P5317Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in the Middle-East: systemic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Shehab ◽  
A S Bhagavathula

Abstract Background Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality in the world and CVDs are responsible for 34% of all deaths in the middle east population. To better understanding of the current CVD prevalence in the middle east population we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. Aim To assess the prevalence and risk factors of CVD among middle east adult population from the published literature. Methods Electronic data basis such as PubMed, Sciencedirect, Embase and Google scholar were searched, from the year 2011 to December 2018. All the original articles published in English and have investigated the prevalence of CVD and risk factors. Study characteristics, participants demographics and risk factors of CVD were recorded. To pull the CVD prevalence, we used random effect meta-analysis. we assess heterogeneity using both the formal tests and subgroup analysis. We also assessed the quality of the studies and examined the publication bias. Results We retrieved 2931 potentially relevant papers through searches of electronic and gray literatures, of which 44 articles met inclusion criteria after the screening and were included in systematic review and meta-analysis (N=191,979). The weighted pooled prevalence of CVD was 13.7% (95% CI: 11.1%-16.3%) in the Middle-East. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors such as dyslipidemia accounts 43.1% (95% CI: 17%-69.3%), diabetes mellitus 32.3%, 95% CI: 23.8%-40.8%), hypertension 30.7% (95% CI: 25.2%-36.3%). Other traditional CVD risk factors, smoking 16.3% (95% CI: 12.9%-19.7%), and family history of CVDs 18.7% (95% CI: 15.2%-22.2%). Conclusion A high CVD prevalence of 13.7% was identified and dyslipidemia remain to be a significant independent risk factor for CVD in the Middle-East. Interventional strategies are urgently required for primary prevention of CVD and its associated risk factors in Middle East population.

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula ◽  
Abdullah Shehab ◽  
Anhar Ullah ◽  
Jamal Rahmani

Background: The increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) threatens the Middle Eastern population. Several epidemiological studies have assessed CVD and its risk factors in terms of the primary prevention of CVD in the Middle East. Therefore, summarizing the information from these studies is essential. Aim: We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of CVD and its major risk factors among Middle Eastern adults based on the literature published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 and carried out a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Embase and Google Scholar to identify literature published from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. All the original articles that investigated the prevalence of CVD and reported at least one of the following factors were included: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, smoking and family history of CVD. To summarize CVD prevalence, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 41 potentially relevant articles were included, and 32 were included in the meta-analysis (n=191,979). The overall prevalence of CVD was 10.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1-14.3%, p<0.001) in the Middle East. A high prevalence of CVD risk factors, such as dyslipidaemia (43.3%; 95% CI: 21.5-68%), hypertension (26.2%; 95% CI: 19.6-34%) and diabetes (16%; 95% CI: 9.9-24.8%), was observed. The prevalence rates of other risk factors, such as smoking (12.4%; 95% CI: 7.7-19.4%) and family history of CVD (18.7%; 95% CI: 15.4-22.5%), were also high. Conclusion: The prevalence of CVD is high (10.1%) in the Middle East. The burden of dyslipidaemia (43.3%) in this region is twice as high as that of hypertension (26.2%) and diabetes mellitus (16%). Multifaceted interventions are urgently needed for the primary prevention of CVD in this region.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e0192895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert W. Major ◽  
Mark R. I. Cheng ◽  
Robert A. Grant ◽  
Saran Shantikumar ◽  
Gang Xu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dafna Merom ◽  
Fiona Stanaway ◽  
Joanna J Sweeting ◽  
Anne Tiedemann ◽  
Shirin J Mumu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: “Active Ageing” policy to delay retirement mean that maintaining the health and fitness of older employees has become increasingly important. This systematic review summarises the characteristics and effect on exercise and fitness outcomes of workplace physical activity (PA) interventions targeting older employees. Methods: Five online databases were searched from inception to December 2018. Eligible studies were of any experimental design, included employees aged ≥50 years, had PA as an intervention component and reported PA-related outcomes. Results: Titles and abstracts of 7470 records were screened and 16 unique interventions were included (3,215 participants). Eleven studies were RCTs. Six interventions targeted multiple risk factors (n=1,586) involving screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors, but had a non-specific description of the PA intervention. Four interventions targeted nutrition and PA (n=1,127), and six intervention (n=195) focused only on PA. Seven interventions were short –term (<15 weeks), six interventions lasted 6-9 months and three interventions were long-term (10-12 months). Interventions overwhelmingly targeted aerobic PA compared to strength, balance and flexibility. No studies involved screening for falls/injury risk. Computation of effect sizes (ES) was only possible in a maximum of three RCTs per outcome. ESs were statistically non-significant for all outcomes. ESs were medium for PA behaviour (ES=0.25 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.56), muscle strength (ES=0.27, 95%CI: -0.26- 0.80), cardiorespiratory fitness (ES=0.28, 95%CI: -22 to 0.78) and flexibility (ES=0.50, 95% CI: -0.04- 1.05) and large for balance (ES=1.29, 95% CI: -0.56- 3.15). GRADE criteria-rated quality of evidence were ‘low’ due to high risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. Conclusions: The effect of workplace interventions for improving fitness outcomes of older employees is uncertain. There is a need for high-quality PA interventions that takes into account the broader PA recommendations for older adults. Such interventions should incorporate strength and balance training and screening of falls/injury risk in multi risk factors approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document