Left atrial dynamics in the hemodynamic response during exercise in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a cardiopulmonary imaging study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Sugimoto ◽  
F Bandera ◽  
M Barletta ◽  
E Alfonzetti ◽  
M Guazzi
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background The hemodynamic impact of left atrial (LA) dynamics in aortic stenosis (AS) in relation to cardiopulmonary response to exercise has never been studied. We aimed at investigating the link between LA function vs valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) and right ventricular (RV)-to-pulmonary circulation (PC) coupling in asymptomatic severe AS patients. Methods A total of 94 patients: 64 asymptomatic severe AS patients (aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0 cm2 or AVA index <0.6 cm2/m2) with ejection fraction >50% and 30 gender-matched control subjects underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with Echo-Doppler with assessment of LA strain and RV-to-PC coupling (tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion (TAPSE)/ pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) ratio). AS patients were divided into 3 groups according to peak aortic jet velocity (PV), mean pressure gradient (MPG) and stroke volume index (SVI). Zva was assessed using (MPG + systolic blood pressure)/ SVI ratio. Results Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS (PLFLG: PV <4 m/s and MPG <40 mmHg, SVI ≤35ml/m2, N=18, AVA 0.77±0.16 cm2), Normal-flow low-gradient AS (NFLG: PV <4 m/s and MPG <40 mmHg, SVI >35ml/m2, N=23, AVA 0.85±0.16 cm2) and High-gradient AS (HG: PV ≥4 m/s or MPG ≥40 mmHg, N=20, AVA 0.62±0.17 cm2) had a higher LA volume index than Control (Control 22±6, PLFLG 33±11*, NFLG 38±12* and HG 33±9* ml/m2, *P<0.05 vs Control). There was no significant difference in peak VO2 (17±5 ml/min/kg) and VE/VCO2 slope (28±3) among 3 AS groups although PLFLG had lower peak cardiac output (7.0±2.4 L/min) compared to NFLG (9.0±2.3 L/min) and HG (9.2±3.3 L/min). In PLFLG and NFLG AS, LA strain at rest (21±9 and 26±13%) and during exercise (26±12 and 31±14%) were decreased compared to Control (37±8% at rest, 43±11% during exercise) but maintained some reserve during exercise (P<0.001). HG AS had no increase in LA strain (31±15% at rest, 28±15% during exercise) (Figure A). In AS groups, no significant correlation at rest was observed between LA strain and Zva, whereas a negative correlation was observed during exercise (R=−0.4, P=0.003, Figure B). LA strain was also correlated with TAPSE/PASP at rest and exercise (R=0.44 and 0.47, P<0.01, respectively, Figure C). Conclusions In asymptomatic severe AS, the study of LA functional adaptation to exercise plays a key role in the hemodynamic unfavorable cascade from AS-related left ventricular afterload to RV-to-PC uncoupling. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Left atrial dynamics in the hemodynamic response during exercise in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Sugimoto ◽  
F Bandera ◽  
G Generati ◽  
E Alfonzetti ◽  
M Guazzi
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background The hemodynamic impact of left atrial (LA) dynamics in aortic stenosis (AS) in relation to cardiopulmonary response to exercise has never been studied. We aimed at investigating the link between LA function vs hemodynamics and prognosis in asymptomatic severe AS patients. Methods A total of 106 patients: 76 asymptomatic severe AS patients (aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0 cm2 or AVA index <0.6 cm2/m2) and 30 gender-matched control subjects underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with Echo-Doppler with assessment of LA strain. AS patients were divided into 4 groups according to peak aortic jet velocity (PV), mean pressure gradient (MPG), stroke volume index (SVI), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results Normal-flow low-gradient AS (NFLG: PV <4 m/s and MPG <40 mmHg, SVI >35ml/m2, LVEF ≥50%, N=23), High-gradient AS (HG: PV ≥4 m/s or MPG ≥40 mmHg, LVEF ≥50%, N=23), Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS (PLFLG: PV <4 m/s and MPG <40 mmHg, SVI ≤35ml/m2, LVEF ≥50%, N=18), and Classical low-flow AS (CLF: LVEF <50%, N=12) had a higher LA volume index than Control (Control 22±6, NFLG 38±12*, HG 33±9*, PLFLG 33±11*, and CLF 49±15* ml/m2, *P<0.05 vs Control). In PLFLG and NFLG AS, LA strain at rest (21±9 and 26±13%) and during exercise (26±12 and 31±14%) were decreased compared to Control (37±8% at rest, 43±11% during exercise) but LA strain was increased from rest to exercise (P<0.001). HG and CLF AS had no increase in LA strain (31±15 and 19±10% at rest, 28±15 and 18±9% during exercise) (figure). In Cox proportional hazards analysis, age and gender adjusted hazard ratio for the composite end point (aortic valve replacement, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality) of changes in LA-strain from rest to exercise (1% increase) was 1.05 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.09, P=0.044) among AS patients. Conclusions In asymptomatic severe AS, the study of LA functional adaptation to exercise plays a key role in the hemodynamic unfavorable cascade signaling major adaptive differences in dynamics during physical challenge. Overall, LA dynamics provides prognostic information also in AS patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals P1370 Correlation of aortic stenosis by integrated transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography with calcium score

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Schwartzenberg ◽  
Y Shapira ◽  
M Vaturi ◽  
M Nassar ◽  
A Hamdan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Coronary Ct

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis (AS) classification depends on left-ventricular ejection-fraction (LVEF <≥50%), aortic valve area (AVA<≥1cm2), mean pressure gradient (MG<≥40mmHg), peak velocity<≥400 cm/sec, and stroke-volume index (SVI<≥35ml/m2). Aortic Valve Agatston CT score (AVC) correlates with AS severity by trans-thoracic echo (TTE), but its association with AS severity determined by integrated TTE and TEE is unknown. PURPOSE We investigated correlation of AVC with dichotomous AS grouping by Integrated TTE + TEE vs TTE only. METHODS 64 TAVI candidates underwent sequential TTE and TEE, of which 24 underwent coronary CT within 4 months. Based on recommended conservative vs invasive treatment implication (A/B respectively), AS types were aggregated separately by TTE or Integrated TTE-TEE into two groups: Group-A (Moderate AS and Normal-Flow Low-Gradient), and Group-B (High-Gradient, Low-EF Low-Flow Low-Gradient, and Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient). Continuous and dichotomous AVC correlation (cutoffs based on guidelines) with echo binary classification was then determined. RESULTS Patients were 81.1(77.3-84.6) years old, 18(48.6%) were women, and had LVEF of 60% (49-65). AVC-score distribution in the two AS A/B Groups by two echo modalities is presented in the boxplot Figure. Only classification by TTE held discriminative accuracy in A/B grouping, with Area-Under-Curve of 0.736 (CI 0.57-0.9), and optimal threshold value of 1946 AU having 77% sensitivity and 74% specificity. Compared with AVC dichotomous classification, integrated TTE + TEE upgraded AS class (from A to B) in 5/6 (83.3%) patients vs 12/18 (66.7%) in which it downgraded AS class from B to A. CONCLUSIONS Aortic valve calcification correlates well with AS class dichotomized by operative implication through conventional TTE but not through integrated TTE + TEE. Our preliminary results appear to be caused by initial selection bias of patients in whom coronary CT performance was deemed to be justified by the treating physician rather than reflect a true better correlation between CT score and AS assessment by TTE vs by integrated TTE + TEE. Abstract P1370 Figure.

scholarly journals Use of passive leg rise as an add-on to dobutamine in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Buffle ◽  
A Papadis ◽  
C Seiler ◽  
S F De Marchi
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Low Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background Dobutamine has been proposed for the assessment of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLGAS). However, in 1/3 of patients, no increase in stroke volume index can be achieved by Dobutamine, thus hampering its diagnostic value. This study evaluated the manoeuvre of cardiac preload augmentation by passive leg rise (PLR) alone or on top of Dobutamine to increase stroke volume index (SVI) in patients with LFLGAS, particularly in paradoxical LFLGAS. Methods We examined 50 patients with LFLGAS. Patients were assigned to the paradoxical LFLGAS (Paradox) group if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was ≥50% (n=29) and to the LFLGAS with low ejection fraction (LEF) group if LVEF was <50% (n=21). A modified Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in all patients with the following 4 steps: Rest, PLR alone, maximal Dobutamine infusion rate alone (Dmax) and Dobutamine plus PLR (Dmax + PLR). Three SVI measurement methods were used: first the left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) method, second the 2D Simpson's method, and third the 3D method. The corresponding aortic valve area (AVA) was obtained by the continuity equation. The increase of those values compared to measurements at rest was calculated and compared between the 3 stress steps. Results In the paradoxical LFLGAS group, delta SVI with Dmax assessed by both Simpson's (depicted in the figures) and 3D method was lowest compared to PLR and Dmax + PLR. PLR alone yielded an equally high delta SVI as Dmax + PLR in Simpson's and 3D, and was at least as high as Dmax across all methods. Dobutamine alone yielded the lowest delta transaortic aortic valve VTI. The highest delta aortic valve area resulted for Dmax + PLR. In the LEF group, the three stress steps yielded an equally high delta SVI with Simpson's method. Dmax never yielded a higher delta SVI than PLR alone. The yielded delta SVI was the highest for Dmax + PLR for both LVOT VTI and 3d method, although the difference was overall not as strong as in the Paradox group. Conclusions In patients with paradoxical LFLGAS, Dobutamine alone is inadequate for testing the potential of aortic valve opening augmentation. Instead, PLR alone or the addition of PLR plus Dobutamine should be used for that purpose. In low LVEF, adding PLR to Dobutamine also seems useful although its diagnostic added value is less evident than in the Paradox group. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Foundation Paradox group Low ejection fraction group

P6470Ventriculo-arterial coupling in severe aortic stenosis: does the flow-gradient pattern play a role?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Vijiiac ◽  
C Neagu ◽  
A Cherry ◽  
S Onciul ◽  
D Zamfir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Arterial Elastance ◽  
Ventricular Elastance ◽  
Flow Gradient

Abstract Background Ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC) assesses the interplay between ventricular contractility and afterload and it is calculated as the ratio between arterial elastance (Ea) and end-systolic left ventricular elastance (EES). Severe aortic stenosis (AS) carries different configurations according to transvalvular flow rates and pressure gradients and each of these entities has its particularities in terms of physiology and clinical outcome. Little has been studied so far regarding the changes of VAC in severe AS. Purpose We sought to assess the VAC non-invasively in patients (pts) with severe AS and to characterize it according to the flow-gradient pattern. Methods We included 61 consecutive pts with severe AS (78±13 years, 30 men, indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2), for whom we performed a comprehensive echocardiography. VAC was determined as the ratio between Ea and EES. Patients were divided in 4 groups, depending on stroke volume index (low-flow [LF] vs. normal-flow [NF]: 35 ml/m2) and mean transaortic pressure gradient (low-gradient [LG] vs. normal gradient [NG]: 40 mm Hg). This resulted in the following flow-gradient patterns: LFLG, LFNG, NFLG, NFNG. Data were compared between groups with one-way analysis of variance and then with a Tukey test. Results There were 11 pts (18%) in the LFLG group, 20 pts (32.8%) in the LFNG group, 8 pts (13.2%) in the NFLG group and 22 pts (36%) in the NGNG group. The arterial elastance was highest in the LFLG group: 3.37±1.49 vs. 2.79±0.92 in the LFNG, 2.05±0.57 in the NFLG and 1.54±0.49 in the NFNG group (p<0.001). The ventricular elastance was also highest in the LFLG group (4.03±2.46) vs. 3.16±1.33 in the LFNG, 2.21±1.22 in the NFLG and 2.29±0.78 in the NFNG group (p=0.007). VAC was most impaired in the NFLG group (1.35±1.08), followed by LFNG group (1.00±0.47), LFLG group (0.93±0.27) and NFNG group (0.70±0.14) (p=0.01). Valvulo-arterial impedance (ZVA) was highest in the LFNG group: 7.78±2.15, followed by 7.38±2.17 in the LFLG group, 4.93±1.17 in the NFLG group and 4.33±1.23 in the NFNG group (p<0.001). VAC and ZVA showed no significant correlation (p=0.27), with VAC being significantly more impaired in patients with abnormal ZVA (>4.5 mm Hg/ml/m2): 0.99±0.60 vs. 0.73±0.20 (p=0.02). Conclusion The ventriculo-vascular interaction in severe AS varies noticeably according to the flow-gradient pattern. Low-gradient states, particularly NFLG, have the most impaired VAC. This study supports the idea that these 4 configurations are different clinical entities and it highlights the importance of integrating the flow-gradient pattern for a comprehensive evaluation of AS severity. Acknowledgement/Funding This work was supported by CREDO Project - ID: 49182, financed through the SOP IEC -A2-0.2.2.1-2013-1 cofinanced by the ERDF

Echocardiographic findings on aortic stenosis: an observational, prospective, and multi-center registry

Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026765912092492
Author(s):  
Shehab Anwer ◽  
Didem Oğuz ◽  
Laura Galian-Gay ◽  
Irena Peovska Mitevska ◽  
Lilit Baghdassarian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The aim of this aortic stenosis registry was to investigate the changes of routine echocardiographic indices and strain in patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis over a 6-month follow-up period. Methods: Our aortic stenosis registry is observational, prospective, multicenter registry of nine countries, with 197 patients with aortic valve area less than 1.5 cm2. The enrolment took place from January to August 2017. We excluded patients with uncontrolled atrial arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension or cardiomyopathies, as well as those with hemodynamically significant valvular disease other than aortic stenosis. We included patients who did not require intervention and who had a complete follow-up study. Results: In patients with preserved ejection fraction, left ventricular mass has significantly increased between baseline and follow-up studies (218 ± 34 grams vs 253 ± 29 grams, p = 0.02). However, when indexed to body surface area, there was no significant difference. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain significantly decreased (-19.7 ± -4.8 vs (-16.4 vs -3.8, p = 0.01). Left atrial volume was significantly higher at follow-up (p = 0.035). Right ventricular basal diameter and mid-cavity diameter were greater at the follow-up (p = 0.04 and p = 0.035, respectively). Patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis had significantly lower global longitudinal strain (-12.3% ± -3.9% vs -19.7% ± -4.8%, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Left atrial dilatation is one of the first changes to take place in low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis patients even when left ventricular dimensions and function remains intact. Global longitudinal strain is an important determinant of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and right ventricular function is an important parameter of aortic stenosis assessment. Accordingly, our registry has further shed the light on these indices role as multisite follow-up of aortic stenosis.

Abstract 20128: Effect of Renin-angiotensin Blockers on Left Ventricular Remodelling in Severe Aortic Stenosis

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Serene S Goh ◽  
Poay Sian S Lee ◽  
Edgar L Tay ◽  
William K Kong ◽  
Tiong Cheng Yeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The use of renin-angiotensin blockers (RAB: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ACEI and angiotensin receptor blockers, ARB) in severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) remains controversial. We aim to explore the relation on their use with degree of left ventricular (LV) remodelling in patients with normal flow (NF) and low-flow (LF) severe AS despite preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: We studied 423 consecutive patients with aortic valve area (AVA) 50%. Subjects with concomitant valvular pathologies, congenital heart disease or prosthetic valves were excluded. NF was categorized as LV stroke volume index (SVi) > 35ml/m2. Increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was ≥96g/m2 and 116g/m2 in females and males respectively while abnormal relative wall thickness (RWT) was ≥0.45. Results: The median age was 74 yrs (IQR: 65-82). Prevalence of male subjects 52%, diabetes mellitus 61%, dyslipidemia 48% and hypertension 43%. A quarter of the patients were on RAB, with a mean duration of 6.7 months(IQR:1.0-72.3). Median LVMI for patients on RAB was 94.5 g/m2 (IQR: 87.3-144), whilst those without was 120.3 g/m2 (IQR: 102-159) (p=0.005). RAB use in patients with LF AS was significantly associated with normal LVMI, adjusted for hypertension (OR 2.00, p=0.002). The use of RAB had a duration dependent association with normal LVMI. Patients on RAB for a year were twice more likely to have normal LVMI (OR 2.24, p=0.048). This effect is greater in patients with 2 years of therapy (OR 3.417, p=0.002). In contrast, the use of RAB was not associated with normal LVMI in the NF group (p=0.428). There was no significant difference between use of either ACEI or ARB on LVMI (p=0.855). Patients on RAB had less risk of having concentric hypertrophy (OR= 0.373, p=0.009) and eccentric hypertrophy (0.392, p=0.025) as compared to those without. Conclusion: Use of RAB in LF severe AS may be associated with beneficial remodeling of the LV especially if prescribed for more than a year. Further studies are warranted to determine the deferential effects of RAB on clinical outcomes in LF versus NF AS.

scholarly journals Impact of the Trifecta bioprosthetic valve in patients with low-flow severe aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Takaseya ◽  
Atsunobu Oryoji ◽  
Kazuyoshi Takagi ◽  
Tomofumi Fukuda ◽  
Koichi Arinaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Effective Orifice Area ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Hemodynamic Performance ◽  
Mid Term Results

AbstractAortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valve disorder in advanced age. Previous reports have shown that low-flow status of the left ventricle is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality after surgery. The Trifecta bioprosthesis has recently shown favorable hemodynamic performance. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Trifecta bioprosthesis, which has a large effective orifice area, in patients with low-flow severe AS who have a poor prognosis. We retrospectively evaluated 94 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients were divided into two groups according to the stroke volume index (SVI): low-flow (LF) group (SVI < 35 ml/m2, n = 22) and normal-flow (NF) group (SVI ≥ 35 ml/m2, n = 72). Patients’ characteristics and early and mid-term results were compared between the two groups. There were no differences in patients’ characteristics, except for systolic blood pressure (LF:NF = 120:138 mmHg, p < 0.01) and the rate of atrial fibrillation between the groups. A preoperative echocardiogram showed that the pressure gradient was higher in the NF group than in the LF group, but aortic valve area was similar. The Trifecta bioprosthesis size was similar in both groups. The operative outcomes were not different between the groups. Severe patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (< 0.65 cm2/m2) was not observed in either of the groups. There were no significant differences in mid-term results between the two groups. The favorable hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis appears to have the similar outcomes in the LF and NF groups. AVR with the Trifecta bioprosthesis should be considered for avoidance of PPM, particularly in AS patients with LV dysfunction.

scholarly journals P289 Aortic valve resistance risk-stratifies low-gradient aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Cho ◽  
T Uejima ◽  
H Nishikawa ◽  
J Yajima ◽  
T Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Grading the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, since there is a discrepancy between aortic valve area (AVA) and mean pressure gradient (mPG). Arotic valve resistance (RES) has been proposed as a usuful descriptor of AS severity, but it is not commonly used for clinical decision-making, because its robust validation of clinical-outcome efficacy is lacking. This study aimed to investigate whether RES holds an incremental value for risk-stratifying AS. Methods This study recuited 565 AS patients (AVA &lt; 1.5cm²) referred to echocardiography for valve assessment. The patients were divided into three different groups, according to the guidelines: high-gradient AS (HG-AS, mPG≥40mmHg, n = 157), low-gradient AS (LG-AS, mPG &lt; 40mmHg + AVA ≤ 1.0cm², n = 155) and moderate AS (Mod-AS, mPG &lt; 40mmHg + AVA &gt; 1.0cm², n = 253). RES was calculated from Doppler measurement of mPG and stoke volume. The diagnositic cutoff point for RES was determined at 190 dynes × s×cm-5 by substituting AVA = 1.0cm² and mPG = 40mmHg into the definition formula of RES and Gorlin formula. The patients were followed up for 2 years. The endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, hospitalization for heart failure and aortic valve replacement necessitated by the development of AS-related symptoms. Result Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that LG-AS exhibited an intermediate outcome between HG-AS and Mod-AS (event-free survival at 2 years = 20.9% for HG-AS, 59.7% for LG-AS, 89.9% for Mod-AS, p &lt; 0.001, figure A). When LG-AS was stratified by RES, the survival curves showed a significant separation (event-free survival at 2 years = 35.3% for high RES, 70.7% for low RES, p &lt; 0.001, figure B). This trend persisted even when analysed separately for norml (stroke volume index &gt; 35ml/m²) and low (stroke volume index ≤ 35ml/m²) flow state ((normal flow) event-free survival at 2 years = 38.7% for high RES, 70.4% for low RES, p = 0.023, figure C; (low flow) event-free survival at 2 years = 26.7% for high RES, 74.6% for low RES, p &lt; 0.001, figure D). Conclusion This study confirmed the clinical efficacy of RES for risk-stratifying LG-AS patients. Abstract P289 Figure.

Demographic characteristics, aortic valve intervention rates and all-cause mortality in 4 flow-gradient sub-types of severe aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Saeed ◽  
A Vamvakidou ◽  
H.Y Yakupoglu ◽  
R Senior ◽  
R.S Khattar
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Flow Gradient ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Introduction Severe aortic stenosis (AS), defined as aortic valve area (AVA) &lt;1.0 cm2, can be divided into 4 categories based on flow status and mean gradient. Stroke volume index &lt;35 ml/m2 has classically been used to define low flow, but recent data suggest that flow rate (FR) &lt;200ml/sec may be a more accurate and robust marker of low flow. Methods We prospectively collected demographic, echocardiographic, aortic valve intervention (AVI) and all-cause mortality data on 1562 patients with symptomatic severe AS from 2010 to 2017 with a mean follow up period of 35±22 months. Patients were divided into 4 flow-gradient sub-groups based on a FR threshold of 200ml/s and mean pressure gradient of 40mmHg. Comparative analyses were performed among the 4 groups using analysis of variance. Results The prevalence of normal flow high gradient (NFHG) severe AS was 30%, NF low gradient (NFLG) 21%, low flow HG (LFHG) 18% and LFLG 31% (Table). Across these 4 sub-groups, there was a graded reduction in LVEF and FR, and an increase in age and all–cause mortality. Conclusions Classification of aortic stenosis based on flow-gradient patterns, shows important differences in the demographic profile and clinical outcome among the 4 groups. Classical NFHG AS was associated with the highest rate of AVI and lowest all-cause mortality compared to the 3 discordant flow-gradient subtypes. The LFLG group had the lowest AVI rates and worst outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Correlation between Left Atrial Volume Index and Pulmonary Hypertension in Patient with Moderate to Severe Aortic Stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 824-828
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Atrium ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Left Atrial Volume ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Left Atrium Volume

Background: Left atrial dilatation is a response to pressure overload in aortic stenosis (AS). Objective: To study the correlation between left atrium volume index (LAVI) and the pulmonary hypertension in patients with moderate to severe AS. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively studied patients with moderate to severe AS (either one or all echocardiographic criteria of aortic valve area [AVA]) smaller than 1.5 cm², AV Vmax of more than 3 m/s, AV mean PG of more than 30 mmHg who underwent transthoracic echocardiography at Pranangklao Hospital between January 2015 and December 2019. Results: One hundred thirty-four patients (age 72.31±12.32 years, 46.3% male) were enrolled. In pulmonary hypertension group, proportion of atrial fibrillation (75%) were significantly higher Sinus Rhythm (26.3%). Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) tended to increase when LAVI increased (r=0.695, p<0.001). The mean RVSP in four groups of LAVI (less than 35 ml/m², 35 to 41 ml/m², 42 to 48 ml/m², and more than 48 ml/m²) were 35.11±8.97, 38.22±11.71, 39.0±8.57, and 60.05±31 mmHg, respectively. RVSP in patients with LAVI of more than 48 ml/m² was significantly higher than those of the other group (p<0.001). LAVI in patients with RVSP of less than 50 and more than 50 mmHg were 35.13±6.86 and 65.22±11.55 ml/m², respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Moderate to severe AS, RVSP increase when LAVI increases. Keywords: Echocardiography, Left atrium volume index, Aortic stenosis, Pulmonary hypertension

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document