Atomoxetine in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope for preventing vasovagal attacks and improvement of depression and anxiety: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tajdini ◽  
A Aminorroaya ◽  
H Tavolinejad ◽  
S Tofighi ◽  
A Jalali ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies showed that sibutramine or reboxetine reduced head-up tilt (HUT)-induced syncope and pre-syncope by 78%. Furthermore, in an open-label series of highly symptomatic patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS), sibutramine reduced frequency of vasovagal spells. In a recent proof of principle study, atomoxetine reduced number of HUT-induced syncopal episodes by about 50% compared to placebo. Purpose In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of atomoxetine on preventing recurrence of syncopal and pre-syncopal episodes in patients with recurrent VVS after three months of follow-up. Moreover, we determined whether it can improve patients' anxiety and depression. Methods In this double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, we screened 843 patients with VVS. Patients with 10 < age < 70 years who had ≥3 syncopal episodes in the past three months were included. Eventually, 46 patients were randomized to receive atomoxetine (20 mg daily for two weeks followed by 40 mg daily for two weeks, N=23) or placebo (for four weeks, N=23). The primary endpoint was the number of syncopal and pre-syncopal episodes at one and three months and was analyzed by the repeated measures analysis of variance. Secondary endpoints were decrements of depression and anxiety measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale after three months and were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results The primary endpoint was lower after three months in the atomoxetine arm (2.3±1.3 vs 4.3±1.7), with a significant between-subjects effect by atomoxetine versus placebo (P<0.001). This observation was primarily due to the reduction of pre-syncopal episodes rather than syncopal episodes (P<0.001 vs P=0.944, respectively, Table). In contrast with placebo, atomoxetine significantly improved anxiety (P=0.048 vs P=0.352) and depression (P=0.001 vs P=0.206) after three months; nonetheless, anxiety and depression scores of the patients were not different across the groups after three months (P>0.05, Figure). Conclusions In patients with VVS, atomoxetine significantly reduced the recurrence of a composite of syncopal and pre-syncopal episodes, and remarkably improved anxiety and depression at three months. Anxiety and Depression of the Patients Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Tehran University of Medical Sciences

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
...  

5 Background: Ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 IgG1 human monoclonal antibody, is the only biologic with proven efficacy as both a single-agent and in combination with paclitaxel in the second-line treatment of G-GEJ adenocarcinoma. RAINFALL (NCT02314117) is a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial addressing the hypothesis that adding ramucirumab to first-line Cis plus Cape or 5-fluorouracil (5FU) produces significant clinical benefit. Methods: Metastatic G-GEJ cancer patients eligible for first-line chemotherapy with ECOG performance status 0-1 were randomized 1:1 to receive either RAM (8 mg/kg iv D1, D8) or placebo (PL), every 21d. All patients received Cape (or 5FU)+Cis. Cis was given for up to 6 cycles. Cape+RAM/placebo was continued until progressive disease, toxicity or other discontinuation criteria. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) for the first 508 patients; overall survival (OS) for ITT population was a powered secondary endpoint. Results: 645 patients were randomized to receive RAM+Cape/Cis (n=326) or PL+Cape/Cis (n=319). PFS was significantly prolonged in patients treated with RAM+Cape/Cis versus PL+Cape/Cis (HR, 0.75; 95% CI 0.61–0.94; p=0.011; median, 5.7 vs 5.4 mos), meeting the primary endpoint. There was no survival benefit for patients treated with RAM+Cape/Cis versus PL+Cape/Cis (HR, 0.96; 95% CI 0.80–1.16; p=0.68; median, 11.2 vs 10.7 mos). ORR in the ITT population was 41.1% in the RAM arm (95% CI 35.8–46.4) and 36.4% (95% CI 31.1–41.6) in the PL arm. Grade ≥3 adverse events in ≥10% of patients in the RAM arm were: neutropenia (26.3% RAM; 27.0% PL), anemia (12.1% RAM; 14.0% PL), and hypertension (9.9% RAM; 1.6% PL). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients with metastatic G-GEJ adenocarcinoma, the addition of ramucirumab to first-line chemotherapy conferred a significant 25% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the primary endpoint of PFS; however, ramucirumab was not associated with an improved OS. Clinical trial information: NCT02314117.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Harandi ◽  
R. Abolfazli ◽  
A. Hatemian ◽  
K. Ghragozlee ◽  
M. Ghaffar-Pour ◽  
...  

Objective. To investigate the safety and efficacy of MLC601 (NeuroAid) as a traditional Chinese medicine on motor recovery after ischemic stroke.Methods. This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on 150 patients with a recent (less than 1 month) ischemic stroke. All patients were given either MLC601 (100 patients) or placebo (50 patients), 4 capsules 3 times a day, as an add-on to standard stroke treatment for 3 months.Results. Sex, age, elapsed time from stroke onset, and risk factors in the treatment group were not significantly different from placebo group at baseline (P>.05). Repeated measures analysis showed that Fugl-Meyer assessment was significantly higher in the treatment group during 12 weeks after stroke (P<.001). Good tolerability to treatment was shown, and adverse events were mild and transient.Conclusion. MLC601 showed better motor recovery than placebo and was safe on top of standard ischemic stroke medications especially in the severe and moderate cases.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1481-1481
Author(s):  
Michael A. Thompson ◽  
Brent A. Bauer ◽  
Laura L. Loehrer ◽  
Stephen S. Cha ◽  
Jayawant N. Mandrekar ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet or SAM-e®) is a commonly used nutritional supplement available in the United States since 1999. AdoMet is metabolized to homocysteine (Hcy), a potential cardiovascular risk factor. A few open-label, single-arm studies have reported on the effect of exogenous AdoMet on the levels of Hcy in humans; however, this has not been tested in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. As a nutritional supplement, AdoMet is subject only to limited regulation by the FDA, despite being used to treat clinical diseases such as depression and osteoarthritis. AdoMet is the methyl donor for small molecule, DNA, RNA, and protein methylation reactions; therefore, further understanding the biology of the AdoMet/Hcy system is important. We hypothesized that exogenous AdoMet would increase plasma Hcy levels. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 93 healthy human subjects were screened and 52 were treated with placebo (26) or 800 mg per day AdoMet (26) pills for 4 weeks. Pre- and post-treatment Hcy levels were measured. The primary endpoint was change in Hcy level. Secondary endpoints included an interim Hcy level, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, lipid profile, and transaminases. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy and concurrent use of medications associated with changes in Hcy. RESULTS: Of 52 subjects enrolled, 45 were evaluable at the end of treatment. Subject characteristics and dropout rates were similar between placebo and control groups. Adverse events were minor and were not different between placebo and AdoMet. The primary endpoint, change in Hcy, was not significantly different between the groups (mean (umol/L), baseline: 7.43 (placebo), 8.25 (AdoMet), P=0.358; 4 week: 7.66 (placebo), 8.06 (AdoMet), P = 0.683; Baseline − 4 week: 0.23 (placebo), −0.19 (AdoMet), P = 0.427). No statistically significant difference in change in Hcy or hsCRP at 2 or 4 weeks was noted. This was true for both absolute differences as well as relative percent changes. A small decrease in ALT was observed at 2 weeks in the AdoMet group compared to the placebo group (P = 0.027). AdoMet is used in the treatment of liver diseases. There was a small, but statistically significant (P = 0.028) decrease in total cholesterol in the AdoMet group as compared to the placebo group. Interestingly, a subject with the highest baseline Hcy level had a decline in Hcy on AdoMet. Study limitations include no evaluation of AdoMet serum levels or measurement of the effect of AdoMet on DNA methylation patterns. CONCLUSIONS: AdoMet seems well tolerated and in a dose of 800 mg/day for 4 weeks does not appear to significantly affect Hcy levels in the blood. Future clinical trials of AdoMet should monitor Hcy levels with extended use of AdoMet to confirm its safety with long term use. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00284011.


1998 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-88
Author(s):  
D P Rastogi ◽  
V P Singh ◽  
Vikram Singh ◽  
S K Dey ◽  
K Rao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document