Positive predictive value of CT coronary angiography vs. CT fractional flow reserve in a real-world population

Abstract Background Computerised tomography coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (CTCA and CT-FFR) are non-invasive diagnostic tools for the detection of flow limiting coronary artery stenoses. Although their negative predictive values are well established, there is a concern that the high sensitivity of these tests may lead to overestimation of coronary artery disease (CAD) and unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA). We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) of CT-FFR with computerised tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) against the gold standard of ICA in different real-world patient groups. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 477 patients referred for CTCA or CT-FFR for investigation of possible coronary ischaemia. Patients were excluded if the image quality was poor or inconclusive. Patient-based PPV was calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as more than 70% stenosis on ICA. A sub-analysis of PPV by indication for scan was also performed. Patients that underwent invasive non-hyperaemic pressure wire measurements had their iFR or RFR compared with their CT-FFR values. Results In a patient-based analysis, the overall PPV was 59.3% for CTCA and 76.2% for CT-FFR. This increased to 81.0% and 86.7% respectively for patients with stable angina symptoms. In patients with atypical angina symptoms, CT-FFR considerably outperformed CTCA with a PPV of 61.3% vs. 37.5%. There was not a linear relationship between invasive pressure wire measurement and CT-FFR value (r=0.23, p=0.265). Conclusion The PPV of CTCA and CT-FFR is lower in the real-world than in previously published trials, partly due to the heterogeneity of indication for the scan. However, in patients with typical angina symptoms, both are reliable diagnostic tools to determine the presence of clinically significant coronary stenoses. CT-FFR significantly outperforms CTCA in patients with more atypical symptoms and the targeted use of CT-FFR in this group may help to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Download Full-text

Abstract 5803: Optimal Threshold for Multi Detector Computer Tomography to Detect Physiologically Significant Stenosis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.118.suppl_18.s_106-a ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽

Author(s):

Takashi Yamano ◽

Atsushi Tanaka ◽

Takashi Tanimoto ◽

Shigeho Takarada ◽

Hiroki Kitabata ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery Disease ◽

Coronary Artery ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Optimal Threshold ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Significant Stenosis ◽

Artery Disease

PURPOSE: Sixty-four multi detector computed tomography angiography (64-MDCT) has emerged as a rapidly developing method for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease with high negative predictive value and relatively low positive predictive value, especially in patients with intermediate-severity coronary artery disease (ISCAD). There are, however, few studies regarding with optimal threshold for detection of physiologically significant stenosis in 64-MDCT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal threshold for 64-MDCT to detect physiologically significant stenosis using fractional flow reserve of the myocardium (FFRmyo) in patients with ISCAD. METHODS: We enrolled single lesions detected by 64-MDCT of 64 ISCAD patients (age, 68.3 +/− 10.2 years; 78% male). FFRmyo </= 0.75 measured by a 0.014-inch pressure wire was used as the gold standard for presence of physiologically significant stenosis. The area stenosis (%AS) in 64-MDCT were compared with the results of FFRmyo and percent diameter stenosis (%DS) in quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) during elective coronary angiography. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimum threshold for percent area stenosis (%AS) in 64-MDCT was determined in the prediction of FFRmyo </= 0.75. RESULTS: There was an inverse correlation between %AS in 64-MDCT and FFRmyo (65 +/− 20 % and 0.71 +/− 0.16, respectively; r = −0.67; p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between %AS in 64-MDCT and %DS in QCA (65 +/− 20 % and 63 +/− 19 %, respectively; r = 0.69; p < 0.01). Using a cutoff of 62 %AS in 64-MDCT, ROC curve analysis shows 79 % sensitivity, 85 % specificity, 82% positive predictive value, 83% negative predictive value and 83% accuracy for detecting physiologically significant stenosis. CONCLUSION: > 62 %AS in 64-MDCT could predict the physiologically significant coronary stenosis in patients with ISCAD. Applying an alternative threshold to detect physiologically significant stenosis might contribute to improve the diagnostic accuracy for 64-MDCT in patients with ISCAD.

Download Full-text

Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR

Cardiovascular Research ◽

10.1093/cvr/cvz289 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 116 (7) ◽

pp. 1349-1356 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jianping Li ◽

Yanjun Gong ◽

Weimin Wang ◽

Qing Yang ◽

Bin Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fluid Dynamics ◽

Coronary Artery ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Fractional Flow Reserve ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Performance ◽

Characteristic Curve ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Performance Goal ◽

Flow Reserve

Abstract Aims Conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured invasively using a coronary guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor. A non-invasive derived FFR would eliminate risk of coronary injury, minimize technical limitations, and potentially increase adoption. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a computational pressure-flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR), applied to coronary angiography, compared to invasive FFR. Methods and results The FLASH FFR study was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study conducted at six centres in China. Eligible patients had native coronary artery target lesions with visually estimated diameter stenosis of 30–90% and diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris. Using computational pressure-fluid dynamics, in conjunction with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, applied to coronary angiography, caFFR was measured online in real-time and compared blind to conventional invasive FFR by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was the agreement between caFFR and FFR, with a pre-specified performance goal of 84%. Between June and December 2018, matched caFFR and FFR measurements were performed in 328 coronary arteries. Total operational time for caFFR was 4.54 ± 1.48 min. caFFR was highly correlated to FFR (R = 0.89, P = 0.76) with a mean bias of −0.002 ± 0.049 (95% limits of agreement −0.098 to 0.093). The diagnostic performance of caFFR vs. FFR was diagnostic accuracy 95.7%, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 97.2%, negative predictive value 95.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.979. Conclusions Using wire-based FFR as the reference, caFFR has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. caFFR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, technical error and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1800019522.

Download Full-text

P2705Hybrid QFR-FFR decision making strategy for revascularization

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.1022 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Y Kanno ◽

M Hoshio ◽

T Sugiyama ◽

Y Kanaji ◽

M Yamaguchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Coronary Revascularization ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Hybrid Strategy ◽

Vasodilator Drugs ◽

Flow Reserve ◽

Pressure Wire

Abstract Background Measurement of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become a standard practice for revascularization decision-making in evaluating the functional significance of angiographically intermediate epicardial coronary stenosis. The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method for rapid computational estimation of FFR without pressure wire and vasodilator drugs. Purpose Nevertheless, the evidence was shown the clinical better outcome of coronary revascularization stratified by FFR, the adoption of FFR remains low. We hypothesized that combined QFR and FFR hybrid strategy could improve the physiological assessment without pressure wire and drugs. Methods and results We performed a post-hocanalysis of 549 vessels with angiographically intermediate stenosis in 549 patients who underwent measurement of FFR. The median FFR and QFR values were 0.81 (0.73–0.87) and 0.79 (0.74–0.87), respectively.The ischemic threshold was defined as 0.80 for both QFR and FFR measures. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the QFR for predicting an FFR of ≤0.80 were 86.2%, 71.9%, 78.9%, 74.5%, and 84.5%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using the cut-off threshold of ≤0.80 for the FFR was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–0.88) for the QFR.In total, 433 (78.9%) and 116 (21.1%) lesions showed concordant and discordant FFR and QFR functional classifications, respectively. A hybrid QFR-FFR strategy was developed, by allowing deferral when QFR values providing negative predictive value greater than 90% and treat others when QFR values greater than that showing 90% positive predictive value, with adenosine being given only to patients with QFR in between those values. For the FFR cut-off (0.8), an QFR of <0.73 could be used to confirm treatment (PPV of 90.7%), while an QFR value of >0.83 could be used to defer revascularization (NPV of 90.0%). When QFR values fall between 0.73 and 0.84, adenosine is given for hyperemic induction and the FFR cut-off of 0.8 is used to guide revascularization. This hybrid QFR-FFR approach has a 95% agreement with an FFR-only decision making, and 285 lesions (51.9%) would have obviated the need of a pressure wire and adenosine. Hybrid QFR-FFR strategy Conclusions A hybrid QFR-FFR strategy for coronary revascularization could reduce the need of a pressure wire and vasodilator drugs, which may increase the penetration of functional assessment of coronary lesions.

Download Full-text

Validation of the diagnostic performance of ‘HeartMedi V.1.0’, a novel CT-derived fractional flow reserve measurement, for patients with coronary artery disease: a study protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037780 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (7) ◽

pp. e037780

Author(s):

Soo-Hyun Kim ◽

Si-Hyuck Kang ◽

Woo-Young Chung ◽

Chang-Hwan Yoon ◽

Sang-Don Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Fractional Flow Reserve ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Performance ◽

Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Non Invasive ◽

Link Type ◽

Flow Reserve

IntroductionCoronary CT angiography (CCTA) is widely used for non-invasive coronary artery evaluation, but it is limited in identifying the nature of functional characteristics that cause ischaemia. Recent computational fluid dynamic (CFD) techniques applied to CCTA images permit non-invasive computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), a measure of lesion-specific ischaemia. However, this technology has limitations, such as long computational time and the need for expensive equipment, which hinder widespread use.Methods and analysisThis study is a prospective, multicentre, comparative and confirmatory trial designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HeartMedi V.1.0, a novel CT-derived FFR measurement for the detection of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses identified by CCTA, based on invasive FFR as a reference standard. The invasive FFR values ≤0.80 will be considered haemodynamically significant. The study will enrol 184 patients who underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography and invasive FFR. Computational FFR (c-FFR) will be analysed by CFD techniques using a lumped parameter model based on vessel length method. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, invasive FFR and c-FFR. The primary objective of the study is to compare the area under the receiver–operator characteristic curve between c-FFR and CCTA to non-invasively detect the presence of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. The secondary endpoints include diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and correlation of c-FFR with invasive FFR.Ethics and disseminationThe study has ethic approval from the ethics committee of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (E-1709/420-001) and informed consent will be obtained for all enrolled patients. The result will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberKCT0002725; Pre-results.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine ◽

10.3389/fcvm.2021.714077 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

Author(s):

Changling Li ◽

Xiaochang Leng ◽

Jingsong He ◽

Yongqing Xia ◽

Wenbing Jiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Stable Angina ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Performance ◽

Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽

Artery Stenosis ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Flow Reserve ◽

Sensitivity Specificity

Background: A new method for calculating fraction flow reserve (FFR) without pressure-wire (angiography-derived FFR) based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) images can be used to evaluate the functional problems of coronary stenosis.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of a novel method of calculating the FFR compared to wire-based FFR using retrospectively collected data from patients with stable angina.Methods: Three hundred patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent ICA and FFR measurement were included in this study. Two ICA images with projections >25° apart at the end-diastolic frame were selected for 3D reconstruction. Then, the contrast frame count was performed in an angiographic run to calculate the flow velocity. Based on the segmented vessel, calculated velocity, and aortic pressure, AccuFFRangio distribution was calculated through the pressure drop equation.Results: Using FFR ≤ 0.8 as a reference, we evaluated AccuFFRangio performance for 300 patients with its accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Comparison of AccuFFRangio with wire-measured FFR resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.954 (per-vessel, p < 0.0001). Accuracy for AccuFFRangio was 93.7% for Pa set from measurement and 87% for Pa = 100 mmHg in this clinical study. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for per-vessel were 90, 95, 86.7, 96.3, and 57.5, 97.7, 90.2, 86.3%, respectively. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for 2-dimensional (2D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were 63.3, 42.5, 70.9, 34.7, and 77.2%, respectively. The average processing time of AccuFFRangio was 4.30 ± 1.87 min.Conclusions: AccuFFRangio computed from coronary ICA images can be an accurate and time-efficient computational tool for detecting lesion-specific ischemia of coronary artery stenosis.

Download Full-text

Accuracy of MSCT Coronary Angiography with 64 Row CT Scanner—Facing the Facts

Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology ◽

10.4137/cmc.s3864 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. CMC.S3864 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

M. Wehrschuetz ◽

E. Wehrschuetz ◽

H. Schuchlenz ◽

G. Schaffler

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery Disease ◽

Coronary Artery ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Diagnostic Potential ◽

Coronary Artery Stenoses ◽

Artery Disease ◽

Msct Angiography

Improvements in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography of the coronary vessels have enabled the minimally invasive detection of coronary artery stenoses, while quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is the accepted reference standard for evaluation thereof. Sixteen-slice MSCT showed promising diagnostic accuracy in detecting coronary artery stenoses haemodynamically and the subsequent introduction of 64-slice scanners promised excellent and fast results for coronary artery studies. This prompted us to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the negative und positive predictive value of 64-slice MSCT in the detection of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses. Thirty-seven consecutive subjects with suspected coronary artery disease were evaluated with MSCT angiography and the results compared with QCA. All vessels were considered for the assessment of significant coronary artery stenosis (diameter reduction ≥ 50%). Thirteen patients (35%) were identified as having significant coronary artery stenoses on QCA with 6.3% (35/555) affected segments. None of the coronary segments were excluded from analysis. Overall sensitivity for classifying stenoses of 64-slice MSCT was 69%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value was 38% and negative predictive value was 98%. The interobserver variability for detection of significant lesions had a κ-value of 0.43. Sixty-four-slice MSCT offers the diagnostic potential to detect coronary artery disease, to quantify haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses and to avoid unnecessary invasive coronary artery examinations.

Download Full-text