P3807Impact of unipolar vs bipolar left ventricular pacing using a quadripolar lead on heart failure hospitalization in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mittal ◽  
T Stivland ◽  
N Wold ◽  
E Hammill ◽  
K M Stein

Abstract Background Unipolar (uni) pacing from a bipolar left ventricular (LV) pacing lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients (pts) has been associated with worse outcomes than bipolar (bi) pacing (MADIT CRT and ALTITUDE analyses). However, it is unknown whether the same is true with quadripolar LV pacing leads. Purpose To determine whether there is a difference in heart failure hospitalization (HFH) following CRT implantation in pts undergoing uni vs. bi LV pacing. Methods All pts enrolled in the NAVIGATE study were implanted with a CRT-D (RESONATE, Boston Scientific) using a quadripolar LV lead (ACUITY X4 Spiral Long, Spiral Short, or Straight). Pts were followed, and data collected on HFH and mortality. Vectors were programmed at the discretion of the implanter. Outcomes were adjusted for age, gender, NYHA class, ischemic etiology, conduction disorder pattern, EF, LV lead location, and LV lead shape. Results The study cohort included 2080 pts; 1781 pts had bi and 299 pts had uni LV pacing. Bi LV had higher % female, NYHA II/III, non-ischemic, LBBB, spiral shape, lateral and apical locations. During follow-up, the adjusted likelihood of HFH was significantly lower in pts undergoing bi LV pacing (HR 0.75, 0.58–0.97, p=0.027, Figure). Mortality was similar between the two groups. Conclusions In this large prospective study, uni LV pacing was associated with significantly greater likelihood of need for HFH during a 4-year follow-up period. These data suggest that routine programming in a bi configuration may be better for post-CRT pts. However, further study is needed to confirm causality and mechanism of this finding.

Author(s):  
Abhishek Bose ◽  
Jagdesh Kandala ◽  
Jagmeet P Singh

Background: While optimal left ventricular (LV) lead location and the female sex are known to predict a favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the role of gender differences affecting CRT outcomes in patients with optimal LV lead location remains uncertain. Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of 180 CRT patients. Anatomical lead location was confirmed by coronary venograms and chest radiographs. LV lead electrical delay (LVLED) was measured from QRS onset on surface ECG to the first sensed signal of the LV lead, and standardized based on native QRS width. Echocardiographic response was evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Time to first heart failure hospitalization or death was assessed over 3 years. Results: 100 patients (Age 68.2 ± 12.3 years; Baseline LVEF 23.2 ± 6.8 %, NYHA 3.0 ± 0.3) with optimal LV lead location defined as ‘long’ LVLED (LVLED>50%) with non-apical and anterolateral, lateral or posterolateral lead position were selected from the original cohort. They were further divided into the female (n=26) and male (n=74) groups. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups except for a higher incidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy in males (72.4% vs. 47.1%, p=0.01) and longer QRS duration in females (171.3 ± 29.9 vs. 153.6 ± 26.9, p=0.008). Baseline echocardiographic characteristics revealed a smaller LV internal dimension in systole (LVIDs) and diastole (LVIDd) in females (51.7 ± 10.2 vs. 57.1 ± 8.9, p=0.02; 58.5% ± 10.1 vs. 64.5 ± 8.3, p=0.007 respectively). Survival with respect to first heart failure hospitalization (Figure 1A) and a composite of mortality and heart failure (Figure 1B) were comparable. Echocardiographic response, defined as an increase in mean LVEF by 10% was significant in females (+11.6 ± 11.0 % vs. +5.3 ± 9.0 %, p=0.01). Conclusion: In CRT patients with optimal lead location, females have superior outcomes with respect to reverse remodeling but gender differences donot appear to predict clinical outcomes.


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M Thelen ◽  
Christopher L Kaufman ◽  
Kevin V Burns ◽  
Daniel R Kaiser ◽  
Aaron S Kelly ◽  
...  

Background: Previous large studies on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure have generally excluded patients previously paced from the right ventricle (RV). Previously RV paced patients (RVp) can exhibit an iatrogenic cause of dyssynchrony and reduced systolic function and thus, may respond differently to CRT than patients not previously RV paced (nRVp). The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that RVp patients have greater improvements in left ventricular systolic function, volumes, and dyssynchrony in response to CRT than nRVp. Methods: Standard echocardiograms with tissue Doppler imaging were performed before and after chronic CRT in RVp (n = 21, 16 male) and nRVp (n = 70, 54 male) heart failure patients. Ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end diastolic (LVEDV) and systolic (LVESV) volumes were calculated using the biplane Simpson’s method. Longitudinal dyssynchrony was calculated as the standard deviation of time to peak displacement (TT-12) of 12 segments in the apical views. Using mid-ventricular short axis views and speckle-tracking methods, radial dyssynchrony (Rad dys ) was calculated as the maximal time difference between six myocardial segments for peak radial strain. Echo response was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in LVESV. Results are reported as mean ± SD. Results: Significant baseline differences (p < 0.05) were observed between groups (RVp vs. nRVp) for age (74 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 13 year), follow-up time (6.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 2.1 months), LVEDV (154.3±50.8 vs.185.3±56.9 mL), and a trend for LVESV (112.4 ± 40.6 vs. 134.9 ± 47 mL, p = 0 .05). No differences were observed for EF, etiology of heart failure, and dyssynchrony measures between groups at baseline. Echo response rate was significantly ( p < 0.05) greater in RVp (76%) than nRVp (57%). After adjusting for baseline differences, RVp had greater improvement in EF (14 ± 9 vs. 8 ± 7%, p < 0.05) and LVESV (−33 ± 18 vs. −20 ± 21%, p < 0.05). After adjustment for follow-up time, no difference was observed for change in dyssynchrony between groups. Conclusion: RVp patients upgraded to CRT exhibit greater improvements in systolic function and ventricular remodeling as compared to nRVp patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Briongos Figuero ◽  
A Estevez ◽  
M L Perez ◽  
J B Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
L Alvarez-Costa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm provides synchronized left ventricular (LV) only pacing and ambulatory optimization of the intrinsic atrioventricular and interventricular conduction intervals. Studies reporting morbidity and mortality outcomes of aCRT carriers in daily clinical practice are lacking. Purpose To determine in a real-life setting, whether 1-year outcomes were different among CRT carriers undergoing aCRT pacing and those under conventional biventricular (biV) pacing. Methods Symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with sinus rhythm undergoing first CRT-defibrillator implant were selected from the UMBRELLA nationwide registry (2012–2017). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 12-month follow-up. HF admission was defined as hospitalization due to symptoms requiring intravenous diuretic treatment. Primary healthcare records were used to prospectively collect all data. Results Two hundred and six patients were collected (66.1±8.7 years; 73.3% male). Eighty-seven out of 206 patients were implanted with an aCRT capable device, but this algorithm was activated at implant and remained enabled at 1-year in 59 patients (aCRT group). The other 147 patients composed the non-aCRT group. At implant left bundle branch block was present in 93% of patients, 69.6% of population was in functional class III or IV and mean left ventricle ejection fraction was of 26.5±5.6%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 63.1% of patients and optimal medical treatment was achieved in majority of population (92% of patients with beta-blockers; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsor angiotensin II receptor blockersin 89%). The percentage of ventricular pacing through 12 months was 96.1±9.4% in non-aCRT patients and 97.5±2.7% in aCRT patients (p=0.261). In aCRT patients, LV-only pacing accounted for a mean of 53.3±37.6% of all ventricular pacing. After 12-month follow-up period, 25 patients (12.1%) met the primary composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization. Nine patients died and nineteen patients were admitted due to worsening HF. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause death or HF hospitalization between aCRT and non-aCRT patients (10.2% vs. 12.9% respectively; OR=0.76, CI: 0.29–2.01, p=0.585) Conclusions In this contemporary cohort of HF patients undergoing CRT with high percentages of ventricular pacing, clinical performance of aCRT algorithm was adequate. The risk of death or HF hospitalization was low and no differences were observed at one-year follow-up. Future randomized studies will clarify the role of this algorithm in CRT carriers. Acknowledgement/Funding None


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 4409
Author(s):  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
E. A. Gorbatenko ◽  
T. N. Enina ◽  
L. M. Malishevsky

Aim. Based on clinical parameters and diagnostic investigations, to create a complex model of personalized selection of patients with heart failure (HF) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). To establish the diagnostic value of the created model in predicting 5-year survival.Material and methods. The study included 141 patients with HF (men, 77,3%; women, 22,7%). The mean age of patients at the time of implantation was 60,0 [53,0; 66,0] years. All patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and QRS ≥130 ms. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=95) and test (n=36) samples, which were comparable in main clinical and functional characteristics.Results. The index included parameters that had a significant relationship with 5-year survival according to the Cox regression: male sex, prior myocardial infarction, hypertension, QRS <150 ms, no left bundle branch block, PR ≥200 ms with sinus rhythm/absence of radiofrequency ablation in atrial fibrillation, NYHA class III, IV HF, LVEF <30%, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥235,0 ml, NT-proBNP ≥2692,0 ng/ml. All variables were scored based on the в-coefficients. In the training sample, a value ≥45 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 82,4% and a specificity of 67,2% in predicting 5-year survival (AUC, 0,873; p<0,001). The index use on the test sample showed comparable results (AUC, 0,718; p=0,020; sensitivity — 71,4%, specificity — 62,5%). Also, in the training sample, the index ≥45 points was associated with1-year survival (sensitivity — 84,6%, specificity — 58,1%, AUC, 0,811; p<0,001).Conclusion. An index of personalized selection for CRT has been created, which makes it possible to accurately predict the 5-year survival rate, as well as the 1-year survival rate, regardless of the current selection criteria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Roshan Raut ◽  
Man Bahadur KC ◽  
Sujeeb Rajbhandari ◽  
Murari Dhungana ◽  
Mukunda Sharma ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established treatment modality for patients with advanced heart failure. CRT abbreviates the dysynchronus heart failure mainly by correcting left ventricular dysynchrony. In the last three years, CRT has been regularly done in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center(SGNHC) which has provided us the platform to report the outcome of CRT, for the first time in Nepal. The aim of this study is to review the recent clinical experience and outcome of CRT in our centre. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent CRT at SGNHC from July, 2016 to July, 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Altogether 42 patients underwent CRT. Mean age was 65±11 years (range 43 to 84). Coronary sinus cannulation was successful in 41 patients. In one patient, LV lead delivery was unsuccessful. Thus, procedural success was obtained in 95% (40 out of 42) patients. LV lead dislodgement occurred in three patients (7%). Coronary sinus dissection occurred in two patients (5%). Biventricular (BiV) paced QRS was significantly narrower compared to baseline QRS (127ms Vs 162ms, p<0.01). During mean follow up of 12±10 months (range 1 to 30 months), there was significant improvement in the clinical outcomes: NYHA class (1.8 Vs 2.9, p<0.01), LVEF (22.3 Vs 27.5, p<0.01), left ventricle internal diameter in systole (LVIDs), (57 Vs 60.5 mm, p<0.01). The CRT responder rate was 86%. Super-responder was observed in 12% of patients. Conclusion: In SGNHC, Cardiac resynchronization therapy is emerging as a routine treatment strategy with a reasonable efficacy and safety outcome.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z L Moreno Weidmann ◽  
C Alonso-Martin ◽  
F Mendez-Zurita ◽  
E Rodriguez-Font ◽  
J Guerra-Ramos ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Women are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials for heart failure. Differences on cardiovascular background may imply differences on indications, device election and outcomes in patients receiving cardiac devices (CRT and ICD). We sought to compare sex-related differences in a real-life cohort. Methods We analyzed all subjects who underwent a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation (with or without ICD) between 2016 and 2019 in a single center, all of them followed by remote monitoring. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared according to gender. Response to resynchronization was defined as clinical improvement in NYHA class or an increase of &gt; =10% in LVEF. Results A total of 430 devices (ICD or CRT) were implanted. 149 (35%) of them were CRTs: 116 (88%) CRT-D and 33 (22%) CRT-P. Of the whole cohort, 43 (29%) were women and the mean age was similar in both sex (70+/-9 years). Women had more likely non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (86% vs 49%, p &lt; 0.01), higher proportion of NYHA class III-IV (26% vs 40%, p 0.04) and worse renal function (mean glomerular filtration 61ml/min vs 75ml/min, p 0.04), but tend to be less affected by atrial fibrillation (21% vs 40%, p 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar at the moment of implantation among both sex (30+/-7%, p &gt; 0.05) and no difference on optimal medical treatment was observed. Women trend to receive more frequently CRT-P than men (33% vs 18%, p 0.054). After a mean follow-up of 3 years, a four-fold higher response to CRT was observed in women (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.0-10.7, p 0.002), after adjustment by the etiology of the myocardiopathy. No differences on all-cause mortality (6% in men vs 1% in women, p 0.2) or ventricular arrhythmias (10% in men vs 2% in women, p 0.3) were observed.  Conclusions in a real-life cohort, CRT implantation showed a sex-disparity: the proportion of women receiving a CRT was lower than in men, but a CRT without defibrillation was more frequently implanted in women, reflecting a higher prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy in men. The underlying myocardial substrate in women and a lower prevalence of AF may explain a more favorable response to CRT, despite more pronounced symptoms of heart failure at the moment of implantation.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengwen Yang ◽  
Zhimin Liu ◽  
Yiran Hu ◽  
Ran Jing ◽  
Wei Hua

Abstract Background Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) has been associated with a better LV reverse remodeling response and better clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aims of our study were to identify the predictors of mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients treated with CRT and design a risk score for prognosis. Methods A cohort of 422 consecutive NICM patients with CRT was retrospectively enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint was heart failure hospitalization. Results In a multivariate analysis the predictors of all-cause death were left atrial diameter [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.056, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.020-1.093, P=0.002], non-left bundle branch block (HR: 1.793, 95% CI: 1.131-2.844, P =0.013), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (HR: 1.081, 95% CI: 1.029-1.134 P= 0.002), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide per 100 pg/ml (HR: 1.018, 95% CI: 1.007-1.030, P =0.002), NYHA IV (HR: 1.018, 95% CI: 1.007-1.030, P =0.002). The Alpha-score (Atrial diameter, non-LBBB, ProBNP, Hs-CRP, NYHA class IV) was derived from each independent risk factor. The novel score had better calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P >0.05) and discrimination for both all cause-death and heart transplantation [c-statistics: 0.749 (95% CI: 0.694-0.804), P <0.001] or heart failure hospitalization [c-statistics: 0.692 (95% CI: 0.639-0.745), P <0.001]. Conclusion The Alpha-score may enable better discrimination and accurate prediction of long-term outcomes among NICM patients with CRT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongkai Wang ◽  
Pan Li ◽  
Bili Zhang ◽  
Jingjuan Huang ◽  
Shaoping Chen ◽  
...  

Background: The patient-tailored SyncAV algorithm shortens the QRS duration (QRSd) beyond what conventional biventricular (BiV) pacing can. However, evidence of the ability of SyncAV to improve the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CRT enhanced by SyncAV on echocardiographic and clinical responses.Methods and Results: Consecutive heart failure (HF) patients from three centers treated with a quadripolar CRT system (Abbott) were enrolled. The total of 122 patients were divided into BiV+SyncAV (n = 68) and BiV groups (n = 54) according to whether they underwent CRT with or without SyncAV. Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and clinical data were assessed at baseline and during follow-up. Echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a ≥15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and clinical response was defined as a NYHA class reduction of ≥1. At the 6-month follow-up, the baseline QRSd and LVESV decreased more significantly in the BiV+SyncAV than in the BiV group (QRSd −36.25 ± 16.33 vs. −22.72 ± 18.75 ms, P &lt; 0.001; LVESV −54.19 ± 38.87 vs. −25.37 ± 36.48 ml, P &lt; 0.001). Compared to the BiV group, more patients in the BiV+SyncAV group were classified as echocardiographic (82.35 vs. 64.81%; P = 0.036) and clinical responders (83.82 vs. 66.67%; P = 0.033). During follow-up, no deaths due to HF deterioration or severe procedure related complications occurred.Conclusion: Compared to BiV pacing, BiV combined with SyncAV leads to a more significant reduction in QRSd and improves LV remodeling and long-term outcomes in HF patients treated with CRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document