Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasound in COVID-19

BackgroundA promising modality for diagnosing pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in the emergency department (ED) is point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the lungs. The currently used PCR as well as chest X-ray and CT scanning have important disadvantages. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in patients with suspected pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in the ED.MethodsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the ED of our non-academic level 1 trauma centre (Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands). Patients were enrolled between 14 April and 22 April 2020. Patients (aged ≥16 years) with suspected COVID-19 presenting to the ED underwent POCUS. All patients received current standard of care, including PCR (naso-oropharyngeal swab). Outcome of POCUS was compared with PCR or CT scan outcome to determine diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated using 2×2 contingency tables.Results100 patients were eligible to participate in this study, data of 93 patients were analysed. 27 (29%) patients were found positive for COVID-19 by PCR or CT. POCUS had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 70% to 97%), specificity of 59% (95% CI 46% to 71%), negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI 79% to 98%) and positive predictive value of 47% (95% CI 33% to 61%). In a subgroup of patients without previous cardiopulmonary disease (n=37), POCUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 70% to 100%), specificity of 76% (95% CI 54% to 90%), negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 79% to 100%) and positive predictive value of 67% (95% CI 41% to 86%).ConclusionPOCUS of the lungs could serve as a valuable, radiation-free tool for excluding pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in patients in the ED at the point of assessment, especially in patients without previous cardiopulmonary disease.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register, No: NTR8544.

Download Full-text

Evidence base for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for diagnosis of skull fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Emergency Medicine Journal ◽

10.1136/emermed-2020-209887 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. emermed-2020-209887

Author(s):

Georgios Alexandridis ◽

Eva W Verschuuren ◽

Arthur V Rosendaal ◽

Danny A Kanhai

Keyword(s):

Head Injury ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Point Of Care ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽

Skull Fractures ◽

Fractures In Children

BackgroundBlunt head trauma is a common presentation to emergency departments (EDs). Identifying skull fractures in children is important as they are known factor of risk for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Currently, CT is the reference standard for diagnosing skull fractures and TBIs in children. Identifying skull fractures with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may help risk-stratify children for TBI following blunt trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of POCUS in identifying skull fractures in children.MethodsA systematic search was performed on 17 July 2020 in Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Embase. Prospective studies reporting skull fractures diagnosed with ultrasound in children younger than 18 years due to blunt head injury were included. Studies that did not confirm the fracture with CT were excluded. The quality of studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data were extracted from the eligible studies to calculate outcomes such as sensitivity and specificity; when possible overall outcomes were calculated.ResultsSeven studies were included. All eligible studies included patients for whom the decision to perform a CT scan was made in advance. Overall, the included studies demonstrated low risk of bias or had minor concerns regarding risk of bias. The pooled data (n=925) demonstrated a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 88% and negative predictive value of 97%.ConclusionThe included studies demonstrate minor methodological limitations. Overall, the evidence suggests that POCUS is a valid option for diagnosing skull fractures in children visiting the ED after blunt head injury.

Download Full-text

Influence of lesion location on the accuracy of CT derived FFR: head-to-head comparison with invasive FFR

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0158 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

M Moshage ◽

S Smolka ◽

S Achenbach ◽

F Ammon ◽

P Ferstl ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Angiography ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽

Roc Curve Analysis ◽

Jude Medical ◽

Lesion Location ◽

Distal Vessel

Abstract Background The accuracy of CT-derived FFR (FFRCT) has been repeatedly reported. However, the influence of lesion location on accuracy is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT to detect lesion-specific ischemia and determined the influence of lesion location (proximal vs. distal vessel segments) compared to invasively measured FFR in patients with suspected CAD. Methods A total of 136 vessels in which “Dual-Source”-CT coronary angiography had been performed due to suspected CAD and who were further referred for invasive coronary angiography with invasive FFR measurement within three months of the index CT examination were retrospectively identified and screened for inclusion in this analysis. Patients with either left main coronary artery stenoses, bifurcation or ostial stenoses were excluded. Invasive FFR was measured using a pressure wire (CERTUS®, St. Jude Medical, Minnesota, USA or Verrata®, Volcano, San Diego, USA). FFRCT was calculated using an on-site prototype (cFFR Version 3.0, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). All vessels were analyzed by an experienced observer blinded to the results of invasive FFR. Stenoses with invasively measured FFR ≤0.80 were classified as hemodynamically significant. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT in proximal vs. non-proximal vessel segments. Proximal lesions included stenoses located in segment one, six, eleven and twelve. All other stenoses were categorized as distal lesions. Results Out of 136 coronary stenoses, 47 (35%) were located in proximal segments and 89 (65%) lesions were located in distal segments. Compared to invasive FFR, the sensitivity of FFRCT to correctly identify/exclude hemodynamically significant stenoses in proximal vessel segments was 93% (95% CI: 68–99.8%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 89–100%), compared to a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 46.5–90%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 77–94%) for FFRCT in distal lesions. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 82.8–99.5%) compared to a positive predictive value of 59% (95% CI: 42–93.9%) and a negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI: 85.4–96.3%) for proximal vs. distal vessel segment, respectively. This corresponds to an accuracy of 98% vs. 84%, respectively (p=0.02). ROC-Curve analysis showed a slightly higher – albeit non-significant – area under the curve for FFRCT to detect hemodynamic relevance in proximal lesions compared to distal lesions (AUC 0.95, p<0.001 vs. AUC: 0.86, p<0.001, respectively, p=0.2). Conclusion FFRCT obtained using an on-site prototype shows overall a high diagnostic accuracy for detecting lesions causing ischemia as compared to invasive FFR with a trend towards better diagnostic performance in proximal vessel segments. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy

Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine ◽

10.3126/jaim.v10i1.37086 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 20-25

Author(s):

Sujan Shrestha ◽

Mamen Prasad Gorhaly ◽

Manil Ratna Bajracharya

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Perception Threshold ◽

Sensitivity Specificity ◽

Vibration Perception ◽

Monofilament Test

Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available.

Download Full-text

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF GRAY SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY VERSUS COLOR DOPPLER IN SUSPECTED CASES OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

The International Journal of Frontier Sciences ◽

10.37978/tijfs.v5i1.319 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Tahir Iqbal ◽

Muhammad Usman Shahid ◽

Ishfaq Ahmad Shad ◽

Shahzad Karim Bhatti ◽

Syed Amir Gilani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Appendicitis ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Color Doppler ◽

Diagnostic Tools ◽

Gray Scale ◽

Versus Color ◽

Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A common surgical emergency is acute appendicitis. Various diagnostic tools are available to diagnosis acute appendicitis. Radiological investigations play an important role in making accurate and early diagnosis and thus preventing morbidity associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography versus color Doppler in suspected cases of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried in the department of Radiology of Mayo Hospital, Lahore. A total of 75 patients were enrolled of age 18-40 years, both genders who were suspected cases of acute appendicitis. All patients underwent baseline investigations along with gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler. All patients were subjected to surgery to confirm the diagnosis and findings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 23.25 ±10.55 and mean transverse diameter of appendix was 8.37 ±3.39. There were 62.7% males and 37.3%females. Findings of gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler were then correlated with surgical findings to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities. The results revealed that gray scale ultrasonography sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy was 92.7%, 94.32%, 95%, 91.4% and 93.3% respectively, whereas color Doppler had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 97.7%, 93.9%, 95.3%, 97% and 96% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of both modalities together was 98.6%. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler has better diagnostic accuracy than gray scale ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the combination of both modalities yields diagnostic accuracy that is similar to gold standard.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care knee ultrasound for evaluation of meniscus and collateral ligaments pathology in comparison with MRI

Acta Radiologica ◽

10.1177/02841851211058280 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 028418512110582

Author(s):

Ahmed Elshimy ◽

Ahmed M Osman ◽

Mohamed El Sayed Awad ◽

Mohamed M Abdel Aziz

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Point Of Care ◽

Operative Procedure ◽

Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽

Collateral Ligaments ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Diagnostic Modality ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Portable Ultrasonography

Background Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often the “gold standard” for diagnosing knee problems, it has many limitations. Therefore, ultrasonography has been suggested as an effective rapid alternative in many knee abnormalities, especially after injuries of the meniscus and collateral ligaments. Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in detecting injuries of the meniscus and collateral ligament compared to MRI. Material and Methods An observational cross-sectional blinded study was conducted of 60 patients with clinically suspicious meniscus and collateral ligament injuries who were planned for an arthroscopy and or operative procedure. These patients underwent both blinded POCUS and MRI of the knees before the intervention procedure and results of both imaging modalities were compared according to the operative and arthroscopic findings. Results The preoperative reliability of POCUS compared to MRI for the assessment of meniscus injuries was sensitivity (92.9% vs. 90.5%), specificity (88.9% vs. 83.3%), positive predictive value (PPV; 95.1% vs. 92.7%), negative predictive value (NPV; 84.2% vs. 79%), and overall accuracy (91.7% vs. 88.3%). However, for diagnosing collateral ligament injures, POCUS versus MRI assessed sensitivity (92.3% vs. 88.5%), specificity (100% vs. 97.1%), PPV (100% vs. 95.8%), NPV (94.4% vs. 91.7%), and overall accuracy (96.7% vs. 93.3%). Conclusion Ultrasonography is a useful screening tool for the initial diagnosis of meniscal and collateral ligament pathology compared to or even with potential advantages over MRI, especially when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated. As newly advanced portable ultrasonography becomes available, it could be considered as a point-of-injury diagnostic modality.

Download Full-text

Point-of-care ultrasound for peripherally inserted central catheter monitoring: a pilot study

Journal of Perinatal Medicine ◽

10.1515/jpm-2019-0198 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 47 (9) ◽

pp. 991-996 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Patrick Motz ◽

Amelie Von Saint Andre Von Arnim ◽

Ramesh S. Iyer ◽

Shilpi Chabra ◽

Maggie Likes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Pilot Study ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Phased Array ◽

Point Of Care ◽

Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽

Central Catheter ◽

Standardized Protocol

Abstract Objective To assess the feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in monitoring peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) location in neonates by non-radiologist physicians. Methods A prospective cohort study compared PICC localization by ultrasound in neonates with a recent radiograph. The ultrasound exam was performed using a standardized protocol with 13–6 MHz linear and 8–4 MHz phased array transducers by a neonatal-perinatal fellow who was blinded to PICC location on the radiograph. Results Of the 30 neonates included, 96.6% (n = 29) were preterm, with 63.3% (n = 19) weighing <1500 g. Nighty-four percent (n = 94) of ultrasound scans matched the radiograph report. The protocol had a sensitivity of 0.97, specificity of 0.66 and positive predictive value of 0.98. Conclusion Limited ultrasound exams to monitor PICC position in neonates using a standardized protocol by non-radiologist physicians are feasible and accurate in a single ultrasound user. Further study in multiple providers is needed before widespread use.

Download Full-text

How well do ACPA discriminate and predict RA in the general population: a study based on 12 590 population-representative Swedish twins

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208980 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 76 (1) ◽

pp. 119-125 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Aase Haj Hensvold ◽

Thomas Frisell ◽

Patrik K E Magnusson ◽

Rikard Holmdahl ◽

Johan Askling ◽

...

Keyword(s):

General Population ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Blood Donation ◽

Large Population ◽

Serum Samples ◽

Protein Levels

ObjectiveAnti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are highly specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA in the general population has not been thoroughly assessed. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA for RA in the general population and to further characterise the citrullinated peptide recognition pattern.MethodsSerum samples from a large population-representative twin cohort consisting of 12 590 individuals were analysed for the presence of ACPA using anti-CCP2 ELISA. All ACPA-positive samples were further tested on ELISAs for four peptide-specific ACPA. RA cases were identified by linkage to the Swedish National Patient Register at inclusion and after a median follow-up of 37 months (IQR 31–49).Results350 out of 12 590 individuals had a positive anti-CCP2 test, measuring ACPA. Of these, 103 had an RA diagnosis at the time of blood donation and inclusion. During a median follow-up of 3 years, an additional 21 of the remaining 247 ACPA-positive individuals developed RA. Overall, a positive anti-CCP2 test had a positive predictive value of 29% for prevalent RA at inclusion (negative predictive value of 99.6%). High titres (>3× cut-off) of anti-CCP2 increased the positive predictive value to 48% (negative predictive value of 99.5%). ACPA-positive individuals without RA had lower anti-CCP2 titres and fewer peptide-specific ACPA than ACPA-positive patients with RA and higher C reactive protein levels than ACPA-negative individuals without RA.ConclusionPresence of ACPA and especially high titres of anti-CCP2 have a high diagnostic accuracy for an RA diagnosis in a population setting.

Download Full-text

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND IN THE DETECTION OF PNEUMOTHORAX IN CHEST TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH CT AS THE GOLD STANDARD

International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies ◽

10.32553/ijmbs.v5i7.2022 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (7) ◽

Author(s):

Danquale Vance Kynshikhar ◽

Chaman Lal Kaushal ◽

Ashwani Tomar ◽

Neeti Aggarwal

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Gold Standard ◽

Chest Trauma ◽

Accurate Diagnosis ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Chest Ultrasound

Background: To study the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax in chest trauma patients with CT as the Gold Standard Methods: The present study was conducted from 31th July 2018 to 30th July 2019. A total of 36 patients were enrolled in the study. Results: By chest ultrasound, pneumothorax was detected in 15 of 24 patients. The sensitivity of chest ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 62.5%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 54.14% and accuracy was 75%. Conclusion: Chest ultrasound can play an important role in the emergency department aiding a physician for bedside rapid and accurate diagnosis of pneumothorax without interruption in the resuscitation process and without transferring the patient to the radiology section. Keywords: Ultrasound, CT, Pneumothorax

Download Full-text

Prevalence and identification of anxiety disorders in pregnancy: the diagnostic accuracy of the two-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2)

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023766 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (9) ◽

pp. e023766 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Selina Nath ◽

Elizabeth G Ryan ◽

Kylee Trevillion ◽

Debra Bick ◽

Jill Demilew ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anxiety Disorder ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Anxiety Disorders ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Stratified Sampling ◽

Generalised Anxiety Disorder ◽

Population Prevalence

ObjectiveTo estimate the population prevalence of anxiety disorders during pregnancy and investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the two-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2) for a) GAD and b) any anxiety disorder.DesignCross-sectional survey using a stratified sampling design. Sampling weights were used in the analysis to adjust for the bias introduced by the stratified sampling.SettingInner-city maternity service, South London.Participants545 pregnant women were interviewed after their first antenatal appointment; 528 provided answers on the GAD-2 questions.Main outcome measuresDiagnosis generated by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (SCID).ResultsPopulation prevalence of anxiety disorders was 17% (95% CI 12% to 21%): 5% (95% CI 3% to 6%) for GAD, 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%) for social phobia, 8% (95% CI 5% to 11%) for specific phobia and 2% (95% CI 1% to 4%) for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prevalence was unclear due to higher levels of reluctance to respond to PTSD interview questions but sensitivity analyses suggest population prevalence maybe up to 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%). Weighted sensitivity of GAD-2 for GAD (cut-off ≥3) was 69%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 26%, negative predictive value 98% and likelihood ratio 7.35. For any anxiety disorder the weighted sensitivity was 26%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 36%, negative predictive value 87% and likelihood ratio 2.92.ConclusionsAnxiety disorders are common but GAD-2 generates many false positives and may therefore be unhelpful in maternity services.

Download Full-text

RISK STRATIFICATION UTILIZING THE MILAN SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION FOR SALIVARY GLAND CYTOLOGY : A CYTOHISTOLOGICAL CORRELATION STUDY IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN HIMACHAL PRADESH

10.36106/ijsr/2717978 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 22-24

Author(s):

Monica Sarohi ◽

Kavita Mardi

Keyword(s):

Salivary Gland ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Clinical Management ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Conventional System ◽

Diagnostic Categories ◽

Risk Of Malignancy

Introduction- Milan system is an evidence based system derived from the literature which correlates diagnostic categories with risk of malignancy and clinical management strategies. The goals of this system were to standardize salivary gland cytology reporting across institutions and provide a framework for guiding clinical management. It is a tier based classication having six diagnostic categories. The conventional system was used for diagnosis before the advent of Milan system. In this study, FNAC done for all sa Material and methods- livary gland lesions over a period of two years from 2018 - 2020 in department of pathology, IGMC Shimla are included. All cases are categorized according to MSRSGC and correlated with histopathological follow up wherever available. We calculated the sensitivity, specicity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of FNA using the Milan system. We also calculated the ROM was for each category. All the cases were Results: categorized as per MSRSGC and were 14%, 45.4%, 0%, 31.4%, 0.6%, 0.6% and 8% in category I, II, III, IVA, IVB, V and VI respectively. ROM for category I, II, IVA, IVB, V and VI was 0%, 0%, 2.6%, 0%, 100% and 87.5% respectively. The sensitivity, specicity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy was 98.51%, 66.67%, 98.51%, 66.67% and 97.14% respectively. Milan system is an Discussion: effective tool for diagnosing salivary gland lesions. It offers advantages over the conventional system such as risk of malignancy, management options for each category and a better communication both institute wise and between clinicians and cytopathologists.

Download Full-text