scholarly journals Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure over an ante-grade biliary stent-our experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2093
Author(s):  
Aarif Bashir ◽  
Shaukat Jeelani ◽  
Saniya Zaffar
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Biliary Stent ◽  
Operative Complication ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Aim of study was the assessment of laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration with primary closure over an ante-gradely placed endo-biliary stent for CBD stones in terms of operating time, rate of conversion to open procedure, hospital stay, postoperative complications and residual disease.Methods: Our data was analysed retrospectively over a period of 5 years (2015-2020) on all the patients who underwent laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure over an ante-gradely placed endo-biliary stent followed by cholecystectomy at SMHS hospital, Srinagar, J and K, India. Total of 30 such patients were identified.Results: The mean procedure time was 93.5±23.16 minutes. There were no intra operative complications encountered in the study. Four patients were converted to open (13.33%). The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.56±1.99 Days. The total number of patients that developed post-operative complications was 7 (23.33%). The most frequently encountered post-operative complication was stent migration (13.33%). The next most common post-operative complication was minor biliary leak (10%) which resolved spontaneously. There was no mortality experienced during the study. Two patients (6.66%) had residual stones and 28 (93.33%) patients had complete clearance of the CBD.Conclusions: Laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure over an ante-gradely placed endo-biliary stent is a feasible option and is a safe procedure. Endoscopic removal of the stent can safely be done after an interval of 6-8 weeks.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic CBD Exploration (LCBDE) a better and safe option for large CBD stones

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1321-1323
Author(s):  
I. Sadiq ◽  
A. Malik ◽  
J. K. Lodhi ◽  
S. T. Bukhari ◽  
R. Maqbool ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Conventionally, common bile duct stones (CBDS) are removed with help of ERCP. However, if CBDS are larger than 10 mm, then the ERCP failure rate to retrieve CBDS becomes high. In that case, open or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is other alternative. In this era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) seems to be a better option than open approach, but in our set up the safety of LCBDE is questioned. Aim: To see the conversion rate as well as complications associated with LCBDE. Material & Methods: Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) for large CBD stones at Fatima Memorial Hospital Lahore. Results: Since 2012, 29 patients of large (≥10 mm) CBD stones were included in this study. Among them 20(69.9%) were females and 9(31.01%) were males. The mean CBD stone size was 13 mm. Stones were extracted transcystically in 4 case and Transcholedochal stone extraction was done in 25 cases. The average duration of surgery was 130 minutes, but all cases were completed successfully without converting to open approach. There was minor bile leak in 3 patients which was managed successfully without any further intervention. No other complication was observed with LCBDE and even no retained stone was reported. Conclusion: Laparoscopic CBD exploration is safe and effective method of dealing CBD stones especially of large size when the chances of ERCP failure to retrieve stones are high. Keywords: Laparoscopy, ERCP, common bile duct,

scholarly journals Novel Method for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Performed Using a Disposable Bronchoscope (Ambu® aScope TM)

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Yousif Mahmood Aawsaj ◽  
Ibrahim K Ibrahim ◽  
Andrew Gilliam
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Capital Outlay ◽  
Case Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration can be performed following choledocotomy or via the trancystic approach. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is limited in some benign upper gastrointestinal units due to the cost of sterilization of the re-usable choledochoscope. We have recently published a case series confirming the safety and efficacy of the 5mm re-usable bronchoscope for CBD exploration. This case series evaluates a single-use bronchochoscope (Ambu aScopeTM) for laparoscopic CBD exploration. Data were collected from electronic records of the patients from January 2015 until December 2016; all the cases had confirmation of CBD stones. Twenty-one patients had CBD exploration using the disposable bronchochoscope. There were 7 male and 14 female (median age 42). 8 procedures were performed as emergencies and 13 were performed electively. All the cases were done laparoscopically apart from one planned as an open procedure due to previous extensive open surgery. Twenty cases had their CBD cleared using disposable bronchoscope and one needed subsequent special test follow up. Choledocotomy was performed in 15 and Tran’s cystic approach was performed in 6. No T-tube was used in the laparoscopic cases. 2 cases were performed as day case surgery. Median postoperative hospital stay was 2.5 days. In conclusion, the disposable bronchoscope is safe and effective for use in CBD exploration with results comparable to our previously published case series. It has guaranteed sterility and is cost effective compared to the re-usable bronchoscope especially when initial capital outlay, sterile processing and maintenance costs are considered.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Primary Closure for Management of Choledocholithiasis: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison with Conventional T-tube Drainage

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Wei Zhang ◽  
Ya-Jin Chen ◽  
Chang-Hao Wu ◽  
Wen-Da Li
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Tube Drainage ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) had become one of the main options for management of choledocholithiasis. This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate on the feasibility and advantages of primary closure versus conventional T-tube drainage of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic choledochotomy. In this retrospective analysis, 100 patients (47 men and 53 women) with choledocholithiasis who underwent primary closure of the CBD (without T-tube drainage) after LCBDE (Group A) were compared with 92 patients who underwent LCBDE with T-tube drainage (Group B). Both groups were evaluated with regard to biliary complications, hospital stay, and recurrence of stones. The mean operation time was 104.12 minutes for Group A and 108.92 minutes for Group B ( P = 0.069). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A than that in Group B (6.95 days and 12.05 days, respectively; P < 0.001). In Group A, bile leakage occurred in two patients on postoperative Day 2 and Day 3, respectively. In Group B, bile leakage noted in one patient after removal of the T-tube on Day 14 after operation ( P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 40 months for both groups, stone recurrence was noted in two patients in Group A and three patients in Group B ( P = 0.672). Primary closure of the CBD is safe and feasible in selected patients after laparoscopic choledochotomy. It results in shorter duration of hospital stay without the need for carrying/care of a T-tube in the postoperative period and similar stone recurrence as that of the conventional method.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Retrieval of Impacted Dormia Basket following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with Mechanical Failure: Case Report with Literature Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. O’Brien ◽  
R. Tyler ◽  
S. Shaukat ◽  
A. M. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Fogarty Catheter ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Laparoscopic Case ◽  
The Common ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Dormia baskets are commonly used during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). One complication is basket retention, through impaction with a gallstone or wire fracture. We describe a case where the external handle of the basket snapped causing retained basket plus large gallstone impacted in the common bile duct (CBD). Following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration allowed direct stone fragmentation under vision with the choledochoscope. Fragments were removed using a choledochoscopic basket and Fogarty catheter, and the basket was withdrawn. Literature search identified 114 cases of retained baskets with management including shockwave lithotripsy (27%), papillary balloon dilatation (22%), open CBD exploration (11%), and one laparoscopic case.

One-step Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Treatment of Gallbladder and Common Bile Duct Stones: Our Experience of the Last 9 Years in a Retrospective Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (12) ◽  
pp. 1243-1247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Liverani ◽  
Mirko Muroni ◽  
Francesco Santi ◽  
Tiziano Neri ◽  
Gerardo Anastasio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
One Step ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

The optimal timing and best method for removal of common bile duct stones (CBDS) associated with gallbladder stones (GBS) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of a single-step procedure combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Between January 2003 and January 2012, 1972 patients underwent cholecystectomy at our hospital. Of those, 162 patients (8.2%; male/female 72/90) presented with GBS and suspected CBDS. We treated 54 cases (Group 1) with ERCP and LC within 48 to 72 hours. In 108 patients (Group 2) we performed LC with IOC and, if positive, was associated with IO-ERCP and sphincterotomy. In Group 1, a preoperative ERCP and LC were completed in 50 patients (30%). In four cases (2%), an ERCP and endobiliary stents were performed without cholecystectomy and then patients were discharged because of the severity of clinical conditions and advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists score (III to IV). Two months later a preoperative ERCP and removal of biliary stents were performed followed by LC 48 to 72 hours later. In Group 2, the IOC was performed in all cases and CBDS were extracted in 94 patients (87%). In two cases, the laparoscopic choledochotomy was necessary to remove large stones. In another two cases, an open choledochotomy was performed to remove safely the stones with T-tube drainage. In three cases, conversion was necessary to safely complete the procedure. The mean operative time was 95 minutes (range, 45 to 150 minutes) in Group 1 and 130 minutes (range, 50 to 300 minutes) in Group 2. The mean hospital stay was 6.5 days (range, 4 to 21 days) in Group 1 and 4.7 days (range, 3 to 14 days) in Group 2. Five cases (two in Group 2 and three in Group 1) presented with CBDS at 12 to 18 months after surgery. They were treated successfully with a second ERCP. There was no perioperative mortality. Our experience suggests that when clinically and technically feasible, a single-stage approach combining LC, IOC, and ERCP to the patients diagnosed with chole-choledocholithiasis is indicated. The IO-ERCP with CBDS extraction is a safe and effective method with low risk of postoperative pancreatitis. One-step treatment is more comfortable for the patient and also reduces the mean hospital stay.

scholarly journals Various Techniques for the Surgical Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta Review

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Shojaiefard ◽  
Majid Esmaeilzadeh ◽  
Ali Ghafouri ◽  
Arianeb Mehrabi
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Biliary Sphincterotomy ◽  
Meta Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Common bile duct stones (CBDSs) may occur in up to 3%–14.7% of all patients for whom cholecystectomy is preformed. Patients presenting with CBDS have symptoms including: biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or may be asymptomatic. It is important to distinguish between primary and secondary stones, because the treatment approach varies. Stones found before, during, and after cholecystectomy had also differing treatments. Different methods have been used for the treatment of CBDS but the suitable therapy depends on conditions such as patient' satisfaction, number and size of stones, and the surgeons experience in laparoscopy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration (transcystic or transcholedochal), or laparotomy with CBD exploration (by T-tube, C-tube insertion, or primary closure) are the most commonly used methods managing CBDS. We will review the pathophysiology of CBDS, diagnosis, and different techniques of treatment with especial focus on the various surgical modalities.

scholarly journals Dilation of the Cystic Duct Confluence in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and stone extraction for Patients with Secondary Choledocholithiasis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Bin Yang ◽  
An-Shu Xu ◽  
Jian-Gang Li ◽  
Yong-Ping Xu ◽  
De-Song Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Cystic Duct ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Stone Extraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Abstract Objectives: Many options exist in the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis. Among them, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with the choledocotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy has gained popularity. However, efforts should be made for minimally invasive or non-invasive to the common bile duct (CBD). For this purpose, we modified the surgical modality of laparoscopic transcystic approach by dilating the cystic duct confluence in CBD exploration (LTD-CBDE). Based on our preliminary experience, the aim of this work was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectivity of LTD-CBDE.Patients and methods: Sixty-eight patients were arbitrarily offered new LTD-CBDE technique from December 2015 to April 2018. During the surgery, we dilated the cystic duct confluence with separation forceps and/or the columnar dilation balloon. Subsequently, the CBD exploration and stone extraction were performed with choledochoscope. The entrance of CBD was covered with cystic duct stump wall and primarily closed at the end of surgery.Results: 49 females and 19 males with cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis were included. The mean age was 53 years old (18 to 72 yr). Of which, 62 cases (91.2%) were performed with LTD-CBDE techniques successfully, bile leakage was observed in 3 cases (4.4%). The mean operation time was 106 minutes and the mean hospital stay was 5.9 days. As for the other 6 patients, 3 cases were converted to open cholecystectomy due to severe fibrosis, unclear anatomical structure at the Calot’s triangle (n=2) and Mirizze syndrome (n=1); LCBDE were performed in 3 patients due to cystic duct atresia (n=2) and low level of the gallbladder duct into CBD (n=1). These patients had smooth postoperative course. None of the patients presented radiological evidence of retained CBD stone on the postoperative follow-up in 43/68 (40 cases used LTD-CBDE) patients one year later.Conclusion: The current work suggests that LTD-CBDE for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis is a feasible, safe and effective technique with a low rate of complications. It offers another alternative for surgeons to treat patients in similar scenarios. However, additional randomized, controlled study is further needed to demonstrate its efficacy, safety, and impact on CBD stenosis.

scholarly journals Dilation of the Cystic Duct Confluence in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Stone Extraction in Patients with Secondary Choledocholithiasis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Bin Yang ◽  
An-Shu Xu ◽  
Jian-Gang Li ◽  
Yong-Ping Xu ◽  
De-Song Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Cystic Duct ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Stone Extraction ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Abstract Background: Many options exist for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis. Among them, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with choledocotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy has gained popularity. However, efforts should be made to ensure minimally invasive or noninvasive management of the common bile duct (CBD). For this purpose, we modified the surgical modality, exploring the use of laparoscopic transcystic dilation of the cystic duct confluence in CBD exploration (LTD-CBDE). Based on our preliminary experience, we can use this technique to resolve patients with secondary common bile duct stones, and the effect is better than placing T tubes.Methods: Sixty-eight patients were randomly offered the new LTD-CBDE technique from December 2015 to April 2018. During the surgery, we dilated the cystic duct confluence with separation forceps and/or a columnar dilation balloon. Subsequently, CBD exploration and stone extraction were performed with a choledochoscope. The entrance of the CBD was covered with a cystic duct stump wall and was subjected to primary closure at the end of surgery.Results: Forty-nine females and 19 males with cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis were included. The mean age was 53 years old (18 to 72 year). Of these patients, 62 (91.2%) were successfully treated with the LTD-CBDE technique, and bile leakage was observed in 3 patients (4.4%). The mean operation time was 106 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 5.9 days. Among the other 6 patients, 3 were converted to open cholecystectomy due to severe fibrosis, unclear anatomical structure at Calot’s triangle (n=2) or Mirizze syndrome (n=1); LCBDE was performed in 3 patients due to cystic duct atresia (n=2) and low level of flow from the gallbladder duct into the CBD (n=1). These patients had a smooth postoperative course. In total, 43/68 of the patients presented no radiological evidence of retained CBD stones at the postoperative follow-up (40 patients treated with LTD-CBDE) one year later.Conclusions: The current work suggests that LTD-CBDE for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis is a feasible, safe and effective technique with a low complication rate. LTD-CBDE offers another alternative for surgeons to treat patients in similar scenarios. However, additional randomized, controlled studies are needed to demonstrate its efficacy, safety, and impact on CBD stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document