scholarly journals Achievement of clinical isavuconazole blood concentrations in transplant recipients with isavuconazonium sulphate capsules administered via enteral feeding tube

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 3023-3028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin K McCreary ◽  
M Hong Nguyen ◽  
Matthew R Davis ◽  
Jared Borlagdan ◽  
Ryan K Shields ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Isavuconazole is a triazole antifungal available in IV and capsule formulation. Prescribing information states that capsules should not be chewed, crushed, dissolved or opened because the drug was not studied in this manner. However, considering the pharmacokinetics of the capsules, we theorized opening and sprinkling the contents into an enteral feeding tube (EFT) would result in adequate absorption and systemic concentrations of isavuconazole. Objectives To determine whether patients receiving isavuconazonium sulphate capsules via EFT would achieve clinical blood concentrations of isavuconazole. Methods Nineteen solid organ and HCT recipients receiving isavuconazole via EFT for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infection (IFI) were prospectively identified at four academic medical centres in the USA. Patients were included in this evaluation if they received isavuconazole via EFT for at least 5 days and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was performed. Results TDM was performed after a median of 7 days (range 6–17) following EFT administration and 15 days (range 7–174) of isavuconazole therapy overall. Median isavuconazole concentration was 1.8 μg/mL (range 0.3–5.2). Median isavuconazole concentrations in patients with or without prior IV administration were 1.8 μg/mL (range 0.3–5.2) and 2.2 μg/mL (range 0.8–3.6; P = 0.896), respectively. Concentrations achieved with the EFT route were similar to or greater than the corresponding concentrations via the IV route in six patients who had TDM performed during both routes of administration. Conclusions It is reasonable to consider opening isavuconazonium sulphate capsules and administering the contents enterally for prevention and treatment of IFI.

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. S54-S55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy O. Lipman ◽  
Oliver W. Cass ◽  
Chia Sing Ho ◽  
Patrick J. Kearns ◽  
Scott A. Shikora

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Jorge Sobreira da Silva ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Meireles Cava ◽  
Patrícia Kaiser Pedroso ◽  
Débora Omena Futuro

Enteral nutrition (EN) is the method of choice for patients that cannot adequately receive oral feeding despite good gastrointestinal tract condition. Enteral diets may be administered through tube or ostomy placed in the stomach, duodenum or jejunum. The administration of drugs via enteral feeding tube (EFT) is a common practice in hospitals due to patient clinical status, and requires special attention from professionals involved in this process. This study entailed an analysis of the profile of drug therapy through EFT based on evaluation of medical prescriptions of the Medical Clinic of the Hospital dos Servidores do Estado (HSE) of Rio de Janeiro sent to the Pharmacy Service between January and June 2007, according to standard protocols in place. Prescription of drugs via EFT outside recommended guidelines was observed, besides potential drug-nutrient incompatibilities associated with this practice. These results point to the need for improvement of enteral route access and the adoption of measures to promote safe and effective use of drugs and nutritional therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S715-S715
Author(s):  
Ahmad Mourad ◽  
Melissa D Johnson ◽  
John R Perfect

Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) continue to affect the immunocompromised patient population. Many of these patients require antifungal prophylaxis. Voriconazole is an azole antifungal that has been utilized for preventing IFIs but does not have an approved indication for prophylaxis. Methods Adult patients admitted to Duke University Hospital from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015 who had received at least 2 days of systemic voriconazole as primary prophylaxis were included in this retrospective medical records review. Demographics, underlying comorbidities, adverse events, drug interactions, voriconazole blood concentrations, and microbiological data were assessed. Results Our review identified 403 patients receiving voriconazole for primary prophylaxis. 220 (55.6%) were male, 303 (75.2%) were Caucasian, and the mean age was 46.0 ± 15.7 years. 233 (57.8%) had leukemia, and 63 (15.6%) had lymphoma. 301 (74.7%) underwent hematopoietic transplant (BMT), and 45 (11.2%) had a solid-organ transplant. 176 (43.7%) patients received chemotherapy and 261 (64.8%) received immunosuppressive drugs. The mean voriconazole total daily maintenance dose was 416.1 ± 65.9 mg (5.5 ± 1.6 mg/kg/day). Patients received inpatient voriconazole for a mean of 19.5 ± 16.5 days. 371 (92.1%) patients received a concomitant interacting drug. Only 140 (43.7%) patients had therapeutic drug monitoring. The mean first voriconazole serum concentration was 1.8 ± 1.7 mg/L. 87 (21.6%) patients discontinued voriconazole prematurely; 41 (10.2% overall) of these patients had an adverse event requiring discontinuation. 5 had breakthrough fungal infections with microbiological data identifying a fungal species, which included Rhizopus spp. among others. Conclusion Voriconazole is frequently used for primary prophylaxis of IFIs and most commonly in BMT. It appears to be relatively well tolerated with some adverse side-effects (~10%) despite many potential drug–drug interactions and provides appropriate fungal coverage for many immunosuppressed patients. However, few patients had breakthrough fungal infections while receiving voriconazole. In a real-world setting, voriconazole can provide antifungal prevention in certain high-risk patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol S. Ireton-Jones ◽  
Jean Cheney ◽  
Ramona Young ◽  
John Hunt ◽  
Gary Purdue

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 2055-2059 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Marc Harrison ◽  
Bonnie Clay ◽  
Mary Jo C. Grant ◽  
Suzanne V. Sanders ◽  
Holly F. Webster ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document