scholarly journals 221Association of physical activity bout length and changing intensity with mortality in UK Biobank

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Millard ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
Tom Gaunt ◽  
David Carslake ◽  
Deborah Lawlor

Abstract Background Spending more time active (and less time sedentary) is associated with many health benefits but it is unclear whether these associations differ depending on whether time spent sedentary or in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is accumulated in long or short bouts. We used a novel analytical approach to examine whether length of sedentary and MVPA bouts associates with all-cause mortality. Methods We used data on 79,507 participants from UK Biobank. We derived the total time participants spent in activity categories (sleep, sedentary, light activity and MVPA) and in sedentary and MVPA bouts of short (1-15 minutes), medium (16-40 minutes) and long (41+ minutes) duration, on average per day. We used Cox proportion hazards regression to estimate the association of spending 10 minutes more average daily time in one activity or bout length category, coupled with spending 10 minutes less time in another, with all-cause mortality. Results Those spending more time in MVPA had lower mortality risk, irrespective of whether this replaced time spent sleeping, sedentary or in light activity. We found little evidence to suggest that mortality risk differed depending on the length of sedentary or MVPA bouts. Conclusions We uniquely show that higher total MVPA improves health irrespective of whether it is obtained from several short bouts or fewer longer bouts, supporting recent policy changes in some countries. Key messages Our results suggest that time spent in MVPA associates with lower mortality risk irrespective of whether it is obtained from several short bouts or fewer longer bouts.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Amanda Claire Millard ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
Tom R Gaunt ◽  
David Carslake ◽  
Deborah A Lawlor

Background Spending more time active (and less time sedentary) is associated with many health benefits such as improved cardiovascular health and lower risk of all-cause mortality. However, it is unclear whether these associations differ depending on whether time spent sedentary or in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is accumulated in long or short bouts. In this study we used a novel analytical approach, that accounts for substitution (i.e. more time in MVPA means spending less time sleeping, in light activity or being sedentary), to examine whether length of sedentary and MVPA bouts associates with all-cause mortality. Methods and findings We used data on 79,507 participants from UK Biobank. We derived the total time participants spent in activity categories - sleep, sedentary, light activity and MVPA - on average per day. We also derived the time spent in sedentary and MVPA bouts of short (1-15 minutes), medium (16-40 minutes) and long (41+ minutes) duration. We used Cox proportion hazards regression to estimate the association of spending 10 minutes more average daily time in one activity or bout length category, coupled with spending 10 minutes less time in another, with all-cause mortality. Those spending more time sedentary had higher mortality risk if this replaced time spent in light activity (hazard ratio 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01, 1.03]), and an even higher risk if this replaced time spent in MVPA (hazard ratio 1.08 [95% CI: 1.06, 1.10]). Those spending more time in MVPA had lower mortality risk, irrespective of whether this replaced time spent sleeping, sedentary or in light activity. We found little evidence to suggest that mortality risk differed depending on the length of sedentary or MVPA bouts. A limitation of our study is that we cannot assume that these results are causal, though we adjusted for key confounders. Conclusions Using our novel analytical approach, we uniquely show that time spent in MVPA is associated with reduced mortality, irrespective of whether it replaces time spent sleeping, sedentary or in light activity. This emphasizes the specific importance of MVPA. We found little evidence to suggest that the impact of MVPA differs depending on whether it is obtained from several short bouts or fewer longer bouts, supporting recent policy changes in some countries. Further studies are needed to investigate causality and explore health outcomes beyond mortality.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. e1003757
Author(s):  
Lousise A. C. Millard ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
Tom R. Gaunt ◽  
David Carslake ◽  
Deborah A. Lawlor

Background Spending more time active (and less sedentary) is associated with health benefits such as improved cardiovascular health and lower risk of all-cause mortality. It is unclear whether these associations differ depending on whether time spent sedentary or in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is accumulated in long or short bouts. In this study, we used a novel method that accounts for substitution (i.e., more time in MVPA means less time sleeping, in light activity or sedentary) to examine whether length of sedentary and MVPA bouts associates with all-cause mortality. Methods and findings We used data on 79,503 adult participants from the population-based UK Biobank cohort, which recruited participants between 2006 and 2010 (mean age at accelerometer wear 62.1 years [SD = 7.9], 54.5% women; mean length of follow-up 5.1 years [SD = 0.73]). We derived (1) the total time participants spent in activity categories—sleep, sedentary, light activity, and MVPA—on average per day; (2) time spent in sedentary bouts of short (1 to 15 minutes), medium (16 to 40 minutes), and long (41+ minutes) duration; and (3) MVPA bouts of very short (1 to 9 minutes), short (10 to 15 minutes), medium (16 to 40 minutes), and long (41+ minutes) duration. We used Cox proportion hazards regression to estimate the association of spending 10 minutes more average daily time in one activity or bout length category, coupled with 10 minutes less time in another, with all-cause mortality. Those spending more time in MVPA had lower mortality risk, irrespective of whether this replaced time spent sleeping, sedentary, or in light activity, and these associations were of similar magnitude (e.g., hazard ratio [HR] 0.96 [95% CI: 0.94, 0.97; P < 0.001] per 10 minutes more MVPA, coupled with 10 minutes less light activity per day). Those spending more time sedentary had higher mortality risk if this replaced light activity (HR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.02; P < 0.001] per 10 minutes more sedentary time, with 10 minutes less light activity per day) and an even higher risk if this replaced MVPA (HR 1.06 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.08; P < 0.001] per 10 minutes more sedentary time, with 10 minutes less MVPA per day). We found little evidence that mortality risk differed depending on the length of sedentary or MVPA bouts. Key limitations of our study are potential residual confounding, the limited length of follow-up, and use of a select sample of the United Kingdom population. Conclusions We have shown that time spent in MVPA was associated with lower mortality, irrespective of whether it replaced time spent sleeping, sedentary, or in light activity. Time spent sedentary was associated with higher mortality risk, particularly if it replaced MVPA. This emphasises the specific importance of MVPA. Our findings suggest that the impact of MVPA does not differ depending on whether it is obtained from several short bouts or fewer longer bouts, supporting the recent removal of the requirement that MVPA should be accumulated in bouts of 10 minutes or more from the UK and the United States policy. Further studies are needed to investigate causality and explore health outcomes beyond mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Godin ◽  
Joanna M. Blodgett ◽  
Kenneth Rockwood ◽  
Olga Theou

The authors sought to examine how much sedentary time needs to be replaced by light or moderate–vigorous physical activity in order to reduce frailty and protect against mortality. The authors built isotemporal substitution models to assess the theoretical effect of replacing sedentary behavior with an equal amount of light or moderate–vigorous activity on frailty and mortality in community-based adults aged 50 years and older. Controlling for age, sex, body mass index, marital status, race, education, employment status, and National Health and Nutrition Examination Study cycle, replacing 1 hr of sedentary time with moderate–vigorous or light physical activity daily was associated with a lower frailty index. For mortality, results varied based on frailty level. Replacing sedentary behavior with moderate–vigorous exercise was associated with lower mortality risk in vulnerable individuals; however, replacing sedentary behavior with light activity was associated with lower mortality risk in frailer individuals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakkoyya H. Lewis ◽  
Kyriakos S. Markides ◽  
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher ◽  
Soham Al Snih

Background: We investigated the association between 10 years of change in physical activity (PA) levels and 7-year all-cause mortality. Methods: Mexican American adults aged 67 and older (N = 803) participating in the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (1995/1996–2012/2013) were included. All-cause mortality was our outcome. Participants were divided into 4 groups based on their difference in overall PA between 1995/1996 and 2005/2006 measured by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. Participants were classified as having unchanged low PA (n = 339), decreased activity (n = 233), unchanged high activity (n = 166), and increased activity (n = 65). Change in the frequency of PA domains was also investigated. PA domains included leisure, household, sedentary, and walking activities. Results:After controlling for all covariates, results from the Cox proportional hazards regression found a 43% lower mortality risk in the increased PA group (hazards ratio = 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–0.97) compared with the unchanged low PA group. In the entire sample, a significantly lower mortality risk was also present among walking (hazards ratio = 0.88) and household (hazards ratio = 0.88) activities. Conclusion:Our results suggest that, independent of other factors, increasing PA is most protective of mortality among older Mexican Americans.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Loprinzi

Purpose. Research demonstrates that moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality. Few studies have examined the effects of light-intensity physical activity on mortality. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the association between objectively measured light-intensity physical activity and all-cause mortality risk. Design. Longitudinal. Setting. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006 with follow-up through December 31, 2011. Subjects. Five thousand five hundred seventy-five U.S. adults. Measures. Participants wore an accelerometer for at least 4 days and completed questionnaires to assess sociodemographics and chronic disease information, with blood samples taken to assess biological markers. Follow-up mortality status was assessed via death certificate data from the National Death Index. Analysis. Cox proportional hazard model. Results. After adjusting for accelerometer-determined MVPA, age, gender, race-ethnicity, cotinine, weight status, poverty level, C-reactive protein, and comorbid illness, for every 60-minute increase in accelerometer-determined light-intensity physical activity, participants had a 16% reduced hazard of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = .84; 95% confidence interval: .78–.91; p < .001). Conclusion. In this national sample of U.S. adults, light-intensity physical activity was inversely associated with all-cause mortality risk, independent of age, MVPA, and other potential confounders. In addition to MVPA, promotion of light-intensity physical activity is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Mauramo ◽  
J Salmela ◽  
N Kanerva ◽  
E Lahelma ◽  
T Lallukka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) are associated with better health outcomes but less is known about their joint associations with the risk of mortality. We examined the joint associations of FVC and LTPA with premature mortality among midlife and ageing municipal employees, adjusting for key covariates. Methods Survey data collected in 2000–2002 among 40–60-year-old employees of the City of Helsinki, Finland, were linked with complete register data on mortality from Statistics Finland (4961 women, 1373 men; response rate 67%; written consent for register linkages 74%). FVC was dichotomised into daily or non-daily, and LTPA into high (&gt;14 MET-hours/week including vigorous exercise) or low. Covariates included age, sex, marital status, socioeconomic position, binge drinking, smoking and self-rated health. Cox regression models were fitted. The follow-up continued until the event of death or the end of 2015. Results A total of 281 deaths occurred during the follow-up. The mortality rate was 7.1% in men and 3.7% in women. A gender interaction was found, showing differing associations for women and men. Men with both daily FVC and high LTPA had the lowest mortality risk (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.63) after adjusting for covariates. Men with high LTPA and non-daily FVC also had a lower mortality risk (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.90) compared to those with non-daily FVC and low LTPA. Women with daily FVC and high LTPA had a lower mortality risk initially, but after adjusting for covariates no statistically significant associations were observed. Conclusions The joint associations of FVC and LTPA with premature mortality differed between women and men. This could be related to gender differences in e.g. the causes of death, and further studies are needed to clarify this. Increasing FVC and LTPA might prevent premature mortality among men. Key messages Fruit and vegetable consumption jointly with physical activity decreased the risk of premature mortality among men only. Further studies are needed to clarify the gender difference which could be related to for example death causes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Purva Jain ◽  
John Bellettiere ◽  
Nicole Glass ◽  
Michael J LaMonte ◽  
Chongzhi Di ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Self-reported time spent standing has been associated with lower risk of mortality. No previous studies have examined this association using device-measured standing. Method This was a prospective cohort study of 5878 older (median age = 80 years), racial/ethnically diverse, community-dwelling women in the WHI Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Study (OPACH). Women wore accelerometers for 1 week and were followed for mortality. The study applied previously validated machine learning algorithms to ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer data to separately measure time spent standing with and without ambulation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate mortality risk adjusting for potential confounders. Effect modification by age, body mass index, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary time, physical functioning, and race/ethnicity was evaluated. Results There were 691 deaths during 26 649 person-years of follow-up through March 31, 2018 (mean follow-up = 4.8 years). In fully adjusted models, all-cause mortality risk was lower among those with more standing without ambulation (quartile [Q] 4 vs Q1 HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.49–0.81, p-trend = .003) and more standing with ambulation (Q4 vs Q1 HR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.35–0.71, p-trend &lt; .001). Associations of standing with ambulation and mortality were stronger among women with above-median sedentary time (HR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.38–0.68) compared to women with below-median sedentary time (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.59–1.07; p-interaction = .02). Conclusions In this prospective study among older women, higher levels of accelerometer-measured standing were associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality. Standing is an achievable approach to interrupting prolonged sedentary time, and if not contraindicated, is a safe and feasible behavior that appears to benefit health in older ages.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1568-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin P Chapman ◽  
Ari J Elliot

Controversy exists over the use of brief Big Five scales in health studies. We investigated links between an ultra-brief measure, the Big Five Inventory-10, and mortality in the General Social Survey. The Agreeableness scale was associated with elevated mortality risk (hazard ratio = 1.26, p = .017). This effect was attributable to the reversed-scored item “Tends to find fault with others,” so that greater fault-finding predicted lower mortality risk. The Conscientiousness scale approached meta-analytic estimates, which were not precise enough for significance. Those seeking Big Five measurement in health studies should be aware that the Big Five Inventory-10 may yield unusual results.


Author(s):  
Anna E Clarke ◽  
Valerie Carson ◽  
Jean-Philippe Chaput ◽  
Rachel C Colley ◽  
Karen C Roberts ◽  
...  

This study determined if meeting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines recommendations are associated with all-cause mortality. Participants were 3,471 adults from the 2005-2006 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey followed for mortality over 11 years. They were classified as meeting or not meeting recommendations for sleep duration, sedentary behaviour, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). A total of 63.8%, 35.3%, and 41.5% of participants met recommendations for sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity while 12.3% met all three recommendations. The hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality in participants meeting the recommendations relative to those not meeting the recommendations were 0.91 (0.72, 1.16) for sleep, 0.92 (0.61, 1.40) for sedentary behavior, and 0.42 (0.24, 0.74) for MVPA. The HR for meeting none, any one, any two, and all three recommendations were 1.00, 0.86 (0.65, 1.14), 0.49 (0.28, 0.86), and 0.72 (0.34, 1.50). When the cut-point used to denote acceptable sedentary time was changed from ≤8 to ≤10 hours/day, the HR for meeting none, any one, any two, and all three recommendations were 1.00, 0.83 (0.59, 1.15), 0.57 (0.34, 0.96), and 0.43 (0.20, 0.93). These findings provide some support for the ability of the 24-hour movement guidelines to predict mortality risk. NOVELTY - The 24-Hour Movement Guidelines provide recommendations for sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity. - The findings of this study provide some support of the ability of these new guidelines to predict mortality risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document