scholarly journals P708 Home-based infusion therapy for biologic agent administration as a therapeutic option for patients with inflammatory bowel disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S469-S469
Author(s):  
M Madden ◽  
S S R Pulusu ◽  
I Lawrance
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S58-S59
Author(s):  
Megan Zangara ◽  
Natalie Bhesania ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Gail Cresci ◽  
Jacob Kurowski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dietary modification shows promise as therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, it is unknown whether adolescents are interested in a dietary approach. Methods Cross-sectional survey of adolescents with IBD ages 14–21 on disease knowledge, dietary habits, and perceptions of diet therapy. Results A total of 132 subjects (48.5% female), mean age of 17.8 years and median disease length of 5 years (range 0, 16), completed the survey. Diet was perceived as a symptom trigger by 59.8% of subjects, and 45.4% had tried using diet as a treatment for symptom resolution, often without physician supervision and with limited success. Overall, subjects reported following a diet significantly more often than documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) by the physician (25.0% vs. 15.0%, p=0.033), with 72% agreement between subject response and EMR documentation on current status of diet modification (AC1=0.59, CI=0.45, 0.73). Subjects experiencing active disease symptoms as determined by Manitoba IBD Index were more likely to be currently modifying their diet compared to subjects without active disease symptoms (OR = 4.11, CI=1.58, 10.73, p=0.003). The subjects reporting unsuccessful dietary modification compliancy (25.7%, n=34) most commonly cited perceived lack of improvement in their IBD symptoms as the primary reason for stopping the diet (48.4%, n=15). Conclusions Adolescents with IBD perceive a relationship between diet and disease symptoms and are interested in dietary modification as a symptom management option. Our study suggests that a large proportion of adolescent IBD patients may already be attempting dietary modification, and therefore would be receptive to a modified dietary plan under the guidance of their gastroenterologist and dietitian. Much is still unknown about how dietary modification will fit in with current treatment regimens, but patient interest informs us that it is necessary to continue development and research of this promising therapeutic option.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S583-S584
Author(s):  
D Chopra ◽  
E Kennedy ◽  
A V Weizman ◽  
A Tennakoon ◽  
L E Targownik

Abstract Background Despite advances in medical therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), surgery is required in 50–80% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 20–30% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Given that fibrostenotic disease may be playing a primary role in patients undergoing resective surgery, practices around biologic administration in this setting need to be clarified. We aimed to describe the pre-operative trends in biologic utilisation for IBD patients undergoing resective surgery. Methods The University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database was used to identify all persons with IBD who underwent resective surgery between April 2005 and 2018. Demographic data were extracted to explore the baseline characteristics of persons on biologic therapy prior to IBD resective surgery. Proportion calculations were used to assess how often a new biologic agent was initiated within 3, 6, and 12 months prior to resective surgery. Results were stratified by type of IBD (UC vs. CD) and disease duration (<3 or ≥3 years) for incident cases. Results A total of 1412 IBD-related resective surgeries were identified from April 2005 to 2018. 67.1% of resective surgeries were performed for CD and 32.9% for UC. Results of analysis are presented below: Conclusion Overall, in Manitoba, rates of biologic initiation or re-start in the pre-operative period for IBD resective surgery are relatively small. Biologic therapy was initiated or re-started more frequently for CD than UC, and when disease duration was less than 3 years. This is reassuring and suggests that physicians are rarely choosing to initiate biologic therapy in futile situations. Work should be performed to see if these findings can be replicated in other practice settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1742-1749.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Heida ◽  
Mariska Knol ◽  
Anneke Muller Kobold ◽  
Josette Bootsman ◽  
Gerard Dijkstra ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S470-S471
Author(s):  
A Viola ◽  
M A Barbieri ◽  
V Pisana ◽  
P M Cutroneo ◽  
W Fries ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Biological therapies are now the mainstay for the treatment of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Post-marketing activities become crucial for monitoring the long-term safety. Aim of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety profile of biologics for the treatment of IBD patients during a prospective pharmacovigilance study. Methods From January 2017 to December 2020, all patients with Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treated with at least one biologic agent at the start of the study or commenced a biologic during the study period were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, and disease-related data were collected. A descriptive analysis of patients’ characteristics at the index date was performed. Moreover, an analysis of all adverse events (AEs) and all primary/secondary failures expressed as number of AEs or failures/10 treatment years was carried out taking into account the total years of treatment for each biologic including all patients treated with a biologic at least once during the follow-up period. Results A total of 654 patients were enrolled, 58.4% with CD and 41.6% with UC. Mean age (±SD) was 44 ± 17 years and 59.0% were males. At the index date, the following treatments were used: 40.8% adalimumab (ADA), 33.3% infliximab (IFX), 21.3% vedolizumab (VED), 2.4% ustekinumab (UST), and 2.1% golimumab (GOL). Patients naïve for biologic therapy were 79.1%. The total years of treatment were 887 yrs for ADA, 663 yrs for IFX, 309 yrs for VED, 89 yrs for UST, and 51 yrs for GOL. Data for AEs and failures were the following: IFX – 1.1 AEs and 0.8 failures, ADA – 0.8 and 0.9, VED – 1.1 and 1.8, GOL – 1.2 and 3.4, and UST - 1.4 and 0.9, respectively (Tab.1). During follow-up, 196 AEs were reported. Infections mainly occurred in patients treated with GOL and ADA (8.7% and 7.6%, respectively), skin reactions in patients treated with ADA (7.6%), while infusion related reactions with IFX (12.6%). A higher frequency of malignancies was observed in patients on treatment with VED (3.4%). Conclusion There were no major differences for AEs between the different treatments, but a higher frequency of failures with GOL and VED, both rarely used as first line therapies. Nevertheless, the acquisition of data from clinical practice should be endorsed to better define the safety and efficacy profile of new biologic agents in IBD.


1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. C. Meijssen

Cyclosporine is an effective drug in acute exacerbations of corticosteroid resistant ulcerative colitis, but its efficacy to maintain disease remission is not clear. Cyclosporine may not be as effective in Crohn's disease. However, being a rapidly acting immunosuppressant, cyclosporine may be a valuable therapeutic option in the short-term to treat corticosteroid resistant Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S517-S518
Author(s):  
N Mc Gettigan ◽  
E Leung ◽  
A Harhen ◽  
E Anderson ◽  
S McMahon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Switching between therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is common and a paucity of data exists regarding the optimal switching strategy. A number of new drug therapies have recently emerged for the treatment of IBD. Failure of biologic and small molecule therapies occur regularly, prompting the need for a treatment switch. Our aim is to review trends amongst our patients who switched biologic/small molecule therapy to identify high risk characteristics and to look for predictor variables which may reduce the need to switch in the future. Methods This is a 4 year retrospective observational study of IBD patients who underwent a therapy switch. Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained IBD database of 141 patients. Patient demographics, treatment history, disease history, biomarkers (within 3 months of switch) and endoscopy results were reviewed. Minitab17 was used for statistical analysis. Results Switching of biologic therapy was observed in 39 patients (28%); 21 (54%) were male; mean age was 42.8Y. Of these, 21 (53.9%) had Crohn’s disease (CD), 17 (44%) had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 1 patient had indeterminate colitis. Mean disease duration at time of switch was 78 months. 82% (n=14/17) of UC patients had pancolitis. 43% (n=9/21) of CD patients had a previous intestinal resection. The most common initial therapy was Adalimumab 46% (n=18) (Fig1) with the most common switch to IFX 36% (n=14) (Fig2). Primary LOR occurred in 28% (n=11) and secondary LOR in 44% (n=17), the remainder switched due to infusion reaction/adverse effects (n=10) and clinical remission (n=1). Mean CRP was 13.68 (95% CI: 7.28, 20.09), mean FCP was 874 (95% CI: 418, 1329), mean mayo score was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.37, 2.39), mean SES CD score was 5.79 (95% CI: 3.24, 8.33). Median IFX level was 0.8ug/ml (IQR 0.4, 9.7), 37.5% (n=6/16) of the patients on IFX developed ADAs to IFX. Median Adalimumab level was 5.2ug/ml (IQR 1.4, 13.5) and 11% (n=2/18) developed ADAs to Adalimumab. A significant negative correlation was found between FCP and IFX level using Spearman rank correlation -0.822, p = 0.01. 39% (n=15) were on an immunomodulator, no significant association was found between immunomodulator therapy and primary/secondary LOR, p= 0.67 and p= 0.63. 28% (n=11) were admitted with an IBD flare in the 1st year post switch and 13% (n=5) underwent intestinal resection. 8 (21%) subsequently switched to a 3rd biologic agent. Conclusion The most common therapy switch was within Anti-TNF drug class, mean CRP and FCP were raised at the time of switch and a significant number of patients were admitted in the year post switch with an IBD flare. Pancolitis in UC and previous intestinal surgery in CD were common characteristics of those who switched.


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Ping Liu ◽  
Yixuan Li ◽  
Ran Wang ◽  
Fazheng Ren ◽  
Xiaoyu Wang

Oxidative stress, caused by the accumulation of reactive species, is associated with the initiation and progress of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The investigation of antioxidants to target overexpressed reactive species and modulate oxidant stress pathways becomes an important therapeutic option. Nowadays, antioxidative nanotechnology has emerged as a novel strategy. The nanocarriers have shown many advantages in comparison with conventional antioxidants, owing to their on-site accumulation, stability of antioxidants, and most importantly, intrinsic multiple reactive species scavenging or catalyzing properties. This review concludes an up-to-date summary of IBD nanomedicines according to the classification of the delivered antioxidants. Moreover, the concerns and future perspectives in this study field are also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S546-S547
Author(s):  
J S Lasa ◽  
A Sambuelli ◽  
I Zubiaurre ◽  
G J Correa ◽  
P Lubrano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Evidence on the adoption of different pharmacologic strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the real-world setting in Latin America is scarce. Herein, we describe the clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategies of IBD patients (pts) in Argentina. Methods RISE AR (NCT03488030) was a multicentre, non-interventional study with a cross-sectional evaluation and a 3-year retrospective data collection period conducted in Argentina (12/2018-05/2019) to assess the use of IBD treatments. Adult pts (≥18 years old) with a previous diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn′s disease (CD) based on clinical, endoscopic or imaging criteria at least 6 months prior to enrolment, were included. Results Overall, 101 CD and 145 UC pts were included. Median (range) age (years) at enrolment was 39.5 (18.2–74.0) for CD (51.2% female) and 41.9 (18.0–80.4) for UC (55.2% female); median (range) disease duration (years) was 7.4 (0.6–36.9) for CD and 5 (0.7–33.8) for UC. At enrolment, 51.5% of CD pts had colonic involvement, 32.7% ileocolonic, 8.9% ileal, 1% isolated upper tract and 5.9% had combined L4/other. In UC, 46.2% had extensive colitis, 44.7% left-sided colitis and proctitis 9.1%. 51.6% of CD pts had non-inflammatory behaviour (37.7% stricturing; 13.9% penetrating), and 34% had perianal disease (13.9% as B1p), resulting in a total of 65.5% pts with complicated disease. Only 9.3% of CD (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≥8) and 7.7% of UC (partial Mayo Score ≥5) pts showed moderate-to-severe disease activity at enrolment. In CD, 70.3% of pts were receiving a biologic agent vs. 29.7% of UC pts. Immunosuppressant (IMM) use was similar between groups (CD 39.6%, UC 40.0%); nearly one-third of the pts on a biologic were receiving concomitant IMM (CD 33.8%, UC 34.9%). Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) were used for most UC pts (89.0%) vs. 47.5% of CD pts, mainly in those with L2 disease. 5-ASA monotherapy was prescribed in 32.1% of UC vs. 5.3% of CD pts, but were also used with IMM (UC 25%, CD 11%), biologics (UC 15%, CD 11.6%) or all three therapies combined (UC 6.4%, CD 17.9%). Corticosteroids (CS) were the least prescribed therapy (CD 7.9%, UC 13.8%). IBD treatments ever prescribed during the retrospective period were (CD, UC): biologics: 79.2%, 33.8%; IMM: 65.3%, 58.6%; 5-ASA: 62.4%, 97.9%; CS: 55.4%, 69.7%. Conclusion In this cohort of IBD patients, biologics use was high, especially among CD patients, in line with disease behaviour, and possibly by their increased availability in these reference centres. This study also highlights country-specific clinical features such as the low proportion of CD pts and the high prevalence of colonic involvement in CD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document