scholarly journals Pervasive Risk Avoidance: Nursing Staff Perceptions of Risk in Person-Centered Care Delivery

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 1424-1435
Author(s):  
Liza L Behrens ◽  
Marie Boltz ◽  
Ann Kolanowski ◽  
Mark Sciegaj ◽  
Caroline Madrigal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objectives Nursing home (NH) staff perceptions of risks to residents’ health and safety are a major barrier to honoring resident preferences, the cornerstone of person-centered care (PCC) delivery. This study explored direct-care nursing staff perceptions of risk (possibilities for harm or loss) associated with honoring residents’ preferences for everyday living and care activities. Research Design and Methods Qualitative, descriptive design using sequential focus group (FG) methodology. Results Participants (N = 27) were mostly female (85%), had more than 3 years of experience (74%), and worked in NHs recently experiencing 6–12 health citations. Content analysis of 12 sequential FGs indicated nursing staff perceptions of risks may impede delivery of person-centered care. This is supported by the overarching theme: pervasive risk avoidance; and subthemes of: staff values, supports for risk-taking, and challenges to honoring preferences. Discussion and Implications Development of a multidimensional framework with specific risk engagement measures that account for the unique risk perspectives of nursing staff will contribute significantly to the clinical management of older adult preferences and research on the effectiveness of preference-based PCC delivery in the NH setting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 837-837
Author(s):  
Liza Behrens ◽  
Kimberly Van Haitsma ◽  
Ann Kolanowski ◽  
Marie Boltz ◽  
Mark Sciegaj ◽  
...  

Abstract Nursing home (NH) staff perceptions of risks to residents’ health and safety is a major barrier to honoring resident preferences, the cornerstone of person-centered care delivery. This study examined direct-care nursing staff perceptions of risk (possibilities for harm or loss) associated with honoring residents’ preferences for everyday living and care activities. Participants (N=27) were mostly female (85%), had more than 3 years of experience (74%), and worked in NHs experiencing 6-12 health citations. Content analysis of 12 focus groups indicated nursing staff perceptions of risks may impede delivery of PCC. This is supported by the overarching theme: pervasive risk avoidance; and sub-themes of: staff values, supports for risk-taking, and challenges to honoring preferences. Findings will be discussed considering a newly modified risk engagement framework meant to understand and inform the clinical management of older adult preferences perceived to carry risks. Opportunities for future research will be discussed (e.g. measurement development). Part of a symposium sponsored by the Research in Quality of Care Interest Group.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 270-270
Author(s):  
Marie Boltz ◽  
Ann Kolanowski ◽  
Mark Sciegaj ◽  
Katherine Abbott ◽  
Caroline Madrigal ◽  
...  

Abstract Effective management of the perceived risks associated with delivering preference-based person-centered care (PBPCC) is historically challenging for nursing home staff. Existing research lacks the granularity needed to guide clinicians who fear negative health and safety outcomes for residents. This study examined direct-care nursing staff perceptions of outcomes associated with delivering PBPCC. Participants (N=27) worked in NHs experiencing 6-12 health citations, were mostly female (85%), and represented diverse ages, race, education, and collective work experience in NHs. Content analysis of verbatim transcripts from 12 focus groups identified an overarching theme of: “person-centered outcomes related to risk engagement”; and sub-themes of: harms to staff (e.g. fear, frustration, guilt); harms to residents (e.g. negative moods and behaviors, physical discomfort); and positive shared outcomes (e.g. building nurse-resident relationships, positive care environment). Implications for risk management that improves quality of care and life outcomes in a post-COVID era will be discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 836-836
Author(s):  
Katherine Abbott ◽  
Kristine Williams

Abstract Advancing our knowledge related to honoring nursing home resident preferences is a cornerstone of person-centered care (PCC). While there are multiple approaches to providing PCC, we focus on resident preferences as assessed via the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI). The PELI is an evidenced-based, validated instrument that can be used to enhance the delivery of PCC. In this symposium, we explore the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders including nursing home residents, staff, and the impact of preference-based care on provider level regulatory outcomes. First, we present a comparative study of preference importance among n=317 African America and White nursing home residents that found more similarities than differences between the two groups. Second, a content analysis of the responses from n=196 interviews with nursing home residents details the barriers and facilitators connected to their levels of satisfaction with their preferences being fulfilled. Third, perspectives from n=27 direct care workers explore the concept of pervasive risk avoidance to the delivery of PCC. Fourth, systems-level practices, such as shift assignments and provider schedules are identified as barriers to successfully fulfilling resident preferences from the perspectives of n=19 staff within assisted living. Our final presentation utilizes a fixed-effects panel regression analysis with n=551 Ohio nursing home providers to explore the impact of PELI use on regulatory outcomes such as substantiated complaints and deficiency scores reported in the CMS Nursing Home Compare data. Discussant Dr. Kristi Williams will integrate findings, highlighting implications for policy, practice, and future directions. Research in Quality of Care Interest Group Sponsored Symposium.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G Blake ◽  
Edwina A Brown

Person-centered care has become a dominant paradigm in modern health care. It needs to be applied to people with end-stage kidney disease considering the initiation of dialysis and to peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription and care delivery. It is relevant to their decisions about goals of care, transplantation, palliative care, and discontinuation of dialysis. It is also relevant to decisions about how PD is delivered, including options such as incremental PD. Shared decision-making is the essence of this process and needs to become a standard principle of care. It requires engagement, education, and empowerment of patients. Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experience are also central to person-centered care in PD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 269-270
Author(s):  
Katherine Abbott ◽  
Kirsten Corazzini

Abstract Person-centered care (PCC) is an approach to care that both nursing homes (NH) and assisted living (AL) communities strive to provide. PCC is a philosophy that recognizes knowing the person and honoring individual preferences. However, when COVID-19 emerged, the NH and AL environments were ground zero for infection spread and disproportionate numbers of deaths among residents. As a result, many practices changed dramatically in efforts to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 in these communities. The purpose of this symposium is to discuss several projects that can speak to the impact of the pandemic on stakeholder efforts to provide PCC. First, Dr. Roberts presents feedback from residents and family members on the challenges COVID-19 created for family involvement in care conferences. In the second study, Dr. Behrens examines focus group data from direct-care nurses on their perceptions of delivering PCC related to risk of harm to staff and residents. The third study presents the voices of activities professionals who were implementing a PCC quality improvement project to communicate resident preferences, which illustrates both the importance of PCC during the pandemic, but also the challenges implementing during the pandemic. Fourth, the Kansas PEAK 2.0 program used provider feedback to direct and inform program responses through components such as consistent staffing. Finally, Dr. Zimmerman presents qualitative data from over 100 AL administrators, medical, and mental health care providers on their experiences pivoting during COVID-19. Our discussant will explore the implications of these studies in terms of the future of PCC in residential settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document