PS01.062: REFLUX ASPIRATION SURGICAL OUTCOMES: DOES LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASE QUANTITATIVE AND SYMPTOMATIC PULMONARY ASPIRATION?
Abstract Background Pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate is one of the indications for anti-reflux surgery. Effectiveness of surgery in preventing pulmonary aspiration post-operatively has not been previously tested. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively populated database of patients with confirmed aspiration of gastric refluxate on scintigraphy. Patients that have undergone anti-reflux surgery between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2015 and had scintigraphy post-operatively were included. Objective data such as resolution of aspiration, degree of proximal aero-digestive contamination, surgical complications and oesophageal dysmotility as well as patient quality of life data was analysed. Results Inclusion criteria were satisfied by 39 patients (11 male and 28 female). Pulmonary aspiration was prevented in 24 out of 39 patients (61.5%) post operatively. Significant reduction of isotope contamination of upper oesophagus supine and upright (P = 0.002) and pharynx supine and upright (P = 0.027) was confirmed on scintigraphy post operatively. Severe oesophageal dysmotility was strongly associated with continued aspiration post-operatively OR 15.3 (95% CI 2.459–95.194; P = 0.02). Majority (24/31, 77%) of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgery, whilst 7/31 (23%) were dissatisfied. Pre-operative GIQLI scores were low (mean 90.5, SD 18.8), modest improvements at 6 months (mean 92.8, SD 23.9) and 12 months (mean 92.2, SD 27), were not significant (P = 0.07). Conclusion Surgery is partially effective in reversing pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate on short-term follow up. Severe oesophageal dysmotility is a predictor of inferior control of aspiration with surgery. Overall satisfaction with surgery in patients with pulmonary aspiration is inferior compared to other patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.