P2834Diagnostic yield of holter recording after atrial fibrillation ablation - detection of asymptomatic recurrences during a one-year follow-up period

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S P G Van Vugt ◽  
R H J A Volleberg ◽  
S W Westra ◽  
J Thannhauser ◽  
R Evertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Implantable Devices ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One

Abstract Background Strategies to detect recurrences after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation vary widely. Whereas a symptom-based approach may overestimate procedural success due to asymptomatic recurrences, continuous invasive monitoring with implantable devices may be refused by patients and is not routinely recommended. In trial settings, Holter monitoring is recommended at one year after ablation, though more frequent and intensive follow-up is encouraged for more accurate detection of arrhythmia recurrences. Purpose To study the diagnostic yield of Holter monitoring in the detection of asymptomatic recurrent arrhythmias after cryoballoon catheter ablation for AF. Methods Prospective registry on AF patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation with subsequent follow-up in our centre. Follow-up comprised routine (i.e. at 3, 6, and 12 months) and symptom-driven electrocardiographic (ECG) registrations after a three-month blanking period. In addition, patients were scheduled for six-day Holter monitoring shortly after the blanking period, at six months and at the end of the one-year follow-up period. For the current analysis, we studied the Holter recordings of the patients without previously detected arrhythmia recurrence and determined the proportion of asymptomatic recurrences at each respective monitoring period. Results We studied 364 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR 54–66) and a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 (IQR 1–2). One-year recurrences were documented in 119 (32.7%) patients, of which 90 were initially detected on Holter recording and 39 on ECG registrations (Table). A total of 34 patients did not report symptoms during the documentation of recurrent arrhythmia and comprised 28.6% (34/119) of all recurrences and 37.8% (34/90) of the Holter-detected recurrences. At the three-month Holter registration, 33.3% of the patients with recurrences did not report symptoms, which was 29.4% and 62.5% at the six- and twelve-month registrations, respectively (Figure). Timing and detection of recurrences Time after ablation 3 months 3–6 months 6 months 6–12 months 12 months Patients with Holter-detected recurrences 57/119 (47.9%) 17/119 (14.3%) 16/119 (13.4%) Patients with ECG-documented recurrences 18/119 (15.1%) 11/119 (9.2%) Proportions of asymptomatic recurrences Conclusions In this cohort of AF patients with serial six-day Holter monitoring after cryoballoon ablation, up to one-third of the patients had asymptomatic recurrences. Whereas Holter monitoring shortly after the blanking period detected nearly half of all one-year recurrences, the proportion of asymptomatic detected recurrences was higher in recordings at one year and seems therefore important in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences after catheter ablation.

scholarly journals CLINICAL CHRACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS AND RESULTS OF CATHETER ABLATION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN RUSSIA: SUBANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN REGISTRY 2012-2016

2018 ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. N. Mikhailov ◽  
N. Z. Gasymova ◽  
S. А. Bayramova ◽  
V. E. Kharats ◽  
O. N. Kachalkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidities ◽  
Minimum Requirements ◽  
One Year

Aim. The results presented, of subanalysis of the catheter ablation (CA) registry in atrial fibrillation (AF) with the patients properties, specifics of CA and treatment results, in Russia comparing to European countries.Material and methods. During 2012 to 2015, totally 3742 patients included to the registry, of those 477 in Russia. In 467 Russian patients (males 56,5%; mean age 58,5 y. o.) CA AF was done. During one year 392 patients were followed up. Minimum requirements to follow-up: routine ECG registration and non less than one contact after 12 months passed.Results. In Russian patients there were more common obesity (46,1% and 29,2%, p<0,001), hypertension heart disease (40,2% and 22,8%, p<0,0001), coronary heart disease (31,7% and 16,2%, p<0,0001), chronic heart failure (67,3% and 13,0%, p<0,0001). In Russia the patients more commonly underwent primary CA (83,5% in Russia and 77,6% in European countries, p<0,05), more rare in Russia the cryoballoon ablation was done (3% and 18%, p<0,05). Generally adverse events were reported more rare in Russia (10,5% and 16,6%, p=0,0007), including cardiovascular adverse events (2,6% and 5,2%, p<0,05). Tachiarrhythmias recurs were diagnosed more rare in Russia, including by the subsutaneous ECG monitors (17% and 1,6% in other countries, р<0,001). Within the year of follow-up, full absence of tachiarrhythmias recurs in Russia was found in 65,8% of patients, in other countries — in 74,7% (р=0,0003).Conclusion. In real clinical setting, high efficacy of CA AF was shown, resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy. In most of Russian patients there were cardiovascular comorbidities. There was lower rate of reported adverse events in Russian centers of interventional treatments.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation – more effectively and safely

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (54) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Piotr Kułakowski ◽  
Agnieszka Sikorska ◽  
Tomasz Kryński ◽  
Roman Piotrowski ◽  
Jakub Baran
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Significant Progress ◽  
One Year

During past twenty years a significant progress in efficacy and safety of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been made. Data from literature and our own experience suggest that success rate during one-year follow-up exceeds 80%, especially in patients with paroxysmal AF. Both, radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon ablation have similar efficacy whereas learning curve is much shorter when using the latter technique. Summary of current status of AF ablation and future perspectives are presented.

scholarly journals Autonomic nervous modulation after cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
I. A. Novikov ◽  
P. S. Novikov ◽  
N. U. Mironov ◽  
M. A. Shariya ◽  
S. F. Sokolov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Autonomic Nervous ◽  
One Year ◽  
Af Recurrence

Aim. Aim of our study was the assessment of autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation by assessment of heart rhythm variation (HRV) using Holter monitoring after single second generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods. Patients who underwent the CBA for paroxysmal AF were include in this study. At the baseline the Holter monitoring after withdrawal of antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) with assessment of HRV: SDNN, RMSSD, ln LF, ln LH, LH/HF, mean, minimal and maximal beats per minute (BPM) was perform. Follow-up was based on outpatient clinic visits at 3, 6, and 12 months including Holter monitoring.Results. Among 80 patients underwent CBA, HRV was assessed in 55 patients (65.5% male, age median 61 years, 97.7% of pulmonary vein have been successful isolated). One year after CBA all HRV parameters and the mean, minimal and maximal BPM was significantly different from baseline parameters (p<0.05). In the AF recurrence group ln LF was lower at 3-, 6and 12-month visits (p<0.05) and minimal HR was higher at 3 months (median 58 vs 55.5, p=0.033). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that early recurrence of AF was independent predictor of AF recurrence after CBA (HR 7,44, 95% CI 2,19-25,25, р=0,001).Conclusion. Our study demonstrated that CBA leads to modulation of ANS which persists for at least 12 months. The early recurrence of AF was only predictor of AF recurrence after CBA.

scholarly journals Impact of atrial fibrillation pattern on outcomes after left atrial appendage closure: lessons from the prospective LAARGE registry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinwan Kany ◽  
Johannes Brachmann ◽  
Thorsten Lewalter ◽  
Ibrahim Akin ◽  
Horst Sievert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One

Abstract Background Non-paroxysmal (NPAF) forms of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been reported to be associated with an increased risk for systemic embolism or death. Methods Comparison of procedural details and long-term outcomes in patients (pts) with paroxysmal AF (PAF) against controls with NPAF in the prospective, multicentre observational registry of patients undergoing LAAC (LAARGE). Results A total of 638 pts (PAF 274 pts, NPAF 364 pts) were enrolled. In both groups, a history of PVI was rare (4.0% vs 1.6%, p = 0.066). The total CHA2DS2-VASc score was lower in the PAF group (4.4 ± 1.5 vs 4.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.033), while HAS-BLED score (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 3.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.40) was comparable. The rate of successful implantation was equally high (97.4% vs 97.8%, p = 0.77). In the three-month echo follow-up, LA thrombi (2.1% vs 7.3%, p = 0.12) and peridevice leak > 5 mm (0.0% vs 7.1%, p = 0.53) were numerically higher in the NPAF group. Overall, in-hospital complications occurred in 15.0% of the PAF cohort and 10.7% of the NPAF cohort (p = 0.12). In the one-year follow-up, unadjusted mortality (8.4% vs 14.0%, p = 0.039) and combined outcome of death, stroke and systemic embolism (8.8% vs 15.1%, p = 0.022) were significantly higher in the NPAF cohort. After adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc and previous bleeding, NPAF was associated with increased death/stroke/systemic embolism (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.02–2.72, p = 0.041). Conclusion Atrial fibrillation type did not impair periprocedural safety or in-hospital MACE patients undergoing LAAC. However, after one year, NPAF was associated with higher mortality. Graphic abstract

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Radiofrequency versus Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Evaluation Using ECG, Holter Monitoring, and Implantable Loop Recorders to Monitor Absolute and Clinical Effectiveness

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karapet Davtyan ◽  
Victoria Shatakhtsyan ◽  
Hermine Poghosyan ◽  
Alexandr Deev ◽  
Alexey Tarasov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
End Point ◽  
Radiofrequency Current ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorders

Introduction. While several studies have compared the radiofrequency current (RFC) and cryoablation for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), no study has monitored the long-term outcomes with the usage of implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Methods. We enrolled 89 consecutive patients with nonvalvular paroxysmal AF (N=44 for RFC and N=45 for cryoballoon). The primary efficacy end point was the assessment of effectiveness for each group (RFC versus cryoballoon) when examining freedom from arrhythmia by monitoring with ECG, Holter, and implantable loop recoder (ILR). The primary safety end point compared rates of adverse events between both groups. The secondary efficacy end point examined the duration of the postablation blanking period from ILR retrieved data. Results. The mean age of the study population was 56.6±10.2 years, and the follow-up duration was 12 months. There were no differences in baseline patient characteristics between groups. At 12 months, the absolute effectiveness (measured by ILR) was 65.9% in the RFC group and 51.1% in the cryoballoon group (OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 0.79–4.35; p=0.157), and the clinical effectiveness (measured by ECG and Holter) was 81.8% in the RFC group and 55.6% in the cryoballoon group (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.37–9.46; p=0.008). There was no difference in safety between both groups. Asymptomatic episodes were significantly more present in the RFC group as measured by ILRs (p<0.010). In cryoballoon group, arrhythmia episodes were recorded equally irrespective of the follow-up method (i.e., ECG and Holter versus ILR (p>0.010)). The blanking period does not seem to be as important in cryoballoon as compared to RFC. Conclusion. RFC and cryoballoon ablation had similar absolute effectiveness at 12 months. ECG and Holter were effective when assessing the efficacy of the cryoballoon ablation; however, in the RFC group, ILR was necessary to accurately assess long-term efficacy.

Abstract 18649: Long-term Outcome and the Mechanisms of Pulmonary Antrum Radial-linear Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Zhao ◽  
Jianqiang Hu ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Yawei Xu ◽  
Yanzhou Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
One Year

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms and effectiveness of pulmonary antrum radial-linear (PAR) ablation in comparison with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after a long-term follow-up. Background: The one-year follow up data suggested that PAR ablation appeared to have a better outcome over the conventional PVI for paroxysmal AF. Methods: The enrollment occurred between March, 2011, and August, 2011, with the last follow-up in May, 2014. A total of 133 patients with documented paroxysmal AF were enrolled from 5 centers and randomized to PAR group or PVI group. Event ECG recorder and Holter monitoring were conductedduring the follow-up for all patients. Results: The average procedure time was 151±23 min in PAR group and 178±43 min in PVI group ( P <0.001). The average fluoroscopy time was 21±7 min in PAR group and 27±11 min in PVI group ( P= 0.002). AF triggering foci were eliminated in 59 patients (89.4%) in PAR group, whereas, only 4 patients (6.0%) in PVI group (P<0.001).At median 36 (37-35) months of follow-up after single ablation procedure, 43 of 66 patients in PAR group (65%) and 28 of 67 patients in PVI group (42%) had no recurrence of AF off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) (P=0.007); and 47 of 66 patients in PAR group (71%) and 32 of 67 patients in PVI group (48%) had no recurrence of AF with AAD (P=0.006). At the last follow-up, the burden of AF was significantly lower in PAR group than in PVI group (0.9% ± 2.3% vs 4.9% ± 9.9%;90th percentile, 5.5% vs 19.6%; P=0.008). No major adverse event (death, stroke, PV stenosis) was observed in all the patients except one case of pericardial tamponade. Conclusions: PAR ablation is a simple, safe, and effective strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal AF with better long-term outcome than PVI. PAR ablation might exhibit the beneficial effect on AF management through multiple mechanisms. Registration: ChiCTR-TRC-11001191

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document