scholarly journals Screening and Enrollment by Sex in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinical Trials in the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1300-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M Smeaton ◽  
Deborah Kacanek ◽  
Kateryna Mykhalchenko ◽  
Kristine Coughlin ◽  
Karin L Klingman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Women are underrepresented in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) research in the United States. To determine if women screening for HIV clinical trials enrolled at lower rates than men, we performed a retrospective, cross-trial analysis. Methods We conducted an analysis of screening and enrollment during 2003–2013 to 31 clinical trials at 99 AIDS Clinical Trials Group network research sites in the United States. Random-effects meta regression estimated whether sex differences in not enrolling (“screen out”) varied by various individual, trial, or site characteristics. Results Of 10 744 persons screened, 18.9% were women. The percentages of women and men who screened out were 27.9% and 26.5%, respectively (P = .19); this small difference did not significantly vary by race, ethnicity, or age group. Most common reasons for screening out were not meeting eligibility criteria (30–35%) and opting out (23%), and these did not differ by sex. Trial and research site characteristics associated with variable screen-out by sex included HIV research domain and type of hemoglobin eligibility criterion, but individual associations did not persist after adjustment for multiple testing. Conclusions In the absence of evidence of significantly higher trial screen-out for women, approaching more women to screen may increase female representation in HIV trials.

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Xu ◽  
Divya A. Patel ◽  
Vanessa K. Dalton ◽  
Mark D. Pearlman ◽  
Timothy R. B. Johnson

Primary prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) continues to pose an important challenge in the United States. Recent clinical trials conducted in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda have demonstrated considerable benefit of male circumcision in reducing HIV seroincidence in males. These results have ignited debate over the appropriateness of implementing routine provision of neonatal circumcision in the United States for HIV prevention. This article discusses major contextual differences between the United States and the three African countries where the clinical trials were conducted, and cautions that the applicability of the scientific data from Africa to this country must be carefully considered before rational policy recommendations regarding routine neonatal circumcision can be made as a strategy to prevent the spread of HIV in the United States.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. S125
Author(s):  
Ashley Morgan Ebersole ◽  
Samantha J. Boch ◽  
Andrea E. Bonny ◽  
Deena J. Chisolm ◽  
Elise Berlan

Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 4520-4528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana P. Ortiz ◽  
Eric A. Engels ◽  
Graciela M. Nogueras‐González ◽  
Vivian Colón‐López ◽  
Marievelisse Soto‐Salgado ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document