scholarly journals Prevention of VEGF inhibitor-induced toxicity by salt restriction: the SUN-SALT study

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Van Doorn ◽  
W J Visser ◽  
D C H Van Dorst ◽  
K M M Mirabito Colafella ◽  
S L W Koolen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors target the formation of new blood vessels required for growth and metastatic spread of a malignant tumor. Although this is an effective anticancer treatment, many patients develop cardiovascular side effects such as hypertension, requiring dose reduction or early termination of treatment. In animals, VEGF inhibitor-induced hypertension is salt-sensitive. Aim To prospectively study whether salt restriction can prevent or attenuate the rise in blood pressure in response to anti-cancer treatment with VEGF inhibitors. Method This is a single centre prospective open-label intervention study. Patients are eligible when treated with a VEGF inhibitor according to standard of care and developing hypertension or a blood pressure rises of 20 mmHg or more during the first treatment cycle. A salt restricted diet (<4 grams/day) including provided salt-less bread is started during the off-treatment period under guidance of a specialized dietitian. The primary endpoint is mean difference in blood pressure rise between the treatment cycle with and the treatment cycle without salt restriction. We aim for a total of 16 patients with a blood pressure rise of at least 20mmHg and/or development of hypertension undergoing the intervention. Results Between 28 November 2019 and 25 March 2021, 45 patients gave informed consent. Fourteen patients developed hypertension and/or a blood pressure rise of at least 20 mmHg after three- four weeks of treatment making them eligible for the intervention. In 10 patients, salt restriction was the only intervention to reduce the blood pressure rise during the following treatment cycle, leading to a reduction in blood pressure rise of 17 mmHg (10 vs 27 mmHg; p<0.001). In four patients antihypertensive treatment was started during the first treatment cycle due to blood pressure rise above 170 mmHg. Salt restriction did not appear to have an important further blood pressure lowering effect, although in one patient the antihypertensive treatment was interrupted during the stop week and salt restriction was sufficient to limit the blood pressure rise in the second cycle. Importantly, the intervention was well tolerated and most patients continued salt restriction after the study finished. Conclusion Applying salt restriction might be an effective and well tolerated intervention to decrease blood pressure rise during treated with VEGF inhibitors. More importantly, this gives important information about the pathogenesis. Further studies of collected blood and 24h urine samples will allow conclusions on the role of endothelin-1, the renin aldosterone system and prostacyclins. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): De Merel (Charity aiming for research directly benefiting patients; yearly award, success rate ∼30% “Stichting De Merel”)

1993 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1123-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Davies ◽  
P. J. Belt ◽  
S. J. Roberts ◽  
N. J. Ali ◽  
J. R. Stradling

During obstructive sleep apnea, transient arousal at the resumption of breathing is coincident with a substantial rise in blood pressure. To assess the hemodynamic effect of arousal alone, 149 transient stimuli were administered to five normal subjects. Two electroencephalograms (EEG), an electrooculogram, a submental electromyogram (EMG), and beat-to-beat blood pressure (Finapres, Ohmeda) were recorded in all subjects. Stimulus length was varied to produce a range of cortical EEG arousals that were graded as follows: 0, no increase in high-frequency EEG or EMG; 1, increased high-frequency EEG and/or EMG for < 10 s; 2, increased high-frequency EEG and/or EMG for > 10 s. Overall, compared with control values, average systolic pressure rose [nonrapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep 10.0 +/- 7.69 (SD) mmHg; rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep 6.0 +/- 6.73 mmHg] and average diastolic pressure rose (NREM sleep 6.1 +/- 4.43 mmHg; REM sleep 3.7 +/- 3.02 mmHg) over the 10 s following the stimulus (NREM sleep, P < 0.0001; REM sleep, P < 0.002). During NREM sleep, there was a trend toward larger blood pressure rises at larger grades of arousal (systolic: r = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.02–0.40; diastolic: r = 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.31–0.62). The average blood pressure rise in response to the grade 2 arousals was approximately 75% of that during obstructive sleep apnea. Arousal stimuli that did not cause EEG arousal still produced a blood pressure rise (mean systolic rise 8.6 +/- 7.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliane Wenstedt ◽  
Nienke Rorije ◽  
Kim Van Der Molen ◽  
Youssef Chahid ◽  
Bert-Jan Van Den Born ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine R. Wilson ◽  
Shalini Manchanda ◽  
David Crabtree ◽  
James B. Skatrud ◽  
Jerome A. Dempsey

Wilson, Christine R., Shalini Manchanda, David Crabtree, James B. Skatrud, and Jerome A. Dempsey. An induced blood pressure rise does not alter upper airway resistance in sleeping humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(1): 269–276, 1998.—Sleep apnea is associated with episodic increases in systemic blood pressure. We investigated whether transient increases in arterial pressure altered upper airway resistance and/or breathing pattern in nine sleeping humans (snorers and nonsnorers). A pressure-tipped catheter was placed below the base of the tongue, and flow was measured from a nose or face mask. During non-rapid-eye-movement sleep, we injected 40- to 200-μg iv boluses of phenylephrine. Parasympathetic blockade was used if bradycardia was excessive. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) rose by 20 ± 5 (mean ± SD) mmHg (range 12–37 mmHg) within 12 s and remained elevated for 105 s. There were no significant changes in inspiratory or expiratory pharyngeal resistance (measured at peak flow, peak pressure, 0.2 l/s or by evaluating the dynamic pressure-flow relationship). At peak MAP, end-tidal CO2 pressure fell by 1.5 Torr and remained low for 20–25 s. At 26 s after peak MAP, tidal volume fell by 19%, consistent with hypocapnic ventilatory inhibition. We conclude that transient increases in MAP of a magnitude commonly observed during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep-disordered breathing do not increase upper airway resistance and, therefore, will not perpetuate subsequent obstructive events.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 741-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Siddiqui ◽  
Hemal Bhatt ◽  
Eric K Judd ◽  
Suzanne Oparil ◽  
David A Calhoun

Abstract BACKGROUND Refractory hypertension (RfHTN), a phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure, is defined as uncontrolled automated office blood pressure (AOBP) ≥130/80 mm Hg and awake ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) ≥130/80 mm Hg on ≥5 antihypertensive medications, including chlorthalidone and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Previous studies suggest that RfHTN is attributable to heightened sympathetic tone. The current study tested whether reserpine, a potent sympatholytic agent, lowers blood pressure (BP) in patients with RfHTN. METHODS Twenty-one out of 45 consecutive patients with suspected RfHTN were determined to be fully adherent with their antihypertensive regimen. Seven patients agreed to participate in the current clinical trial with reserpine and 6 patients completed the study. Other sympatholytic medications, such as clonidine or guanfacine, were tapered and discontinued before starting reserpine. Reserpine 0.1 mg daily was administered in an open-label fashion for 4 weeks. All patients were evaluated by AOBP and 24-hour ABP at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS Reserpine lowered mean systolic and diastolic AOBP by 29.3 ± 22.2 and 22.0 ± 15.8 mm Hg, respectively. Mean 24-hour systolic and diastolic ABPs were reduced by 21.8 ± 13.4 and 15.3 ± 9.6 mm Hg, mean awake systolic and diastolic ABPs by 23.8 ± 11.8 and 17.8 ± 9.2 mm Hg, and mean asleep systolic and diastolic ABPs by 21.5 ± 11.4 and 13.7 ± 6.4 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Reserpine, a potent sympatholytic agent, lowers BP in patients whose BP remained uncontrolled on maximal antihypertensive therapy, lending support to the hypothesis that excess sympathetic output contributes importantly to the development of RfHTN.


1958 ◽  
Vol 195 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Charles Freed ◽  
Shirley St. George ◽  
Ray H. Rosenman

The hypotension of potassium-deficiency is associated with a decrease in aorta potassium concentration, the sodium content remaining unchanged, resulting in a high sodium/potassium ratio. Loss of arterial tone may result and thus contribute to the lowering of blood pressure. Cortisone administration to such rats does not alter the low aorta potassium content but appreciably reduces the sodium concentration. The return to a more normal sodium/potassium ratio in the aorta following cortisone may restore the arterial tone and thus explain the blood pressure rise to normal levels.


1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 941-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. G. Benfey ◽  
D. R. Varma

The effects of tolazoline and Hydergine on blood pressure, cardiac contractility, and heart rate have been studied in dogs under pentobarbitone anesthesia. Whereas in the absence of reserpine, tolazoline had a pressor effect in two of four dogs, following reserpine it had a marked pressor action in each of eight dogs. The blood pressure rise was associated with positive inotropic and negative chronotropic effects. Phenoxybenzamine abolished these effects of tolazoline. Hydergine had pressor and negative chronotropic effects in the absence of reserpine. Following reserpine these effects were associated with positive inotropic actions. Phenoxybenzamine reduced these effects of Hydergine. It is concluded that the pressor action of tolazoline is wholly due to adrenergic vasoconstriction, whereas that of Hydergine is only partly an adrenergic effect.


The Lancet ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 318 (8248) ◽  
pp. 693-694
Author(s):  
Hugh Trowell ◽  
Denis Burkitt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document