P431Flecainide or propafenone oral bolus to facilitate electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Compagnucci ◽  
A Barbarossa ◽  
M Centanni ◽  
A Urbinati ◽  
G Ciliberti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background  electrical cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a pivotal component of the rhythm control approach. Although ECV is safe and effective in the majority of patients, approximately one patient out of ten experiences an early or very early recurrence. In order to improve ECV’s success rate, oral or intravenous amiodarone pre-treatment is commonly prescribed and followed by a second ECV attempt. However, due to the long time needed to achieve therapeutic levels and the high risk of phlebitis, faster and safer strategies to facilitate ECV are highly needed. Purpose  to evaluate whether the administration of a flecainide or propafenone oral bolus followed by ECV would prove effective and safe in facilitating conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF and a prior ECV failure. Methods we conducted a prospective, open-label, single center observational study. The case group was formed by patients with persistent AF and a prior ECV failure receiving flecainide or propafenone oral bolus (at the same doses used for the "pill-in-the-pocket" approach) followed by a second ECV attempt 3 hours after drug ingestion. For comparison, we selected patients with a prior ECV failure that underwent amiodarone-facilitated ECV. Before ECV, amiodarone was either administered orally for at least 1 month or intravenously for 24 hours. The primary outcome was conversion to sinus rhythm, defined as sinus rhythm persisting for at least 12 hours after ECV. Results patient’s characteristics were well balanced in the 3 groups, apart from slightly lower left ventricular ejection fraction values in the amiodarone groups. The day after ECV failure, 29 patients received oral flecainide at a 200 mg (n = 15) or at a 300 mg (n = 14) dose and one patient received oral propafenone at a 600 mg dose before undergoing a second ECV attempt. In nine patients, amiodarone was given intravenously for 24 hours. Amiodarone was prescribed orally to 22 patients for a median of seven weeks at an average daily dose of 241.4 mg. In the flecainide/propafenone group, one patient converted to sinus rhythm one hour after drug ingestion; among the other 29 subjects, the second ECV was effective in 23 (cumulative effectiveness: 80.0%). In the intravenous amiodarone group, 2 patients converted to sinus rhythm during drug infusion; among the other 7, the second ECV proved effective in 4 (cumulative effectiveness: 66.7%). In the oral amiodarone group, ECV was successful in 17 patients (77.3%). When comparing the three groups, the primary outcome occurred in a similar proportion of patients (Chi-squared test: p = 0.34; Fisher’s exact test: p = 0.24). Serious adverse events were not reported. Conclusions flecainide or propafenone oral bolus quickly facilitated conversion to sinus rhythm in the vast majority of patients with persistent AF and a prior ECV failure with a low inherent risk of adverse events. Flecainide effectiveness proved similar to intravenous or oral amiodarone.

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
E Maund ◽  
C McKenna ◽  
M Sarowar ◽  
D Fox ◽  
M Stevenson ◽  
...  

This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter based upon a review of the manufacturer’s submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal process. The population considered in the submission were adult clinically stable patients with a recent history of or current non-permanent AF. Comparators were the current available anti-arrhythmic drugs: class 1c agents (flecainide and propafenone), sotalol and amiodarone. Outcomes were AF recurrence, all-cause mortality, stroke, treatment discontinuations (due to any cause or due to adverse events) and serious adverse events. The main evidence came from four phase III randomised controlled trials, direct and indirect meta-analyses from a systematic review, and a synthesis of the direct and indirect evidence using a mixed-treatment comparison. Overall, the results from the different synthesis approaches showed that the odds of AF recurrence appeared statistically significantly lower with dronedarone and other anti-arrhythmic drugs than with non-active control, and that the odds of AF recurrence are statistically significantly higher for dronedarone than for amiodarone. However, the results for outcomes of all-cause mortality, stroke and treatment discontinuations and serious adverse events were all uncertain. A discrete event simulation model was used to evaluate dronedarone versus antiarrhythmic drugs and standard therapy alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of dronedarone was relatively robust and less than £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Exploratory work undertaken by the ERG identified that the main drivers of cost-effectiveness were the benefits assigned to dronedarone for all-cause mortality and stroke. Dronedarone is not cost-effective relative to its comparators when the only effect of treatment is a reduction in AF recurrences. In conclusion, uncertainties remain in the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dronedarone. In particular, the clinical evidence for the major drivers of cost-effectiveness (all-cause mortality and stroke), and consequently the additional benefits attributed in the economic model to dronedarone compared to other anti-arrhythmic drugs are highly uncertain. The final guidance, issued by NICE on 25 August 2010, states that: Dronedarone is recommended as an option for the treatment of non-permanent atrial fibrillation only in people: whose atrial fibrillation is not controlled by first-line therapy (usually including beta-blockers), that is, as a second-line treatment option, and who have at least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors: - hypertension requiring drugs of at least two different classes, diabetes mellitus, previous transient ischaemic attack, stroke or systemic embolism, left atrial diameter of 50 mm or greater, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (noting that the summary of product characteristics [SPC] does not recommend dronedarone for people with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35% because of limited experience of using it in this group) or age 70 years or older, and who do not have unstable New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure. Furthermore, ‘People who do not meet the criteria above who are currently receiving dronedarone should have the option to continue treatment until they and their clinicians consider it appropriate to stop’.


Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Piccini ◽  
Christopher Dufton ◽  
Ian A. Carroll ◽  
Jeff S. Healey ◽  
William T. Abraham ◽  
...  

Background - Bucindolol is a genetically targeted β-blocker/mild vasodilator with the unique pharmacologic properties of sympatholysis and ADRB1 Arg389 receptor inverse agonism. In the GENETIC-AF trial conducted in a genetically defined heart failure (HF) population at high risk for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), similar results were observed for bucindolol and metoprolol succinate for the primary endpoint of time to first atrial fibrillation (AF) event; however, AF burden and other rhythm control measures were not analyzed. Methods - The prevalence of ECGs in normal sinus rhythm, AF interventions for rhythm control (cardioversion, ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs), and biomarkers were evaluated in the overall population entering efficacy follow-up (N=257). AF burden was evaluated for 24 weeks in the device substudy (N=67). Results - In 257 patients with HF the mean age was 65.6 ± 10.0 years, 18% were female, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 36%, and 51% had persistent AF. Cumulative 24-week AF burden was 24.4% (95% CI: 18.5, 30.2) for bucindolol and 36.7% (95% CI: 30.0, 43.5) for metoprolol (33% reduction, p < 0.001). Daily AF burden at the end of follow-up was 15.1% (95% CI: 3.2, 27.0) for bucindolol and 34.7% (95% CI: 17.9, 51.2) for metoprolol (55% reduction, p < 0.001). For the metoprolol and bucindolol respective groups the prevalence of ECGs in normal sinus rhythm was 4.20 and 3.03 events per patient (39% increase in the bucindolol group, p < 0.001), while the rate of AF interventions was 0.56 and 0.82 events per patient (32% reduction for bucindolol, p = 0.011). Reductions in plasma norepinephrine (p = 0.038) and NT-proBNP (p = 0.009) were also observed with bucindolol compared to metoprolol. Conclusions - Compared with metoprolol, bucindolol reduced AF burden, improved maintenance of sinus rhythm, and lowered the need for additional rhythm control interventions in patients with HF and the ADRB1 Arg389Arg genotype.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D McCauley ◽  
Esseim Sharma ◽  
John Dudley ◽  
Antony Chu

Introduction: Based on the data from CASTLE-AF trial, in patient with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) catheter ablation may offer a significant reduction in both death, and hospitalization, while promoting maintenance of sinus rhythm as well as improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This multi-center randomized trial is hailed as a paradigm shifting study in catheter ablation, however it is not without fault. One of the critiques of the CASTLE-AF trial was the high frequency of crossover between the treatment arms. To help sort out this potential source of confounding, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of prospective trials for catheter ablation in AF in patients with Class II through IV heart failure. Hypothesis: The reduction in death, and hospitalization, as well as the maintenance in sinus rhythm and improvement in LVEF seen CASTLE-AF trial are support by other similarly designed AF ablation trials. Methods: Using the inclusion/exclusion criteria from the CASTLE-AF trial, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of 28 published studies. Randomized and non-randomized observational studies comparing the impact of catheter ablation of AF in HF. Studies were identified using the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed. Results: A total of 29 studies were identified (n =2,339). Mean follow-up was 25 (95% confidence interval, 18-40) months. Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 60% (43%-76%). Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly during follow-up by 15% (P<0.001). Conclusions: Following our meta-analysis, we found data to support the findings of improved LVEF and maintenance of sinus rhythm reported in the CASTLE-AF trial. However, due to differences in study design, we were unable to further validate the reduction in both hospitalization and death seen in CASTLE-AF. We recommend future prospective trials be conducted without cross over to further explore this topic.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2142-2144
Author(s):  
Christian Sticherling ◽  
Michael Kuehne

Many patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation require acute rate control. Beta blockers and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists (verapamil/diltiazem) are the first choice and can be given intravenously. Digoxin can be added if a resting heart rate of less than 110 bpm cannot be achieved. In patients with signs of heart failure or a known left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, small doses of beta blocker should be given and digoxin may be added. Because of their pronounced negative inotropic effect, verapamil and diltiazem should not be used in these circumstances. In unstable patients, intravenous amiodarone can be used for acute rate control. Haemodynamically unstable patients should be considered for urgent cardioversion. After achieving rate control the need for anticoagulation should be assessed and an echocardiogram needs to be performed before deciding on further management.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-160
Author(s):  
A. V. Ardashev ◽  
E. G. Zhelyakov ◽  
A. A. Kocharian

The article described a clinical case of a patient with chronic heart failure (CHF) with preserved ejection fraction (CHF-PEF) and permanent normosystolic atrial fibrillation (AF). A 73 year-old man (body mass index, 26.4 kg /m2) with permanent normosystolic AF (duration, 10 years) was hospitalized for augmenting of CHF symptoms. The patient had NYHA II-III functional class CHF and a history of long-standing arterial hypertension. The patient received chronic therapy according to the effective guidelines (angiotensin receptor blockers, diuretics, beta-blockers, and new oral anticoagulants). Transthoracic echocardiography showed a normal ejection fraction (EF) (57 %), a moderate enlargement of the left atrium (48 mm), and moderate left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of left atrial AF was performed. For preparation to the RFCA, the patient was administered propanorm two weeks prior to the procedure. Following external electrical cardioversion (ECV) after RFCA, sinus rhythm did not recover. The patient was prescribed amiodarone, and repeat ECV was performed in a month, which resulted in successful recovery of sinus rhythm. However, due to an increase in serum thyrotropic hormone, amiodaron was replaced with the sotalol therapy (240 mg/day). This resulted in development of symptomatic sinus bradycardia and AF relapse at 3 days after ECV. A dual-chamber cardioverter defibrillator was implanted to the patient; in another three months, repeat AF RFCA was performed with successful recovery of sinus rhythm. During the cardioverter testing for one year, the patient had one more AF episode, which was stopped by external ECV. Also, a 6-hour AF episode occurred at three months after the repeat RFCA. Symptoms of CHF disappeared by the 12th month. The combination therapy administered to the patient with normosystolic permanent AF and preserved EF, which included a pathogenetic therapy for CHF, antiarrhythmic drugs, implantation of a dual-chamber ECV, two sessions of AF RFCA, and repeat external ECVs, provided considerable improvement of CHF symptoms and stable sinus rhythm during a one-year follow-up. The return to sinus rhythm after 10 years of permanent AF necessitated changing the arrhythmia diagnosis to long-standing, persistent AF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Menezes Fernandes ◽  
T.F Mota ◽  
H.A Costa ◽  
M Espirito Santo ◽  
D Bento ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are commonly terminated by electrical cardioversion (EC) when a rhythm control strategy is adopted. However, the long-term success following EC is variable. Purpose To determine the clinical characteristics and independent predictors of sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance after EC due to AF/AFL. Methods We conducted a retrospective study enrolling patients with AF/AFL referred to EC in our Cardiology Department, from September 2011 to September 2020. Clinical characteristics and echocardiographic studies were analysed. Primary endpoints were the incidence of ischemic stroke, all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Independent predictors of SR maintenance were identified through a binary logistic regression analysis, considering p=0,05. Results A total of 719 patients with a median age of 67 years-old were included, and EC was successfully performed in 93,2%. AFL was diagnosed in 21%, 57,3% had arterial hypertension and 34,6% were obese. 62,1% had persistent AF/AFL, 19,6% presented with first diagnosed AF/AFL and 17,2% had paroxysmal episodes. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was preserved in 66,7%. Maintenance of SR after one-year was documented in 64,7% of patients with successful EC. They had lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (2,6% vs 10,7%; p&lt;0,001) and received less electrical shocks during EC (1,20 vs 1,39; p=0,005). There were no differences regarding antiarrhythmic therapy between both groups. Complete LVEF recovery after EC was more frequent in patients who maintained SR (58,8% vs 31,9%; p=0,008), with a greater prevalence of preserved LVEF after EC (88,8% vs 73,6%; p&lt;0,001). During a median follow-up of 1368 days, these patients performed less additional EC (0,26 vs 0,65; p&lt;0,001) and were less referred to ablation procedures (7,1% vs 15,1%; p=0,011). No differences were found regarding stroke rate, but all-cause mortality (12,8% vs 25%; p=0,002) and CV death (3,8% vs 10,9%; p=0,005) were significantly lower in patients who maintained SR. Absence of CKD (p=0,013), applying fewer electric shocks during EC (p=0,013) and preserved LVEF after EC (p=0,004) were independent predictors of SR maintenance. Conclusion In our study, most patients maintained SR one year after EC, which was associated with a lower all-cause and CV mortality. Absence of CKD, applying fewer electric shocks during EC and preserved LVEF after EC were independent predictors of SR maintenance. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E El-Am ◽  
S Alsidawi ◽  
D Oguz ◽  
C Scott ◽  
J Thaden ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Mayo Clinic Background Variability in Doppler signals is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF is common in low-gradient AS (LGAS). Presence of high single beat Doppler signals (peak velocity ≥4m/s or mean gradient ≥40mmHg) is not factored into decision-making in low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS). Objective Determine prevalence of at least one high Doppler signal in AF LGAS and its relationship to computed tomography aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) versus sinus rhythm (SR) high-gradient aortic stenosis (HGAS). Methods Consecutive patients with aortic valve area ≤1cm2 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% during echo were identified (January 1, 2012-December 31, 2016). At least three consecutive Doppler signals were averaged in sinus rhythm (SR) and five in atrial fibrillation (AF). Results Of 1,854 patients, age 76± 11 years, male 52%, 301/1,854 (16%) were in AF and LGAS was present in 122/301 (41%). At least one high Doppler signal in AF LGAS was present in 43/122 (35%). AVCS within 1 year of echo was available for 36% of patient with SR HGAS and 34% of AS LGAS. Median AVCS was not different in SR HGAS 2424 (IQR 1623, 3445) vs AF LGAS with at least one high Doppler signal 2509 [IQR1547, 3119], p =0.10 AVCS threshold for severe AS (men &gt;2000 women &gt;1200) was met in 80% SR HGAS vs 86% AF LGAS with high signals. Conclusions High Doppler signals in AF LGAS are associated with high AVCS more frequently exceeding thresholds for severe AS. Single-beat high Doppler signals instead of the average correlate better with AVCS and classic HGAS.


Author(s):  
Andreas Schäfer ◽  
Ulrike Flierl ◽  
Johann Bauersachs

AbstractImpaired left-ventricular ejection-fraction (LV-EF) is a known risk factor for ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with heart failure (HF) even in the absence of atrial fibrillation. While stroke risk is inversely correlated with LV-EF in HF patients with sinus rhythm, strategies using anticoagulation with Vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) were futile as the increase in major bleedings outweighed the potential benefit in stroke reduction. Non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) proved to be an effective and in general safer approach for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and may also have a favourable risk–benefit profile in HF patients. In HF patients with sinus rhythm, the COMPASS trial suggested a potential benefit for rivaroxaban, whereas the more dedicated COMMANDER-HF trial remained neutral on overall ischemic benefit owed to a higher mortality which was not influenced by anticoagulation. More recent data from subgroups in the COMMANDER-HF trial, however, suggest that there might be a benefit of rivaroxaban regarding stroke prevention under certain circumstances. In this article, we review the existing evidence for NOACs in HF patients with atrial fibrillation, elaborate the rationale for stroke prevention in HF patients with sinus rhythm, summarise the available data from anticoagulation trials in HF with sinus rhythm, and describe the patient who might eventually profit from an individualised strategy aiming to reduce stroke risk. Graphic abstract


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Furukawa ◽  
T Watanabe ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
T Morita ◽  
S Tamaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Cather ablation (CA) has been identified as an effective and safe treatment option for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). One of the serious complications associated AF is cerebral infarction (CI). Recent studies reported that CA was associated with lower incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with AF. However, CA for AF itself has a potential risk of CI. Several previous studies showed that the incidence of silent CI (SCI) assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain occurred 5 to 18% during CA for AF. Recently, CA for AF made a remarkable progress in technology. However, there are few information available that the impact of 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system on the incidence of SCI. This study aimed to clarify the prevalence and predictors of SCI during CA for AF. Methods We enrolled 893 consecutive patients (male 534, age 71±10 years), who underwent CA for AF and MRI of brain 1 day after the procedure. We collected patients data such as physical examinations, blood sampling, echo cardiography, and CA data. A brain MRI was performed the next day following the procedure to identify any CIs. One-hundred and forty-six of patients used the Rhythmia® mapping system catheter, and the other mapping system such as CARTO or EnSite system used in the remaining 747 patients. Results The MRI depicted acute micro-CIs in 144 (16%) patients, but neither symptoms nor abnormal neurological findings were present in these patients. Patients with SCI had significantly higher prevalence of persistent AF (60 vs 43%, p=0.0002), CHADS2 Score (2 (1–3) vs 1 (1–2), p=0.0001), higher prevalence of previous stroke (19 vs 12%, p=0.02), larger left atrial (LA) diameter (43.2±6.4 vs 41.7±6.5mm, p=0.01), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (59.0±13.2 vs 64.2±11.3%, p≤0.0001), higher B-type natriuretic peptide level (221±236 vs 163±225 pg/dl, p≤0.0001), more Rhythmia® mapping system use (30 vs 8%, p&lt;0.0001), and longer procedure time (129±46 vs 108±39 min, p≤0.0001) than those without SCI, while there were no significant differences in age, LA appendage flow velocity, kind of anti-coagulant agent between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis identified Rhythmia® use [odds ratio (OR) 4.26, (95% CI 2.32–7.84), p=0.0001], LVEF (OR 1.02, p=0.0059), CHADS2 score (OR 1.27, p=0.009), and procedure time (OR 1.005, p=0.04) as independent risk factors of acute SCI during CA for AF. Conclusion Acute SCI occurred about 16% after CA for AF. Rhythmia® mapping system use exhibited a higher incidence of acute SCI after catheter ablation for AF than the other mapping system use. Rhythmia® mapping system use, LVEF, CHADS2 score, and procedure time are associated with SCI relating CA for AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document