P1174Impact of sex-differences in long-term outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy: are women different?

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z L Moreno Weidmann ◽  
C Alonso-Martin ◽  
F Mendez-Zurita ◽  
E Rodriguez-Font ◽  
J Guerra-Ramos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
The Moment

Abstract Introduction Women are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials for heart failure. Differences on cardiovascular background may imply differences on indications, device election and outcomes in patients receiving cardiac devices (CRT and ICD). We sought to compare sex-related differences in a real-life cohort. Methods We analyzed all subjects who underwent a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation (with or without ICD) between 2016 and 2019 in a single center, all of them followed by remote monitoring. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared according to gender. Response to resynchronization was defined as clinical improvement in NYHA class or an increase of > =10% in LVEF. Results A total of 430 devices (ICD or CRT) were implanted. 149 (35%) of them were CRTs: 116 (88%) CRT-D and 33 (22%) CRT-P. Of the whole cohort, 43 (29%) were women and the mean age was similar in both sex (70+/-9 years). Women had more likely non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (86% vs 49%, p < 0.01), higher proportion of NYHA class III-IV (26% vs 40%, p 0.04) and worse renal function (mean glomerular filtration 61ml/min vs 75ml/min, p 0.04), but tend to be less affected by atrial fibrillation (21% vs 40%, p 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar at the moment of implantation among both sex (30+/-7%, p > 0.05) and no difference on optimal medical treatment was observed. Women trend to receive more frequently CRT-P than men (33% vs 18%, p 0.054). After a mean follow-up of 3 years, a four-fold higher response to CRT was observed in women (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.0-10.7, p 0.002), after adjustment by the etiology of the myocardiopathy. No differences on all-cause mortality (6% in men vs 1% in women, p 0.2) or ventricular arrhythmias (10% in men vs 2% in women, p 0.3) were observed.  Conclusions in a real-life cohort, CRT implantation showed a sex-disparity: the proportion of women receiving a CRT was lower than in men, but a CRT without defibrillation was more frequently implanted in women, reflecting a higher prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy in men. The underlying myocardial substrate in women and a lower prevalence of AF may explain a more favorable response to CRT, despite more pronounced symptoms of heart failure at the moment of implantation.

Abstract 14932: Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients by Revascularization Procedures in MADIT-CRT

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Husaini ◽  
Yitschak Biton ◽  
Scott McNitt ◽  
Wojciech Zareba ◽  
Arthur J Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Revascularization Procedures

Background: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) showed that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) had similar reductions in clinical events with implanted CRT-D vs. ICD-only when compared to patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Frequency of revascularizations may serve as a surrogate for severity of coronary artery disease in patients with ICM and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. However, it is unknown whether the number of revascularizations plays a role in clinical outcomes in ICM patients implanted with CRT-D vs. ICD-only. Methods: Using a multivariable analysis of MADIT-CRT data, we evaluated the effect of CRT-D vs. ICD-only on combined heart failure (HF) or death and combined ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) or death in ICM patients by the number of pre-enrollment revascularizations (1 or ≥ 2 revascularizations) compared to those with no need for revascularization. Follow-up over a median period of 5.6 years for HF/death and 4.0 years for VT/VF/death was assessed among 1374 ICM patients with a Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB). Results: There was a significant and similar risk reduction with CRT-D vs. ICD-only in HF/death in all three sub-groups: ICM with no need for revascularization (HR 0.45 [0.26-0.80]; p < 0.006), ICM with one revascularization (HR 0.46 [0.31-0.69]; p <0.001), and ICM with 2 or more revascularization (HR 0.50 [0.30-0.84]; p = 0.008). However, significant risk reduction of VT/VF/death with CRT-D vs. ICD-only was only observed in patients with no need for revascularization (HR 0.52 [0.30-0.89]; p = 0.017), less so in those with ICM with one revascularization (HR 0.72 [0.49-1.06]; p = 0.10), and no reduction was seen in those with ICM with 2 or more revascularization (HR 0.94 [0.54-1.62]; p = 0.81). Conclusions: In ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, CRT-D vs. ICD-only is associated with a significant risk reduction in heart failure events or death irrespective of the frequency of pre-enrollment revascularization procedures; however, the benefit of CRT-D vs. ICD-only to reduce ventricular tachyarrhythmias is attenuated with the increasing number of revascularization procedures.

scholarly journals Prediction of 5-year survival in patients with heart failure and implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 4409
Author(s):  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
E. A. Gorbatenko ◽  
T. N. Enina ◽  
L. M. Malishevsky
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Training Sample ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Aim. Based on clinical parameters and diagnostic investigations, to create a complex model of personalized selection of patients with heart failure (HF) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). To establish the diagnostic value of the created model in predicting 5-year survival.Material and methods. The study included 141 patients with HF (men, 77,3%; women, 22,7%). The mean age of patients at the time of implantation was 60,0 [53,0; 66,0] years. All patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and QRS ≥130 ms. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=95) and test (n=36) samples, which were comparable in main clinical and functional characteristics.Results. The index included parameters that had a significant relationship with 5-year survival according to the Cox regression: male sex, prior myocardial infarction, hypertension, QRS <150 ms, no left bundle branch block, PR ≥200 ms with sinus rhythm/absence of radiofrequency ablation in atrial fibrillation, NYHA class III, IV HF, LVEF <30%, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥235,0 ml, NT-proBNP ≥2692,0 ng/ml. All variables were scored based on the в-coefficients. In the training sample, a value ≥45 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 82,4% and a specificity of 67,2% in predicting 5-year survival (AUC, 0,873; p<0,001). The index use on the test sample showed comparable results (AUC, 0,718; p=0,020; sensitivity — 71,4%, specificity — 62,5%). Also, in the training sample, the index ≥45 points was associated with1-year survival (sensitivity — 84,6%, specificity — 58,1%, AUC, 0,811; p<0,001).Conclusion. An index of personalized selection for CRT has been created, which makes it possible to accurately predict the 5-year survival rate, as well as the 1-year survival rate, regardless of the current selection criteria.

scholarly journals His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmytro Volkov ◽  
Dmytro Lopin ◽  
Stanislav Rybchynskyi ◽  
Dmytro Skoryi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an option for treatment for chronic heart failure (HF) associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients with HF and right bundle branch block (RBBB) have potentially worse outcomes in comparison to LBBB. Traditional CRT in RBBB can increase mortality and HF deterioration rates over native disease progression. His bundle pacing may improve the results of CRT in those patients. Furthermore, atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging in patients with previously implanted leads in His region. Case summary  We report the case of 74-year-old gentleman with a 5-year history of HF, permanent AF with a rapid ventricular response, and RBBB. He was admitted to the hospital with complaints of severe weakness and shortness of breath. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased (41%), right ventricle (RV) was dilated (41 mm), and QRS was prolonged (200 ms) with RBBB morphology. The patient underwent His-optimized CRT with further left-sided AVNA. As a result, LVEF increased to 51%, RV dimensions decreased to 35 mm with an improvement of the clinical status during a 6-month follow-up. Discussion  Patients with AF, RBBB, and HF represent the least evaluated clinical subgroup of individuals with less beneficial clinical outcomes according to CRT studies. Achieving the most effective resynchronization could require pacing fusion from sites beyond traditional with the intention to recruit intrinsic conduction pathways. This approach can be favourable for reducing RV dilatation, improving LVEF, and maximizing electrical resynchronization.

P5680One-year outcomes of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy using adaptivCRT algorithm

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Briongos Figuero ◽  
A Estevez ◽  
M L Perez ◽  
J B Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
L Alvarez-Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm provides synchronized left ventricular (LV) only pacing and ambulatory optimization of the intrinsic atrioventricular and interventricular conduction intervals. Studies reporting morbidity and mortality outcomes of aCRT carriers in daily clinical practice are lacking. Purpose To determine in a real-life setting, whether 1-year outcomes were different among CRT carriers undergoing aCRT pacing and those under conventional biventricular (biV) pacing. Methods Symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with sinus rhythm undergoing first CRT-defibrillator implant were selected from the UMBRELLA nationwide registry (2012–2017). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 12-month follow-up. HF admission was defined as hospitalization due to symptoms requiring intravenous diuretic treatment. Primary healthcare records were used to prospectively collect all data. Results Two hundred and six patients were collected (66.1±8.7 years; 73.3% male). Eighty-seven out of 206 patients were implanted with an aCRT capable device, but this algorithm was activated at implant and remained enabled at 1-year in 59 patients (aCRT group). The other 147 patients composed the non-aCRT group. At implant left bundle branch block was present in 93% of patients, 69.6% of population was in functional class III or IV and mean left ventricle ejection fraction was of 26.5±5.6%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 63.1% of patients and optimal medical treatment was achieved in majority of population (92% of patients with beta-blockers; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsor angiotensin II receptor blockersin 89%). The percentage of ventricular pacing through 12 months was 96.1±9.4% in non-aCRT patients and 97.5±2.7% in aCRT patients (p=0.261). In aCRT patients, LV-only pacing accounted for a mean of 53.3±37.6% of all ventricular pacing. After 12-month follow-up period, 25 patients (12.1%) met the primary composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization. Nine patients died and nineteen patients were admitted due to worsening HF. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause death or HF hospitalization between aCRT and non-aCRT patients (10.2% vs. 12.9% respectively; OR=0.76, CI: 0.29–2.01, p=0.585) Conclusions In this contemporary cohort of HF patients undergoing CRT with high percentages of ventricular pacing, clinical performance of aCRT algorithm was adequate. The risk of death or HF hospitalization was low and no differences were observed at one-year follow-up. Future randomized studies will clarify the role of this algorithm in CRT carriers. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy with quadripolar leads offer improvement in cardiac energetics in heart failure patients compared with bipolar leads: HUMVEE Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Antoniou ◽  
C Chrysohoou ◽  
P Dilaveris ◽  
K Konstantinou ◽  
P Manolakou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Power

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established technique for symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients, producing significant clinical benefits. Recent studies have revealed the potential role of multipoint pacing (MPP) in improving response and clinical outcomes. The aim of this work from the Heart failUre study of Multisite pacing effects on VEntriculoartErial coupling (HUMVEE) trial was to evaluate the association between MPP of the left ventricle vs those of optimized biventricular pacing (optBVP) on: a) ventriculoarterial coupling (VAC) and energy efficiency of the failing heart. Both BVP and MPP mode were optimized according to the optimal VTI value of left ventricular outflow track. Methods HUMVEE is a single-center, prospective (13 months) trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03189368), of 80 NYHA III patients (68±10 years; 75% men; 53% ischemic cardiomyopathy), under optimal tolerated therapy, with standard BVP indication, having being implanted with a CRT system able to deliver both modes of pacing. Echocardiographic measurements, including VAC calculation, 6-min-walking-test and quality of life (MLHF questionnaire) were measured at baseline, 6 months post BVP optimization (right before MPP activation) and at the end of follow-up (6 months post MPP optimization). Cardiac power (CP) was calculated according the equation: CP=Cardiac Output x Mean Aortic Pressure/451. Results 23 patients (30%), due to inability to deliver MPP, remained in optBVP. Those in MPP had 45% ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. 65% in optBVP patients, (p=0.056); ejection fraction 26.5%, vs. 29.5%, p=0.05; while there was no significant difference in gender, age and baseline NYHA class. Both optBVP and MPP patients improved VAC (baseline: 1,26±0,3; CRT: 1.18±0.4; MPP: 1.07±0.06, p=0.07); but only MPP patients significant improved from baseline to 12-months (p=0.02); CP was improved in both groups (p=0.02 in optBVD and p=0.01 in MPP), with MPP patients showing improvement in CP by 30% vs 12% in optBVP (p=0.001); 6-min-walk test was improved in MPP patients by 42% from baseline (p=0.0001), compared to optBVP patients who showed improvement up to 30% (p=0.05) and during the first 6 months only. NtproBNP levels were decreased in all patients (p=0.05 for MPP and p=0.07 for optBVP). Only patients who achieved MPP showed improvement in the Quality of life score (baseline: 31.6±23; optBVD:20.1±17; MPP:15.8±12, p=0.002; while those remained in optBVP showed no significant improvement. Conclusions MPP is a new, promising biventricular pacing modality offering additive effects on myocardial energy balance, cardiac power, systolic and diastolic ventricular function and aortoventricular coupling. HUMVEE trial illustrates those clinical, imaging and biochemical divergences of MPP from even opt BVP that confer significant improvement in quality of life reflecting better myocardial energy handling in patients with advanced HF and cardiac dysychronization. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Resynchronization therapy in end-stage heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 206-211
Author(s):  
D.V. Shumakov ◽  
◽  
D.I. Zybin ◽  
M.A. Popov ◽  
V.V. Dontsov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Heart Transplant ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
End Stage Heart Failure ◽  
End Stage

Heart failure (HF) is a common condition, and its overall prevalence is constantly growing. HF ultimately progresses to end-stage disease that is refractory to optimal medical therapy and requires implantable devices or heart transplant. In recent years, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been generally accepted in patients with NYHA class III or IV, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (less than 35%), and the wide QRS complex (>120 msec). CRT improves the efficacy of heart ventricle function and, as a result, physical performance and quality of life. Reverse cardiac remodeling occurs at a pathophysiological level that improves systolic function. Patients with end-stage HF who are on the heart transplant list are a specific group in whom CRT is considered a “bridge” to surgery. This review paper discusses state-of-the-art, advances, and unresolved issues in this area. KEYWORDS: cardiac resynchronization therapy, heart failure, left ventricular remodeling, ejection fraction, heart transplant. FOR CITATION: Shumakov D.V., Zybin D.I., Popov M.A. et al. Resynchronization therapy in end-stage heart failure. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(4):206–211 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-4-206-211.

scholarly journals Resynchronization in Heart Failure: What to choose?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad El Baba ◽  
Moses Wananu ◽  
Marwan Refaat ◽  
Jayakumar Sahadevan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Achieving Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with Biventricular pacing(BiVP) pacing for patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF), left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony is well established and is currently the standard of care. Multiple studies have demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV heart failure who underwent resynchronization therapy1,2. In addition, resynchronization therapy is associated with survival benefit3. However, one third of patients do not respond to BIVP. New modalities for resynchronization have emerged namely His bundle pacing (HBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). In this paper, we will review the benefits and limitations of BiVP and also the role of new pacing modalities such as HBP and LVSP in patients with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dysynchrony.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document