P141 IVOR LEWIS MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER : IMPACT OF THORACOSCOPY ON POST-OPERATIVE MORBIDITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Louis ◽  
Voron Thibault ◽  
Drubay Vincent ◽  
Messier Marguerite ◽  
Eveno Clarisse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Respiratory Complications ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hybrid Group

Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the impact of thoracoscopy versus conventional thoracotomy on postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilisation for esophageal resectable cancer. Background & Methods Esophagectomy for cancer is a complexe procedure associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity1,2, especially respiratory, despite recent improvements in perioperative cares and advances in surgical techniques. Recently, minimally invasive esophagectomy has shown a benefit in decreasing postoperative respiratory complications in 2 randomized trials comparing firstly the hybrid approach (Ivor Lewis with laparoscopy and right thoracotomy) to the open approach (MIRO trial3) and secondly the totally minimally invasive approach with cervical anastomosis (McKeown with laparoscopy and thoracospy) to the open approach (TIME trial4). Few studies have focused on comparing specifically thoracosopic(TMIE) versus conventional thoracotomy approach(HYBRID) for intra-thoracic anastomosis. We performed a single-center retrospective study, including all patients undergoing either Ivor Lewis HYBRID or TMIE in our high-volume center between 2010 and 2019. The primary endpoint was major postoperative complications within 30 days (Dindo-Clavien grade≥III). Secondary endpoints included operative parameters, postoperative morbidity and mortality within 90 days and quality of oncological resection. Results 498 patients were included, 440 underwent HYBRID and 58 TMIE. Ninety-six patients(19.3%) had major postoperative complication, 11 patients(19%) in TMIE and 85 patients(19.3%) in HYBRID. Anastomotic leak (AL) rate was significantly higher in TMIE (36.2% versus 10.8%,p<0.001). However AL in TMIE group were frequently less severe than in the HYBRID group (rate of AL type 2/3 respectively 23.8% and 50%;p=0.044). Respiratory complications were observed in 202 patients (45.9%) in the HYBRID group and in 14 patients (24.1%;p=0.002) in TMIE group, without significant difference in severe respiratory complications rate. The complete resection rate (R0 resection) (5.3% vs 3.7%) and the number of lymph nodes retrieved (25.26 vs 25.92) were comparable in both groups. Conclusion The TMIE approach is burdened with a significant AL rate, probably related to an unreached learning curve, which mitigates the benefit of this approach to respiratory complications. The technical difficulty caused by intrathoracic anastomosis, whose modalities are not well-established, remains a major concern.

PS01.197: SURVIVAL COMPARISON BETWEEN IVOR-LEWIS AND MCKEOWN MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
Jang-Ming Lee ◽  
Pei-Hsing Chen
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Both Ivor Lewis (anastomosis in the chest) and McKeown (anastomosis in the neck) esophagectomy has been used to treat patients with esophageal cancer. It is unclear in literature about the survival difference performed by these two methods. Methods A prospective randomized trial enrolling 100 patients with esophageal cancer in the middle or lower esophagus was done to compare the survival outcome treated with minimally invasive esophagectomy by Ivor Lewis and McKeown approaches. Analysis for the retrospective patient cohort (n = 253) including Ivor Lewis (n = 115) and McKeown (n = 138) MIE in the same hospital was also performed. Results There is no significant difference in the overall and disease progression-free survival duration between the two groups of patients (n = 50 for each group) (Figure 1 for overall survival). Similar results were found when the comparison was done for the retrospective and whole patients cohort. Multivariate analysis demonstrates the TNM staging of the tumor to be the single significant factor for prognosis in terms of overall and disease progression-free survival. There was no significant difference in overall and disease progression- free survival between the patients with Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE both in prospective and retrospective study cohort. Conclusion Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE provide a similar survival results for the patients with esophageal cancer in the middle and lower thoracic esophagus. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Among Esophageal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482097401
Author(s):  
LaiTe Chen ◽  
BinBin Li ◽  
ChenYang Jiang ◽  
GuoSheng Fu
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Aims: Postoperative Atrial fibrillation (POAF) after esophagectomy may prolong stay in intensive care and increase risk of perioperative complications. A minimally invasive approach is becoming the preferred option for esophagectomy, yet its implications for POAF risk remains unclear. The association between POAF and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was examined in this study. Methods: We used a dataset of 575 patients who underwent esophagectomy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between MIE and POAF. A cox proportional hazards model was applied to assess the long-term mortality (MIE vs open esophagectomy, OE). Results: Of the 575 patients with esophageal cancer, 62 developed POAF. MIE was negatively associated with the occurrence of POAF (Odds ratio: 0.163, 95%CI: 0.033-0.801). No significant difference was observed in long-term mortality (Odds ratio: 2.144, 95%CI: 0.963-4.775). Conclusions: MIE may reduced the incidence of POAF without compromising the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Moreover, the specific mechanism of MIE providing this possible advantage needs to be determined by larger prospective cohort studies with specific biomarker information from laboratory tests.

Learning Curve to Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankit Dhamija ◽  
Joshua E. Rosen ◽  
Anish Dhamija ◽  
Bonnie E. Gould Rothberg ◽  
Anthony W. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Nodal Yield ◽  
The Impact

Objective Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a safe alternative to open approaches, yet the impact of the minimally invasive approach on oncologic efficacy is unclear. The objectives of the current study were to compare lymph node yields and surgical margins during a single-surgeon series to examine the learning curve to oncologic aspects of MIE. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional database was performed. The sequential MIE experience for esophageal cancer was subcategorized into terciles (first 25 MIEs as early, next 24 as middle, and most recent 24 as later). Results Seventy-three patients underwent MIE for cancer between 2008 and 2013. Complete resections (R0) were performed in 71 cases (93%), and there were no significant differences in the number of complete resections with negative margins during the MIE experience ( P = 0.54). The number of lymph nodes harvested during MIE increased significantly with progressive experience, with a mean of 22, 29, and 28 nodes recovered in the early, middle, and late subgroups, respectively ( P = 0.038). On multivariate analysis, only increasing surgeon experience (1.4-fold increase in nodal yield for the latter two thirds relative to the first third, P = 0.0011) and histology of high-grade dysplasia (0.54-fold decrease in nodal yield relative to adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, P = 0.025) were significant predictors of lymph node yield. Conclusions The ability to execute a complete lymphadenectomy during MIE is affected by surgeon experience and improves over time, plateauing after the first 25 cases.

The Comparisons of Three Stapler Placement Methods for Intrathoracic Mechanistic Circular Stapling in Ivor Lewis Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Zi xiang Wu ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Sai Bo Pan ◽  
Lian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Esophageal Reconstruction ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Anastomotic Complications ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives: To analyze the impact of the reversal penetrating technique (RPT) for intrathoracic gastroesophageal mechanical anastomosis on the development of anastomotic complications in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (ILMIE) and further identify the risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage and stricture.Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using clinical data of 316 patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) who underwent ILMIE from January 2012 to December 2019. The participants were divided into three groups of RPT, transoral Orvil technique (TOT), or purse-string technique (PST) according to the different stapler placenent methods for intrathoracic mechanistic circular stapling. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the association of risk factors with anastomotic leakage and stricture.Results: There were 154 patients with RPT, 78 with TOT and 84 with PST intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling in ILMIE. There was no differences in intraoperative anastomosis related conditions inclouding conversion of open operations, ways of esophageal reconstruction, lymph nodes harvested between the three groups. Whereas, The mean total operative time, and gastroesophageal anastomosis time in the RPT group were significantly shorter than those in other groups (both p<0.05). The rates of anastomotic leakage and stricture showed no statistical differences between three groups, respectively (Leakage: p=0.941; Stricture: p=0.942). Multivariate analysis revealed that the PRT method of the anvil placement does not increase the probability of anastomotic leakage (PRT: reference; TOT: odds ratio(OR) 2.845, P=0.255; PST: OR 2.234, p=0.242) and stricture (PRT: reference; TOT: OR 1.976, P=0.556; PST: OR 1.872, p=0.284).Conclusions: The PRT method of the anvil placement for intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling does not increase the risk of anastomotic complications in ILMIE, but had significantly shorter surgical time and anastomosis time.

scholarly journals European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yassin Eddahchouri ◽  
◽  
Frans van Workum ◽  
Frits J. H. van den Wildenberg ◽  
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Delphi Methodology ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
European Consensus ◽  
Mckeown Esophagectomy

Abstract Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex and technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To master MIE, training in essential steps is crucial. Yet, no consensus on essential steps of MIE is available. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on essential steps in Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE through Delphi methodology. Methods Based on expert opinion and peer-reviewed literature, essential steps were defined for Ivor Lewis (IL) and McKeown (McK) MIE. In a round table discussion, experts finalized the lists of steps and an online Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international expert panel (7 European countries) of minimally invasive upper GI surgeons. Based on replies and comments, steps were adjusted and rephrased and sent in iterative fashion until consensus was achieved. Results Two Delphi rounds were conducted and response rates were 74% (23 out of 31 experts) for the first and 81% (27 out of 33 experts) for the second round. Consensus was achieved on 106 essential steps for both the IL and McK approach. Cronbach’s alpha in the first round was 0.78 (IL) and 0.78 (McK) and in the second round 0.92 (IL) and 0.88 (McK). Conclusions Consensus among European experts was achieved on essential surgical steps for both Ivor Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 513-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alongkorn Yanasoot ◽  
Kamtorn Yolsuriyanwong ◽  
Sakchai Ruangsin ◽  
Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol ◽  
Somkiat Sunpaweravong
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy

Background A minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy is being used increasingly, but concerns remain regarding the feasibility, safety, cost, and outcomes. We performed an analysis of the costs and benefits of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open esophagectomy approaches for esophageal cancer surgery. Methods The data of 83 consecutive patients who underwent a McKeown’s esophagectomy at Prince of Songkla University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2014 were analyzed. Open esophagectomy was performed in 54 patients, minimally invasive esophagectomy in 13, and hybrid esophagectomy in 16. There were no differences in patient characteristics among the 3 groups Minimally invasive esophagectomy was undertaken via a thoracoscopic-laparoscopic approach, hybrid esophagectomy via a thoracoscopic-laparotomy approach, and open esophagectomy by a thoracotomy-laparotomy approach. Results Minimally invasive esophagectomy required a longer operative time than hybrid or open esophagectomy ( p = 0.02), but these patients reported less postoperative pain ( p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in blood loss, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, or postoperative complications among the 3 groups. Minimally invasive esophagectomy incurred higher operative and surgical material costs than hybrid or open esophagectomy ( p = 0.01), but there were no significant differences in inpatient care and total hospital costs. Conclusion Minimally invasive esophagectomy resulted in the least postoperative pain but the greatest operative cost and longest operative time. Open esophagectomy was associated with the lowest operative cost and shortest operative time but the most postoperative pain. Hybrid esophagectomy had a shorter learning curve while sharing the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Impact of nasogastric decompression on gastric tube size after McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy: A retrospective controlled cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duo Jiang ◽  
Xian-Ben Liu ◽  
Wen-Qun Xing ◽  
Pei-Nan Chen ◽  
Shao-Kang Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Tube Size ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nasogastric Decompression

Abstract Purpose: This retrospective study evaluated the impact of nasogastric decompression (NGD) on gastric tube size to optimize the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol after McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Methods: Overall, 640 patients were divided into two groups according to nasogastric tube (NGT) placement intraoperatively. Using propensity score matching, 203 pairs of individuals were identified for gastric tube size comparisons on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 5. Results: Gastric tubes were larger in the non-NGD group than the NGD group on POD 1 (vertical distance from the right edge of the gastric tube to the right edge of the thoracic vertebra, 22.2 [0–34.7] vs. 0 [0–22.5] mm, p <0.001). No difference was noted between the groups on POD 5 (18.5 [0–31.7] vs. 18.0 [0–25.4] mm, p =0.070). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that non-NGD was an independent risk factor for gastric tube distention on POD 1. No difference in the incidence of complications (Clavien–Dindo（CD）≥2) (40 (23.0%) vs. 46 (19,8%), p =0.440), pneumonia (CD≥2) (29 [16.8%] vs. 30 [12.9%], p =0.280) or anastomotic leakage (CD≥3) (3 [1.7%] vs. 6 [2.6%], p =0.738) were noted between the without gastric tube distention group and with gastric tube distention group. Conclusion: Intraoperative NGT placement reduces gastric tube distention rates after McKeown MIE on POD 1, but the complications are similar to those of unconventional NGT placement. This finding is based on NGT placement or replacement at the appropriate time postoperatively through bedside chest X-ray examination.

scholarly journals Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor-Lewis approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Kelsey Musgrove ◽  
Charlotte R. Spear ◽  
Jahnavi Kakuturu ◽  
Britney R. Harris ◽  
Fazil Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in the prone versus lateral decubitus position: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Schizas ◽  
Dimitrios Papaconstantinou ◽  
Anastasia Krompa ◽  
Antonios Athanasiou ◽  
Tania Triantafyllou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Respiratory Complications ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Postoperative Respiratory Complications ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

Abstract The thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy was initially performed in the lateral decubitus position (LDP); however, many experts have gradually transitioned to a prone position (PP) approach. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to quantitatively compare the two approaches. A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was undertaken for studies comparing outcomes between patients undergoing minimally invasive esophageal surgery in the PP versus the LDP. In total, 15 studies with 1454 patients (PP; n = 710 vs. LDP; n = 744) were included. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the PP provides statistically significant reduction in postoperative respiratory complications (Risk ratios 0.5, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.34–0.76, P &lt; 0.001), blood loss (weighted mean differences [WMD] –108.97, 95% CI –166.35 to −51.59 mL, P &lt; 0.001), ICU stay (WMD –0.96, 95% CI –1.7 to −0.21 days, P = 0.01) and total hospital stay (WMD –2.96, 95% CI –5.14 to −0.78 days, P = 0.008). In addition, prone positioning increases the overall yield of chest lymph node dissection (WMD 2.94, 95% CI 1.54–4.34 lymph nodes, P &lt; 0.001). No statistically significant difference in regards to anastomotic leak rate, mortality and 5-year overall survival was encountered. Subgroup analysis revealed that the protective effect of prone positioning against pulmonary complications was more pronounced for patients undergoing single-lumen tracheal intubation. A head to head comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone versus the LDP reveals superiority of the former method, with emphasis on the reduction of postoperative respiratory complications and reduced length of hospitalization. Long-term oncologic outcomes appear equivalent, although validation through prospective studies and randomized controlled trials is still necessary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document