13. Breach of contract

2021 ◽  
pp. 493-534
Author(s):  
Robert Merkin ◽  
Séverine Saintier ◽  
Jill Poole
Keyword(s):  
Contract Law ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
Anticipatory Breach ◽  
The Law

Course-focused and comprehensive, Poole’s Textbook on Contract Law provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. There are four ways to discharge a contract: by performance, agreement, frustration, or breach. The standard of performance required in relation to each contractual obligation needs to be identified because a failure to perform to the required standard constitutes a breach. In the absence of lawful excuse, a breach of contract arises if a party either fails or refuses to perform a contractual obligation imposed on that party by the terms of the contract or performs a contractual obligation in a defective manner. While every breach of contract will give rise to a right to claim damages, the contract will remain in force unless the breach constitutes a repudiatory breach. The chapter examines the types of repudiatory breaches and the election to terminate or affirm, together with an assessment of the law governing the identification of a repudiatory breach and the consequences of terminating when the breach is not in fact repudiatory. It also examines the options available to the non-breaching party when an anticipatory breach occurs.

8. Breach of contract

2019 ◽  
pp. 297-338
Author(s):  
Robert Merkin ◽  
Séverine Saintier
Keyword(s):  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
Anticipatory Breach ◽  
The Law

Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on series provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. There are four ways to discharge a contract: by performance, agreement, frustration, or breach. The standard of performance required in relation to each contractual obligation needs to be identified because a failure to perform to the required standard constitutes a breach. In the absence of lawful excuse, a breach of contract arises if a party either fails or refuses to perform a contractual obligation imposed on that party by the terms of the contract or performs a contractual obligation in a defective manner. While every breach of contract will give rise to a right to claim damages, the contract will remain in force unless the breach constitutes a repudiatory breach. The chapter examines the types of repudiatory breaches and the election to terminate or affirm, together with an assessment of the law governing the identification of a repudiatory breach and the consequences of terminating when the breach is not in fact repudiatory. It also examines the options available to the non-breaching party when an anticipatory breach occurs.

13. Breach of contract

2021 ◽  
pp. 628-677
Author(s):  
Robert Merkin ◽  
Séverine Saintier
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
Anticipatory Breach ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Selection Of

Poole’s Casebook on Contract Law provides a comprehensive selection of case law that addresses all aspects of the subject encountered on undergraduate courses. The performance obligations of the parties to a contract are determined by contractual terms. A breach of contract arises when a party fails to fully comply with a performance obligation, without lawful excuse. If a contractual obligation is strict, failure to comply constitutes a breach of contract regardless of fault. Subject to an enforceable exemption clause, the injured party is entitled to damages to compensate for the loss suffered as a result of the breach. This chapter focuses on breach of contract and its legal consequences. It discusses the election on repudiatory breach; termination or affirmation of a contract; the classification of terms: conditions, warranties, and innominate or intermediate terms; the ‘entire obligation rule’; and anticipatory breach.

Israeli Contract Law — Recent Trends and Evaluation

1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Renner
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Legal Obligation ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
Recent Trends ◽  
The Law ◽  
Israeli Supreme Court

Two questions are central in the law of contracts: first, what are the conditions necessary to the formation of a contract; second, what is the scope of the contractual obligation. The first question deals with the two basic requirements for the formation of a contract — offer and acceptance, whose substantive components are the intention to form a legal obligation and definiteness. It also deals with the substantive requirement of writing, in those classes of contracts in which it is required, and the requirement of consideration, in those legal systems in which it exists. The second question deals with those rules which determine the remedies for breach of contract such as specific performance, damages and restitution. In this article I shall try to identify and evaluate recent trends in Israeli law concerning these questions, as demonstrated by decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court, and to evaluate these trends by measuring their consistency with one another.

12. Discharge by frustration: subsequent impossibility

2021 ◽  
pp. 467-492
Author(s):  
Robert Merkin ◽  
Séverine Saintier ◽  
Jill Poole
Keyword(s):  
Contract Law ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
General Terms ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
Common Purpose ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Course-focused and comprehensive, Poole’s Textbook on Contract Law provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. In general terms non-performance constitutes a breach of contract. The contract may have expressly allocated the risk of certain external events which occur after the contract is made to one of the parties by means of a force majeure clause. The terms of this clause will determine the parties’ positions if the event in question occurs. In the absence of an express allocation of the risk, the frustration doctrine is a residual doctrine that governs when such frustrating events intervene, without the fault of either party. These frustrating events relate to impossibility, illegality or frustration of the common purpose of both parties. This chapter examines the legal basis of the frustration doctrine, when it applies, when it does not apply and the legal consequences of frustration on the parties’ positions. Frustration automatically terminates the contract for the future and, where it applies, the provisions of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 govern the parties’ pre-existing legal position.

22. Breach of Contract and Termination

Contract Law ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewan McKendrick
Keyword(s):  
Contract Law ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Vienna Convention ◽  
European Contract ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Anticipatory Breach ◽  
The Status ◽  
Anticipatory Breach Of Contract ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

This chapter begins with a definition of ‘breach of contract’ and then outlines the circumstances in which a breach of contract gives to the innocent party a right to terminate further performance of the contract. These include breach of a condition and breach of an intermediate term where the consequences of the breach are sufficiently serious. The chapter also considers the problems that can arise in deciding the status of a term which has not been classified by the parties as a condition, a warranty, or an intermediate term. It examines termination clauses and the significance attached to the good faith of the party who is alleged to have repudiated the contract. The chapter includes a brief comparison of English law with the Vienna Convention and with the Principles of European Contract Law, and also addresses the question of whether an innocent party is obligated to exercise its right to terminate further performance of the contract, and considers the loss of the right to terminate. It concludes with a discussion of the law of anticipatory breach of contract.

8. Breach of contract

2019 ◽  
pp. 346-396
Author(s):  
Robert Merkin ◽  
Séverine Saintier
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
Anticipatory Breach ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
A Performance

The Casebook series provides a comprehensive selection of case law that addresses all aspects of the subject encountered on undergraduate courses. The performance obligations of the parties to a contract are determined by contractual terms. A breach of contract arises when a party fails to fully comply with a performance obligation, without lawful excuse. If a contractual obligation is strict, failure to comply constitutes a breach of contract regardless of fault. Subject to an enforceable exemption clause, the injured party is entitled to damages to compensate for the loss suffered as a result of the breach. This chapter focuses on breach of contract and its legal consequences. It discusses the election on repudiatory breach, termination or affirmation of a contract, the classification of terms: conditions, warranties and innominate or intermediate terms, the ‘entire obligation rule’, and anticipatory breach.

26. Anticipatory breach of contract

2021 ◽  
pp. 392-400
Author(s):  
Paul S. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contract Price ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
Anticipatory Breach ◽  
Legitimate Interest ◽  
Anticipatory Breach Of Contract ◽  
Do So

This chapter examines the doctrine of anticipatory breach, which occurs where, before the time comes for A to perform their part of the contract, A declares that A is not going to do so. This repudiation of the contractual obligation is itself a breach of contract. The innocent party may choose to either accept or reject an anticipatory breach. If they accept, the contract is terminated and the innocent party can sue for damages immediately. If the anticipatory breach is rejected, then the contract remains on foot. If the innocent party elects not to accept the breach and to keep the contract alive, then they may proceed to perform their side of the bargain and sue for the contract price. However, it appears that this action for the agreed sum, or action in debt, may not succeed if the innocent party had no ‘legitimate interest’ in taking such steps.

Cheshire, Fifoot, and Furmston's Law of Contract

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
MP Furmston
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Undue Influence ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
The Law

Cheshire, Fifoot & Furmston’s Law of Contract is a classic text on contract law. The first edition was published over seventy years ago. The book combines an account of the principles of the law of contract with analysis and insights, and the narrative brings understanding of complex contractual issues to a wider readership. It starts by providing a historic introduction, and goes on to look at issues such as modern contract law, agreement, consideration, and legal relations. The book details the contents of the contract and looks at unenforceable contracts, mistake, misrepresentation, duress, and undue influence. Chapters then examine contracts rendered void under statute, contracts illegal by statute or at common law, and contracts void at common law due to public policy. The text moves on to look at privity, rights and liabilities, performance and breach, and discharge under the doctrine of frustration. Finally, the book looks at remedies for breach of contract.

scholarly journals DISGORGEMENT DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-110
Author(s):  
Adam Temple
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Rational Basis ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Contractual Obligation ◽  
The Core ◽  
The Law

Gain-based damages for breach of contract are often viewed as anomalous, and lacking a clear rational basis. This article seeks to provide a theoretical basis for the requirement to disgorge profits gained through breach of contract.  By looking at the core contractual obligation, it can be seen that a contracting party has two ways in which they can fulfil their promises. They can pay damages where they fully compensate the other party, or they can perform. Where damages are inadequate, the contracting party must perform. Failure to perform in such circumstances should be prevented, and it is argued that disgorgement of profits is a suitable deterrent to such contract breakers. It is suggested that the law should act in this way to protect the facilitative institution of contract. 

JC Smith's The Law of Contract

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Contract Law ◽  
Undue Influence ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Strong Focus ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Expert Analysis ◽  
The Law ◽  
Unfair Terms ◽  
Compensatory Damages ◽  
Contractual Rights

Driven by exposition of the leading cases, JC Smith’s The Law of Contract offers the perfect balance between accessibility and authority. The strong focus on cases guides the reader through the intricacies of contract law with expert analysis ensuring key points are clear. The text begins with an introduction to contractual rights and duties. It looks at objectivity in contract law, the formation of bilateral and unilateral contracts, contract as agreement, offeror and offeree, estoppel, legal relations, and the role of third parties. It also considers the terms of the contract, interpretation of the contract, implication and rectification, and exclusion clauses and unfair terms. It goes on to look at issues such as duress, undue influence, good faith, capacity, illegality, contractual assumptions, breach of contract, remedies and damages, and remedies beyond compensatory damages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document