scholarly journals Progrostic impact of a pre-existing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Tufano

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf none Introduction heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing public health problem. Its prevalence among heart failure patients increases over time, accounting for at least 50 % of all hospital admissions for HF.  Nevertheless, no single guideline exists for diagnosis or treatment for HFpEF, and older age or comorbidities are additional factors that confuse etiology and complicate prognosis. Moreover, there are few data regarding the consequences of HFpEF on other recurrent pathologies. Aims to assess the prognostic impact of a pre-existing HFpEF on patients ospidalized for intercurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) or acute pulmonary embolism (PE) Methods We performed a retrospective evaluation of 194 patients, consecutively hospitalized in our unit of Cardiology with a diagnosis of paroxysmal AF or acute PE, from April 2017 to October 2020. We recruited exclusively patients with normal cardiac function and HFpEF patients.  Heart failure with reduced FEVS patients were excluded from the study. We have described for each patient the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, instrumental test results and clinical outcomes.  In order to assess, for each group, the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, the Chi-square test or alternatively the Pearson-Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. Results the 194 patients studied had an average age of 73,7 years (min. 27, max 94). 59 AF patients had  pre-existing HFpEF, whereas AF patients  without HF were 67.  Patients with pre-existing HFpEF and newly-onset AF had a more advanced age (76,7 y vs 72,9 y), and greater comorbidity (meanly 4 vs 3) rather than AF patients without HFpEF. Moreover, percentage of converting arrhythmia were significantly higher in AF patients without HFpEF.  . Patients with acute PE and pre-existing HFpEF were 38, whereas PE patients without HF were 30. Acute PE patients with pre-existing HFpEF had older age, a prevalence for femal sex, more comorbidities, an average longer hospitalizations,  but no significantly different rates of severe complications (ictus, hemorrhagies, needs for ventilation, pulmonary infarction or deaths) rather than PE patients without HFpEF. Conclusions the patients with AF or PE and concomitant HFpEF that were hospitalized from April 2017 to October 2020, showed an average longer hospitalization, a lower percentage of converting arrhythmia, probably due to the older age and the greater comorbidity.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Tufano ◽  
Salvatore De Turris

Abstract Aims Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing public health problem. Its prevalence among heart failure patients increases over time, accounting for at least 50% of all hospital admissions for HF. Nevertheless, no single guideline exists for diagnosis or treatment for HFpEF, and older age or comorbidities are additional factors that confuse etiology and complicate prognosis. Moreover, there are few data regarding the consequences of HFpEF on other recurrent pathologies. To assess the prognostic impact of a pre-existing HFpEF on patients ospidalized for intercurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) or acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods and results We performed a retrospective evaluation of 222 patients, consecutively hospitalized in our unit of Cardiology with a diagnosis of paroxysmal AF or acute PE, from January 2017 to December 2020. We recruited exclusively patients with normal cardiac function and HFpEF patients. Heart failure with reduced FEVS patients were excluded from the study. We have described for each patient the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, instrumental test results, and clinical outcomes. In order to assess, for each group, the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, the Chi-square test or alternatively the Pearson–Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. The 222 patients studied had an average age of 73.7 years (min. 27, max: 94). 68 AF patients had pre-existing HFpEF, whereas AF patients without HF were 77. Patients with pre-existing HFpEF and newly-onset AF had a more advanced age (76.7 y vs. 72.9 y), and greater comorbidity (meanly 4 vs. 3) rather than AF patients without HFpEF. Moreover, percentage of converting arrhythmia were significantly higher in AF patients without HFpEF. Patients with acute PE and pre-existing HFpEF were 44, whereas PE patients without HF were 33. Acute PE patients with pre-existing HFpEF had older age, a prevalence for female sex, more comorbidities, an average longer hospitalizations, but no significantly different rates of severe complications (ictus, haemorrhagies, needs for ventilation, pulmonary infarction or deaths) rather than PE patients without HFpEF. Conclusions The patients with AF or PE and concomitant HFpEF that were hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2020, showed an average longer hospitalization, a lower percentage of converting arrhythmia, probably due to the older age and the greater comorbidity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Masuda ◽  
T Kanda ◽  
M Asai ◽  
T Mano ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated to be associated with poor clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Objective This study aimed to elucidate the impact of the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the clinical characteristics, therapeutics, and outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods PURSUIT-HFpEF is a multicenter prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of >50%. Patients with acute coronary syndrome or severe valvular disease were excluded. Results Of 486 HFpEF patients (age, 80.8±9.0 years old; male, 47%) from 24 cardiovascular centers, 199 (41%) had AF on admission. Patients with AF had lower systolic blood pressures (142±27 vs. 155±35mmHg, p<0.0001) and higher heart rates (91±29 vs. 82±26bpm, p<0.0001) than those without. There was no difference in the usage of inotropes or mechanical ventilation between the 2 groups. A higher quality of life score (EQ5D, 0.72±0.27 vs. 0.63±0.30, p=0.002) was observed at discharge in patients with than without AF. In addition, AF patients tended to demonstrate lower in-hospital mortality rates (0.5% vs. 2.4%, p=0.09) and shorter hospital stays (20.3±12.1 vs. 22.6±18.4 days, p=0.09) than those without. During a mean follow up of 360±111 days, mortality (14.1% vs. 15.3) and heart failure re-hospitalization rates (13.1% vs. 13.9%) were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusion In contrast to heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, AF on admission was not associated with poor long-term clinical outcomes among HFpEF patients. Several in-hospital outcomes were better in patients with AF than in those without. Acknowledgement/Funding None


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krunalkumar Patel ◽  
Kirtenkumar Patel ◽  
Jay Shah ◽  
Rajkumar Doshi ◽  
Amitkumar Patel ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is a lack of research comparing outcomes of Surgical Ablation (SA) and Catheter Ablation (CA) among Atrial Fibrillation(AF) patients with heart failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and . Hypothesis: The main objective is to compare short-term clinical outcomes of SA and CA in AF patients with HFpEF. Methods: We used the national inpatient sample to identify patients over 18 years with HFpEF hospitalization and AF, and undergoing SA and CA from 2016 - 2017. The clinical outcomes of SA versus CA in AF stratified as non-paroxysmal and paroxysmal were analyzed. Results: 1,530 HFpEF hospitalizations with AF who underwent SA and 1,045 HFpEF hospitalizations with AF who underwent CA were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing CA had higher baseline comorbidity. The in-hospital mortality between HFpEF with AF undergoing SA as compared to CA was similar (1.9% versus 1.4%, adjusted P-value 0.04). Patients undergoing SA had a significantly longer length of hospital stay, a higher percentage of post-procedural, and cardiac complications. In HFpEF patients with non-paroxysmal AF, SA as opposed to CA was associated with a higher percentage of in-hospital mortality (2.7% versus 0%, adjusted P-value=0.23), a longer length of stay, a higher cost of treatment, and a higher percentage of cardiac complications. Conclusions: In conclusion, CA is associated with lower in-hospital outcomes as compared to SA among AF with HFpEF patients. Further research with freedom from AF is needed between this group with long-term out c omes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Machino-Ohtsuka ◽  
Yoshihiro Seo ◽  
Tomoko Ishizu ◽  
Masayoshi Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshie Hamada-Harimura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document