Protein contact map refinement for improving structure prediction using generative adversarial networks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya ◽  
Genki Terashi ◽  
Aashish Jain ◽  
Yuki Kagaya ◽  
Daisuke Kihara
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Generative Adversarial Networks ◽  
Contact Map ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Adversarial Networks

Abstract Motivation Protein structure prediction remains as one of the most important problems in computational biology and biophysics. In the past few years, protein residue–residue contact prediction has undergone substantial improvement, which has made it a critical driving force for successful protein structure prediction. Boosting the accuracy of contact predictions has, therefore, become the forefront of protein structure prediction. Results We show a novel contact map refinement method, ContactGAN, which uses Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). ContactGAN was able to make a significant improvement over predictions made by recent contact prediction methods when tested on three datasets including protein structure modeling targets in CASP13 and CASP14. We show improvement of precision in contact prediction, which translated into improvement in the accuracy of protein tertiary structure models. On the other hand, observed improvement over trRosetta was relatively small, reasons for which are discussed. ContactGAN will be a valuable addition in the structure prediction pipeline to achieve an extra gain in contact prediction accuracy. Availability and implementation https://github.com/kiharalab/ContactGAN. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Protein Contact Map Denoising Using Generative Adversarial Networks

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya ◽  
Genki Terashi ◽  
Aashish Jain ◽  
Yuki Kagaya ◽  
Daisuke Kihara
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Generative Adversarial Networks ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Contact Map ◽  
Denoising Method ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Adversarial Networks

ABSTRACTProtein residue-residue contact prediction from protein sequence information has undergone substantial improvement in the past few years, which has made it a critical driving force for building correct protein tertiary structure models. Improving accuracy of contact predictions has, therefore, become the forefront of protein structure prediction. Here, we show a novel contact map denoising method, ContactGAN, which uses Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) to refine predicted protein contact maps. ContactGAN was able to make a consistent and significant improvement over predictions made by recent contact prediction methods when tested on two datasets including protein structure modeling targets in CASP13. ContactGAN will be a valuable addition in the structure prediction pipeline to achieve an extra gain in contact prediction accuracy.

scholarly journals The evolution of contact prediction: Evidence that contact selection in statistical contact prediction is changing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Chonofsky ◽  
Saulo H P de Oliveira ◽  
Konrad Krawczyk ◽  
Charlotte M Deane
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Chemical Interactions ◽  
Sequence Alignments ◽  
Multiple Sequence ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Multiple Sequence Alignments ◽  
Physico Chemical

Abstract Motivation Over the last few years, the field of protein structure prediction has been transformed by increasingly-accurate contact prediction software. These methods are based on the detection of coevolutionary relationships between residues from multiple sequence alignments. However, despite speculation, there is little evidence of a link between contact prediction and the physico-chemical interactions which drive amino-acid coevolution. Furthermore, existing protocols predict only a fraction of all protein contacts and it is not clear why some contacts are favoured over others. Using a dataset of 863 protein domains, we assessed the physico-chemical interactions of contacts predicted by CCMpred, MetaPSICOV, and DNCON2, as examples of direct coupling analysis, meta-prediction, and deep learning. Results We considered correctly-predicted contacts and compared their properties against the protein contacts that were not predicted. Predicted contacts tend to form more bonds than non-predicted contacts, which suggests these contacts may be more important than contacts that were not predicted. Comparing the contacts predicted by each method, we found that metaPSICOV and DNCON2 favour accuracy whereas CCMPred detects contacts with more bonds. This suggests that the push for higher accuracy may lead to a loss of physico-chemically important contacts. These results underscore the connection between protein physico-chemistry and the coevolutionary couplings that can be derived from multiple sequence alignments. This relationship is likely to be relevant to protein structure prediction and functional analysis of protein structure and may be key to understanding their utility for different problems in structural biology. Availability We use publicly-available databases. Our code is available for download at http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/. Supplementary information Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.

Prediction of Structural and Functional Aspects of Protein

2014 ◽  
pp. 317-333
Author(s):  
Arun G. Ingale
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Predict Protein Structure ◽  
Basic Ideas

To predict the structure of protein from a primary amino acid sequence is computationally difficult. An investigation of the methods and algorithms used to predict protein structure and a thorough knowledge of the function and structure of proteins are critical for the advancement of biology and the life sciences as well as the development of better drugs, higher-yield crops, and even synthetic bio-fuels. To that end, this chapter sheds light on the methods used for protein structure prediction. This chapter covers the applications of modeled protein structures and unravels the relationship between pure sequence information and three-dimensional structure, which continues to be one of the greatest challenges in molecular biology. With this resource, it presents an all-encompassing examination of the problems, methods, tools, servers, databases, and applications of protein structure prediction, giving unique insight into the future applications of the modeled protein structures. In this chapter, current protein structure prediction methods are reviewed for a milieu on structure prediction, the prediction of structural fundamentals, tertiary structure prediction, and functional imminent. The basic ideas and advances of these directions are discussed in detail.

Bioinspired Algorithms in Solving Three-Dimensional Protein Structure Prediction Problems

2017 ◽  
pp. 316-337
Author(s):  
Raghunath Satpathy
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
Prediction Problems

Proteins play a vital molecular role in all living organisms. Experimentally, it is difficult to predict the protein structure, however alternatively theoretical prediction method holds good for it. The 3D structure prediction of proteins is very much important in biology and this leads to the discovery of different useful drugs, enzymes, and currently this is considered as an important research domain. The prediction of proteins is related to identification of its tertiary structure. From the computational point of view, different models (protein representations) have been developed along with certain efficient optimization methods to predict the protein structure. The bio-inspired computation is used mostly for optimization process during solving protein structure. These algorithms now a days has received great interests and attention in the literature. This chapter aim basically for discussing the key features of recently developed five different types of bio-inspired computational algorithms, applied in protein structure prediction problems.

SPOT‐Fold: Fragment‐Free Protein Structure Prediction Guided by Predicted Backbone Structure and Contact Map

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 745-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufeng Cai ◽  
Xiongjun Li ◽  
Zhe Sun ◽  
Yutong Lu ◽  
Huiying Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Contact Map ◽  
Free Protein ◽  
Backbone Structure

scholarly journals Deep Template-based Protein Structure Prediction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fandi Wu ◽  
Jinbo Xu
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Random Fields ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Conditional Random Fields ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Query Protein ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Distance Information ◽  
Alternating Direction

AbstractMotivationTBM (template-based modeling) is a popular method for protein structure prediction. When very good templates are not available, it is challenging to identify the best templates, build accurate sequence-template alignments and construct 3D models from alignments.ResultsThis paper presents a new method NDThreader (New Deep-learning Threader) to address the challenges of TBM. DNThreader first employs DRNF (deep convolutional residual neural fields), which is an integration of deep ResNet (convolutional residue neural networks) and CRF (conditional random fields), to align a query protein to templates without using any distance information. Then NDThreader uses ADMM (alternating direction method of multipliers) and DRNF to further improve sequence-template alignments by making use of predicted distance potential. Finally NDThreader builds 3D models from a sequence-template alignment by feeding it and sequence co-evolution information into a deep ResNet to predict inter-atom distance distribution, which is then fed into PyRosetta for 3D model construction. Our experimental results on the CASP13 and CAMEO data show that our methods outperform existing ones such as CNFpred, HHpred, DeepThreader and CEthreader. NDThreader was blindly tested in CASP14 as a part of RaptorX server, which obtained the best GDT score among all CASP14 servers on the 58 TBM targets.Availability and Implementationavailable as a part of web server at http://[email protected] InformationSupplementary data are available online.

scholarly journals MULTICOM2: an open-source protein structure prediction system powered by deep learning and distance prediction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianqi Wu ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Zhiye Guo ◽  
Jie Hou ◽  
Jianlin Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Protein Structure ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Modeling Method ◽  
Structure Modeling ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Template Free

Abstract Protein structure prediction is an important problem in bioinformatics and has been studied for decades. However, there are still few open-source comprehensive protein structure prediction packages publicly available in the field. In this paper, we present our latest open-source protein tertiary structure prediction system - MULTICOM2, an integration of template-based modeling (TBM) and template-free modeling (FM) methods. The template-based modeling uses sequence alignment tools with deep multiple sequence alignments to search for structural templates, which are much faster and more accurate than MULTICOM1. The template-free (ab initio or de novo) modeling uses the inter-residue distances predicted by DeepDist to reconstruct tertiary structure models without using any known structure as template. In the blind CASP14 experiment, the average TM-score of the models predicted by our server predictor based on the MULTICOM2 system is 0.720 for 58 TBM (regular) domains and 0.514 for 38 FM and FM/TBM (hard) domains, indicating that MULTICOM2 is capable of predicting good tertiary structures across the board. It can predict the correct fold for 76 CASP14 domains (95% regular domains and 55% hard domains) if only one prediction is made for a domain. The success rate is increased to 3% for both regular and hard domains if five predictions are made per domain. Moreover, the prediction accuracy of the pure template-free structure modeling method on both TBM and FM targets is very close to the combination of template-based and template-free modeling methods. This demonstrates that the distance-based template-free modeling method powered by deep learning can largely replace the traditional template-based modeling method even on TBM targets that TBM methods used to dominate and therefore provides a uniform structure modeling approach to any protein. Finally, on the 38 CASP14 FM and FM/TBM hard domains, MULTICOM2 server predictors (MULTICOM-HYBRID, MULTICOM-DEEP, MULTICOM-DIST) were ranked among the top 20 automated server predictors in the CASP14 experiment. After combining multiple predictors from the same research group as one entry, MULTICOM-HYBRID was ranked no. 5. The source code of MULTICOM2 is freely available at https://github.com/multicom-toolbox/multicom/tree/multicom_v2.0.

scholarly journals Study of Real-Valued Distance Prediction For Protein Structure Prediction with Deep Learning

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Jinbo Xu
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Structure Modeling ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Real Value ◽  
3D Structure Modeling ◽  
Distance Prediction

AbstractInter-residue distance prediction by deep ResNet (convolutional residual neural network) has greatly advanced protein structure prediction. Currently the most successful structure prediction methods predict distance by discretizing it into dozens of bins. Here we study how well real-valued distance can be predicted and how useful it is for 3D structure modeling by comparing it with discrete-valued prediction based upon the same deep ResNet. Different from the recent methods that predict only a single real value for the distance of an atom pair, we predict both the mean and standard deviation of a distance and then employ a novel method to fold a protein by the predicted mean and deviation. Our findings include: 1) tested on the CASP13 FM (free-modeling) targets, our real-valued distance prediction obtains 81% precision on top L/5 long-range contact prediction, much better than the best CASP13 results (70%); 2) our real-valued prediction can predict correct folds for the same number of CASP13 FM targets as the best CASP13 group, despite generating only 20 decoys for each target; 3) our method greatly outperforms a very new real-valued prediction method DeepDist in both contact prediction and 3D structure modeling; and 4) when the same deep ResNet is used, our real-valued distance prediction has 1-6% higher contact and distance accuracy than our own discrete-valued prediction, but less accurate 3D structure models.

scholarly journals CopulaNet: Learning residue co-evolution directly from multiple sequence alignment for protein structure prediction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusong Ju ◽  
Jianwei Zhu ◽  
Bin Shao ◽  
Lupeng Kong ◽  
Tie-Yan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Sequence Alignment ◽  
Multiple Sequence Alignment ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Query Protein ◽  
Spatial Proximity ◽  
Multiple Sequence ◽  
Variance Matrix

Protein functions are largely determined by the final details of their tertiary structures, and the structures could be accurately reconstructed based on inter-residue distances. Residue co-evolution has become the primary principle for estimating inter-residue distances since the residues in close spatial proximity tend to co-evolve. The widely-used approaches infer residue co-evolution using an indirect strategy, i.e., they first extract from the multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of query protein some handcrafted features, say, co-variance matrix, and then infer residue co-evolution using these features rather than the raw information carried by MSA. This indirect strategy always leads to considerable information loss and inaccurate estimation of inter-residue distances. Here, we report a deep neural network framework (called CopulaNet) to learn residue co-evolution directly from MSA without any handcrafted features. The CopulaNet consists of two key elements: i) an encoder to model context-specific mutation for each residue, and ii) an aggregator to model correlations among residues and thereafter infer residue co-evolutions. Using the CASP13 (the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction) target proteins as representatives, we demonstrated the successful application of CopulaNet for estimating inter-residue distances and further predicting protein tertiary structure with improved accuracy and efficiency. Head-to-head comparison suggested that for 24 out of the 31 free modeling CASP13 domains, ProFOLD outperformed AlphaFold, one of the state-of-the-art prediction approaches.

scholarly journals Phylogenetic correlations have limited effect on coevolution-based contact prediction in proteins

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Rodriguez Horta ◽  
Martin Weigt
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Protein Sequences ◽  
Protein Families ◽  
Coupling Analysis ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Phylogenetic Relations ◽  
Direct Coupling Analysis

AbstractCoevolution-based contact prediction, either directly by coevolutionary couplings resulting from global statistical sequence models or using structural supervision and deep learning, has found widespread application in protein-structure prediction from sequence. However, one of the basic assumptions in global statistical modeling is that sequences form an at least approximately independent sample of an unknown probability distribution, which is to be learned from data. In the case of protein families, this assumption is obviously violated by phylogenetic relations between protein sequences. It has turned out to be notoriously difficult to take phylogenetic correlations into account in coevolutionary model learning. Here, we propose a complementary approach: we develop two strategies to randomize or resample sequence data, such that conservation patterns and phylogenetic relations are preserved, while intrinsic (i.e. structure- or function-based) coevolutionary couplings are removed. An analysis of these data shows that the strongest coevolutionary couplings, i.e. those used by Direct Coupling Analysis to predict contacts, are only weakly influenced by phylogeny. However, phylogeny-induced spurious couplings are of similar size to the bulk of coevolutionary couplings, and dissecting functional from phylogeny-induced couplings might lead to more accurate contact predictions in the range of intermediate-size couplings.The code is available at https://github.com/ed-rodh/Null_models_I_and_II.Author summaryMany homologous protein families contain thousands of highly diverged amino-acid sequences, which fold in close-to-identical three-dimensional structures and fulfill almost identical biological tasks. Global coevolutionary models, like those inferred by the Direct Coupling Analysis (DCA), assume that families can be considered as samples of some unknown statistical model, and that the parameters of these models represent evolutionary constraints acting on protein sequences. To learn these models from data, DCA and related approaches have to also assume that the distinct sequences in a protein family are close to independent, while in reality they are characterized by involved hierarchical phylogenetic relationships. Here we propose Null models for sequence alignments, which maintain patterns of amino-acid conservation and phylogeny contained in the data, but destroy any coevolutionary couplings, frequently used in protein structure prediction. We find that phylogeny actually induces spurious non-zero couplings. These are, however, significantly smaller that the largest couplings derived from natural sequences, and therefore have only little influence on the first predicted contacts. However, in the range of intermediate couplings, they may lead to statistically significant effects. Dissecting phylogenetic from functional couplings might therefore extend the range of accurately predicted structural contacts down to smaller coupling strengths than those currently used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document