EP.FRI.530 ‘Emergency’ Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct (CBD) Exploration: Is this the right time to change?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangram Patil ◽  
Sudin Daniel ◽  
Abdulzahra Hussain ◽  
Peter Vasas
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Emergency Case ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Abstract Aims Common Bile Duct (CBD) stones are becoming more common on surgical emergency take and accounts for up to 20 % of patients presenting with acute biliary pathologies. The hospital stay is prolonged whilst waiting for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP). We aim to evaluate the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of emergency laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) in these patients.  Methods A cohort of patients with CBD stones underwent emergency LCBDE between January 2016 and December 2020 at a regional hospital in the United Kingdom was retrospectively reviewed. Results In total, 11 LCBDE were performed on emergency list. All patients were admitted with acute symptoms of either obstructive jaundice cholangitis or pancreatitis. All procedures were performed with choledochotomy. The mean patient age was 58 years and male-to-female ratio was 2:9. 3 patients (27%) had T- tube otherwise all ducts were primarily closed. Average hospital stay was 8.5 days. 1 patient returned to theatre for retained stone of 11mm. There was no 30 days mortality. There were no readmissions. Initial analysis with small number of patients showed, performing these procedures on emergency basis not only improved patient’s overall experience but also benefitted NHS Trust by approximately £18,500 as per the National Tariff System 2020/21. Conclusions Emergency LCBDE is safe, feasible and cost effective. We can safely aim to increase the proportion of LCBDE performed as an emergency case, where clinically appropriate, to reduce the financial burden and improve patient’s outcome with overwhelming NHS Trust funds. 

scholarly journals Laparoscopic CBD Exploration (LCBDE) a better and safe option for large CBD stones

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1321-1323
Author(s):  
I. Sadiq ◽  
A. Malik ◽  
J. K. Lodhi ◽  
S. T. Bukhari ◽  
R. Maqbool ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Conventionally, common bile duct stones (CBDS) are removed with help of ERCP. However, if CBDS are larger than 10 mm, then the ERCP failure rate to retrieve CBDS becomes high. In that case, open or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is other alternative. In this era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) seems to be a better option than open approach, but in our set up the safety of LCBDE is questioned. Aim: To see the conversion rate as well as complications associated with LCBDE. Material & Methods: Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) for large CBD stones at Fatima Memorial Hospital Lahore. Results: Since 2012, 29 patients of large (≥10 mm) CBD stones were included in this study. Among them 20(69.9%) were females and 9(31.01%) were males. The mean CBD stone size was 13 mm. Stones were extracted transcystically in 4 case and Transcholedochal stone extraction was done in 25 cases. The average duration of surgery was 130 minutes, but all cases were completed successfully without converting to open approach. There was minor bile leak in 3 patients which was managed successfully without any further intervention. No other complication was observed with LCBDE and even no retained stone was reported. Conclusion: Laparoscopic CBD exploration is safe and effective method of dealing CBD stones especially of large size when the chances of ERCP failure to retrieve stones are high. Keywords: Laparoscopy, ERCP, common bile duct,

scholarly journals Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure over an ante-grade biliary stent-our experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2093
Author(s):  
Aarif Bashir ◽  
Shaukat Jeelani ◽  
Saniya Zaffar
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Biliary Stent ◽  
Operative Complication ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Aim of study was the assessment of laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration with primary closure over an ante-gradely placed endo-biliary stent for CBD stones in terms of operating time, rate of conversion to open procedure, hospital stay, postoperative complications and residual disease.Methods: Our data was analysed retrospectively over a period of 5 years (2015-2020) on all the patients who underwent laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure over an ante-gradely placed endo-biliary stent followed by cholecystectomy at SMHS hospital, Srinagar, J and K, India. Total of 30 such patients were identified.Results: The mean procedure time was 93.5±23.16 minutes. There were no intra operative complications encountered in the study. Four patients were converted to open (13.33%). The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.56±1.99 Days. The total number of patients that developed post-operative complications was 7 (23.33%). The most frequently encountered post-operative complication was stent migration (13.33%). The next most common post-operative complication was minor biliary leak (10%) which resolved spontaneously. There was no mortality experienced during the study. Two patients (6.66%) had residual stones and 28 (93.33%) patients had complete clearance of the CBD.Conclusions: Laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure over an ante-gradely placed endo-biliary stent is a feasible option and is a safe procedure. Endoscopic removal of the stent can safely be done after an interval of 6-8 weeks.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery in management of common bile duct stones: experience at the Sohag University Hospital, Egypt

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mena Z. Helmy ◽  
Ahmed E. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Cbd Stones

Background: Management of common bile duct (CBD) stones includes removal of the gallbladder and clearance of the ductal system which can be achieved through different approaches; endoscopic, laparoscopic or surgical.  Objective of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, technical feasibility and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) versus open surgery in the treatment of patients with cholidocholithiasis.Methods: From June 2015 to December 2017, 120 patients with CBD stones were prospectively treated at Sohag University Hospital, Upper Egypt. Patients were divided into two groups: the first one treated by LCBDE (60 patients), while the other group treated by open surgery (60 patients).Results: The ages of our patients were ranged from 20 to 80 (mean = 40) years, with a female predominance (female/male = 74/46). Patients in the first group were treated by laparoscopic approaches: transcystic approaches in four patients and transcholedochotomy approaches in 56 patients. Choledochoscop was routinely used to detect, extract the stones, in addition to assessment of CBD clearance. The conversion rate was done in two cases. The operative time was 120 (90-220) min, the clearance of CBD stones was achieved in 98.4% of cases (one case of missed stones). Hospital stay was 3 (2-4) days, with no mortality, morbidity rate was 5% including bile leak, and missed stone. The operative time in the second group was 100 (80-180) min, the clearance of CBD stones was achieved in 96.6% of cases (two cases of missed stones). Hospital stay was 8 (5-12) days, with no mortality; the morbidity rate was 15% in the form of wound infection, bile leak, missed stone and ileus.Conclusions: Management of cholidocholithiasis by laparoscopic approach is feasible, effective and safe procedure with good outcome and high success rate. 

scholarly journals O-EGS03 Laparoscopic surgery versus Endoscopy in the management Common Bile Duct Stones: systematic review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafs Elhag ◽  
Omar Eltayeb
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Cholangitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cbd Stones

Abstract Background With the advancement in minimally invasive surgery, a 1 stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) is a great alternative to removing the gallbladder and CBD stones provided the surgeon possesses the necessary skills. The current guidelines for managing CBD stones is the 2 stage approach, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by (LC). The objective of this study is to assess whether LCBDE+LC should be the gold standard in managing CBD stones by comparing the clearance rate of common bile duct stones, morbidity, mortality, and the duration of hospital stay with ERCP+LC. Methods This is a systematic review with a meta-analysis that included RCTs of patients who were treated by the LCBDE/LC versus ERCP+LC. The PRISMA guidelines for reporting systemic reviews were followed. RCTs were collected by 2 authors Independently from Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline and Embase. Statistical analysis was carried out by a computer application called Review Manager using the Mantel–Haenszel method, the results were then plotted on a Forest Plot diagram and the 2 groups were then compared. Results 849 patients from 7 RCTs were included in the study, 426 patients in the ERCP+LC arm and 423 in the LCBDE/LC arm. According to the Meta-analysis, Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Cholecystectomy was significantly superior to ERCP + LC in terms of successful Clearance of CBD stone, mortality rate, and Acute Pancreatitis. but had significantly higher rates in biliary leakages. There were no significant differences in Surgical Site Infections, Haemorrhages, Acute Cholangitis, Perforations, or duration of hospital stay between the two arms. Conclusions The current evidence suggests that LCBDE/LC is superior in successful CBD stone clearance, mortality, and acute pancreatitis. However, further RCTs will be needed to assess overall Morbidity, surgical site infections, Haemorrhages, Acute Cholangitis, perforations, or duration of hospital stay. The current guidelines must be reviewed to consider LCBDE/LC as the gold standard in managing patients with CBD stones.

scholarly journals Choledochoduodenostomy versus T-tube drainage in patients have stones in common bile duct with risk factors of post-operative missed stones

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4343
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Ali ◽  
Mena Zarif Helmy ◽  
Emad Gomaa
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Biliary Surgery ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Group I ◽  
Ascending Cholangitis ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Residual or missed stones of common bile duct (CBD) and ascending cholangitis after CBD exploration are major biliary surgery problems. Repeated biliary tract interventions for correction of complications are catastrophic on both patients and surgeons.Methods: This is a prospective study of 83 patients which compares two methods for surgical management of CBD stones between June 2016 to May 2018. Group I included 43 patients who were managed by CBD exploration followed by insertion of T tube, the risk factors of the incidence of missed retained stone in CBD were multiple stones in CBD and hugely dilated CBD (>15 mm).The second method was choledochoduodenal anastomosis for patients having the same previous risk factors (Group II) which included 40 patients. Postoperative follow up was for 12 to 18 months.Results: In group I, 6 patients developed residual stones in CBD, reoperation was required for 3 of them and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy for another 3 patients, while in the other group (group II) 2 patients suffered from ascending cholangitis and are managed conservatively. No missed or residual CBD stones were developed and no patients need reoperation.Conclusions: With choledochoduodenostomy in patients with multiple CBD stones or markedly dilated CBD the incidence of missed or retained stones in CBD was reduced.

EP.TH.754One Year Experience of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in a District General Hospital Using Ambu Disposable Scope

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alsarah Diab ◽  
Jane Kilkenny ◽  
Omer Eltayeb
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Abstract Aim Common bile duct (CBD) stones are the most common cause of obstructive jaundice. Laparoscopic exploration of the CBD with laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been preferred to endoscopic treatment, as a single-stage modality of treatment for CBD stones. This procedure was started in a District General Hospital in May 2019 using the standard port sites and Ambu® aScope™ 2 single-use flexible scope. Methods Retrospective analysis of outcome of all laparoscopic CBD explorations done in a District General Hospital between May 2019 and September 2020. Results A total of ten laparoscopic CBD explorations were carried out during the identified period, the main indications were young patients (40%), referral by gastroenterologist (40%) and failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (20%). The mean age (±SD) was 54.7 (± 19.2) and 70% of patients were females. Two thirds of the operations were done in emergency setting, with choledochotomy approach being used in 60% of cases and primary closure in all cases. The average length of stay (±SD) after the operation was 3.1 (±1.9). Only one patient developed a haemoserous collection that required a laparoscopic washout, none of the patients required readmission. Conclusion Laparoscopic CBD exploration can be performed safely in a district general hospital, the disposable Ambu® aScope™ 2 is safe, feasible and cost-effective substitute to the reusable choledochoscope. Provision of this laparoscopic CBD exploration at district general hospital level is more convenient to patients and can reduce referrals to regional hepatobiliary units, and therefore provide a good training opportunity for surgical registrars in this setting.

scholarly journals Evaluation of different methods of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2670
Author(s):  
Elghamry E. Elghamry ◽  
Mohamed M. Elsheikh ◽  
Hamdy A. Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are the second most common complication of gall bladder stones. The best management of patients with CBD stones remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods of laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE).Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with CBD stones through 2 years. CBD stricture was excluded. Authors used transcystic and transcholedochotomy approaches for LCBDE either with or without choledoschope. Primary repair of the choledochotomy incision was done. Results: The mean age was 48.90±11.84 years. Biliary colic was the presentation in 63.3% of patients. The transcystic approach for CBD exploration was used in 16 cases without conversion, 11 cases were completed without choledochoscope, while 5 cases with choledochoscopic guided extraction. Choledochotomy approach had been used in 13 cases, 6 cases were completed with choledochoscope and 7 cases without it, two cases of them failed. One case failed from the beginning and was converted to open exploration. 5 ERCP previously inserted stents were removed. The mean operative time was 162.33±74.67 min. Bile leakage occurred in 2 cases following the choledochotomy approach. The mean hospital stay was 3.37±1.38 days.Conclusion: LCBDE is a feasible, effective and safe approach to bile duct stones. Depending on proper training and gaining experience. 

scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Binit Prasad ◽  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Cbd Stone ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Introduction: Common Bile Duct stones (CBD) are found in approximately 16% of the patients undergoing Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Till recently, the gold standard for treating CBD stones was endoscopic removal, if that failed, then open surgery. However, in the laparoscopic era, the best treatment for CBD stones is a matter of debate and it continues to evolve. The objective of the present study is to determine that laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a safe, feasible and single-stage option for the management of CBD stones. Materials and Methods :Out of the 2900 laparoscopic cholecystectomies we did selective intraoperative cholangiogram in 262 patients who were suspected to have CBD stones based on deranged liver function tests, dilated CBD with or without CBD stone on sonography or having the history of recent jaundice/pancreatitis. If CBD stone was found, either a transcystic or transcholedochal exploration was done depending on the size, site, number of stones and CBD diameter. Choledochotomy was closed over a t-tube in the majority of the patients. Primary closure of CBD was done in few patients and in one patient we placed an antegrade stent and in another we placed endoscopic stent into the CBD laparoscpically which was removed after four weeks. Results :Till date we have performed LCBDE in 64 patients. Transcystic exploration was done in 14 patients and transcholedochal exploration was done in 46 cases out of which 2 patients had minor biliary leak which settled on conservative treatment in 2-3 days. Four patients required conversion to open surgery as there were multiple stones. We did not have any major complication and on 6 months follow-up in 76% patients, none was found to have residual stone. Conclusion :The treatment of CBD stones depends on the resources available, technical limitations and the surgeon’s expertise. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is a safe, feasible and single-stage option for the management of CBD stones.

CONCOMITANT GALLSTONES AND COMMON BILE DUCT STONES: SHOULD SINGLE-STEP LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY?

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 99-104
Author(s):  
Vy Pham Trung ◽  
Hiep Pham Nhu ◽  
Vu Pham Anh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Study Results

Purpose: To evaluate results from treatment of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones by ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Analysis of single-step or separated-step characteristics. Object: During the 3 years (2015-2017), 285 patients CBD stones concomitant or not gallstones underwent ERCP, 68 patients concomitant gallstones and CBD suitable criteria for inclusion at Hue Central Hospital. Retrospective clinical descriptive study. Results: Average age 52.2±12.5 (24-90), male/female ratio of 0.7/1 (27/41). Abdominal pain was the most common symptom 91.2%, jaundice 51.5%, direct bilirubin increased 27.3±15.6μmol/l (2.2-165). The diameter of CBD stone is 12.4±3.2mm (6-20), gallstones size 11.3±6.2mm (536). The first time CBD stones 95.6%, recurrence CBD stones 4.4%. ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) 34patients, ERCP 1.4±2.5times and secondary LC. Single-step ductal clearance 76.5%, separatestep ductal clearance 94.1% (p=0.041). Length of hospital stay 6.5±4.3days and 13.6±2.2days (p<0.0001). Conclusions: The percentage of ductal clearance in the separate-step patients group was higher than that single-step patients group with p=0.041. The indication of cholecystectomy immediately endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography should be based on the patient status, the ductal clearance as well as the complications. Key words: Common bile duct stones, Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography

scholarly journals Surgical procedure for unexpected balloon burst complication during endoscopic balloon dilatation in a patient with common bile duct stones

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Morishita ◽  
Hideaki Sasaki
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Balloon

Abstract Background Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is the established treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. Although pancreatitis and bleeding have been reported as major complications of EBD, balloon-related complications are rarely reported in EBD. Case presentation A 30-year-old woman with suspected CBD stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EBD. During EBD, the balloon of the EBD catheter suddenly burst at the biliary sphincter. We therefore performed surgical intervention: removal of the broken EBD catheter and T-tube drainage. Finally, the patient was discharged without any complications. Conclusions We present a case involving a burst balloon of an EBD catheter as a rare complication during EBD, as well as the surgical technique that was used to treat this complication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document