scholarly journals 414 Informed Consent for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Evidence-Based Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Cuthbert ◽  
D Ferguson ◽  
B Kayani ◽  
S Haque ◽  
A Ali ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Surgical intervention for neck of femur fractures continues to be prioritised during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, there remains a lack of clarity for clinicians during the consent process. This study quantifies additional perioperative risks for Covid-19 positive patients undergoing neck of femur fracture surgery and establishes an evidence-based framework for facilitating informed consent during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method 259 patients undergoing neck of femur fracture surgery in four hospitals at the epicentre of the United Kingdom’s first wave of Covid-19 were recruited. 51 patients were positive for Covid-19. Predefined outcomes were recorded in a 30-day postoperative period. Results Odds of intensive care admission were 4.64 times higher (95% CI 1.59-13.50, p = 0.005) and odds of 30-day mortality were 3 times higher (95% CI 1.22-7.40, p = 0.02) in Covid-19 positive patients. 74.5% of Covid-19 positive patients suffered post-operative complications. 35.3% of Covid-19 positive patients developed lower respiratory tract infection with 13.7% progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome. 9.8% of Covid-19 positive patients experienced symptomatic thromboembolic events with a 3.9% incidence of pulmonary emboli. Conclusions The implications of Covid-19 on the informed consent process for neck of femur fracture surgery are profound. Covid-19 positive patients should be consented for increased risk of postoperative complications (including lower respiratory tract infection, acute respiratory distress syndrome and thromboembolic events), longer inpatient stay, increased frequency of intensive care admission and higher risk of mortality.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Khaleeq ◽  
U Hanif ◽  
Y Maqsood ◽  
K Ahmed ◽  
A Patel

Abstract Using guidelines highlighted by the British Orthopaedic Association an reaudit was performed within our department to assess the adequacy of informed consent for NOF fractures to complete the audit cycle. 50 patients were included in the Audit and reaudit. Risk was classified as common, less common, rare and ‘other’. The adequacy of informed consent was evaluated by assessing the quality and accuracy of documentation. Infection, bleeding risks, clots and anaesthetic risks were documented in all patients (100%). Areas of improvement were seen in the documentation of neurovascular injuries (98%), pain (90%) and altered wound healing (87%). There was no significant change in the documentation of failure of surgery (83%) and neurovascular injuries (98%). The Poorly documented risk factors from the initial audit were seen to improve which included mortality (70%), prosthetic dislocation (90%) and limb length discrepancy (50%). There has been a significant improvement in the quality of Informed consent in the department and this could be attributed to the installation of ward posters and verbal dissemination of information to junior doctors. Recommendation for interventions would be to present in the next clinical governance meeting and presenting at the new junior doctors’ induction at August.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Saha ◽  
E Demoulin ◽  
J Newman

Abstract Introduction The aim of the study is to determine the 7- and 30-day mortality rate, hospital stay period and pre- and post-operative symptoms in NOF fracture patients undergoing surgery and compare between COVID-19 positive and negative cohorts. Method This was a retrospective, descriptive study involving 188 NOF fracture patients who underwent operation from 21/03/20 to 21/07/20 in Mid Yorkshire Hospitals Trust. Only people who tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days of operation were counted in the positive cohort. Result: Total 21 patient tested positive for COVID-19, 16 within 30 days of operation and 5 tested beyond 30-day period. 24 were not tested. 143 tested negative. The average age of patients was 79.02±11.163 years. Average hospital stay was 14.688±10.657 days (average stay for positive patients 22±13.789 days). 12 patients had pre-operative symptoms (respiratory symptoms, fever) out of which 2(16.67%) tested positive. 7-day post-op mortality was 2.128% (6.25% for COVID-19 positive patients). 30-day mortality was 6.383% (5.814% for untested/negative patients and 12.5% for positive patients). 41 patients (21 .81%) developed post-operative respiratory symptoms (56.25% for positive patients). 8.51% developed post-operative sepsis (25% of positive patients). Conclusions Mortality and morbidity rate was higher for NOF fracture patients with positive COVID-19 test.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215145931878223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Thomas Tilston ◽  
Katherine Walsh ◽  
Michael Kelly

Background: Patients with a neck of femur fracture have a high mortality rate. National outcomes have improved significantly as the management of this patient group is prioritized. In 2016, however, 4398 (6.7%) patients died within 30 days of admission. Objective: To investigate whether palliative care could be integrated early in the care plan for high-risk patients. Methods: All cases of inpatient mortality following neck of femur fracture at North Bristol Major Trauma Centre over a 24-month period were reviewed. A comprehensive assessment of care was performed from the emergency department until death. All investigations, interventions, and management decisions were recorded. A consensus decision regarding expected mortality was made for each case at a multidisciplinary meeting which included surgical, orthogeriatric, nursing, and anesthetic team input. Results: A total of 1033 patients were admitted following a neck of femur fracture. There were 74 inpatient deaths, and 82% were considered predictable at our multidisciplinary meeting. The mean length of stay was 18 days (range: 0-85, median 14). In 42% of cases, mortality was considered predictable on admission, and 40% were considered predictable following acute deterioration. These patients received on average 28 blood tests (range: 4-114) and 6.8 X-rays and computed tomographies (range: 2-20). Of this, 66% received end-of-life care; mean duration 2.3 days (range: 0-17). Conclusions: Mortality rates remain high in a subset of patients. This study demonstrates that intensive investigation and medical management frequently continues until death, including in patients with predictably poor outcomes. Early palliative care input has been integrated successfully into patient management in other specialties. We demonstrate that it is feasible to identify patients with hip fracture who may benefit from this expertise.


Injury Extra ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
N. Gunasekera ◽  
D. Ramoutar ◽  
C. Morris ◽  
T. Aung ◽  
C. Moran

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O A Javed ◽  
M J Khan ◽  
Y Abbas ◽  
S Pillai ◽  
K Hristova ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Elderly patients with femoral fractures are often frail and require a multidisciplinary approach to optimise medical care, rehabilitation and prevention of further injury. Previously, neck of femur fracture patients were the focus of such an approach, but NICE and BOAST guidelines emphasise extending this care to other elderly trauma patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 43 patients over 60 years old at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2019 with a femoral fracture other than a neck of femur fracture. BOAST guideline standards were surgery within 36 hours, orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours, a documented ceiling of treatment, falls risk assessment, bone health review, nutritional assessment and physiotherapy review. Results Our study showed worse outcomes in all standards for patients with femoral shaft, distal femur and periprosthetic femur fractures compared to neck of femur fractures: surgery within 36 hours (63.9% vs. 66%); orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours (32.6% vs. 91.9%); falls risk assessment (76.7% vs. 99.6%); bone health review (41.9% vs. 99.7%); nutritional assessment (55.8% vs. 99.6%); physiotherapy review (97.7% vs. 98.9%). The group also had worse outcomes for average length of stay (19 days vs. 14 days) and 30 day mortality (9.3% vs. 8.6%). Discussion Our study showed a discrepancy in care received by elderly patients with femoral fractures other than neck of femur. We will introduce a proforma for all femoral fractures, present our findings to orthogeriatric, bone health and physiotherapy teams to involve them in the care of such patients and re-audit following these recommendations.


Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2144-2148 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Lim ◽  
G.S. Ng ◽  
R.C. Jenkins ◽  
D. Ridley ◽  
A.C. Jariwala ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-76
Author(s):  
J Fingleton ◽  

Seizures are a common presenting complaint in acute medicine and post-ictal patients can pose a diagnostic challenge. Approximately 1% of patients presenting after a seizure will have sustained a fracture. Delayed diagnosis is common and can lead to worse functional outcomes. A case of occult bilateral neck of femur fracture secondary to seizure is presented together with a review of the literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document