scholarly journals 1235 A Multi-Site Review of Second Hip Fractures Across 6 Dublin Teaching Hospitals

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Murphy ◽  
C Downey ◽  
S Flannery ◽  
T Daly ◽  
S Conway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Healthcare Expenditure ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Fracture Liaison Services ◽  
Bone Protection ◽  
Fracture Liaison ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Introduction Hip fractures are a common presentation to Irish hospitals with 3,701 hip fractures recorded by 16 hospitals in the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) in 2019. Second hip fractures (HF2) make up a significant proportion of hip fractures and represent an opportunity to prevent subsequent fragility fracture. Method Hip fracture datasheets from 2019 in six Dublin hospitals were analysed. Results 1,284 hip fractures in total were recorded in 2019 in these six hospitals. 112 of these were second hip fractures (8.72%). 24.1% of patients had a HF2 in year 1 post their first hip fracture (HF1). 14.3% of patients had a HF2 in Year 2, 8% in Year 3, 8.9% in Year 4 and 6.3% in Year 5. 17.9% of patients had an HF2 at an unknown time in relation to their HF1. 57.6% of all patients with any hip fracture were started on bone protection medications (BPMs) during their admission. 18.9% continued a pre-admission prescription. 7% of all patients were previously assessed and determined not to require BPM. 6.9% of patients were awaiting outpatient department (OPD) assessment for bone protection. 8.6% had no assessment for bone protection conducted. Of all patients with an HF2, 48.2% were started on BPMs on admission with their HF2. 33% continued BPMs started pre-admission. Discussion In 2019, approximately 1 in 10 hip fractures were second hip fractures. Evidence suggests that fracture liaison services represent a viable, economic means of preventing second hip fractures to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare expenditure.

scholarly journals Orthopedic Research: A golden opportunity to improve patient outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Site Administrator ◽  
Czar Louie Gaston
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
The Core ◽  
Fracture Liaison Services ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Fracture Liaison ◽  
Improve Patient

Research has been one of the core pillars of the Department of Orthopedics of the Philippine General Hospital over its now 50 years of existence. The department established one of the earliest resident’s research contests in the hospital in 1983 and its graduates regularly publish in peer reviewed journals and present their results in international conferences.1 Residents are required to complete 2 original studies prior to graduation and encouraged to document their clinical cases fully for future observational studies. Despite the apparent fascination, questions remain for a lot of trainees and clinicians. “Why do research? How does it  help our patients?” Skepticism abounds as even clinically sound and well-made studies oftentimes do not lead to policy and practice changes needed to improve patient care.2 Given contrarian evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), practices of most established surgeons do not change.3 Hope remains however as evidence-based practice in orthopedics is growing and here to stay.4 Surgeons who accurately examine and diagnose their patient, keep medical records, analyze the medical literature for the best treatment, and explain the available options are subconsciously practicing the scientific methods of observation, documentation, analysis, and reporting conclusions which are the basis of all scientific research. Incorporating research education not just to residency training programs but also to continuing medical education (CME) courses for surgeons may help develop the skills to comprehend new studies and incorporate them into patient care. Reassuringly for the elder surgeon, even old dogs have been shown to learn new tricks for their practice, just not as fast as the younger generation.5 The challenge now presented to Philippine medical practitioners is to develop clinical research that will translate into improved care for patients. As majority of literature dictating treatment for musculoskeletal disorders come from developed countries, case series or observational cohorts reporting local data in our setting is greatly important in guiding patient care.6 The fundamental goal is to produce high quality studies or new breakthroughs that engage discussion amongst a wide audience and lead to system changes that eventually enhance patient outcomes.7 As part of the celebration of the PGH Department of Orthopedics 50th golden anniversary, this orthopedic issue of the ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA represents work from the different orthopedic subspecialities of the department and its graduates. Pioneering studies on brachial plexus injuries, computer navigated spine surgery, rotationplasty, artificial intelligence, pedagogy, and much more highlight the growth of orthopedics in the Philippines. A study on one of the newest fields in Philippine orthopedics, orthogeriatrics, exemplifies the importance of blazing a new trail. The publication by Reyes et al. on a multidisciplinary orthogeriatric approach to the treatment of fragility hip fractures has shown improved outcomes consistent with the positive results of other fracture liaison services in Asia and worldwide.8,9 Their work has since led to the UPM-PGH Orthogeriatric Multidisciplinary Fracture Management Model and Fracture Liaison Service being adopted by PGH as a clinical pathway and has served as a model for other hospitals in the Philippines to improve their care of patients with fragility hip fractures. With the follow-through from the initial clinical study to administrative and policy changes, this example aptly illustrates the power of research to effect significant improvements in clinical outcomes and inspires all of us to continue to strive for better care for our patients.   Czar Louie Gaston, MD, FPOA Department of Orthopedics Philippine General Hospital University of the Philippines Manila   REFERENCES College of Medicine University of the Philippines Manila. Orthopedics [Internet]. [cited 2021 May]. Available from: https://cm.upm.edu.ph/p/orthopedics/ Buchbinder R, Maher C, Harris IA. Setting the research agenda for improving health care in musculoskeletal disorders. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;11(10):597-605. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.81. Epub 2015 Jun 16. PMID: 26077917. Sonntag J, Landale K, Brorson S, Harris IA. Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? Bone Jt Open. 2020 Sep 11;1(9):549-555. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1. PMID: 33215153; PMCID: PMC7659699. Griffin XL, Haddad FS. Evidence-based decision making at the core of orthopaedic practice. Bone Joint J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1000-1. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.34614. PMID: 25086112. Niles SE, Balazs GC, Cawley C, Bosse M, Mackenzie E, Li Y, et al. Translating research into practice: is evidence-based medicine being practiced in military-relevant orthopedic trauma? Mil Med. 2015 Apr;180(4):445-53. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00296. PMID: 25826350. Elliott IS, Sonshine DB, Akhavan S, Slade Shantz A, Caldwell A, Slade Shantz J, et al. What factors influence the production of orthopaedic research in East Africa? A qualitative analysis of interviews. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2120-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4254-5. Epub 2015 Mar 21. PMID: 25795030; PMCID:PMC4419000. Tchetchik A, Grinstein A, Manes E, Shapira D, Durst R. From research to practice: Which research strategy contributes more to clinical excellence? Comparing high-volume versus high-quality biomedical research. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129259. PMID: 26107296; PMCID: PMC4480880. Chang LY, Tsai KS, Peng JK, Chen CH, Lin GT, Lin CH, et al. The development of Taiwan Fracture Liaison Service network. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018 Jun;4(2):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 7. PMID: 30775542; PMCID: PMC6362955. Barton DW, Piple AS, Smith CT, Moskal SA, Carmouche JJ. The clinical impact of fracture liaison services: A systematic review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Jan 11;12:2151459320979978. doi: 10.1177/2151459320979978. PMID: 33489430; PMCID: PMC7809296

scholarly journals 72 Surviving the Epidemic That Confronts Us—Fracture Liaison Service Evaluation Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
T Larcombe ◽  
R A Lisk ◽  
K F Yeong
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Fracture Liaison

Abstract Introduction 1 in 2 women and 1 in 5 men over the age of 50 will break a bone and a significant proportion will suffer from osteoporosis.A fragility fracture will double the risk of future fractures. Between 1990 and 2000, there was nearly a 25% increase in hip fractures worldwide. A hip fracture is one of the most devastating, and often terminal, injury for an older person. Intervention The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) captures patients aged 50 and above that present to fracture clinic with possible fragility fractures with the aim to reduce further fracture incidence. Patients are assessed for osteoporosis and recommendations made for treatment. Results Here we present the results of our FLS service evaluation after 6 years in operation, using the rate of hip fractures (number of hip fractures/Emergency Department [ED] attendances over 75’s) as a surrogate marker for effectiveness. Evaluation Summary Trend analysis of our data indicates a reduction in the number of patients attending the Trust with fractured neck of femur (NOF) despite the increase in ED attendances. This is against the trend nationally where fractured NOF numbers are rising (National Hip Fracture Database, accessed online August 2019). Next steps The FLS to attempt to comprehensively capture muscular-skeletal patients and to consider opportunities present to target case finding to high risk cohorts.

Integration of Podiatric Medicine Within the Fracture Liaison Services Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler MacRae ◽  
David W. Shofler
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Metabolic Disorders ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Treatment Of Osteoporosis ◽  
Fracture Liaison Services ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Care Costs ◽  
Fracture Liaison

Underlying bone metabolic disorders are often neglected when managing acute fractures. The term fracture liaison services (FLS) refers to models of care with the designated responsibility of comprehensive fracture management, including the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Although there is evidence of the effectiveness of FLS in reducing health-care costs and improving patient outcomes, podiatric practitioners are notably absent from described FLS models. The integration of podiatric practitioners into FLS programs may lead to improved patient care and further reduce associated health-care costs.

scholarly journals 295 Characteristics of Older Hip Fracture Adults Admitted to a Dublin Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Niamh Maher ◽  
Georgina Steen ◽  
Nessa Fallon ◽  
Claire O Carroll ◽  
Máire Rafferty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Dublin Hospital ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Bone Protection

Abstract Background Hip fractures are common in older adults and are associated with increased mortality and morbidity resulting in medical and socioeconomic burden for healthcare system and patient alike. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted to a Dublin hospital for hip fracture repair between October 2018 and February 2019. Data on sociodemographic characteristics such as; gender; age; pre-admission residence; fracture history; bone protection medication use; pre-fracture mobility; discharge mobility and destination; length of stay and mortality rate was collected. Results 50 patients admitted between 01/10/19 and 31/01/2019. 2:1 female to male. Average age 78 ranging from 48-93. 88% admitted from home. 44% had previous fractures. Vertebral (36%), wrist (23%) and pelvic (23%) most common fractures. 27% of these were on bone protection medication on admission. 41% were taking Calcium and Vit D or Vitamin D only. 70% of participants were independently mobile pre-fracture. 94% required some form of mobility aid on discharge. The average length of stay was 32 days ranging from 2 to 160 days. 38% went home whilst 36% were discharged to rehabilitation. 88% were discharged on bone protection medication - 70% received IV Zoledronic acid as inpatients, 14% commenced Prolia 6 monthly injections and 4% on oral bisphosphonates. Mortality rate was 6% Conclusion Hip fractures have a negative effect on a person’s mobility. Whilst many guidelines for the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis recommend intervention be considered in men and women who have sustained a fragility fracture, it is clear from this study that an osteoporosis care gap exists and further work is required to better identify, assess and treat patients following their first fracture in the hope of reducing further fractures, particularly hip and vertebral fractures.

scholarly journals A Hospitalist-Led Fracture Liaison Service Improves Care of Hip Fracture Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A241-A241
Author(s):  
Anne Drabkin ◽  
Micol Sara Rothman ◽  
Goold Audrey ◽  
Yasui Robin ◽  
Mancini Diana
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Osteoporosis Care ◽  
Fracture Liaison

Abstract Background: Osteoporosis care traditionally falls to outpatient primary care providers despite the fact that over 300,000 elderly patients are hospitalized yearly with hip fractures in the United States. Internal medicine hospitalists are often involved in the co-management of their care on surgical teams and are skillful in osteoporosis recognition and management. Objective: A hospitalist-led Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) was established to provide improved care of hospitalized patients with hip fractures. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of inpatient and post-discharge management of patients admitted with low-impact hip fractures was performed before (8/17-2/18) and after (8/19 - 2/20) launch of the hospitalist Fracture Liaison Service (H-FLS). Results: Eighty-nine patients were admitted with a hip fracture in post-launch period compared to 73 admitted prior. 74% vs 11% of eligible patients (based on adequate renal function and vitamin D stores) were discharged with anti-osteoporosis medications (p<0.001), 82% vs 38% were discharged with vitamin D/calcium supplements (p<0.001), 22% vs 5% underwent a DXA scan after discharge (p<0.05) and 65% vs 0% were referred to outpatient osteoporosis-specific care at discharge (p<0.001). Conclusion: A hospitalist-led FLS is a unique approach to osteoporosis care that significantly improved quality metrics for elderly patients with osteoporotic hip fractures including initiation of anti-osteoporosis medication and bone density imaging. Outpatient follow-up data are needed to evaluate adherence to this initial management over time.

scholarly journals Using a Wearable Activity Monitor to Accurately Measure Mobility After Surgery for Hip Fractures (MASH)—A Feasibility Study Protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215145932096408
Author(s):  
James T. Berwin ◽  
Hamish Macdonald ◽  
Tom Fleming ◽  
Peter Kempshall ◽  
Daniel Engelke
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Activity Monitor ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Fracture Surgery

Introduction: Hip fractures are the most common reason for acute orthopaedic admission in the United Kingdom (UK) and pose a substantial cost to the National Health Service (NHS). A significant proportion of this expenditure is accounted for by hospital bed days, with additional contributions from health and social aftercare. Early ambulation following hip fracture surgery improves outcomes by accelerating functional recovery and reducing the need for ongoing care. The ability to track a patient’s rehabilitation is important in assessing their care needs. While this is challenging to assess accurately, doing so may help to further improve outcomes. The aim of this feasibility study is to determine whether it is possible to accurately measure Mobility After Surgery for Hip fractures (MASH) in the immediate post-operative period by tracking the frequency of mobilization, distance walked and overall activity in the first week following surgery using a wearable activity monitor, the activPAL device. Methods and Materials: A total of 50 patients will be recruited to participate in the study. Ethical approval was given to recruit patients with and without capacity to consent. Immediately after undergoing hip fracture surgery, a activPAL monitor weighing 9 grams and measuring 23.5 mm x 43 x 5 mm in size will be applied to the anterior aspect of the participants thigh with a standard adhesive dressing. We will be assessing the feasibility of using the activPALto measure mobility in this patient group. Discussion: The MASH study will contribute to the design and execution of the MASH trial, which will seek to assess the accuracy by which mobility can be measured following hip fracture surgery and how this information can best be used to improve rehabilitation and care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document