Aggressive lipid lowering therapy with pitavastatin and ezetimibe improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the HIJ-PROPER Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Otsuki ◽  
H Arashi ◽  
M Nakazawa ◽  
Y Inagaki ◽  
S Ebihara ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with pitavastatin and ezetimibe in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as compared with those with other classification of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) including non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UA). Methods This is a post hoc sub-analysis of the HIJ-PROPER study. In the original study, ACS patients with dyslipidemia were randomized to either pitavastatin + ezetimibe therapy or pitavastatin monotherapy. In the present analysis, we divided HIJ-PROPER participants into the STEMI group (n=880) and NSTEMI + UA group (n=841). Cardiovascular events were analyzed between the two groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of major advanced cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina pectoris, and ischemia-driven revascularization) Result During median follow-up period of 3.4 years, the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint in STEMI group was 31.9% in the pitavastatin+ezetimibe therapy, compared with 39.7% in the pitavastatin-monotherapy (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62–0.97; p=0.02). However, there was no effect of pitavastatin+ezetimibe therapy on the primary endpoint in the NSTEMI + UA group. Concerning the individual components of the primary endpoint in STEMI group, the percentage of occurrence of all-cause death was significantly lower in the pitavastatin+ezetimibe therapy compared to pitavastatin mono-therapy (14 patients (3.2%) vs. 31 patients (6.9%), respectively; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23–1.84, p=0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that use of ezetimibe and prevalence of diabetes mellitus at baseline were independent predictors of primary endpoints in STEMI group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–0.99; p=0.04 for use of ezetimibe, HR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.22–1.94, p=0.0003 for diabetes mellitus). Conclusion Patients with pitavastatin+ezetimibe therapy as compared with pitavastatin-monotherapy had lower cardiovascular event in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Kaplan-Meier curves for primary endpoint Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. e63-e77
Author(s):  
T Huynh ◽  
P Lecca ◽  
M Montigny ◽  
R Gagnon ◽  
M Eisenberg ◽  
...  

Background Adherence to statins is often sub-optimal and declines over time. Direct costs incurred by patients are often cited as responsible for inadequate statin adherence. To determine whether patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who benefit from low or no-cost drug dispensation have optimal long-term adherence to statins, we aimed to evaluate 10-year adherence to statin in a cohort of STEMI survivors. Methods The AMI-QUEBEC Study follows a cohort of STEMI patients hospitalized at 17 hospitals in Quebec, Canada during the year 2003. We obtained 10-year data on lipid lowering therapy (LLT) consumption in STEMI survivors with drug coverage by the Quebec Provincial Health Board (i.e., Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec – RAMQ). Optimal adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) of ≥80%. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine factors independently associated with optimal adherence to statins. Results Complete 10-year data on statin dispensation was available for 524 patients. Optimal adherence remained stable over time at 80% and more during the 10-year follow-up period. During the last 5 years, despite being STEMI patients at very high-risk and therefore requiring some LLT therapy, 12% of patients did not use any LLT. Patients between the age of 60 and 80 years had the most optimal PDC. Older age (up to 80 years), living in less socially deprived areas, concomitant use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and admission to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)-hospitals were associated with improved statin adherence. Conclusion Future studies are needed to explore the potential factors associated with concomitant use of ACEI/ARB, and admission to PCI-hospitals that may have optimized statin adherence. As for socially deprived patients (single, widow, single-parent family member, and those who lived alone), they may benefit from more support and encouragement to enhance their long-term statin adherence.


2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (45) ◽  
pp. 2115-2119 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Jánosi ◽  
Dániel Várnai ◽  
Zsófia Ádám ◽  
Adrienn Surman ◽  
Katalin Vas

A szerzők 139, nem ST-elevációs infarktus miatt kezelt betegük adatait elemzik. Vizsgálják a betegek kórházi és késői prognózisát, egyes echokardiográfiás adatok prognózissal való összefüggését, valamint a kórházból elbocsátott betegek esetén a szekunder prevenció szempontjából ajánlott gyógyszeres kezelés gyakoriságát. Az utánkövetés a betegek 98%-ában sikeres volt, a bekövetkezett eseményekről, illetve az utánkövetés idején alkalmazott gyógyszeres kezelésről postai kérdőív útján szereztek adatokat. A nők átlagéletkora 78,6, a férfiaké 71,4 év volt. A kezelt betegeknél gyakori volt a társbetegségek (hypertonia, diabetes mellitus, korábbi ischaemiás szívbetegség) előfordulása. A kórházi kezelés időszakában 30 betegnél (22%) történt koronarográfia, és 29 betegnél revascularisatiós beavatkozásra is sor került. A kórházi halálozás 15% volt, az utánkövetés háromnegyed éve alatt 17%-os halálozást észleltek. A kórházban, illetve az utánkövetési idő alatt meghalt betegek szignifikánsan idősebbek voltak azoknál, akik életben maradtak. Egyes echokardiográfiás adatok (ejekciós frakció, végszisztolés átmérő, szegmentális falmozgászavar és a mitralis insufficientia nagysága) prognosztikus jelentőségűnek bizonyultak, mivel szignifikánsan különböztek az életben maradt és a meghalt betegek esetén. A kórházból elbocsátott betegek igen magas arányban részesültek a másodlagos prevenció szempontjából fontosnak ítélt gyógyszeres kezelésben (aszpirin, béta-blokkoló, ACE-gátló, statin). Az utánkövetés idején sem csökkent ezen gyógyszerek használatának aránya, ami a betegek jó compliance-ét igazolja.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0249338
Author(s):  
Syed Waseem Abbas Sherazi ◽  
Jang-Whan Bae ◽  
Jong Yun Lee

Objective Some researchers have studied about early prediction and diagnosis of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but their accuracies were not high. Therefore, this paper proposes a soft voting ensemble classifier (SVE) using machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods We used the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry dataset and selected 11,189 subjects among 13,104 with the 2-year follow-up. It was subdivided into two groups (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction NSTEMI), and then subdivided into training (70%) and test dataset (30%). Third, we selected the ranges of hyper-parameters to find the best prediction model from random forest (RF), extra tree (ET), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and SVE. We generated each ML-based model with the best hyper-parameters, evaluated by 5-fold stratified cross-validation, and then verified by test dataset. Lastly, we compared the performance in the area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F-score. Results The accuracies for RF, ET, GBM, and SVE were (88.85%, 88.94%, 87.84%, 90.93%) for complete dataset, (84.81%, 85.00%, 83.70%, 89.07%) STEMI, (88.81%, 88.05%, 91.23%, 91.38%) NSTEMI. The AUC values in RF were (98.96%, 98.15%, 98.81%), ET (99.54%, 99.02%, 99.00%), GBM (98.92%, 99.33%, 99.41%), and SVE (99.61%, 99.49%, 99.42%) for complete dataset, STEMI, and NSTEMI, respectively. Consequently, the accuracy and AUC in SVE outperformed other ML models. Conclusions The performance of our SVE was significantly higher than other machine learning models (RF, ET, GBM) and its major prognostic factors were different. This paper will lead to the development of early risk prediction and diagnosis tool of MACE in ACS patients.


Author(s):  
Gautam V Shah ◽  
Bhuvnesh Aggarwal ◽  
Mandeep Randhawa ◽  
Sachin S Goel ◽  
A. Micheal Lincoff ◽  
...  

Background: Presence of insulin resistance has been known to be a strong independent risk factor for coronary artery disease. However, there is limited data on gender differences in metabolic profile of patients that present with an acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: All patients (N = 1,652) who underwent primary PCI for STEMI at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between January 2005 to December 2012 were included. Insulin Resistance (IR) was defined as presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) or pre-DM. Further DM was identified if there was a known history of DM or hypoglycaemic therapy or if admission glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was ≥ 6.5 and pre-DM was defined for admission HbA1c ≥ 5.7 and < 6.5. Lastly, prevalence of IR in women was compared with similarly aged men presenting with STEMI at our institution. Results: IR was identified in 70% (n= 1,163/1,652) and DM in 30% (n = 487/1,652) of patients presenting with STEMI. Prevalence of IR was significantly higher in post menopausal women (age > 50 years) when compared with similarly aged men (79%; 344/435 vs. 69%; 603/871; p <0.0001) with majority of the difference contributed by difference in incidence of DM (38%; 163/435 in females vs 29%; 257/871 in males; p<0.0001; Figure 1). Conclusions: Our results indicate that prevalence of IR including diabetes mellitus may be higher in women as compared to similarly aged men who present with STEMI and the difference increases with increasing age. We also noted that Pre-DM contributes significantly to the high prevalence of IR in subjects with STEMI irrespective of gender. Larger studies are required to assess the impact of Pre-DM on adverse cardiovascular events in men as well as women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enfa Zhao ◽  
Hang Xie ◽  
Yushun Zhang

Objective. This study aimed to establish a clinical prognostic nomogram for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods. Information on 464 patients with STEMI who performed PCI procedures was included. After removing patients with incomplete clinical information, a total of 460 patients followed for 2.5 years were randomly divided into evaluation (n = 324) and validation (n = 136) cohorts. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify the significant factors associated with MACEs in the evaluation cohort, and then they were incorporated into the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Results. Apelin-12 change rate, apelin-12 level, age, pathological Q wave, myocardial infarction history, anterior wall myocardial infarction, Killip’s classification > I, uric acid, total cholesterol, cTnI, and the left atrial diameter were independently associated with MACEs (all P<0.05). After incorporating these 11 factors, the nomogram achieved good concordance indexes of 0.758 (95%CI = 0.707–0.809) and 0.763 (95%CI = 0.689–0.837) in predicting MACEs in the evaluation and validation cohorts, respectively, and had well-fitted calibration curves. The decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the nomogram was clinically useful. Conclusions. We established and validated a novel nomogram that can provide individual prediction of MACEs for patients with STEMI after PCI procedures in a Chinese population. This practical prognostic nomogram may help clinicians in decision making and enable a more accurate risk assessment.


Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Nepper-Christensen ◽  
Dan Eik Høfsten ◽  
Steffen Helqvist ◽  
Jens Flensted Lassen ◽  
Hans-Henrik Tilsted ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe Third Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction – Ischaemic Postconditioning (DANAMI-3-iPOST) did not show improved clinical outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with ischaemic postconditioning. However, the use of thrombectomy was frequent and thrombectomy may in itself diminish the effect of ischaemic postconditioning. We evaluated the effect of ischaemic postconditioning in patients included in DANAMI-3-iPOST stratified by the use of thrombectomy.MethodsPatients with STEMI were randomised to conventional primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or ischaemic postconditioning plus primary PCI. The primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure.ResultsFrom March 2011 until February 2014, 1234 patients were included with a median follow-up period of 35 (interquartile range 28 to 42) months. There was a significant interaction between ischaemic postconditioning and thrombectomy on the primary endpoint (p=0.004). In patients not treated with thrombectomy (n=520), the primary endpoint occurred in 33 patients (10%) who underwent ischaemic postconditioning (n=326) and in 35 patients (18%) who underwent conventional treatment (n=194) (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 (95%confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.89), p=0.016). In patients treated with thrombectomy (n=714), there was no significant difference between patients treated with ischaemic postconditioning (n=291) and conventional PCI (n=423) on the primary endpoint (adjusted HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.28), p=0.62).ConclusionsIn this post-hoc study of DANAMI-3-iPOST, ischaemic postconditioning, in addition to primary PCI, was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure in patients with STEMI not treated with thrombectomy.Trial registration numberNCT01435408.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Dykun ◽  
R Mincu ◽  
M Totzeck ◽  
T Rassaf ◽  
A A Mahabadi

Abstract Background Lipid lowering therapy is a key cornerstone in secondary prevention of patients with coronary artery disease. However, only a minority of patients with statin therapy reach LDL thresholds as suggested by the ESC. Ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors allow for reduction in LDL-cholesterol in addition to statin therapy. Purpose To perform a meta-analysis of existing trials, evaluating how lipid lowering therapy beyond statins impacts cardiovascular outcome. Methods We performed a systematic search using the Pubmed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for studies, evaluating the impact of an intensified lipid lowering therapy via ezetimibe or PCSK-9 inhibitor in addition to statin therapy compared to statin therapy alone. Manuscript and congress presentations, published until 1st of November 2018, were included. We made our search specific and sensitive using Medical Subject Headings terms and free text and considered studies published in English language. Search terms used were “ezetimibe”, “evolocumab”, “alirocumab”, or “bococizumab” and “cardiovascular events”. Results A total of 100,610 patients from 9 randomized controlled trials (IMPROVE-IT, FOURIER, ODYSSEY Outcomes, SIPRE I, SPIRE II, ODYSSEY LONG TERM, OSLER-1 and OSLER-2, HIJ-PROPER) were included. Treatment with ezetimibe or a PCSK-9 inhibitor was associated with a 18% risk reduction in cardiovascular events (OR [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.75–0.89]). Effect sizes were similar for myocardial infarction (0.84 [0.76–0.92]) and even more pronounced for ischemic stroke (0.77 [0.67–0.83]). In contrast, all-cause mortality was not improved by the intensified lipid lowering therapy (0.94 [0.85–1.05]). No relevant heterogeneity and inconsistency between groups was present in all analyses (detailed data not shown). Comparing efficacy of LDL-reduction and relative risk redaction of cardiovascular events, a linear relationship was observed (figure). Figure 1. Correlation of reduction of LDL-cholesterol at one year with relative risk reduction (95% confidence interval) of cardiovascular events in included trials. Conclusion Intensified LDL-lowering therapy with ezetimibe or PCSK-9 inhibitors, in addition to statins, reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, however, does not impact overall mortality. There is a linear relationship between LDL reduction and cardiovascular risk reduction, confirming the beneficial effects of LDL lowering therapy beyond statins in secondary prevention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document