scholarly journals Elements essential for accumulation and function of small nucleolar RNAs directing site-specific pseudouridylation of ribosomal RNAs

1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-L. Bortolin
1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Filipowicz ◽  
P Pelczar ◽  
V Pogacic ◽  
F Dragon

Maturation of pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA) in eukaryotic cells takes place in the nucleolus and involves a large number of cleavage events, which frequently follow alternative pathways. In addition, rRNAs are extensively modified, with the methylation of the 2'-hydroxyl group of sugar residues and conversion of uridines to pseudouridines being the most frequent modifications. Both cleavage and modification reactions of pre-rRNAs are assisted by a variety of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), which function in the form of ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs). The majority of snoRNAs acts as guides directing site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation or pseudouridine formation. Over one hundred RNAs of this type have been identified to date in vertebrates and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This number is readily explained by the findings that one snoRNA acts as a guide usually for one or at most two modifications, and human rRNAs contain 91 pseudouridines and 106 2'-O-methyl residues. In this article we review information about the biogenesis, structure and function of guide snoRNAs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Laeya Baldini ◽  
Bruno Charpentier ◽  
Stéphane Labialle

Box C/D small nucleolar RNAs (C/D snoRNAs) represent an ancient family of small non-coding RNAs that are classically viewed as housekeeping guides for the 2′-O-methylation of ribosomal RNA in Archaea and Eukaryotes. However, an extensive set of studies now argues that they are involved in mechanisms that go well beyond this function. Here, we present these pieces of evidence in light of the current comprehension of the molecular mechanisms that control C/D snoRNA expression and function. From this inventory emerges that an accurate description of these activities at a molecular level is required to let the snoRNA field enter in a second age of maturity.


Cell ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 799-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Ganot ◽  
Marie-Line Bortolin ◽  
Tamás Kiss

Cell ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
pp. 1077-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Kiss-László ◽  
Yves Henry ◽  
Jean-Pierre Bachellerie ◽  
Michèle Caizergues-Ferrer ◽  
Tamás Kiss

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 53-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Lui ◽  
Todd Lowe

snoRNAs (small nucleolar RNAs) constitute one of the largest and best-studied classes of non-coding RNAs that confer enzymatic specificity. With associated proteins, these snoRNAs form ribonucleoprotein complexes that can direct 2′-O-methylation or pseudouridylation of target non-coding RNAs. Aided by computational methods and high-throughput sequencing, new studies have expanded the diversity of known snoRNA functions. Complexes incorporating snoRNAs have dynamic specificity, and include diverse roles in RNA silencing, telomerase maintenance and regulation of alternative splicing. Evidence that dysregulation of snoRNAs can cause human disease, including cancer, indicates that the full scope of snoRNA roles remains an unfinished story. The diversity in structure, genomic origin and function between snoRNAs found in different complexes and among different phyla illustrates the surprising plasticity of snoRNAs in evolution. The ability of snoRNAs to direct highly specific interactions with other RNAs is a consistent thread in their newly discovered functions. Because they are ubiquitous throughout Eukarya and Archaea, it is likely they were a feature of the last common ancestor of these two domains, placing their origin over two billion years ago. In the present chapter, we focus on recent advances in our understanding of these ancient, but functionally dynamic RNA-processing machines.


Genes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Motorin ◽  
Virginie Marchand

Ribose 2′-O-methylation is certainly one of the most common RNA modifications found in almost any type of cellular RNA. It decorates transfer RNAs (tRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) (and most probably small nucleolar RNAs, snoRNAs), as well as regulatory RNAs like microRNAs (miRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), and finally, eukaryotic messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Due to this exceptional widespread of RNA 2′-O-methylation, considerable efforts were made in order to precisely map these numerous modifications. Extensive studies of RNA 2′-O-methylation were also stimulated by the discovery of C/D-box snoRNA-guided machinery, which insures site-specific modification of hundreds 2′-O-methylated residues in archaeal and eukaryotic rRNAs and some other RNAs. In this brief review we discussed both traditional approaches of RNA biochemistry and also modern deep sequencing-based methods, used for detection/mapping and quantification of RNA 2′-O-methylations.


Author(s):  
Witold Filipowicz ◽  
Pawel Pelczar ◽  
Vanda Pogacic ◽  
François Dragon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document