scholarly journals Genes Involved in Sister Chromatid Separation and Segregation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-470
Author(s):  
Sue Biggins ◽  
Needhi Bhalla ◽  
Amy Chang ◽  
Dana L Smith ◽  
Andrew W Murray
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Marked Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Abstract Accurate chromosome segregation requires the precise coordination of events during the cell cycle. Replicated sister chromatids are held together while they are properly attached to and aligned by the mitotic spindle at metaphase. At anaphase, the links between sisters must be promptly dissolved to allow the mitotic spindle to rapidly separate them to opposite poles. To isolate genes involved in chromosome behavior during mitosis, we microscopically screened a temperature-sensitive collection of budding yeast mutants that contain a GFP-marked chromosome. Nine LOC (loss of cohesion) complementation groups that do not segregate sister chromatids at anaphase were identified. We cloned the corresponding genes and performed secondary tests to determine their function in chromosome behavior. We determined that three LOC genes, PDS1, ESP1, and YCS4, are required for sister chromatid separation and three other LOC genes, CSE4, IPL1, and SMT3, are required for chromosome segregation. We isolated alleles of two genes involved in splicing, PRP16 and PRP19, which impair α-tubulin synthesis thus preventing spindle assembly, as well as an allele of CDC7 that is defective in DNA replication. We also report an initial characterization of phenotypes associated with the SMT3/SUMO gene and the isolation of WSS1, a high-copy smt3 suppressor.

scholarly journals Reduced Mad2 expression keeps relaxed kinetochores from arresting budding yeast in mitosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2448-2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin L. Barnhart ◽  
Russell K. Dorer ◽  
Andrew W. Murray ◽  
Scott C. Schuyler
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Antimicrotubule Drugs

Chromosome segregation depends on the spindle checkpoint, which delays anaphase until all chromosomes have bound microtubules and have been placed under tension. The Mad1–Mad2 complex is an essential component of the checkpoint. We studied the consequences of removing one copy of MAD2 in diploid cells of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Compared to MAD2/MAD2 cells, MAD2/mad2Δ heterozygotes show increased chromosome loss and have different responses to two insults that activate the spindle checkpoint: MAD2/mad2Δ cells respond normally to antimicrotubule drugs but cannot respond to chromosomes that lack tension between sister chromatids. In MAD2/mad2Δ cells with normal sister chromatid cohesion, removing one copy of MAD1 restores the checkpoint and returns chromosome loss to wild-type levels. We conclude that cells need the normal Mad2:Mad1 ratio to respond to chromosomes that are not under tension.

scholarly journals Human securin proteolysis is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Hagting ◽  
Nicole den Elzen ◽  
Hartmut C. Vodermaier ◽  
Irene C. Waizenegger ◽  
Jan-Michael Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Exact Time ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Progress through mitosis is controlled by the sequential destruction of key regulators including the mitotic cyclins and securin, an inhibitor of anaphase whose destruction is required for sister chromatid separation. Here we have used live cell imaging to determine the exact time when human securin is degraded in mitosis. We show that the timing of securin destruction is set by the spindle checkpoint; securin destruction begins at metaphase once the checkpoint is satisfied. Furthermore, reimposing the checkpoint rapidly inactivates securin destruction. Thus, securin and cyclin B1 destruction have very similar properties. Moreover, we find that both cyclin B1 and securin have to be degraded before sister chromatids can separate. A mutant form of securin that lacks its destruction box (D-box) is still degraded in mitosis, but now this is in anaphase. This destruction requires a KEN box in the NH2 terminus of securin and may indicate the time in mitosis when ubiquitination switches from APCCdc20 to APCCdh1. Lastly, a D-box mutant of securin that cannot be degraded in metaphase inhibits sister chromatid separation, generating a cut phenotype where one cell can inherit both copies of the genome. Thus, defects in securin destruction alter chromosome segregation and may be relevant to the development of aneuploidy in cancer.

scholarly journals Analysis of kinesin motor function at budding yeast kinetochores

2006 ◽  
Vol 172 (6) ◽  
pp. 861-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica D. Tytell ◽  
Peter K. Sorger
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Kinesin Motor ◽  
Complex Processes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes ◽  
And Function

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis requires biorientation of sister chromatids on the microtubules (MT) of the mitotic spindle. Chromosome–MT binding is mediated by kinetochores, which are multiprotein structures that assemble on centromeric (CEN) DNA. The simple CENs of budding yeast are among the best understood, but the roles of kinesin motor proteins at yeast kinetochores have yet to be determined, despite evidence of their importance in higher eukaryotes. We show that all four nuclear kinesins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae localize to kinetochores and function in three distinct processes. Kip1p and Cin8p, which are kinesin-5/BimC family members, cluster kinetochores into their characteristic bilobed metaphase configuration. Kip3p, a kinesin-8,-13/KinI kinesin, synchronizes poleward kinetochore movement during anaphase A. The kinesin-14 motor Kar3p appears to function at the subset of kinetochores that become detached from spindle MTs. These data demonstrate roles for structurally diverse motors in the complex processes of chromosome segregation and reveal important similarities and intriguing differences between higher and lower eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Identification and cloning of the CHL4 gene controlling chromosome segregation in yeast.

Genetics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kouprina ◽  
A Kirillov ◽  
E Kroll ◽  
M Koryabin ◽  
B Shestopalov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Strain Analysis ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Nucleotide Sequence Analysis ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Chromosome Transmission ◽  
Marked Chromosome ◽  
The Right

Abstract A collection of chl mutants characterized by decreased fidelity of chromosome transmission and by minichromosome nondisjunction in mitosis was examined for the ability to maintain nonessential dicentric plasmids. In one of the seven mutants analyzed, chl4, dicentric plasmids did not depress cell division. Moreover, nonessential dicentric plasmids were maintained stably without any rearrangements during many generations in the chl4 mutant. The rate of mitotic heteroallelic recombination in the chl4 mutant was not increased compared to that in an isogenic wild-type strain. Analysis of the segregation of a marked chromosome indicated that sister chromatid nondisjunction and sister chromatid loss contributed equally to chromosome malsegregation in the chl4 mutant. A genomic clone of CHL4 was isolated by complementation of the chl4-1 mutation and was physically mapped to the right arm of chromosome IV near the SUP2 gene. Nucleotide sequence analysis of CHL4 clone revealed a 1.4-kb open reading frame coding for a 53-kD predicted protein which does not have homology to published proteins. A strain containing a null allele of CHL4 is viable under standard growth conditions but has a temperature-sensitive phenotype (conditional lethality at 36 degrees). We suggest that the CHL4 gene is required for kinetochore function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

scholarly journals Astrin is required for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and centrosome integrity

2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin H. Thein ◽  
Julia Kleylein-Sohn ◽  
Erich A. Nigg ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Cysteine Protease ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Successful Completion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Multipolar Spindles ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Faithful chromosome segregation in mitosis requires the formation of a bipolar mitotic spindle with stably attached chromosomes. Once all of the chromosomes are aligned, the connection between the sister chromatids is severed by the cysteine protease separase. Separase also promotes centriole disengagement at the end of mitosis. Temporal coordination of these two activities with the rest of the cell cycle is required for the successful completion of mitosis. In this study, we report that depletion of the microtubule and kinetochore protein astrin results in checkpoint-arrested cells with multipolar spindles and separated sister chromatids, which is consistent with untimely separase activation. Supporting this idea, astrin-depleted cells contain active separase, and separase depletion suppresses the premature sister chromatid separation and centriole disengagement in these cells. We suggest that astrin contributes to the regulatory network that controls separase activity.

scholarly journals Correct spindle elongation at the metaphase/anaphase transition is an APC-dependent event in budding yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fedor Severin ◽  
Anthony A. Hyman ◽  
Simonetta Piatti
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Spindle Elongation

At the metaphase to anaphase transition, chromosome segregation is initiated by the splitting of sister chromatids. Subsequently, spindles elongate, separating the sister chromosomes into two sets. Here, we investigate the cell cycle requirements for spindle elongation in budding yeast using mutants affecting sister chromatid cohesion or DNA replication. We show that separation of sister chromatids is not sufficient for proper spindle integrity during elongation. Rather, successful spindle elongation and stability require both sister chromatid separation and anaphase-promoting complex activation. Spindle integrity during elongation is dependent on proteolysis of the securin Pds1 but not on the activity of the separase Esp1. Our data suggest that stabilization of the elongating spindle at the metaphase to anaphase transition involves Pds1-dependent targets other than Esp1.

scholarly journals Evidence for cohesin sliding along budding yeast chromosomes

Open Biology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 150178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ocampo-Hafalla ◽  
Sofía Muñoz ◽  
Catarina P. Samora ◽  
Frank Uhlmann
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Active Genes

The ring-shaped cohesin complex is thought to topologically hold sister chromatids together from their synthesis in S phase until chromosome segregation in mitosis. How cohesin stably binds to chromosomes for extended periods, without impeding other chromosomal processes that also require access to the DNA, is poorly understood. Budding yeast cohesin is loaded onto DNA by the Scc2–Scc4 cohesin loader at centromeres and promoters of active genes, from where cohesin translocates to more permanent places of residence at transcription termination sites. Here we show that, at the GAL2 and MET17 loci, pre-existing cohesin is pushed downstream along the DNA in response to transcriptional gene activation, apparently without need for intermittent dissociation or reloading. We observe translocation intermediates and find that the distribution of most chromosomal cohesin is shaped by transcription. Our observations support a model in which cohesin is able to slide laterally along chromosomes while maintaining topological contact with DNA. In this way, stable cohesin binding to DNA and enduring sister chromatid cohesion become compatible with simultaneous underlying chromosomal activities, including but maybe not limited to transcription.

Fission yeast Pds5 is required for accurate chromosome segregation and for survival after DNA damage or metaphase arrest

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Win Wang ◽  
Rebecca L. Read ◽  
Chris J. Norbury
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion, which is established during the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle and persists until the onset of anaphase, is essential for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Cohesion requires the multi-protein complex cohesin, as well as a number of accessory proteins including Pds5/BIMD/Spo76. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds5 is an essential protein that localises to chromosomes in a cohesin-dependent manner. Here we describe the characterisation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe of pds5+, a novel,non-essential orthologue of S. cerevisiae PDS5. The S. pombePds5 protein was localised to punctate nuclear foci in a manner that was dependent on the Rad21 cohesin component. This, together with additional genetic evidence, points towards an involvement of S. pombe Pds5 in sister chromatid cohesion. S. pombe pds5 mutants were hypersensitive to DNA damage and to mitotic metaphase delay, but this sensitivity was apparently not due to precocious loss of sister chromatid cohesion. These cells also suffered increased spontaneous chromosome loss and meiotic defects and their viability was dependent on the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1. Thus, while S. pombe Pds5 has an important cohesin-related role, this differs significantly from that of the equivalent budding yeast protein.

scholarly journals Stu1p Is Physically Associated with β-Tubulin and Is Required for Structural Integrity of the Mitotic Spindle

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Yin ◽  
Liru You ◽  
Danielle Pasqualone ◽  
Kristen M. Kopski ◽  
Tim C. Huffaker
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Balance Of Forces ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Β Tubulin

Formation of the bipolar mitotic spindle relies on a balance of forces acting on the spindle poles. The primary outward force is generated by the kinesin-related proteins of the BimC family that cross-link antiparallel interpolar microtubules and slide them past each other. Here, we provide evidence that Stu1p is also required for the production of this outward force in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the temperature-sensitive stu1–5mutant, spindle pole separation is inhibited, and preanaphase spindles collapse, with their previously separated poles being drawn together. The temperature sensitivity of stu1–5 can be suppressed by doubling the dosage of Cin8p, a yeast BimC kinesin–related protein. Stu1p was observed to be a component of the mitotic spindle localizing to the midregion of anaphase spindles. It also binds to microtubules in vitro, and we have examined the nature of this interaction. We show that Stu1p interacts specifically with β-tubulin and identify the domains required for this interaction on both Stu1p and β-tubulin. Taken together, these findings suggest that Stu1p binds to interpolar microtubules of the mitotic spindle and plays an essential role in their ability to provide an outward force on the spindle poles.

scholarly journals A quantitative analysis of cohesin decay in mitotic fidelity

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (10) ◽  
pp. 3343-3353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Carvalhal ◽  
Alexandra Tavares ◽  
Mariana B. Santos ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Raquel A. Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Force Balance ◽  
Chromosome Organization ◽  
Centromeric Chromatin ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Alignment

Sister chromatid cohesion mediated by cohesin is essential for mitotic fidelity. It counteracts spindle forces to prevent premature chromatid individualization and random genome segregation. However, it is unclear what effects a partial decline of cohesin may have on chromosome organization. In this study, we provide a quantitative analysis of cohesin decay by inducing acute removal of defined amounts of cohesin from metaphase-arrested chromosomes. We demonstrate that sister chromatid cohesion is very resistant to cohesin loss as chromatid disjunction is only observed when chromosomes lose >80% of bound cohesin. Removal close to this threshold leads to chromosomes that are still cohered but display compromised chromosome alignment and unstable spindle attachments. Partial cohesin decay leads to increased duration of mitosis and susceptibility to errors in chromosome segregation. We propose that high cohesin density ensures centromeric chromatin rigidity necessary to maintain a force balance with the mitotic spindle. Partial cohesin loss may lead to chromosome segregation errors even when sister chromatid cohesion is fulfilled.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document