.Patients and MethodsWomen with relapsed ovarian cancer after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to topotecan monotherapy 1.25 mg/m2/d, topotecan 1.0 mg/m2plus oral etoposide 50 mg/d, or topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2on day 1 and 600 mg/m2on day 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive disease according to a recurrence-free interval of less or more than 12 months, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rates, toxicity, and quality of life (as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 30-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire).ResultsThe trial enrolled 502 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years (± 10.2 years), 208 of whom were platinum resistant. Median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 21.9 months) with topotecan, 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 20.0 months) with topotecan plus etoposide (log-rank P = .7647), and 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.9 months) with topotecan plus gemcitabine (log-rank P = .2344). Platinum-sensitive patients lived significantly longer than platinum-refractory patients (21.9 v 10.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.0, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Objective response rates were 27.8%, 36.1%, and 31.6%, respectively. Patients under combined treatment were at higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia.ConclusionNonplatinum topotecan combinations do not provide a survival advantage over topotecan alone in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.

Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Compared With Carboplatin in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Intergroup Trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (29) ◽  
pp. 4699-4707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobus Pfisterer ◽  
Marie Plante ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Hal Hirte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

Purpose Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer develop recurrent disease. For those patients who recur at least 6 months after initial therapy, paclitaxel platinum has shown a modest survival advantage over platinum without paclitaxel; however, many patients develop clinically relevant neurotoxicity, frequently resulting in treatment discontinuation. Thus, an alternative regimen without significant neurotoxicity was evaluated by comparing gemcitabine plus carboplatin with single-agent carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Methods Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone, every 21 days. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS). Results Three hundred fifty-six patients (178 gemcitabine plus carboplatin; 178 carboplatin) were randomly assigned. Patients received a median of six cycles in both arms. With a median follow-up of 17 months, median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.9 to 9.7 months) for gemcitabine plus carboplatin and 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 7.1 months) for carboplatin. The hazard ration (HR) for PFS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; P = .0031). Response rate was 47.2% (95% CI, 39.9% to 54.5%) for gemcitabine plus carboplatin and 30.9% (95% CI, 24.1% to 37.7%) for carboplatin (P = .0016). The HR for overall survival was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.75 to1.23; P = .7349). While myelosuppression was significantly more common in the combination, sequelae such as febrile neutropenia or infections were uncommon. No statistically significant differences in quality of life scores between arms were noted. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus carboplatin significantly improves PFS and response rate without worsening quality of life for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Quality of Life in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Chemotherapy Versus Surgery Plus Chemotherapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2387-2394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Plotti ◽  
Giuseppe Scaletta ◽  
Alessia Aloisi ◽  
Daniela Luvero ◽  
Stella Capriglione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

DICE: Study Protocol for a Randomised Trial Investigating a Novel Therapy Called TAK228 in Ovarian Cancer Resistant to Standard Treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Webber ◽  
Francesca Fiorentino ◽  
Jonathan Krell ◽  
Consuelo Nohpal de la Rosa
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Novel Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Abstract Background:The standard initial treatment for ovarian cancer is surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and potentially maintenance therapy with avastin or inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP). While a proportion of women are cured by this approach, the vast majority will relapse and become resistant to platinum chemotherapy either initially or on subsequent treatment. There is an unmet need to improve response to treatment and quality of life in these women. TAK228 is a novel therapy that can be added to standard treatment in the participant population and the aim of the DICE trial is to assess its effectiveness. Laboratory and clinical research has shown that these ovarian cancers may respond to the molecular target of a drug such as TAK228, and there have been studies using it in other advanced solid tumours including endometrial cancer. Methods: 124 eligible women will be recruited from participating research sites in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany. Randomised participants will receive either weekly paclitaxel alone (standard treatment, n=62) or TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel (n=62) until the cancer significantly worsens, there are significant adverse events or any other protocol-defined stopping criteria. Participants will be monitored for response to treatment (using radiological imaging), adverse events and quality of life during both randomised treatment and subsequent follow up.Discussion:The primary objective/endpoint of the study is to compare the two treatments in terms of progression free survival, or the length of time that each participant is alive without the cancer significantly worsening according to defined assessment criteria. If the addition of TAK228 to weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy is shown to significantly improve this statistically, and adverse events and quality of life are not significantly worse than standard treatment, then TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel could potentially be taken forward within the context of a larger phase III trial.Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03648489. Registered 27th August 2018.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03648489

scholarly journals Maintenance with Trabectedin in the Treatment of Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva María Guerra Alía ◽  
Cayetano Sempere Ortega ◽  
Alfonso Cortés Salgado ◽  
Concepción Sanchez Martínez ◽  
Julio Galindo Álvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Abdominal Distension ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Good Tolerance ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Selection Of

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common type of cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. The current usual therapeutic approach in this disease includes optimal cytoreductive therapy followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, along with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery in selected cases. The platinum-free interval (PFI) continues to be the most useful tool to assist in the selection of the subsequent therapy and to predict response to treatment. The combination of trabectedin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is useful in patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, in patients who have previously received two or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, in patients who have already experienced a platinum-induced hypersensitivity reaction and in patients who have previously failed to respond to a platinum-based treatment. Case Presentation: A 64-years-old postmenopausal woman with pain, abdominal distension, and an altered intestinal transit and with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, was successfully treated with a second line of trabectedin chemotherapy in combination with PLD, followed by trabectedin in monotherapy. This case proves the effectiveness of the combination of trabectedin and PLD and demonstrates how the administration of trabectedin, even in monotherapy, allows to maintain an adequate clinical response with good tolerance to the treatment during more than two years of drug administration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document