scholarly journals P672 The escalation of therapy or intervention (ETI) calculator for ulcerative colitis: does it have the potential to help outpatient capacity meet demand?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S550-S551
Author(s):  
A J Walsh ◽  
L Matini ◽  
R Kantschuster ◽  
M Lepetyukh ◽  
D Simadibrata ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Demand for outpatient clinic appointments for ulcerative colitis (UC) often exceeds capacity, since spaces are frequently assigned to routine follow-up of patients who are well. Demand might better be managed by targeting appointments for patients in need of therapeutic decisions. The TrueColours UC (TCUC) Escalation of Therapy or Intervention (ETI) calculator is a potential enabling tool. Methods TCUC is a web-based programme based on email prompts linked to validated, disease-specific indices. The ETI Calculator was created after logistic regression showed that patient-reported symptoms (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index) and quality of life (IBD Control-8) could calculate the probability of therapy escalation or an urgent intervention during an outpatient appointment (OPA, Figure 1). From June 2018 to August 2019, all OPA for 650 patients using TCUC and under standard OPA follow-up were examined. The probability of escalation at each OPA was calculated using the most recent prior SCCAI and IBD-Control scores (within 2 weeks of appointment). Clinic letters were assessed to determine whether treatment escalation or intervention had occurred during the OPA. Results Of 650 patients, 236 had a total of 403 OPAs. 210/403 (52%) of these OPAs resulted in no treatment escalation; 159/403 (40%) had escalation and 34/410 (8%) had de-escalation. An ETI calculator threshold set at 5% estimated probability of treatment escalation would have correctly identified 143/159 (90%) escalation events. 16/159 (10%) escalations were not correctly predicted: 12/16 were escalations of medication (oral 5-aminosalicylic acid, n = 3), azathioprine (2), methotrexate (1), increase infliximab dose (2), adalimumab (3), tofacitinib (1). Other escalations were endoscopy requests (2), dermatology/rheumatology referrals (2). Importantly, 6/16 (38%) had taken steroids within 1 month of data collection. 143/403 (35%) of OPAs could have been deferred using a 5% ETI threshold. In contrast, increasing the ETI threshold to 25% would have allowed 274/403 (68%) OPAs to be deferred but would have resulted in missing an additional 53 escalations. Conclusion A model that predicts the likelihood of treatment escalation or intervention during an OPA, based on real-time data entered by patients, has the potential to improve outpatient clinic resource utilisation. The calculator may not be valid to triage patients recently on steroids.

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 468-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
MG Robinson ◽  
DL Decktor

The efficacy of 4 g 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalamine) enemas was assessed in 666 patients with distal ulcerative colitis. Patients were enrolled in an open-label compassionate use program. One 4 g 5-ASA enema was administered each night for a period of four weeks and the disease activity index was assessed at baseline and on days 14 and 28. On days 14 and 28, 78.0% and 88.1% of patients, respectively, demonstrated an improvement in disease activity index. The mean decline in disease activity index on day 14 was 40.7% (P=0.0001) and on day 28 it was 55.4% (P=0.0001). Efficacy was similar whether the disease was confined to or extended beyond 30 cm from the anus. There was no difference in efficacy in patients suffering their first episode of disease compared to patients suffering subsequent attacks. In conclusion, high dose 5-ASA enemas are a highly effective treatment for distal ulcerative colitis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S474-S474
Author(s):  
C Arieira ◽  
F Dias de Castro ◽  
T Cúrdia Gonçalves ◽  
M J Moreira ◽  
J Cotter

Abstract Background Biologic therapy has demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it remains unclear whether oral aminosalicylates (5-ASA) should be continued or stopped after treatment escalation to biologics. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in inflammatory biomarkers or the occurrence of complications in UC patients being treated with a combination of 5-ASA and biologics vs. biologics alone. Methods Retrospective study, including patients with UC and on biologic therapy with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Collected inflammatory biomarkers were faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The occurrence of complications was defined as the need of hospitalisation, need of corticosteroids or other top-up therapy, surgery and the occurrence of dysplasia or colorectal cancer. Results We included 65 patients with UC, 56.9% female with a mean age of 32.8 (±12.8) years. The median follow-up was 30 (6–132) months. Regarding extension, 61.5% were E3, 35.4% E2 and 3.1% E1. While 44 patients (67.7%) were on 5-ASA and biologics (infliximab = 32, adalimumab = 6, vedolizumab = 6), 21 (32.3%) were on biologics alone (infliximab = 13, adalimumab = 3, vedolizumab = 5). The median duration of biologic therapy was 30 (6–126) months. Regarding baseline characteristics, including age, gender, duration of the disease or biologic therapy and age at UC diagnosis, there were no differences between groups. No differences regarding inflammatory biomarkers were observed – fecal calprotectin (p = 0.39), CRP (p = 0.9) and ESR (p = 0.61). No differences were found regarding complications, namely the need of hospitalisation (p = 0.06) or need of corticosteroids (p = 0.89). Only one patient developed dysplasia (under infliximab and 5-ASA). Any of the included patients needed surgery or developed colorectal cancer. Conclusion About two-thirds of the UC patients under biologics are co-treated with 5-ASA. No differences between UC patients under combination biologics+5-ASA vs. biologics alone were found regarding inflammatory biomarkers or the occurrence of complications. These results raise the question if continuing 5-ASA in UC patients under biologics is really necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S631-S631
Author(s):  
P A Golovics ◽  
L Gonczi ◽  
J Reinglass ◽  
C Verdon ◽  
W Afif ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate assessment of disease activity. Endoscopic evaluation is considered the gold standard approach, but it is invasive. We aimed to determine the operating characteristics of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), to quantify the cut off most closely correlated with clinical remission or activity and determine agreement with the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron score, clinical scores and biomarkers. Methods 136 patients were included prospectively (age: 48 (IQR38-61) years, duration 12 (4–19)years, 63 females, 53.7% extensive disease, 40.4% on biologicals) at the time of the colonoscopy. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron scores were calculated, as well as the2 item patient reported outcome (PRO), partial MAYO, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI). CRP and faecal calprotectin (FCAL) was available in 58.1 and 33.8% of patients. 20.7% had clinical flare, treatment was escalated in 17.8% of patients. ROC analysis and K-statistics were performed and Spearman’s correlation was calculated. Results UCEIS was strongly associated to PRO2 SF (AUC:0.866), RBS (AUC:0.921), PRO2 combined remission (AUC:0.905), partial MAYO (AUC:0.956) and SCCAI (AUC:0.907) remission in a ROC analysis. A UCEIS of ≤3 was identified as the best cut-off to identify RBS subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission (RBS 0 and SF ≤1), partial MAYO (≤2) and SCCAI (≤2.5) remission, while a UCEIS≥4 identified active disease frequently needing change in medical therapy. A moderate agreement was found between UCEIS and MES (K=0.451) or Baron (K=0.499) scores. Correlation between FCAL and UCEIS (coeff:0.743, p < 0.0001) was strong, while modest only with CRP (coeff:0.333, p = 0.01). Conclusion A UCEIS was strongly associated with clinical remission defined as PRO2, SF, RBS, partial Mayo or SCCAI with best agreement with RBS and partial Mayo remission. A UCEIS of ≤3 was identified as a cut-off for quiescent disease, while a UCEIS≥4 identified active disease, which can support clinical decision-making based on endoscopic findings. Agreement between UCEIS and FCAL was strong, while agreement with UCEIS and MES/Baron scores was moderate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
H Thorlacius ◽  
A Bjoerk ◽  
Ö Nordle ◽  
G Hedlund

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition with no known medical cure. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA [mesalazine]) represents the cornerstone of first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate UC. Sulfasalazine (SASP) is the original agent in this class of drugs. Meta-analyses of patients with mild-to-moderately active UC comparing 5-ASA to placebo showed 5-ASA to be significantly superior to placebo. However, about two-thirds of patients treated with 5-ASA fail to enter clinical remission. It is therefore most important to identify strategies to accelerate and maximise the therapeutic effects of 5-ASA. Therapeutic intervention against NFκB activation is a useful strategy for treatment of UC. The 4-alkanoylaminobenzamide PM0503 inhibits the breakdown of the NFκB inhibitor IκBβ, and SASP/5-ASA inhibits the breakdown of IκBα. This elicited a hypothesis of a possible synergistic action and converging effect on NFκB signalling. In the present study, we investigated the effect of combining SASP/5-ASA with PM0503 in experimental colitis. Methods SASP and PM0503 alone or in combination were administered for 5 days to Balb/c mice with colitis triggered by 5% dextran sulphate sodium (DSS). Blood in the stool, stool consistency and body weight loss were evaluated daily on a 0–4 point scale. The disease activity index (DAI) was calculated by summarising the total score of these three parameters. Results Addition of 5% DSS in the drinking water for 5 days produced reproducible symptoms of colitis. PM0503 was shown to inhibit DSS induced colitis by reducing mean DAI at day 5 from 6.9 in controls to 1.7 (a 75% decrease). Mean DAI recorded with SASP treatment at optimal doses in the same series of experiments was 4.4 (a 36% decrease). Furthermore, and most important, lower doses of PM0503 acted synergistically with SASP in ameliorating DSS-induced disease severity. The combination of PM0503 and SASP using suboptimal doses having minimal beneficial effects as monotherapies, showed more than 50% disease inhibition at day 5. In addition, no toxicity was observed with PM0503 alone or in combination with SASP. Conclusion Our findings offer a preclinical rationale for simultaneous coadministration of PM0503 and a 5-ASA agent such as SASP or 5-ASA as first-line treatment for patients with UC.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gürel ◽  
M Kiyici

We evaluated the usefulness of various parameters in predicting the prognosis of ulcerative colitis. The records of 73 patients with ulcerative colitis were examined retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had received only 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA; n = 26) or glucocorticoids and/or azathioprine with or without 5-ASA ( n = 47). The disease extent, endoscopic activity and ulcerative colitis activity index (UCAI) before therapy were recorded, together with the disease outcome. No statistically significant differences in outcome were observed in relation to therapy group, disease extent or endoscopic activity. UCAI had a significant effect on outcome, however: patients with lower UCAI values were more likely to remain in remission and less likely to require urgent surgery or experience a fatal outcome than those with higher UCAI values. This difference was apparent in both treatment groups. Thus a high pre-treatment UCAI may indicate a worse outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Chen Sarbagili-Shabat ◽  
Dror Weiner ◽  
Joram Wardi ◽  
Lee Abramas ◽  
Michal Yaakov ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by low sustained remission rates and frequent extension of disease even if clinical remission is obtained with therapy. Moderate to severe endoscopic activity is a risk factor for relapse while evidence regarding early mucosal healing or persistence of inflammation after remission in children is not available. Our aim was to evaluate if persistence of significant inflammation is common and could explain the high relapse rate in pediatric UC. Methods Pediatric UC patients with clinical remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) scores < 10, were prospectively assessed for mucosal healing by endoscopy 3–5 months after remission was documented. Mayo score was assessed for each segment by a blinded adult gastroenterologist using central reading. Symptomatic patients prior to sigmoidoscopy were excluded Sustained remission was assessed retrospectively at 18 months follow-up. Results Forty-six children were enrolled, 28 children in continuous clinical remission at time of sigmoidoscopy were included in the final analysis. Mayo 0 was present in 12/28 (42.86%), Mayo 1 in 2/28 (7.1%) and Mayo 2–3 in 14/28 (50.0%) endoscopies. Among 23/28 patients with follow-up through 18 months, remission was sustained in 2/11 (18.18%) of patients with Mayo 2 and 3 versus 6/12 (50.0%) with Mayo score 0–1. Conclusion Over 50% of children assessed for mucosal healing 3–5 months after clinical remission is obtained have residual disease activity, primarily moderate to severe inflammation which was associated with lower sustained remission. Early sigmoidoscopy after clinical remission for assessment of mucosal disease should be considered in pediatric UC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S008-S009
Author(s):  
B Verstockt ◽  
C Jorissen ◽  
E Hoefkens ◽  
N Lembrechts ◽  
L Pouillon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Treating beyond endoscopic remission, aiming for histological remission, has shown to reduce relapse and hospitalization rates in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, very little is known on how histological remission associates with patient reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods PROMs (Simple clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI], IBD disk and Visual Analogue Scales [VAS]) were prospectively collected through a digital questionnaire in all patients with UC undergoing colonoscopy between July 21st 2020-Jan 21st 2021. Mayo endoscopic sub score and UCEIS were determined, as well as the Nancy histologic index (NHI) of the most affected area. Endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score 0 and UCEIS 0; histologic remission as NHI 0, absence of active inflammation as NHI ≤ 1. PRO2 remission was defined as stool frequency ≤ 1 (absolute stool frequency ≤ 3 OR 1–2 stools more than usual) and rectal bleeding score of 0. Results Fifty-six paired assessments were collected in 48 unique patients (Table 1), with a histologic, endoscopic and PRO-2 remission rate of 23.2%, 28.6% and 38.2% respectively. Patients with histologic remission or absence of histologic inflammation had a significantly lower overall IBD disability (p=0.007, p=0.003) and disease activity score (p=0.003, p<0.001), as compared to patients without. In line, NHI correlated with the overall IBD disk (r=0.40, p=0.002) and SCCAI score (r=0.50, p<0.001). Many individual components of both scores (abdominal pain, arthralgia, impact on education and work/interpersonal interactions/sexual function, regulation of defecation, blood loss, general wellbeing, joint pain, numbers of stools during night/day, urgency) differed significantly between patients with and without histologic remission. VAS scores assessing general wellbeing (r=0.33, p=0.01), impact on daily activities (r=0.41, p=0.002), UC-related symptoms (r=0.42, p=0.001) and worries (r=0.40, p=0.002) correlated with histology. Quartile analysis of the overall IBD disk and SCCAI scores confirmed the highest likelihood for histologic remission in patients with the lowest scores (Q1-Q2 vs Q3-Q4 39.3% vs 7.1%, p=0.01; 40.0% vs 9.7%, p=0.01) (Figure 1). Nevertheless, the overall accuracy of the IBD disk (0.75) or SCCAI score (0.76) for histologic remission is lower (p<0.05) than the accuracy of the Mayo endoscopic (0.90) or UCEIS (0.90) score. Table 1: Baseline features Abstract OP09 – Figure 1: Quartile analysis Conclusion In patients with UC, PROMs for disability and clinical disease activity reflect histologic disease activity and should therefore be further explored in (trial) endpoint discussions. However, they cannot fully replace endoscopic and histologic findings, and should be considered complementary.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S056-S057
Author(s):  
P Golovics ◽  
L Gonczi ◽  
J Reinglas ◽  
C Verdon ◽  
S Pundir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate assessment of disease activity. Endoscopic evaluation is considered the gold standard approach, but it is invasive. We aimed to determine the operating characteristics of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), to quantify the cut off most closely correlated with clinical remission or activity and determine agreement with the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron score, clinical scores and biomarkers. Methods 171 patients were included prospectively and consecutively (age: 49 (IQR: 38–61) years, duration 12 (4–19)years, 79 females (46.2%), 57.3% extensive disease, 42.7% on biologicals) at the time of the colonoscopy. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron scores were calculated, as well as the 2 item patient reported outcome (PRO), partial MAYO, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI). C reactive Protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCAL) was available in 83 and 45.6% of patients. 17.0% had clinical flare, treatment was escalated in 14.6% of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were calculated, ROC analysis and K-statistics were performed. Results UCEIS was strongly associated to PRO2 SF (AUC:0.863), RBS (AUC:0.924), PRO2 combined (AUC:0.898), partial MAYO (AUC:0.945) and SCCAI (AUC:0.901) remission in a ROC analysis. A UCEIS of ≤3 was identified as the best cut-off to identify RBS subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission (RBS 0 and SF ≤1), partial MAYO (≤2) and SCCAI (≤2.5) remission, while a UCEIS≥4 identified active disease frequently needing change in medical therapy. A moderate agreement was found between UCEIS <4 and MES 0 (K=0.471) or Baron 0 (K=0.414)/Baron 0–1 (K=0.353). Correlation between FCAL and UCEIS (coeff:0.701, p<0.0001) was strong, while modest only with CRP (coeff:0.248, p=0.01). Conclusion UCEIS was strongly associated with clinical remission defined as PRO2, SF, RBS, partial Mayo or SCCAI with best agreement with RBS and partial Mayo remission. A UCEIS of ≤3 was identified as a cut-off for quiescent disease, while a UCEIS≥4 identified active disease, which can support clinical decision-making based on endoscopic findings. Agreement between UCEIS and FCAL was strong, while agreement with UCEIS and MES/Baron scores was moderate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S381-S382
Author(s):  
P Golovics ◽  
L Gonczi ◽  
J Reinglass ◽  
C Verdon ◽  
S Pundir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate assessment of disease activity. Endoscopic evaluation is considered the gold standard approach, but it is invasive. We aimed to determine how strong patient reported outcomes, clinical scores and symptoms correlate with endoscopy for assessment of disease activity in UC patients. Methods 171 patients were included prospectively and consecutively (age: 49 (IQR: 38-61) years, duration 12 (4-19)years, 79 females (46.2%), 57.3% extensive disease, 42.7% on biologicals) at the time of the colonoscopy. The 2 item patient reported outcome (PRO), partial MAYO, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) scores were calculated. C reactive Protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCAL) was available in 83 and 45.6% of patients. 17.0% had clinical flare, treatment was escalated in 14.6% of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were calculated, ROC analysis and K-statistics were performed. Results Rectal bleeding (RBS), stool frequency (SF) subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission (RBS 0 and SF ≤1), partial MAYO (≤2) and SCCAI (≤2.5) remission were similarly associated to mucosal healing defined by MES (0 or ≤1) or Baron (0 or ≤1) scores (Table 1). PRO2 (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.770/0.740, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1: 0.868/0.858), SF (AUCMES0/Baron0:0.751/0.724, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0842/0.820), RBS (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.718/0.698, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1: 0.814/0.845) partial Mayo (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.823/0.788, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1: 0.927/0.902) and SCCAI (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.767/0.752, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0.888/0.867) were similarly associated with mucosal healing in a ROC analysis. There was a strict association between MES 0 and Baron 0 (k=0.917) and UCEIS <4 and MES 0-1 (k=0.813), while moderate to fair agreement between UCEIS <4 and MES 0 (K=0.471) or Baron 0 (K=0.414)/Baron 0-1 (K=0.353), and between MES 0-1 and Baron 0-1 (K= 0.350) scores. Agreement between CRP and clinical remission or endoscopic healing (MES/Baron) was poor (K~0.2), while agreement between FCAL (>100 or >250) and RBS-PRO2 remission (K>100 or >250: 0.44-0.60) or pMAYO (K>100 or >250: 0.41-0.59) or MES/Baron 0 was moderate to good (K>100:0.53-0.52 and K>250:0.57-0.53). Conclusion We found no difference across accuracy of RBS, SF, PRO2, partial Mayo and SCCAI in predicting endoscopic healing. A strong association was found with high PPV for MES/Baron ≤1 and high NPV for MES/Baron 0. FCAL, but not CRP was associated to clinical and endoscopic remission.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S559-S559
Author(s):  
O Atia ◽  
C Friss ◽  
A Mendelovici ◽  
E Shteyer ◽  
E Orlanski-Meyer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Thiopurines have been long used to maintain remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) but are also associated with toxicity and therapeutic failure. We aimed to assess the sustainability rate of thiopurines commenced as monotherapy in UC, and to explore predictors of sustainability. Methods This study was performed on data from four Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), covering 98% of the Israeli population. We included all biologic-naïve UC patients diagnosed after 2005 and treated with thiopurines monotherapy for at least three months. Treatment with 5- aminosalicylic acid (ASA) was allowed if initiated prior to or during the first three months from initiation of thiopurines. Sustainability was defined as continued thiopurines treatment without switching therapy, adding biologics or requiring surgery. At most one short steroid course was allowed. Cox regression model was used to explore estimated predictors to sustainability. Results A total of 1,897 (370 [20%] pediatric-onset and 1,527 [80%] adults) thiopurines-treated patients were included with a 15,033 person-years of follow-up. The median time from UC diagnosis to initiation of thiopurines was 12.7 months (IQR 4.6–30.9), and the median treatment duration was 13.0 months (6.3–28.4). Sustainability rate was evident in 92% of patients after 6 months from initiation of thiopurines and 83%, 65% and 42% at one, three and five years, thereafter. Sustainability was associated with early initiation of thiopurines during disease course (HR 0.99 [95%CI 0.985–0.995]) and lack of 5-ASA at initiation of thiopurines (HR 0.7 [95%CI 0.6–0.8]). Conclusion As many as two thirds of biologic-naïve UC patients treated with thiopurines monotherapy sustain this treatment after five years, especially when initiated early and without 5-ASA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document