scholarly journals P-P37 Robot assisted pancreaticojejunostomy may be associated with lower risk of post-operative pancreatic fistula in high-risk cases: Initial experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexia Farrugia ◽  
Qazi Rahim Muhammad ◽  
Omar Jalil ◽  
Majid Ali ◽  
Gabriele Marangoni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Robot assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy has increased in popularity over recent years. There is evidence from high volume centers which suggests that it is associated with lower risk of post-operative pancreatic fistula than open surgery. The aims of this study were to evaluate our initial experience after robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and compare if a low volume center can produce similar positive outcomes. Methods The initial 12 patients who were listed for a robot assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in the study in a consecutive manner. A standardised method of anastomosis was used in all surgeries, this being a duct-to-mucosa two-layer modified Blumgart pancreato-jejunostomy. Data was collected prospectively and stored in an encrypted database. Surgical outcomes were then analysed. Results The study included first 12 consecutive patients who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy between August 2019 and January 2020. None of the patients had clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula despite 75% of the patients falling into moderate to high-risk group for fistula development. Median operative time and length of stay was 547 minutes and 8 days respectively with three  Clavien Dindo grade III complications and three Clavien-Dindo grade II complications. Conclusions Robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy maybe associated with lower risk of post-operative pancreatic fistula in high-risk cases.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2181
Author(s):  
Marco V. Marino ◽  
Adrian Kah Heng Heng Chiow ◽  
Antonello Mirabella ◽  
Gianpaolo Vaccarella ◽  
Andrzej L. Komorowski

Background: Different techniques of pancreatic anastomosis have been described, with inconclusive results in terms of pancreatic fistula reduction. Studies comparing robotic pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) are scarcely reported. Methods: The present study analyzes the outcomes of two case-matched groups of patients who underwent PG (n = 20) or PJ (n = 40) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary aim was to compare the rate of post-operative pancreatic fistula. Results: Operative time (375 vs. 315 min, p = 0.34), estimated blood loss (270 vs. 295 mL, p = 0.44), and rate of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (12.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.82) were similar between the two groups. PJ was associated with a higher rate of intra-abdominal collections (7.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), but lower post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (2.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.003). PG was associated with a lower rate of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (33.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.003) in the high-risk group of patients. Conclusions: The outcomes of post-operative pancreatic fistula are comparable between the two reconstruction techniques. PG may have a lower incidence of POPF in patients with high-risk of pancreatic fistula.


2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 559-563
Author(s):  
Seungmin Lee ◽  
Kwang Yeol Paik

Background The aim of this study is to examine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the better reconstructive method to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the fistula risk. Methods An institutional database was reviewed for patients undergoing PD between January 2008 and August 2019. A total of 159 patients were stratified into 4 groups according to the Clinical Risk Score-Pancreatic Fistula. POPF according to 4 risk groups was compared between PJ and PG. Results Of the 159 patients, 82 underwent PG (51.6%) and 77 underwent PJ (48.4%) reconstruction. POPF rate was 17.1% (n = 14) in the PG group and 12.9% (n = 10) in the PJ group (P = 0.51). POPF rates were not different in intermediate, low, and negligible risks between 2 reconstructive methods. In the high-risk group (n = 47), there were 4 POPFs (22.2%) in PJ group and 9 (31.0%) in the PG group, respectively (P = 0.74). Conclusion In PD, there was no superior method of reconstruction with regard to POPF, even in high-risk glands.


TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. e59-e65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Concetta Lipardi ◽  
Jianfeng Xu ◽  
Colleen Peluso ◽  
Theodore E. Spiro ◽  
...  

AbstractAn individualized approach to identify acutely ill medical patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a low risk of bleeding to optimize the benefit and risk of extended thromboprophylaxis (ET) is needed. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE risk score has undergone extensive external validation in medically ill patients for in-hospital use and a modified model was used in the MARINER trial of ET also incorporating an elevated D-dimer. The MAGELLAN study demonstrated efficacy with rivaroxaban but had excess bleeding. This retrospective analysis investigated whether the modified IMPROVE VTE model with an elevated D-dimer could identify a high VTE risk subgroup of patients for ET from a subpopulation of the MAGELLAN study, which was previously identified as having a lower risk of bleeding. We incorporated the modified IMPROVE VTE score using a cutoff score of 4 or more or 2 and 3 with an elevated D-dimer (>2 times the upper limit of normal) to the MAGELLAN subpopulation. In total, 56% of the patients met the high-risk criteria. In the placebo group, the total VTE event rate at Day 35 was 7.94% in the high-risk group and 2.83% for patients in the lower-risk group. A reduction in VTE was observed with rivaroxaban in the high-risk group (relative risk [RR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51–0.91, p = 0.008) and in the lower-risk group (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40 -1.20, p = 0.187). The modified IMPROVE VTE score with an elevated D-dimer identified a nearly threefold higher VTE risk subpopulation of patients where a significant benefit exists for ET using rivaroxaban.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3138-3138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Dicker ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
Claudia Haferlach

Abstract Metaphase cytogenetics have recently defined important prognostic subgroups in CLL. In addition to the poor prognosis FISH markers del(17p) and del(11q), the presence of translocations and a complex aberrant karyotype, defined by chromosome banding analyses, have been associated with shorter overall survival in a retrospective analysis. Thus far, a complex aberrant karyotype is defined by a number of three or more chromosomal aberrations, therefore, we aimed at characterizing an unselected CLL cohort of 92 patients with complex aberrant karyotype in more detail with molecular genetic, cytogenetic, and immunophenotypic parameters. Median age at diagnosis was 62.5 years (range: 33.4–83.3 years), the male/female ratio was 2.8. An unmutated IgVH status (<= 2% mutations) was detected in 51 (60.7%) of 84 analyzed samples. A positive CD38 expression (>= 30% CD38 positive cells) was detected in 55 (64%) of 86 samples and TP53 gene mutations by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography of exons 4–9 of TP53 in 29 (36.7%) of 79 samples. As the main approach for prognostication in CLL uses FISH for del(17p), del(11q), +12, del(13q) sole and normal, we related our cohort with complex aberrant karyotype into these different FISH categories. The poor prognosis markers del(17p) and del(11q) were detected with frequencies of 39.1% (n=36) and 22.8% (n=21), respectively, accounting for almost two third of all samples (n=57, 61.9%). An overlap between del(17p) and del(11q) was detected in 5 of the 36 del(17p) cases. The intermediate risk FISH marker +12 and low risk FISH markers del(13q) as sole abnormality and “normal karyotype” appeared with an incidence of 8.7% (n=8), 21.7% (n=20) and 7.6% (n=7), respectively. The high incidence of del(11q) and del(17p) in complex karyotype seems likely, as genes implicated in sensing DNA damage and in regulating apoptosis, ATM and TP53, are candidate genes in these deleted regions. As TP53 mutations have been suggested as independent poor prognostic markers, we also added TP53 gene mutation analysis to the FISH stratification. Del(17p) was associated with TP53 mutation in 26 (86.7%) of 30 analyzed cases, whereas the three residual TP53 mutations were associated with del(11q) (n=1) and del(13q) as sole abnormality (n=2). Therefore, we chose to merge samples with high risk features within the complex karyotype into one group (n=59), i.e., samples with del(17p), del(11q) or TP53 mutation, and compared these samples to the remaining samples (n=33). Effectively, the high risk group compared to the other cohort was significantly associated with an unmutated IgVH (p=0.02, Fisher’s exact test) and with an increased, median amount of cytogenetic aberrations (4.9 vs. 3.7 aberrations, p=0.005, t-test). However, no significant difference between the two groups regarding a CD38 positive status was detected (p=0.257). The prognostic impact of high risk features (del(17p), del(11q) and TP53 mutation) within the group defined above vs the lower risk group was analyzed with log-rank statistics with respect to time from diagnosis of CLL to initial treatment (TTT). 34 patients from the high risk group and 18 patients from the low risk group were available for analysis. The high risk features within the complex karyotype were significantly associated with a higher risk of early treatment in log-rank statistics with a median TTT of 12.2 month in the higher risk group compared to 70.1 month in the lower risk group (p=0.005). In conclusion, based on poor risk cytogenetic and molecular genetic features within the group of CLL with complex aberrant karyotype, we characterized patients with a higher risk of early treatment initiation. This group includes samples with del(17p), del(11q) and TP53 mutations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Siena ◽  
Graziano Vignolini ◽  
Andrea Mari ◽  
Vincenzo Li Marzi ◽  
Simone Caroassai ◽  
...  

Purpose. To describe our initial experience with a full robot-assisted approach for living donor nephrectomy (RALDN) and kidney transplantation (RAKT) in a dedicated twin operating room. Methods. From January to December 2017, 5 cases of RALDN and RAKT were performed in a single high-volume robotic center. All patients underwent a standard left RALDN. The renal hilum was controlled with Hem-O-Lok clips (WECK) and the kidney extracted through a Pfannenstiel incision. RAKT was performed according to the Vattikuti Urology Institute–Medanta technique. Results. RALDN: median estimated blood loss was 182 mL (range = 80-450 mL), no postoperative blood transfusion was required. The median (range) warm ischemia time was 175 (90-220 seconds). No conversion was registered. Median console time was 143 minutes (range = 115-220 minutes). No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. RAKT: all 5 patients successfully underwent RAKT. Median (range) console time was 230 (190-200) minutes, vascular suture time was 58.7 (48-73) minutes, cold ischemia time was 46.2 (30-88) minutes, and rewarming time was 61.2 (55-72) minutes. No conversion was required. No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. Mean glomerular filtration rate at days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively was 26, 42, and 57 (range = 6-90) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. No case of delayed graft function was observed. No anastomosis revision, urological complications, lymphocele, and surgical site infection occurred. Conclusions. In our experience, RALDN and RAKT are safe and effective. The intuitiveness of the robotic approach provided substantial benefits both for the living donor and recipient from the very beginning of our series. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4668-4668
Author(s):  
Enrico Balleari ◽  
Chiara Salvetti ◽  
Andrea Bacigalupo ◽  
Gianluca Forni ◽  
Marco Gobbi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a highly heterogeneous group of clonal disorders, with very different prognosis in given individuals, overall survival (OS) ranging from more than 10 years (y) for the more indolent conditions to only few months (m) for the forms approaching AML; beside of the well-established disease-related prognostic systems (classical IPSS or its revised form [IPSS-R], the prognostic implication of comorbidities is emerging as a relevant patient-related factor influencing clinical outcome. Aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of comorbidities in a series of MDS patients whatever treated in a “real-life” setting. Methods: this retrospective cohort study involved the MDS patients consecutively registered between Jan 2011 and Dec 2013 into the Registro Ligure delle Mielodisplasie database, a regional registry established within the framework of the Italian Network of regional MDS registries. Data of 318 patients (pts) with available complete assessment of comorbidities at diagnosis were included into the study. The clinical characteristics and comorbidities were all considered into the analysis. Comorbidities were evaluated according to both hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and MDS-specific comorbidity index (MDS-CI). All survival analyses were made from the date of diagnosis to last follow-up, death, or progression to AML. Unless specified, survival analyses were Cox models using continuous variables accounting for interactions. Results: Our cohort mainly consisted of older (median age 75y (range 40-98) “lower-risk” MDS pts: according to IPSS stratification, 151 (54.7%) pts were classified as low-risk, 86 (31.2%) as intermediate-1, 32 (11.6%) as intermediate-2 and 7 (2.5%) were in the high-risk group. One or more comorbidity of any grade of severity was seen in 177 (55.7%) pts at diagnosis. The more common comorbidity was cardiac (26.5%). At least a single comorbidity was present in 61.2% of pts older than 75y and in 50.6% of younger pts (p=0.07). Cardiovascular disorders were more frequent among older (32.9% for >75y vs 15.1% for ≤ 75y, p<0.001), and among males (28.7% vs 17.1% for females, p=0.02). According to HCT-CI risk stratification, 141pts (44.3%) were in the low-risk group, 94 (29.6%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 83 (26.1%) in the high-risk group, while according to MDS-CI, 197 (61.9%) pts had a low-risk score, 99 (31.1%) were intermediate, and 22 (6.9%) were in the high-risk group. MDS-CI score was higher among males (43.8% vs 30.7% for females, p=0.02). It was also higher among subjects >75 y (48% vs. 28.9% for < 75 y (p=0.001). A lower comorbidity score impacted on the clinical choice for active forms of therapy, while pts with an higher burden of comorbidities were preferentially treated with supportive care, even if difference did not reach significance (p=0.07). Overall survival and risk of non-leukemic death (NLD) were analyzed (median f.u. 26.9 m (range 1-220). HCT-CI did not significantly correlated with OS nor NLD (p= 0.1 and p= 0.07, respectively), while MDS-CI was found to be of prognostic significance both for OS (mean 136.6 (95%CI 116-157) m for the low-risk group, 81.3 (95%CI 61-102) m for the intermediate group and 48.1 (95%CI 30-66) m for the high-risk group, p=0.001) and for NLD (mean 159.6 (95%CI 139-180) m for the low-risk group, 96.5 (95%CI 72-121) m for the intermediate group and 49 (95%CI 31-67) m for the high-risk group (p<0.001). The correlation was significant (p<0.001) in IPSS or IPSS-R “lower-risk” (low and intermediate-1 risk or very-low, low and intermediate groups, respectively) but not in IPSS nor IPSS-R “higher-risk” (intermediate-2 and high or high and very-high groups, respectively) pts. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic impact of MDS-CI remained independent of baseline IPSS (p=0.01) or IPSS-R (p=0.03). Conclusions: a comprehensive evaluation of comorbidities according to a tailored tool such is MDS-CI helps to predict survival in patients with MDS and should be incorporate to current prognostic scores in order to better define clinical management of these patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ng ◽  
A Nathan ◽  
N Campain ◽  
Y Yuminaga ◽  
F Mumtaz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Horseshoe kidneys (HSK) are the most common renal fusion abnormality. However, they are only present in 0.2% of the population. Due to anatomical variation in vasculature, ectopia and malrotation, surgery has traditionally been performed via an open approach. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted surgery for HSK. Method Six patients (four female, two male) with HSKs were operated on between 2016 and 2019 across two high-volume centres by high-volume surgeons. All operations were robot-assisted, with three partial nephrectomies and one nephroureterectomy for renal masses and two benign nephrectomies for non-functioning kidneys. 3D reconstruction using CT renal angiograms was used to help identify vasculature and tumour location (where appropriate). Results The median age was 53 years (IQR 47-58.3) and the median BMI was 25 (IQR 25-25.8). Median tumour size in the four patients with renal masses was 35.5 mm (IQR 25.3-44.8). Median console time was 120 minutes (IQR 117-172.5) and the median estimated blood loss was 150 mL (IQR 112.5-262.5). The median pre-operative eGFR was 76 (IQR 70-86.5) and median post-operative eGFR was 65.5 (IQR 59.3-80.8). All operations were uneventful, there were no perioperative transfusions and no complications reported. Length of stay was two days for all patients. Conclusions We report the largest series of mixed robotic-assisted surgery on HSK. Robotic surgery is safe and feasible for HSK in high-volume centres with acceptable perioperative outcomes. Further prospective, longer-term, multi-centre studies are required to evaluative if robotic surgery for HSK is superior to open surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document