Peripheral cytotoxic T cell correlates with tumor mutational burden and is predictive for progression free survival in advanced breast cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v47
Author(s):  
X.-R. Liu ◽  
G. Song ◽  
H. Jiang ◽  
L.-J. Di ◽  
J. Yu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1104-TPS1104
Author(s):  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Suzette Delaloge ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
...  

TPS1104 Background: Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) block estrogen receptor (ER) associated signaling and have created interest for treating patients (pts) with advanced ER+ breast cancer (BC). Fulvestrant is currently the only SERD available for advanced BC but requires intramuscular administration, limiting the applied dose, exposure and receptor engagement. Amcenestrant (SAR439859) is an oral SERD that binds with high affinity to both wild-type and mutant ER, blocking estradiol binding and promoting up to 98% ER degradation in preclinical studies. In the phase I AMEERA-1 study of pretreated pts with ER+/HER2- advanced BC, amcenestrant 150–600 mg once daily (QD) showed a mean ER occupancy of 94% with plasma concentrations > 100 ng/mL and a favorable safety profile (Bardia, 2019; data on file). Combination therapy with amcenestrant + palbociclib (palbo) was also evaluated as part of this ongoing phase I study. CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), the gold standard for first line treatment for advanced breast cancer, prolong progression free survival (PFS) in pts with no prior treatment for ER+/HER2- advanced BC, but OS benefit has not been shown yet in postmenopausal pts. There remains a clinical need for more effective treatments in this setting. Methods: AMEERA-5 (NCT04478266) is an ongoing, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of amcenestrant + palbo with that of letrozole + palbo in pts with advanced, locoregional recurrent or metastatic ER+/HER2- BC who have not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. The study includes men, pre/peri-menopausal (with goserelin) and post-menopausal women. Pts with progression during or within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy using any of the following agents are excluded: AI, selective estrogen receptor modulators, CDK4/6i. Pts are randomized 1:1 to either continuous amcenestrant 200 mg or letrozole 2.5 mg QD orally with matching placebos; both combined with palbo 125 mg QD orally (d1–21 every 28-d cycle). Randomization is stratified according to disease type (de novo metastatic vs recurrent disease), the presence of visceral metastasis, and menopausal status. The primary endpoint is investigator assessed progression free survival (PFS) (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant and palbo, health-related quality of life, time to chemotherapy, and safety. Biomarkers will be measured in paired tumor biopsies and cell free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) over time. Target enrolment = 1066 pts; enrolment as of 1/2021 = 33 pts. Bardia A, et al., J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37 (15 suppl):1054 Clinical trial information: NCT04478266 .


The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Xiao-Ran Liu ◽  
Jian-Jun Yu ◽  
Guo-Hong Song ◽  
Li-Jun Di ◽  
Han-Fang Jiang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (23) ◽  
pp. 2673-2686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise A Yardley

Ribociclib has received approval in the pre/peri- and postmenopausal disease settings on the basis of the MONALEESA trials. MONALEESA-2 demonstrated that ribociclib plus letrozole significantly improved progression-free survival compared with placebo plus letrozole as first-line therapy in postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Subsequently, ongoing trials reported significant progression-free survival improvements with ribociclib in combination with either fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who were either treatment naive or received ≤1 line of prior endocrine therapy in the advanced disease setting (MONALEESA-3) or tamoxifen/nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor with ovarian function suppression in pre/perimenopausal women (MONALEESA-7). This review summarizes the MONALEESA clinical program. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01958021 (MONALEESA-2), NCT02422615 (MONALEESA-3), NCT02278120 (MONALEESA-7).


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. A342
Author(s):  
R Miksad ◽  
V Zietemann ◽  
R Mattheucci Gothe ◽  
R Schwarzer ◽  
A Conrads-Frank ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
Hongnan Mo ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Qing LI ◽  
Pin Zhang ◽  
...  

88 Background: Breast cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of progression-free survival (PFS) in predicting overall survival (OS), and to explore whether PFS in the first-line treatment could help in the choice of posterior regimens. Methods: Data from the China National Cancer Center database that recorded 2061 women from February 1992 to March 2018 were pooled as the study cohort. Women were eligible if they had metastatic breast cancer and had not received systemic treatment for the advanced disease. The independent validation cohort was composed of 1756 patients with advanced breast cancer from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Results: The correlation coefficient between PFS and OS was 0.862 in patients receiving endocrine therapy alone as first-line treatment, and 0.647 in the whole study cohort (all P < 0.0001).Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that PFS = 12 months was the optimal cutoff value for predicting patient’s survival(P < 0.0001). In the study cohort, the median survival time among patients who experienced any PFS at 12 months was 29.0 months, compared with 72.6 months in those patients who did not experience any PFS at 12 months (HR = 2.736, P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, the median PPS after progression was 22.6months in patients whose PFS < 12 months, which was also significantly worse than that in patients who did not progress at 12 months (median 31.3 months, P = 0.001).Notably, in the subgroup analysis of 732 with hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative disease, combined chemotherapy assecond-line treatment could significantly improve patient survival compared with single agent chemotherapy (HR = 0.597, P = 0.040) in patients with first-line PFS > 12m, but not in patients with first-line PFS < 12m (P = 0.109).A similar pattern is observed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: First-line PFS at 12 months predicted OS in patients with advanced breast cancer, and could potentially serve as a convenient identifier in clinical practice to precision medicine approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document