310 Management of Anterior Penetrating Abdominal Injuries and the Role of Computerised Tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Sanchez-Thompson ◽  
D Frith
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Abdominal Injury ◽  
Computerised Tomography ◽  
Abdominal Injuries ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Operative Findings

Abstract Introduction Optimal management of anterior penetrating abdominal injuries (A-PAI) is an area of ongoing debate. Randomised controlled trials are missing and guidelines are based on expert opinion. The accuracy of computerised tomography (CT) is challenged, and hence diagnostic laparoscopies are still widely used. Method We retrospectively reviewed the TARN database identifying patients presenting with A-PAI to a London Major Trauma Centre between 01/19/2015-31/03/2018 and reviewed their clinical notes. Results 143 patients were identified (79% male, mean age = 30). Non-operative management (NOM) took place without complication in 15% (n = 12) of cases, despite 38% (n = 8) showing a potential peritoneal breach on CT, and 19% (n = 4) a definitive intra-abdominal injury. Of the 37% (n = 53) of patients undergoing laparoscopy, half revealed no intra-abdominal injury. When comparing CT consultant reports to intra-operative findings, the accuracy of CT in identifying peritoneal breach was calculated to be 93% and sensitivity at 95%. Negative predictive value was 62%. Conclusions We concluded that a significant number of patients have unnecessary laparoscopies, which are not without risk. CT is an excellent resource, but negative predictive value is poor. NOM with serial abdominal examination remains a valid clinical option in the stable non-peritonitic patient and in the absence of definitive viscous perforation on CT.

scholarly journals Peritoneal Breach as an Indication for Exploratory Laparotomy in Penetrating Abdominal Stab Injury: Operative Findings in Haemodynamically Stable Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmina Kevric ◽  
Victor Aguirre ◽  
Kate Martin ◽  
Dinesh Varma ◽  
Mark Fitzgerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Exploratory Laparotomy ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Visceral Injury ◽  
Negative Laparotomy ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Ct ◽  
Operative Findings

Introduction. Management of haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal injuries varies from nonoperative to operative management. The aim was to investigate whether peritoneal breach when used as an indication for exploratory laparotomy appropriately identified patients with intra-abdominal visceral injury.Methods.We conducted retrospective cohort study of all patients presenting with PAI at a major trauma centre from January 2007 to December 2011. We measured the incidence of peritoneal breach and correlated this with intra-abdominal visceral injury diagnosed at surgery.Results. 252 patients were identified with PAI. Of the included patients, 71 were managed nonoperatively and 118 operatively. The operative diagnoses included nonperitoneal-breaching injuries, intraperitoneal penetration without organ damage, or intraperitoneal injury with organ damage. The presenting trauma CT scan was reported as normal in 63%, 34%, and 2% of these groups, respectively. The total negative laparotomy/laparoscopy rate for all patients presented with PAI was 21%, almost half of whom had a normal CT scan.Conclusion. We found that peritoneal breach on its own does not necessarily always equate to intra-abdominal visceral injury. Observation with sequential examination for PAI patients with a normal CT scan may be more important than exclusion of peritoneal breach via laparoscopy.

scholarly journals The impact of surgeon-based ultrasonography for parathyroid disease on a British endocrine surgical practice

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
SR Aspinall ◽  
S Nicholson ◽  
RD Bliss ◽  
TWJ Lennard
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Parathyroid Disease ◽  
Operative Findings ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION Surgeon-based ultrasonography (SUS) for parathyroid disease has not been widely adopted by British endocrine surgeons despite reports worldwide of accuracy in parathyroid localisation equivalent or superior to radiology-based ultrasonography (RUS). The aim of this study was to determine whether SUS might benefit parathyroid surgical practice in a British endocrine unit. METHODS Following an audit to establish the accuracy of RUS and technetium sestamibi (MIBI) in 54 patients, the accuracy of parathyroid localisation by SUS and RUS was compared prospectively with operative findings in 65 patients undergoing surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). RESULTS The sensitivity of RUS (40%) was below and MIBI (57%) was within the range of published results in the audit phase. The sensitivity (64%), negative predictive value (86%) and accuracy (86%) of SUS were significantly greater than RUS (37%, 77% and 78% respectively). SUS significantly increased the concordance of parathyroid localisation with MIBI (58% versus 32% with RUS). CONCLUSIONS SUS improves parathyroid localisation in a British endocrine surgical practice. It is a useful adjunct to parathyroid practice, particularly in centres without a dedicated parathyroid radiologist, and enables more patients with pHPT to benefit from minimally invasive surgery.

scholarly journals Accuracy of ultrasound in pediatric undescended testes

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 983-986
Author(s):  
Teerasak Phewplung ◽  
Atchara Mahayosnond ◽  
Panruethai Trinavarat
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Undescended Testis ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
Undescended Testes ◽  
Ultrasonographic Diagnosis ◽  
Operative Findings

Abstract Background: The undescended testis represents a common condition affecting male infants with significant clinical implications such as infertility and testicular malignancy. There is controversy as to the diagnosis when a clinical examination fails to identify a testis. Objective: Investigate the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of undescended testis, and evaluate the correlation between the preoperative ultrasonographic data and operative findings. Material and method: Thirty-nine boys (age: 3months -12 years) with undescended testes were examined between January 2003 and December 2007. All the boys had undergone a sonogram performed for localizing the undescended testes. Only 20 boys were sent for inguinal exploration, or other surgical procedures for localizing the undescended testes. We calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the accuracy of ultrasonographic diagnosis in boys with undescended testes. Results: Twenty-nine undescended testes were included in this study. Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 0%, PPV of 96%, NPV of 0%, and accuracy of 79% in the diagnosis of the undescended testis. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity including NPV of uetrasound had the unsatisfactory outcomes.

scholarly journals Frequency and severity of general surgical emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: single-centre experience from a large metropolitan teaching hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Patel ◽  
AJ Hainsworth ◽  
K Devlin ◽  
JH Patel ◽  
A Karim
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Emergency General Surgery ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has put significant stress on healthcare systems globally. This study focuses on emergency general surgery services at a major trauma centre and teaching hospital. We aimed to identify whether the number of patients and the severity of their presentation has significantly changed since the implementation of a national lockdown. Materials and methods This study is a retrospective review of acute referrals (from general practice and accident and emergency) to the emergency general surgery team over a 14-day period before (group 1) and during (group 2) lockdown. Results A total of 151 patients were reviewed by the general surgical team in group 1 and 75 in group 2 (a 50.3% reduction). The number of days with symptoms prior to presentation was significantly shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (3 vs 4, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the National Early Warning Score, white blood cell count, lymphocytes and C-reactive protein on admission between the two groups of patients. There were significantly fewer patients admitted after lockdown compared with pre-lockdown (66% vs 48%, p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter during lockdown compared with pre-lockdown (5 days vs 4 days, p = 0.04). Conclusion Fewer patients were referred and admitted during lockdown compared with pre-lockdown, and the length of stay was also significantly reduced. There was also a delay in presentation to hospital, although these patients were not more unwell based on the scoring criteria used within this study.

scholarly journals 257 The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Associated Trauma, Admissions and Fractures at a London Major Trauma Centre

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Jamal ◽  
D Hay ◽  
K Al-Tawil ◽  
A Petohazi ◽  
V Gulli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Psychiatric Diagnosis ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim Non-injury related factors have been extensively studied in major trauma and shown to have a significant impact on patient outcomes, with mental illness and associated medication use proven to have a negative effect on bone health and fracture healing. We report the epidemiological effect of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health associated Orthopaedic trauma, fractures, and admissions to our centre. Method We collated data retrospectively from the electronic records of Orthopaedic inpatients in an 8-week non-COVID and COVID period analysing demographic data, referral and admission numbers, orthopaedic injuries, surgery performed and patient co-morbidities including psychiatric history. Results here were 824 Orthopaedic referrals and 358 admissions (6/day) in the non-COVID period with 38/358 (10.6%) admissions having a psychiatric diagnosis and 30/358 (8.4%) also having a fracture. This was compared to 473 referrals and 195 admissions (3/day) in the COVID period with 73/195 (37.4%) admissions having a documented psychiatric diagnosis and 47/195 (24.1%) a fracture. 22/38 (57.9%) and 52/73 (71.2%) patients were known to mental health services, respectively. Conclusions Whilst total numbers utilising the Orthopaedic service decreased, the impact of the pandemic and lockdown disproportionately affected those with mental health problems, a group already at higher risk of poorer functional outcomes and non-union. The proportion of patients with both a fracture and a psychiatric diagnosis more than doubled and the number of patients presenting due to a traumatic suicide attempt almost tripled. It is imperative that adequate support is in place for vulnerable mental health patients, particularly as we are currently experiencing the “second wave” of COVID-19.

Torso Computed Tomography Can be Bypassed after Thorough Trauma Bay Examination of Patients who Fall from Standing

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kedar S. Lavingia ◽  
Jay N. Collins ◽  
Michael C. Soult ◽  
W. Helman Terzian ◽  
Leonard J. Weireter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Abdominal Injury ◽  
Thoracic Injury ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Trauma Bay

Reliance on CT imaging in the evaluation of low-impact blunt trauma is a major source of radiation exposure, cost, and resource utilization. This study sought to determine if torso (chest and abdomen) CT could be avoided in patients with ground level falls. This was a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the trauma service between January 2013 and April 2014. The mechanism of injury was ground level fall or fall from sitting. Patient demographics, physical examination (PE) findings, imaging results, length of stay, and complications were reviewed. History and physical data were based on chief resident or attending documentation. A significant thoracic injury was defined as a hemothorax, a pneumothorax, greater than three rib fractures, or aortic injury. A significant abdominal injury was defined as a solid organ injury, an intra-abdominal hematoma, a hollow viscus injury, aortic injury, or a urologic injury. The trauma service evaluated 156 patients. Nine patients were excluded for intubation or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 13. Of the 147 remaining, mean age was 69 years, mean GCS was 14.8. A chest CT was obtained in 111 (76%). Eight (7%) had a significant thoracic injury. All patients with significant thoracic injury had positive examination findings. No patient with a normal PE was found to have a significant thoracic injury (negative predictive value of 100%). An abdominal CT was obtained in 86 (59%). Five (6%) were found to have a significant abdominal injury. All patients who had a significant radiographic injury had an abnormal PE (negative predictive value of 100%). In conclusion, thorough history and physical in the trauma bay allow the clinician to obtain selective torso CT imaging. Routine torso CT warrants re-evaluation in low-impact injury mechanisms as there appears to be little benefit compared with the resource utilization and expense.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasound in COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. emermed-2020-210125
Author(s):  
Svenja L Haak ◽  
Iris JE Renken ◽  
L Cara Jager ◽  
Heleen Lameijer ◽  
Brigitta (Britt) YM van der Kolk
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Manifestations

BackgroundA promising modality for diagnosing pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in the emergency department (ED) is point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the lungs. The currently used PCR as well as chest X-ray and CT scanning have important disadvantages. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in patients with suspected pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in the ED.MethodsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the ED of our non-academic level 1 trauma centre (Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands). Patients were enrolled between 14 April and 22 April 2020. Patients (aged ≥16 years) with suspected COVID-19 presenting to the ED underwent POCUS. All patients received current standard of care, including PCR (naso-oropharyngeal swab). Outcome of POCUS was compared with PCR or CT scan outcome to determine diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated using 2×2 contingency tables.Results100 patients were eligible to participate in this study, data of 93 patients were analysed. 27 (29%) patients were found positive for COVID-19 by PCR or CT. POCUS had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 70% to 97%), specificity of 59% (95% CI 46% to 71%), negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI 79% to 98%) and positive predictive value of 47% (95% CI 33% to 61%). In a subgroup of patients without previous cardiopulmonary disease (n=37), POCUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 70% to 100%), specificity of 76% (95% CI 54% to 90%), negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 79% to 100%) and positive predictive value of 67% (95% CI 41% to 86%).ConclusionPOCUS of the lungs could serve as a valuable, radiation-free tool for excluding pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in patients in the ED at the point of assessment, especially in patients without previous cardiopulmonary disease.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register, No: NTR8544.

scholarly journals The effects of a UK lockdown on orthopaedic trauma admissions and surgical cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Hampton ◽  
Matthew Clark ◽  
Ian Baxter ◽  
Richard Stevens ◽  
Elinor Flatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Hand Injuries ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Aims The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service. Methods Data was collected from an adult major trauma centre, paediatric major trauma centre, district general hospital, and a regional hand trauma unit. Data collection included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury type and treatment required. Time periods studied corresponded with the two weeks leading up to lockdown in the UK, two weeks during lockdown, and the same two-week period in 2019. Results There was a 55.7% (12,935 vs 5,733) reduction in total accident and emergency (A&E) attendances with a 53.7% (354 vs 164) reduction in trauma admissions during lockdown compared to 2019. The number of patients with fragility fractures requiring admission remained constant (32 patients in 2019 vs 31 patients during lockdown; p > 0.05). Road traffic collisions (57.1%, n = 8) were the commonest cause of major trauma admissions during lockdown. There was a significant increase in DIY related-hand injuries (26% (n = 13)) lockdown vs 8% (n = 11 in 2019, p = 0.006) during lockdown, which resulted in an increase in nerve injuries (12% (n = 6 in lockdown) vs 2.5% (n = 3 in 2019, p = 0.015) and hand infections (24% (n = 12) in lockdown vs 6.2% (n = 8) in 2019, p = 0.002). Conclusion The national lockdown has dramatically reduced orthopaedic trauma admissions. The incidence of fragility fractures requiring surgery has not changed. Appropriate provision in theatres should remain in place to ensure these patients can be managed as a surgical priority. DIY-related hand injuries have increased which has led to an increased in nerve injuries requiring intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document