scholarly journals Site-Specific Pseudouridine Formation in Preribosomal RNA Is Guided by Small Nucleolar RNAs

Cell ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 799-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Ganot ◽  
Marie-Line Bortolin ◽  
Tamás Kiss
1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Filipowicz ◽  
P Pelczar ◽  
V Pogacic ◽  
F Dragon

Maturation of pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA) in eukaryotic cells takes place in the nucleolus and involves a large number of cleavage events, which frequently follow alternative pathways. In addition, rRNAs are extensively modified, with the methylation of the 2'-hydroxyl group of sugar residues and conversion of uridines to pseudouridines being the most frequent modifications. Both cleavage and modification reactions of pre-rRNAs are assisted by a variety of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), which function in the form of ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs). The majority of snoRNAs acts as guides directing site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation or pseudouridine formation. Over one hundred RNAs of this type have been identified to date in vertebrates and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This number is readily explained by the findings that one snoRNA acts as a guide usually for one or at most two modifications, and human rRNAs contain 91 pseudouridines and 106 2'-O-methyl residues. In this article we review information about the biogenesis, structure and function of guide snoRNAs.


Cell ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
pp. 1077-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Kiss-László ◽  
Yves Henry ◽  
Jean-Pierre Bachellerie ◽  
Michèle Caizergues-Ferrer ◽  
Tamás Kiss

Genes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Motorin ◽  
Virginie Marchand

Ribose 2′-O-methylation is certainly one of the most common RNA modifications found in almost any type of cellular RNA. It decorates transfer RNAs (tRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) (and most probably small nucleolar RNAs, snoRNAs), as well as regulatory RNAs like microRNAs (miRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), and finally, eukaryotic messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Due to this exceptional widespread of RNA 2′-O-methylation, considerable efforts were made in order to precisely map these numerous modifications. Extensive studies of RNA 2′-O-methylation were also stimulated by the discovery of C/D-box snoRNA-guided machinery, which insures site-specific modification of hundreds 2′-O-methylated residues in archaeal and eukaryotic rRNAs and some other RNAs. In this brief review we discussed both traditional approaches of RNA biochemistry and also modern deep sequencing-based methods, used for detection/mapping and quantification of RNA 2′-O-methylations.


Cell ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwei Ni ◽  
Amy L Tien ◽  
Maurille J Fournier

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Laeya Baldini ◽  
Bruno Charpentier ◽  
Stéphane Labialle

Box C/D small nucleolar RNAs (C/D snoRNAs) represent an ancient family of small non-coding RNAs that are classically viewed as housekeeping guides for the 2′-O-methylation of ribosomal RNA in Archaea and Eukaryotes. However, an extensive set of studies now argues that they are involved in mechanisms that go well beyond this function. Here, we present these pieces of evidence in light of the current comprehension of the molecular mechanisms that control C/D snoRNA expression and function. From this inventory emerges that an accurate description of these activities at a molecular level is required to let the snoRNA field enter in a second age of maturity.


1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 4382-4390
Author(s):  
O J Rimoldi ◽  
B Raghu ◽  
M K Nag ◽  
G L Eliceiri

We have recently described three novel human small nucleolar RNA species with unique nucleotide sequences, which were named E1, E2, and E3. The present article describes specific psoralen photocross-linking in whole HeLa cells of E1, E2, and E3 RNAs to nucleolar pre-rRNA. These small RNAs were cross-linked to different sections of pre-rRNA. E1 RNA was cross-linked to two segments of nucleolar pre-rRNA; one was within residues 697 to 1163 of the 5' external transcribed spacer, and the other one was between nucleotides 664 and 1021 of the 18S rRNA sequence. E2 RNA was cross-linked to a region within residues 3282 to 3667 of the 28S rRNA sequence. E3 RNA was cross-linked to a sequence between positions 1021 and 1639 of the 18S rRNA sequence. Primer extension analysis located psoralen adducts in E1, E2, and E3 RNAs that were enriched in high-molecular-weight fractions of nucleolar RNA. Some of these psoralen adducts might be cross-links of E1, E2, and E3 RNAs to large nucleolar RNA. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide-targeted RNase H digestion of nucleolar extracts revealed accessible segments in these three small RNAs. The accessible regions were within nucleotide positions 106 to 130 of E1 RNA, positions 24 to 48 and 42 to 66 of E2 RNA, and positions 7 to 16 and about 116 to 122 of E3 RNA. Some of the molecules of these small nucleolar RNAs sedimented as if associated with larger structures when both nondenatured RNA and a nucleolar extract were analyzed.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisheng Zhang ◽  
Jiaohui Wu ◽  
Andrew J Vista ◽  
Leigh Brian ◽  
Yushi Bai ◽  
...  

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to atherogenesis. An unusual mechanism that increases cellular ROS levels and oxidative stress involves 4 ubiquitously expressed noncoding small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) from introns of the ribosomal protein L13a ( Rpl13a ) locus: U32a , U33 , U34 , and U35a . We tested the hypothesis that these snoRNAs promote aortic smooth muscle cell (SMC) activation and vascular inflammation, by using “snoKO” mice with targeted deletion of the 4 snoRNAs (but not Rpl13a ). Compared with congenic WT SMCs, snoKO SMCs showed 40±20% lower ROS levels, assessed by DCF fluorescence ( p <0.02). Congruently, ROS levels were 35±5% lower in snoKO than WT aorta and carotid frozen sections ( p <0.01), assessed by CellROX Orange fluorescence. Proliferation and migration evoked by FBS and PDGF-BB, respectively, were each 30±10% less in snoKO than WT SMCs ( p <0.01 for each). To assess SMC migration and proliferation in vivo, we performed carotid artery endothelial denudation. Before injury, snoKO and WT carotid arteries were morphologically equivalent. Four wk after injury, carotid neointimal hyperplasia was 57±9% less and luminal area was 40±20 % more in snoKO than in WT mice ( p <0.01). WT and snoKO mice had equivalent heart rates and systolic blood pressures by tail-cuff plethysmography: 480±20 vs 420±80 beats/min; 133±5, 132±7 mm Hg, respectively (n=5/group). To test whether snoRNAs affect atherosclerosis, we orthotopically transplanted carotid arteries from WT and snoKO mice into congenic Apoe -/- mice. Six wk post-op, atherosclerotic neointima was 70±10% smaller in snoKO than in WT carotids ( p <0.01). To assess SMC-to-foam-cell transdifferentiation, which is ROS-dependent, carotid cross-sections were stained for apoE to identify graft-derived cells and for cholesteryl ester with BODIPY. BODIPY + foam cells comprised 21±3% and 11±7% of neointimal area in WT and snoKO carotids, respectively ( p <0.05). Confocal co-localization of apoE and BODIPY (optical slice thickness 1 μm) showed that graft-derived foam cells were 2.0±0.6-fold more prevalent in WT than in snoKO carotids ( p <0.01). We conclude that Rpl13a snoRNAs promote SMC ROS levels, proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo, and that these snoRNAs augment atherosclerosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document