scholarly journals MALNUTRITION IN SURGICAL EMERGENCY PATIENTS: UN UNKOWN ISSUE

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Diego Alonso ◽  
O Abdel-Lah Fernández ◽  
Lo Hernández Cosido ◽  
I Jiménez Vaquero ◽  
S Carrero García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Global Leadership ◽  
Severe Malnutrition ◽  
Emergency Patients ◽  
Surgical Emergency ◽  
Oncological Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Moderate Malnutrition

Abstract INTRODUCTION Malnutrition in hospitals is increasingly becoming more problematic, although its severity in surgical emergency patients has yet to be researched in depth. It entails higher rates of morbimortality as well as an increase in both days hospitalized and re-admissions which inflates health care-related costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using GLIM (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition) criteria, we evaluated the nutritional state of 84 patients admitted through the emergency department in the Oesophago-Gastric and Bariatric Surgery Unit in our centre. RESULTS Of the total patients sampled, 57 (67,85%) were at risk of malnutrition. The percentage of patients suffering malnutrition was 44.04%, of which 15.8% were diagnosed with moderate malnutrition and 48.1% severe malnutrition. Patients suffering malnutrition stay at hospital for 24 days on average, which implies a longer stay that those without malnutrition (13 days hospitalized on average), but no relation was found regarding any increase in overall complications. After performing an analysis, malnutrition was significantly higher in oncological patients than in those who were admitted for other causes (58,3% vs 36.6%). However, the age analysis (over-70 vs under-70) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION 50% patients admitted through emergency services were diagnosed from malnutrition. Oncological patients suffer greater risk and severity of malnutrition. Malnutrition does imply longer stays at hospital; however there is no correlation with further complications.

scholarly journals APPLICABILITY OF THE CONCEPT OF ‘DO NOT ATTEMPT RESUSCITATION’ IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslı Şener ◽  
pınar hanife kara ◽  
erden erol ünlüer
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Physical Violence ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Terminal Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The World

Introduction : The issue of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR), which is still being debated all over the world, is extremely complex and has not yet been discussed extensively in our country. Our aim in this study; to determine the place of DNAR in emergency services and the applicability of DNAR concept. Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional survey in Turkey. The questions were designed to examine physicians’ approaches to the concept of DNAR, whether they apply this concept and why. Results: A total of 246 physicians were reached. Sixty-nine physicians (30%) stated that they used DNAR in practice and metastatic terminal stage malignancy patients were found to be the most accepted DNAR group. There was a statistically significant difference between physicians’ anxiety about physical violence. Discussion: In order to increase the quality of CPR, patients should be well analyzed. The applicability of the concept of DNAR in our country is not legally possible. However, this situation does not prevent the emergence of patients who will not benefit from treatment in the clinic. Conclusion: It is best to establish a committee on DNAR and redefine the legal rules within certain norms.

How Much Time Do Unhospitalized Patients Applying For Emergency Services Stay in Emergency Department

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Mansur Kursad Erkuran ◽  
Arif Duran ◽  
Tarık Ocak ◽  
Mervan Bekdaş
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Services

scholarly journals Adolescents’ pain and distress during peripheral intravenous cannulation in a paediatric emergency setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Cozzi ◽  
Marta Cognigni ◽  
Riccardo Busatto ◽  
Veronica Grigoletto ◽  
Manuela Giangreco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Paediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Paediatric Emergency ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractThe objective of the study is to investigate pain and distress experienced by a group of adolescents and children during peripheral intravenous cannulation in a paediatric emergency department. This cross-sectional study was performed between November 2019 and June 2020 at the paediatric emergency department of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health of Trieste, Italy. Eligible subjects were patients between 4 and 17 years old undergoing intravenous cannulation, split into three groups based on their age: adolescents (13–17 years), older children (8–12 years), and younger children (4–7 years). Procedural distress and pain scores were recorded through validated scales. Data on the use of topical anaesthesia, distraction techniques, and physical or verbal comfort during procedures were also collected. We recruited 136 patients: 63 adolescents, 48 older children, and 25 younger children. There was no statistically significant difference in the median self-reported procedural pain found in adolescents (4; IQR = 2–6) versus older and younger children (5; IQR = 2–8 and 6; IQR = 2–8, respectively). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in the rate of distress between adolescents (79.4%), older (89.6%), and younger (92.0%) children. Adolescents received significantly fewer pain relief techniques.Conclusion: This study shows that adolescents experience similar pain and pre-procedural distress as younger children during peripheral intravenous cannulation. What is Known:• Topical and local anaesthesia, physical and verbal comfort, and distraction are useful interventions for pain and anxiety management during intravenous cannulation in paediatric settings. • No data is available on pain and distress experienced by adolescents in the specific setting of the emergency department. What is New:• Adolescents experienced high levels of pre-procedural distress in most cases and similar levels of pain and distress when compared to younger patients• The number of pain relief techniques employed during procedures was inversely proportional to patient’s age, topical or local anaesthesia were rarely used

scholarly journals Is duodeno-jejunal bypass liner superior to pylorus preserving bariatric surgery in terms of complications and efficacy?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Istvan Bence Balint ◽  
Ferenc Csaszar ◽  
Krisztian Somodi ◽  
Laszlo Ternyik ◽  
Adrienn Biro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Jejunal Mucosa ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Weight Loss Outcomes ◽  
Jejunal Bypass

Abstract Purpose Based on recent scientific evidence, bariatric surgery is more effective in the management of morbid obesity and related comorbidities than conservative therapy. Pylorus preserving surgical procedures (PPBS) such as laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodeno-jejunal or duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are modified duodenal switch (DS) surgical techniques. The duodeno-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a novel surgical method in the inventory of metabolism focused manual interventions that excludes duodeno-jejunal mucosa from digestion, mimicking DS procedures without the risk of surgical intervention. The aim of this article is to summarize and compare differences between safety-related features and weight loss outcomes of DJBL and PPBS. Methods A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database. Records of DJBL-related adverse events (AEs), occurrence of PPBS-related complications and reintervention rates were collected. Mean weight, mean body mass index (BMI), percent of excess of weight loss (EWL%), percent of total weight loss (TWL%) and BMI value alterations were recorded for weight loss outcomes. Results A total of 11 publications on DJBL and 6 publications on PPBS were included, involving 800 and 1462 patients, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the patients were matched. Comparison of DJBL-related AEs and PPBS-related severe complications showed an almost equal risk (risk difference (RD): −0.03 and confidence interval (CI): −0.27 to 0.21), despite higher rates among patients having received endoscopic treatment. Overall AE and complication rates classified by Clavien-Dindo showed that PPBS was superior to DJBL due to an excess risk level of 25% (RD: 0.25, CI: 0.01–0.49). Reintervention rates were more favourable in the PPBS group, without significant differences in risk (RD: −0.03, CI: −0.27 to 0.20). However, PPBS seemed more efficient regarding weight loss outcomes at 1-year follow-up according to raw data, while meta-analysis did not reveal any significant difference (odds ratio (OR): 1.08, CI: 0.74–1.59 for BMI changes). Conclusion Only limited conclusions can be made based on our findings. PPBS was superior to DJBL with regard to safety outcomes (GRADE IIB), which failed to support the authors’ hypothesis. Surgical procedures showed lower complication rates than the incidence of DJBL-related AEs, although it should be emphasized that the low number of PPBS-related mild to moderate complications reported could be the result of incomplete data recording from the analysed publications. Weight loss outcomes favoured bariatric surgery (GRADE IIB). As the DJBL is implanted into the upper gastrointestinal tract for 6 to 12 months, it seems a promising additional method in the inventory of metabolic interventions.

scholarly journals Reported and unreported potentially important incidental findings in urgent nonenhanced abdominal CT for renal colic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Belloni ◽  
Stefania Tentoni ◽  
Ilaria Fiorina ◽  
Chandra Bortolotto ◽  
Olivia Bottinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Incidental Findings ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Original Report ◽  
The Difference

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the prevalence of reported and unreported potentially important incidental findings in consecutive nonenhanced abdominal CTs performed specifically for renal colic in the urgent setting. METHOD: One radiologist, blinded to the finalized report, retrospectively re-evaluated nonenhanced abdominal CTs performed from January through December 2017 on adult patients from the Emergency Department with the specific request of urgent evaluation for renal colic, searching for potentially important incidental findings. RESULTS: The CTs of 312 patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight findings were reported in 38 different CTs, whereas the re-evaluation added 47 unreported findings in 47 different CTs, adding to total of 85 findings (27%). The difference in the proportion of reported and unreported potentially important incidental findings between the original report and re-evaluation was significant (P<.001). No significant difference was found between the age of patients with and without reported findings. The proportion of potentially important findings did not vary significantly among the three shifts neither in the original report nor in the re-evaluation. The most frequent findings, both reported and unreported, were pleural effusion, lymphadenopaties and liver nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially important additional findings are frequently present in urgent nonenhanced abdominal CTs performed for renal colic, and many are not described in the finalized reports. Radiologists should take care not to under report potentially important incidental findings even in the urgent setting because of the possible consequences on the patient’s health status and in order to avoid legal issues, while satisfying the need for timely and efficient reporting.

scholarly journals Does Bariatric Surgery Improve Faecal Incontinence? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fardowsa Mohamed ◽  
Megna Jeram ◽  
Christin Coomarasamy ◽  
Melanie Lauti ◽  
Don Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Faecal Incontinence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Bariatric Surgery

Abstract Introduction Obesity increases the risk of pelvic floor disorders in individuals with obesity, including faecal incontinence. Faecal incontinence (FI) is a condition with important clinical and psychosocial consequences. Though it is associated with obesity, the effect of bariatric surgery on the prevalence and severity of FI is not well reported. Objective To assess the effect of bariatric surgery on the prevalence and severity of FI in adult patients with obesity. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Two independent reviewers performed a literature search in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane and Embase from 1 January 1980 to 12 January 2019. We included published English-language randomized control trials and observational studies assessing pre- and post-bariatric surgery prevalence or severity of FI. Random-effects models with DerSimonian and Laird’s variance estimator were used for meta-analysis. Results Thirteen studies were included, eight assessing prevalence (678 patients) and 11 assessing severity of FI (992 patients). There was no significant difference in prevalence post-operatively overall, though it trended towards a reduction [pooled OR=0.55; =0.075]. There was a significant reduction of FI prevalence in women post-bariatric surgery [95% CI 0.22 to 0.94, p=0.034]. There was a statistically significant reduction in FI prevalence following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass [0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.81; p=0.007]. There was no significant reduction of incontinence episodes post-operatively [pooled mean difference =−0.17, 95% CI −0.90 to 0.56; p=0.65]. Quality of life (QOL) was not significantly improved post-bariatric surgery [mean differences for the following facets of QOL: behaviour −0.35, 95% CI −0.94 to 0.24; depression 0.04, 95% CI −0.12 to 0.2; lifestyle −0.33, 95% CI −0.98 to 0.33; p values of 0.25, 0.61 and 0.33, respectively]. Discussion There was a significant reduction in FI prevalence in women and those who underwent Roux-en-Y or one anastomosis gastric bypass. Our results for FI prevalence overall, FI severity and impact on quality of life were not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed in this under-researched area to determine the true effect of bariatric surgery on FI. Graphical abstract

scholarly journals COVD-27. THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND NEURO-ONCOLOGICAL PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii26-ii26
Author(s):  
Sofya Norman ◽  
Rupa Juthani
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Oncology Patient ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Oncological Care ◽  
Oncological Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has uprooted healthcare systems worldwide, disrupting care and increasing dependence on alternative forms of health care delivery. It is yet to be determined how the pandemic affected neuro-oncology patient outcomes, given that the majority of even “elective” neurosurgical oncology procedures are time-sensitive. This study quantifies changes in neuro-oncological care during the height of the pandemic in New York City and investigates patient outcomes in 2020 compared to a historical control. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients with brain tumor diagnoses (primary or secondary) who were seen at the Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center between March 13, 2020 and May 1, 2020. A control cohort from the corresponding time period in 2019 was also reviewed. Alterations in care, including shift from in-person to telehealth, delays in evaluation and intervention, and treatment modifications were evaluated. These variables were analyzed with respect to brain tumor control and mortality. RESULTS 114 patients from 2020 and 171 patients from 2019 were included, with no significant difference in baseline demographics between the groups. There was no significant difference in outcomes between the cohorts, despite significantly more treatment delays (p= 0.0154) and use of telehealth (p&lt; 0.0001) in 2020. For patients treated during the pandemic in 2020, patients who experienced delays in care did not suffer from worse outcomes compared to those without delays. Patients who utilized telehealth visits had significantly more stable tumor control (P = 0.0027), consistent with appropriate use of in-person visits for patients with progression. CONCLUSION Our study showed that use of telehealth and selective alterations in neuro-oncological care during the COVID-19 pandemic did not lead to adverse patient outcomes. This suggests that adaptive physician-led changes during the pandemic were successful and effective. Further studies are needed to evaluate impact on long-term survival.

Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common cause of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease in comparison with other bariatric operations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
majdi abu sneineh ◽  
malek abu sneineh ◽  
Monther Abu Sneineh ◽  
mustafa abu sneineh ◽  
muneer abu snineh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Bariatric Procedure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptomatic Gerd ◽  
Swallow Study ◽  
Contrast Swallow ◽  
Gerd Symptoms

Abstract Introduction GERD is one of the complications of bariatric operations that might affect the quality of life. We aim to perform a retrospective cohort study to determine the incidence of symptomatic GERD following different types of bariatric surgery and which operations are considered a contraindication of GERD. Besides, we are attempting to identify the risk factors of GERD after bariatric surgery. Methods Medical records of 729 patients undergone bariatric operations between January 2010 and June 2019 at Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center were reviewed. Results There was a significant difference between the type of bariatric procedure and the incidence of GERD symptoms after the operation. The incidence of symptomatic GERD in patients who underwent SG was 39.9% (p =0.0131). This was significantly higher compared to 16.4% following roux en y gastric bypass, 23.4% following LAGB, and 11% following OAGB. 113 patients out of 718 had a positive swallow test and of these patient 71 developed GERD symptoms post-operatively without correlation to the degree of reflux at the swallow test but with statistically significant correlation to the type of operation especially for SG (P-value <0.001) and to our knowledge this was never reported in the literature. Conclusion SG is a good bariatric procedure option but should be contraindicated in asymptomatic reflux contrast swallow study and symptomatic GERD patients preoperatively because of high levels of symptomatic GERD post-operatively. Asymptomatic reflux at contrast swallow study pre-operatively should be considered a risk factor for GERD after the operation.

Utilization of Emergency Departments for Psychiatric Treatment

1978 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.D. Watson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Suicide Attempts ◽  
Psychiatric Treatment ◽  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Personal Distress ◽  
Clinical Records

A survey of four Edmonton hospital emergency department records for a one month period was carried out to determine the frequency of utilization by patients suffering from psychiatric disorders. Male attenders outnumbered females and the majority of patients fell into the 21 — 50 year age range. Alcohol-related illness was almost three times more frequent in males than females, whereas females were more frequently categorized as suffering “personal distress” or presented as suicide attempts. Overall, seventy-three percent of the patients were discharged; of those admitted, females outnumbered males. The changing pattern of emergency department utilization was compared by examining data from one hospital for the years 1972, 1974 and 1976. During this four-year period the annual number of visits by psychiatric patients increased by almost eighty percent, largely due to dramatic increases in alcohol related problems in males and those described as “personal distress” in females. The establishment of intoxication recovery centres in 1973 paralleled a drop in the proportion of patients admitted to inpatient wards for alcohol-related, street drugs and overdose problems. The results of the present survey are compared to those reported in the relevant literature, and the methodological problems encountered in carrying out a retrospective study of emergency services from clinical records are described.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Initial Revision Digit Amputation Performed in the Emergency Department Versus the Operating Room

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Gil ◽  
Avi D. Goodman ◽  
Andrew P. Harris ◽  
Neill Y. Li ◽  
Arnold-Peter C. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Fingertip Amputation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Initial Procedure ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Threshold

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the comparative cost-effectiveness of performing initial revision finger amputation in the emergency department (ED) versus in the operating room (OR) accounting for need for unplanned secondary revision in the OR. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients presenting to the ED with traumatic finger and thumb amputations from January 2010 to December 2015. Only those treated with primarily revision amputation were included. Following initial management, the need for unplanned reoperation was assessed and associated with setting of initial management. A sensitivity analysis was used to determine the cost-effectiveness threshold for initial management in the ED versus the OR. Results: Five hundred thirty-seven patients had 677 fingertip amputations, of whom 91 digits were initially primarily revised in the OR, and 586 digits were primarily revised in the ED. Following initial revision, 91 digits required unplanned secondary revision. The unplanned secondary revision rates were similar between settings: 13.7% digits from the ED and 12.1% of digits from the OR ( P = .57). When accounting for direct costs, an incidence of unplanned revision above 77.0% after initial revision fingertip amputation in the ED would make initial revision fingertip amputation in the OR cost-effective. Therefore, based on the unplanned secondary revision rate, initial management in the ED is more cost-effective than in the OR. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the incidence of unplanned/secondary revision of fingertip amputation rate after the initial procedure was performed in the ED versus the OR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document