1071 SUFE and the Internet: Are Healthcare Information Websites Accessible to Parents?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mc Carthy ◽  
C Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Grade Level ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Healthcare Information ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Accepted Standard ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis

Abstract Background Slipped upper femoral epiphysis(SUFE) is an adolescent hip disorder requiring rapid surgical intervention. Faced with the prospect of their child undergoing surgery, many fearful parents will turn to the internet to provide information and reassurance. Previous studies have shown the orthopaedic information can be difficult to comprehend. Objective Assess the readability of healthcare websites regarding SUFE. Method The term Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis was searched in Google, Bing and Yahoo and evaluated using readability software with seven specialised readability tests. A Flesich Read Ease Score (FRES) score above 65 and a Reading Grade Level (RGL) of sixth grade and under was considered acceptable. Results 21 unique websites were assessed. The average FRES was 52.5 +/- 15.4. Only 3 websites scored 65 or higher (14%). There was a statistically significant difference between website scores based on affiliation, with physician websites having the overall highest mean(P = 0.004). The average RGL was 8.67 +/- 1.8. Only two websites met the accepted RGL criteria (9.5%) while five websites were marked as extremely difficult to understand (23.8%). Only five websites offered translations (23.8%). There was no statistically significant difference in readability scores between websites which offered translation and those which did not. One-way t-tests showed that both the RGL (p < 0.001; CI: 1.83-3.49) and the FRES (P < 0.001, CI: -19.4 to -5.4) scores were significantly different from the accepted standard. Conclusions Most websites reviewed were deemed inaccessible. Improving readability would enhance the internet’s usability as a healthcare tool for parents.

scholarly journals SUFE and the internet: are healthcare information websites accessible to parents?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000782
Author(s):  
Andrea Mc Carthy ◽  
Colm Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Grade Level ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis ◽  
Translation Services

BackgroundSlipped upper femoral epiphysis is an adolescent hip disorder requiring rapid surgical intervention. Faced with the prospect of their child undergoing surgery, many fearful parents will turn to the internet to provide information and reassurance. Previous studies have shown the orthopaedic information can be difficult to comprehend.ObjectiveAssess the readability of healthcare websites regarding slipped upper femoral epiphysis.MethodsThe term Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis was searched in Google, Bing and Yahoo. The websites were evaluated using readability software with seven specialised readability tests including the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index and the Gunning Fog Index. The reading grade level (RGL) was also calculated.A Flesich Read Ease Score (FRES) score above 65 and an RGL of sixth grade and under was considered acceptable. Websites were also assessed for translation services.Results21 unique websites were assessed. The average FRES was 52.5±15.4. Only 3 websites scored 65 or higher (14%). There was a statistically significant difference between website scores based on affiliation, with physician websites having the overall highest mean(p=0.004).The average RGL was 8.67±1.8. Only two websites met the accepted RGL criteria (9.5%) while five websites were marked as extremely difficult to understand (23.8%). Only five websites offered translations (23.8%). There was no statistically significant difference in readability scores between websites which offered translation and those which did not.One-sample t-tests showed that both the RGL (p<0.001; CI 1.83 to 3.49) and the FRES (p<0.001, CI −19.4 to −5.4) scores were significantly different from the accepted standard.ConclusionMost websites reviewed were above the recommended RGL, making content inaccessible. Improving readability and translation services would enhance the internet’s usability as a healthcare tool for parents.

scholarly journals An Evaluation of Readability of Information on the Internet Regarding Total Ankle Replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
andrea mc carthy ◽  
Robert Flavin
Keyword(s):  
Health Literacy ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background:Health literacy is defined as the ability to understand basic health information with such competence as to be able to use this information to enhance health. Lower health literacy is associated with increased post-operative complications, reduced satisfaction and compliance. To ensure accessibility and comprehension by the general public, many international health organisations suggest that health literature has a reading grade level equivalent to the American sixth grade. However, previous studies show that this rarely occurs.Total ankle replacement (TAR) technology has rapidly progressed with new prosthesis showing increasingly improving outcomes. However, TAR remains a complex procedure which may be challenging to explain to the patient. Thus, many patients will turn to the internet for more information and as a ‘quasi-second opinion’. If the health education materials provided on the internet is not accessible to patients, it can leave them overwhelmed and confused. The aim of the study is to evaluate the readability of information on the internet with regards to Total Ankle ReplacementMethods: 110 websites from the two main search engines (Google and Bing) were assessed using the terms ‘total ankle replacement’ and ‘total ankle arthroplasty’. Once duplicates had been removed and exclusion criteria were applied, 36 unique websites were categorised and underwent analysis using readability software (WEB FX readability tool). The websites were assessed for readability using the Fleisch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the Reading Grade Level (RGL). A score of greater than 65 for FRES and an RGL of six or less were considered acceptable. Differential and Inferential statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.Results:The mean FRES score was 54.95 (SD: ± 13.2); this was significantly below the recognised acceptable standard score of 65 (P<.0001). An ANOVA conducted showed significant difference between FRES scores based on categories (P=.041) with post-hoc testing showing that the difference between commercial and non-physician scores was the most significant (P=.016; CI:3.84-61.66).The mean RGL was 8.31 (SD: ± 1.95). One-way t-tests showed that these scores were significantly higher than the acceptable standard (P<.0001; CI: 1.64-2.97). ANOVA testing showed a significant difference based on category (P=.028) with post hoc testing showing significant difference between non physician and commercial scores (P=.012, CI: 0.71-9.33).Conclusion:The majority of the websites pertaining to total ankle replacement are significantly beyond the comprehension levels of the general public. This will affect the patient’s ability to discern the complexities and potential complications of total ankle arthroplasty, with serious ramifications for consent as well as post-operative rehabilitation and compliance.Level of Evidence: not applicable

Measuring Text Readability Using Reading Level

2019 ◽  
pp. 93-103
Author(s):  
James C. Brewer
Keyword(s):  
Grade Level ◽  
The United States ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Web Pages ◽  
Wide Audience ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Text Readability ◽  
Worldwide Phenomenon ◽  
The Military

Reading grade level calculations have been in use for over a century in the United States and have guided the selection of texts used in school programs. Government agencies at all levels, the military in its various branches, and editors of publications have found such formulas of use in setting policy or determining who can participate in programs. As readership is now a worldwide phenomenon with English as the primary language of the internet, reading grade level calculations can also be useful in creating web pages and assigning reading texts to large multi-user classes (MOOCs) run over the internet. In this regard, it is possible for faculty to be assured that the material is reachable to a wide audience by checking reading grade level and providing additional guidance for the more difficult items in the form of discussion or focused questions. Authors can use the formulas as a tool to check the quality of their own writing and improve sections which are unnecessarily complex.

Development and Content Validation of the Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt F. Pados ◽  
Suzanne M. Thoyre ◽  
Jinhee Park ◽  
Hayley H. Estrem ◽  
Cara McComish
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Cognitive Interviews ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Motor Proficiency ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Validity Indices

This article describes the development and content validation of the Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS), a parent-report assessment of eating, drinking, and related skills in children 6 months to 7 years of age. Initially, 69 items for the ChOMPS were generated from literature review. Nineteen professionals evaluated the ChOMPS using content validity indices (CVI). Significant revisions were made to items and directions based on professional feedback. CVI were acceptable for both the relevance and clarity of items. Cognitive interviews were then conducted with 19 parents to explore parent understanding of items. Additional revisions were made based on parent feedback. The reading grade level of the resulting ChOMPS was less than sixth grade. The 70-item ChOMPS has evidence of content validity, indicating the items are relevant and clear to professionals, and parents understand the directions and items as intended.

scholarly journals Dupuytren's Contracture: The Readability of Online Information

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110564
Author(s):  
Shayan Hosseinzadeh ◽  
Philip Blazar ◽  
Brandon E Earp ◽  
Dafang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Patient Information ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Dupuytren’S Contracture ◽  
Online Information ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Dupuytren's Contracture ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Grade Reading Level

Dupuytren's contracture is a common hand pathology for which consultation and treatment are largely at the patient's discretion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the readability of current online patient information regarding Dupuytren's contracture. The largest public search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) were queried using the search terms “Dupuytren's contracture,” “Dupuytren's disease,” “Viking's disease,” and “bent finger.” The first 30 unique websites by each search were analyzed and readability assessed using five established algorithms: Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning-Fog Index, Flesch–Kincaid Grade level, Coleman–Liau index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook grade level. Analysis of 73 websites demonstrated an average Flesch Reading Ease score of 48.6 ± 8.0, which corresponds to college reading level. The readability of websites ranged from 10.5 to 13.3 reading grade level. No article was written at or below the recommended sixth grade reading level. Information on the internet on Dupuytren's contracture is written at higher than recommended reading grade level. There is a need for high-quality patient information on Dupuytren's contracture at appropriate reading grade levels for patients of various health literacy backgrounds. Hospitals, universities, and academic organizations focused on the development of readable online information should consider patients’ input and preferences.

scholarly journals An Analysis of the Readability of Educational Materials on the Consumer Webpage of a Health Professional Organization: Considerations for Practice

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naudia Falconer ◽  
E. Reicherter ◽  
Barbara Billek-Sawhney ◽  
Steven Chesbro
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Health Professional ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Professional Organization ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
Site Evaluation ◽  
American Physical

The readability level of many patient education materials is too high for patients to comprehend, placing the patient’s health at risk. Since health professionals often recommend Internet-based patient education resources, they must ensure that the readability of information provided to consumers is at an appropriate level. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of educational brochures found on the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) consumer website. Methods: Fourteen educational brochures on the APTA website in March 2008 were analyzed using the following assessments: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, Fry Readability Formula, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Checklist for Patient Education Materials, and Consumer Health Web Site Evaluation Checklist. Results: According to the Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch Reading Ease, over 90% of the brochures were written at greater than a sixth grade level. The mean reading level was grade 10.2 (range = 3.1 to 12) with a Reading Ease score between 31.5 to 79.9. Using the SMOG formula, the brochures had a mean reading level of grade 11.5 (range = 9 to 13). The Fry Readability showed that 85% of the brochures were written higher than a sixth grade level, with a mean reading level of grade 9.5 (range = 6 to 14). Conclusion: Findings suggest that most of the consumer education information available on the website of this health professional organization had readability scores that were too high for average consumers to read.

Assessing the quality and readability of NHS urology webpages in England

2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582110119
Author(s):  
Celina J Pook ◽  
Kay Thomas ◽  
Matthew F Bultitude
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aid Decision ◽  
Standard Framework

Objective: To examine the readability of urology webpages to assess their suitability for the general population and their inclusivity for varied levels of health literacy. Methods: We accessed all urology department websites from NHS trusts in England. A standard framework was used to assess these for ease of navigation, availability and quality of urology-specific information. Text was analysed using Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level and Ease Score to measure readability. Results: From the 132 NHS trust websites investigated, 117 (88.6%) had a urology-specific webpage, a considerable increase from 98 trusts (68%) in 2010. However, a smaller proportion of websites explained their services and procedures, and only 23.9% explained common urological conditions. Websites still appeared outdated, 23.9% had spelling errors, and 75.2% made none or poor use of images. The mean reading grade level was 13.40, equivalent to a UK reading age above 18 years, and the mean reading ease score was 30.35, in the range of ‘difficult’ text. Conclusion: Our data suggest that urology-specific webpages are not providing useful content for patients and are too complex for the general population to understand. Improvement would allow patients to be able to utilise such resources to aid decision making and to navigate complex NHS pathways. Level of evidence: Not applicable

Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (7) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Leigh Aaronson ◽  
Johnathan Edward Castaño ◽  
Jeffrey P. Simons ◽  
Noel Jabbour
Keyword(s):  
Grade Level ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Google Trends ◽  
Optimal Range ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Public Health Information ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
Readability Formula

Objective: This study evaluates the quality and readability of websites on ankyloglossia, tongue tie, and frenulectomy. Methods: Google was queried with six search terms: tongue tie, tongue tie and breastfeeding, tongue tie and frenulectomy, ankyloglossia, ankyloglossia and breastfeeding, and ankyloglossia and frenulectomy. Website quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Score, and Fry readability formula. Correlations were calculated. Search terms were analyzed for frequency using Google Trends and the NCBI database. Results: Of the maximum of 80, average DISCERN score for the websites was 65.7 (SD = 9.1, median = 65). Mean score for the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level was 11.6 (SD = 3.0, median = 10.7). Two websites (10%) were in the optimal range of 6 to 8. Google Trends shows tongue tie searches increasing in frequency, although the NCBI database showed a decreased in tongue tie articles. Conclusions: Most of the websites on ankyloglossia were of good quality; however, a majority were above the recommended reading level for public health information. Parents increasingly seek information on ankyloglossia online, while fewer investigators are publishing articles on this topic.

scholarly journals Kyphosis-Related Information On The Internet Is the Quality, Content and Readability Sufficient for the Patients?

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110159
Author(s):  
Anıl Agar ◽  
Adem Sahin
Keyword(s):  
Web Sites ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Information Value ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Online Information ◽  
Specific Content ◽  
Significant Difference

Study Design: A quality-control Internet-based study using recognized quality scoring systems. Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality, content and readability of online information on kyphosis. Methods: The 3 most frequently used search engines were identified and a search for “Kyphosis” was made in each. The 2 reviewers categorized their Web-sites by type, and the quality of each was assessed using well-known scoring systems, including the DISCERN score, JAMA benchmark, GQS, and the kyphosis specific content score. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL) was used to assess the readability. The quality of the information was also evaluated according to the presence and absence of the HONcode. Results: Sixty unique Web sites were identified and analyzed. The distribution of the categories was 33 (55%) medical, 22 (36.7%) academic, 2 (3.3%) non-physician, 2 (3.3%) commercial and 1 (1.7%) physician. There wasn’t statistically significant difference between the sources in terms of DISCERN, JAMA, GQS and KSC scores ( P > 0.05). However, a review of the FKGL scores revealed that the academic-based websites’ FKGL score was significantly higher than the medical-based websites ( P: 0.007). Also there wasn’t statistically significant difference among the DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, KSC, FKRS and FKGL scores of the web-sites according to the HON code’s presence ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Information about kyphosis on the Internet is of limited quality and low information value. The readability of the online information in our results showed a significantly higher reading level than the sixth grade level recommended by the AMA and NIH.

scholarly journals Readability of patient education materials related to radiation safety: What are the implications for patient-centred radiology care?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis T. Delaney ◽  
Tiarnán Ó. Doinn ◽  
James M. Broderick ◽  
Emma Stanley
Keyword(s):  
Grade Level ◽  
Radiation Safety ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Online Resources ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
8Th Grade ◽  
Ease Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade Reading Level

Abstract Background Increasing numbers of patients and carers rely on online resources for healthcare information. Radiation safety can be misunderstood by patients and clinicians and lead to patient anxiety. We aimed to assess the readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) related to radiation safety. Methods A total of 84 articles pertaining to radiation safety from 14 well-known online resources were identified. PEMs were then analysed using Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2019. Readability was assessed using eight different instruments: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, Raygor Estimate, SMOG, Coleman–Liau, Fry, FORCAST, Gunning Fog, and Flesch Reading Ease Score formula. The mean reading grade level (RGL) of each article was compared to the 6th and 8th grade reading level using 1-sample t-tests. Results The cumulative mean RGL for all 84 articles was 13.3 (range = 8.6–17.4), and none were written at or below the 6th or 8th grade level. The cumulative mean RGL exceeded the 6th grade reading level by an average of 7.3 levels (95% CI, 6.8–7.8; p < 0.001) and the 8th grade level by an average of 5.3 grade levels (95% CI, 4.8–5.8; p < 0.001). The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score was 39/100 (‘difficult’). Conclusion Currently available online PEMs related to radiation safety are still written at higher than recommended reading levels. Radiation safety is a topic in which the specialist training of radiologists is crucial in providing guidance to patients. Addressing the readability of online PEMs can improve radiology-patient communication and support the shift to a patient-centred model of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document