scholarly journals Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan: Prospective observational study using Rome IV OIC diagnostic criteria (OIC-J Study)

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii612
Author(s):  
H. Imai ◽  
S. Fumita ◽  
T. Harada ◽  
T. Noriyuki ◽  
M. Gamoh ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1498-1504
Author(s):  
Takahito Omae ◽  
Nobuyuki Yotani ◽  
Akihiro Sakashita ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kizawa

Background: Unused medications (UM) are an important issue, with the waste associated with UM a burden to the health-care system. The aims of this study were to clarify the amount and costs of UM in patients with advanced cancer at the time of their last admission to a palliative care unit and to explore the factors contributing to the cost of UM and how patients dealt with UM. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in single palliative care unit. Unused medications were classified into 6 categories and the number and cost of UM by category calculated per patient. Patients were classified into 2 cost groups (high and low) based on the total cost of UM, and the number and cost of UM by category were compared between these 2 groups. Results: Of 194 consecutive hospitalized patients, data were analyzed for 90. The mean number and cost of UM per patient was 440 and US$301, respectively. Opioids accounted for 47% of the cost of UM. Comparing costs by UM category, the proportion of opioids (51% vs 21%; P < .0001) and oral anticancer drugs (14% vs 3%; P = .02) was higher in the high- than in the low-cost group. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the estimated annual waste cost of UM for patients with cancer who died in Japan was approximately US$110 million. Interventions to educate patients regarding UM and to eliminate barriers to opioid use may help reduce the cost of UM, particularly opioids and anticancer drugs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 2134-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Gianpiero Porzio ◽  
Patrizia Ferrera ◽  
Federica Aielli ◽  
Lucilla Verna ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19350-e19350
Author(s):  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Jan Tack ◽  
Ana Fernandez ◽  
Jonathan Chambers ◽  
Juan Luis Sanz ◽  
...  

e19350 Background: Opioids have been the cornerstone of analgesic treatment for severe chronic pain. OIC is the most commonly reported adverse effect associated with opioids, and compromises patient satisfaction and adherence to analgesic treatment and also quality of life. Naloxegol is a PEGylated derivative of the µ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adult patients who have had an inadequate response to laxatives. This real-world (RW) study (NCT03638440) aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of Naloxegol in patients with cancer pain diagnosed with OIC. Methods: This is a single-arm, multinational, prospective, RW observational study in adult subjects receiving treatment with opioids for at least 4 weeks, diagnosed with OIC that receive naloxegol in routine clinical practice. This study will recruit patients from 25 European hospitals. Data for efficacy are collected through the patient's diary during a 4-week period. Results: One hundred fifty-two patients, median age 66 years, 54% women, have been included in this analysis. Main cancer locations were lung (26%), breast (21%), prostate (10%), pancreas (9%) and head and neck (9%), and 67% had metastasis, mainly in bone (37%). Most frequent opioid treatments were fentanyl (29%), oxycodone (22%), and morphine (15%). Most frequent previous laxatives were osmotic (61%) and stimulant (27%) laxatives. Over 109 patients with at least one BFI score available after baseline, change in BFI score was ≥12 points in 61% of patients and 33% had BFI score <30 points after 4 weeks of treatment. There were statistically significant differences between baseline and final visit in BFI overall score as well as in the score of each of the three questions. Most common adverse reactions to naloxegol were abdominal pain (7.9%), diarrhea (2.6%), flatulence (1.3%) and nausea (1.3%), most of them grade 1-2. Eight patients had adverse reactions leading to study discontinuation: abdominal pain (5), diarrhea (2), intestinal perforation (1) and fatigue (1). Only one patient died due to an adverse reaction: intestinal perforation. Conclusions: Preliminary results show a promising efficacy of naloxegol in this RW treatment study. Toxicity profile was as expected. RW evidence seems to be a useful methodology to assess the real-life use of naloxegol and its efficacy in cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Guro Falk Eriksen ◽  
Jūratė Šaltytė Benth ◽  
Bjørn Henning Grønberg ◽  
Siri Rostoft ◽  
Lene Kirkhus ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Soo Jeon ◽  
Jung Ah Lee ◽  
Jin Woo Choi ◽  
Eu Gene Kang ◽  
Hong Soo Jung ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hisao Imai ◽  
Soichi Fumita ◽  
Toshiyuki Harada ◽  
Toshio Noriyuki ◽  
Makio Gamoh ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate the opioid-induced constipation burden in the subgroup of patients with lung cancer who participated in the observational Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Cancer Pain in Japan (OIC-J) study. Methods The prospective, observational study, OIC-J, included 212 patients with various tumour types, 33% of whom had lung cancer. The incidence of opioid-induced constipation was evaluated using several diagnostic criteria, as well as the physician’s diagnosis and patient’s subjective assessment. Following initiation of opioids, patients recorded details of bowel movements (i.e. date/time, Bristol Stool Scale form, sensations of incomplete evacuation or anorectal obstruction/blockage and degree of straining) in a diary for 2 weeks. Relationships between patient characteristics and opioid-induced constipation onset and effects of opioid-induced constipation on quality of life were explored. Results In total, 69 patients were included in this post hoc analysis. The incidence of opioid-induced constipation varied (39.1–59.1%) depending on which diagnostic criteria was used. Diagnostic criteria that included a quality component or a patient’s feeling of bowel movement as an evaluation item (i.e. Rome IV, physician’s diagnosis, Bowel Function Index, patient’s assessment) showed higher incidences of opioid-induced constipation than recording the number of spontaneous bowel movements alone. Opioid-induced constipation occurred rapidly after initiating opioids and had a significant impact on Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms total score (P = 0.0031). Patient baseline characteristics did not appear to be predictive of opioid-induced constipation onset. Conclusions In patients with lung cancer, opioid-induced constipation can occur quickly after initiating opioids and can negatively impact quality of life. Early management of opioid-induced constipation, with a focus on quality-of-life improvement and patient’s assessments of bowel movements, is important for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document