Microdiffusion and Fluoride-Specific Electrode Determination of Fluoride in Infant Foods: Collaborative Study

1981 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1021-1026
Author(s):  
Robert W Dabeka ◽  
Arthur D Mckenzie ◽  
◽  
R A Baetz ◽  
D W Bingham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Variance Analysis ◽  
Infant Foods ◽  
Reproducibility Standard Deviation ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation

Abstract Twelve laboratories analyzed (1 replicate) 12 samples of infant foods – milk, pears, and peas – containing 0.2-5 ppm F. There was one laboratory outlier. Mean coefficients of variation were 7.06% for intralaboratory determination of 3 sets of blind duplicates and 21.6% for interlaboratory determination of 12 samples. Variance analysis for all samples yielded a reproducibility standard deviation of 0.41 ppm; for 3 sets of blind duplicates, repeatability standard deviation was 0.26 ppm and reproducibility standard deviation was 0.32 ppm.

Mass Loss on Drying for Instant Coffee: Collaborative Study

1980 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-179
Author(s):  
William P Clinton ◽  
Paul H Manni ◽  
John M Ferry
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Mass Loss ◽  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Instant Coffee ◽  
Reproducibility Standard Deviation ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation ◽  
Working Method

Abstract A collaborative study was undertaken to define an acceptable routine working method for determination of mass loss in instant coffee. Fourteen laboratories of 24 invited to participate submitted results. The repeatability standard deviation and coefficient of variation were 0.026 and 0.7%, respectively. The reproducibility standard deviation and coefficient of variation were 0.153 and 3.8%, respectively. The method has been adopted as official first action.

scholarly journals Determination of Selenium in Feeds and Premixes: Collaborative Study

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan S Palmer ◽  
Nancy Thiex ◽  
R Allen ◽  
E Alley ◽  
N Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Atomic Absorption ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Hydride Generation ◽  
Poor Agreement ◽  
Reproducibility Standard Deviation ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation ◽  
Fluorometric Study

Abstract A total of 17 laboratories participated in a collaborative study for the determination of selenium in feeds and premixes using either a fluorometric or a continuous hydride generation atomic absorption (HGAA) method. Each collaborator analyzed 16 blind duplicate samples of feed and premixes from various feed manufacturers. The amount of Se in these materials ranged from 0.2 to 5500 μg/g. Six laboratories used only the fluorometric procedure, 8 laboratories used only the hydride generation atomic absorption procedure, and 3 laboratories used both procedures. One laboratory in the fluorometric study and 3 laboratories in the HGAA study were initially excluded because of invalid data. Poor agreement between the blind duplicates indicated probable sample interchange and/or dilution error. The data from 8 laboratories were submitted to statistical analysis, including data from 2 laboratories participating in both studies. The repeatability standard deviation (RSDr) for samples analyzed by the fluorometric procedure ranged from 5.9 to 33%, and the reproducibility standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 12 to 33%. RSDf for samples analyzed by HGAA ranged from 2.8 to 18%, and RSDR ranged from 4.0 to 36%. Both fluorometric and continuous hydride generation atomic absorption methods for the determination of Se in feeds and premixes have been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Experimental Designs for Interlaboratory Precision Experiments: Comparison of ISO 5725 with Draft NEN 6303

1989 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zaalberg
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Edible Oils ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Experimental Designs ◽  
Interlaboratory Experiments ◽  
Interlaboratory Studies ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation ◽  
Level Design ◽  
Iso 5725

Abstract To determine the precision of standardized analytical methods, interlaboratory experiments are carried out in which several laboratories analyze identical samples from well homogenized batches of material. From the test results, estimates of the standard deviations under repeatability as well as under reproducibility conditions are calculated. In the present work, the experimental designs recommended in the International Standard ISO 5725 have been compared with a design proposed in the draft Netherlands Standard NEN 6303. This has been done by comparing their mathematical models as well as by applying them to the results of a recent collaborative study on the determination of heavy metals in edible oils and fats. The reproducibility standard deviation is estimated equally well with both Standards, but it appeared that the designs given in ISO 5725 can lead to serious underestimation (uniform-level design) or overestimation (split-level design) of the repeatability standard deviation. By using the design proposed in NEN 6303, these biases can be avoided. Hence, it is recommended that interlaboratory studies be organized according to the design of NEN 6303.

Evaluation of the Babcock Method for the Determination of Milk Fat

1975 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-956
Author(s):  
Myron R Mckinley ◽  
Richard E Arnold ◽  
John B Rosenbury ◽  
Earl C Born ◽  
Chapman E Dunham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sulfuric Acid ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Tempering Temperature ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Sample Composition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation ◽  
Milk Solids

Abstract The Babcock test for fat in milk was evaluated to study the effects of variables such as glassware calibration, sample preparation, sample composition, reagents, tempering conditions, procedural variations, and analyst. Certain test bottles yielded significantly different results; however, there was little indication of pipet variation. Analysis of the various techniques for tempering and mixing indicated that samples tempered at 68°F (20°C), containing an airspace of approximately 25% of the total container, and mixed by inversion 5–10 times or poured from one container to another gave the most consistent results. Sample composition did not affect results, provided all milk-solids-notfat were digested by the sulfuric acid. A pipet draining time of 10 sec followed by blowing out the pipet was sufficient to yield reproducible results. Differences between lots of sulfuric acid affected results. Results were 0.027% less when the final test tempering was 130°F (54.5°C) compared to 140°F (60°C); however, a final tempering for a minimum of 3 min gave satisfactory results. Variations in reading results between individual analysts were negligible. The Babcock method for fat in milk, modified to include the optimum parameters as determined in this study, was subjected to a collaborative study. Nine laboratories analyzed 10 samples in duplicate. Statistical analysis of collaborative data indicates a significant difference between laboratories (p <0.01 ). The repeatability standard deviation of the method is 0.0183%. The reproducibility standard deviation is 0.0407%. The repeatability and reproducibility coefficients of variation are 0.53 and 1.17%, respectively. On the basis of the collaborative results, the following changes have been incorporated into the official final action method: specifications for the reading light; sample draining time; tempering temperature of the acid; tempering procedure for reading the test bottle.

Collaborative Study of the Determination of Dichlorophene in Veterinary Preparations by Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry

1972 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-165
Author(s):  
Dalia M Gilvydis
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Synthetic Mixture ◽  
Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry ◽  
Average Recovery ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract Dichlorophene is determined in veterinary preparations by a liquid-liquid extraction and UV quantitation. Eight collaborators each analyzed 4 commercial preparations and one synthetic mixture. The average recovery for dichlorophene in the synthetic mixture is 100.3% with a standard deviation of 2.13. The standard deviations obtained for the 5 samples range from 0.13 to 3.69 with coefficients of variation from 0.69 to 3.43. It is recommended that the method be adopted as official first action.

Determination of Total Nitrogen in Urine by Pyrochemiluminescence: Collaborative Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi A Boehm ◽  
P Frank Ross
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
External Control ◽  
Severe Stress ◽  
Average Recovery ◽  
Oxidative Pyrolysis ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation

Abstract Twelve collaborating laboratories analyzed 5 blind duplicate samples of human urine for total nitrogen using a pyrochemiluminescence method. The nitrogen content ranged from low (650 mg/L) to high levels (8800 mg/L) in urine samples of people under moderate to severe stress. In addition to test samples, collaborators also received a certified standard (sodium nitrite in water) as an external control. The pyrochemiluminescence assay was performed on urine samples diluted in water within a range of 1:50 to 1:100. The method detects total nitrogen by reaction of the product of high temperature oxidative pyrolysis and ozone. Repeatability standard deviation values (RDSr) ranged from 1.49 to 3.91% and reproducibility standard deviation values (RSDR) ranged from 3.66 to 9.57%. The average recovery of total nitrogen was 99.9%. The pyrochemiluminescence method for determination of total nitrogen in urine was adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Collaborative Study of a Spectrophotometric Method for Determining Maleic Hydrazide Residues in Tobacco and Vegetables

1975 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235-1243
Author(s):  
Milan Ihnat ◽  
Brian Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Spectrophotometric Method ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Maleic Hydrazide ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Green Bean ◽  
F Test ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Better Than

Abstract A distillation-spectrophotometric method for the determination of maleic hydrazide residues in tobacco and vegetables reported previously was studied collaboratively. Ten laboratories submitted analytical results on 10 samples containing residues resulting either from field treatment or laboratory fortification. The samples were estimated to contain from 0.99 to 16.36 μg maleic hydrazide/0.5 g sample analyzed. The coefficients of variation based on precision standard deviation ranged from 57.7% for the lowest residue content to 32.4% for the highest. The corresponding coefficients of variation based on overall standard deviations were estimated to be at least one-fifth larger. Strong evidence of systematic laboratory differences was found (F-test, significant at 0.1%). Apparent recoveries of 10.0 fifl maleic hydrazide added to 0.5 g fluecured tobacco and potato were 97.3 and 89.7%, respectively. Apparent recoveries of 16.0 and 16.5 μg added to 0.5 g green bean were 87.4 and 85.5%, respectively. The precision of the method studied was no better than that of the current official final action method, 29.121–29.127, and its adoption is not recommended.

High Pressure Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Bacitracin in Premix Feeds and Finished Feeds: Collaborative Study

1982 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1178-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B Gallagher ◽  
Paul W Love ◽  
Linda L Knotts ◽  
◽  
M Allred ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Chromatographic Technique ◽  
Reverse Phase ◽  
High Pressure Liquid Chromatographic ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic

Abstract A liquid chromatographic technique for the determination of bacitracin in finished feeds and premix feeds consists of an isocratic reverse phase, ion-suppressed technique. The chromatography can be completed in less than 25 min. In a collaborative study involving 9 laboratories and 3 samples of bacitracin methylene disalicylic acid and 3 samples of bacitracin zinc premixes covering the range of 10-50 g/lb, the repeatability standard deviation was 0.55, and the reproducibility standard deviation was 1.35. The average recovery of the bacitracin was 102.0%. The method has been adopted official first action for bacitracin in premix feeds.

scholarly journals Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Maleic Hydrazide in Technical and Formulated Products: Collaborative Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 929-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L Mertz ◽  
Dora Y Lau ◽  
David M Borth ◽  
E D Ausan ◽  
O Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Potassium Salt ◽  
Maleic Hydrazide ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
Reversed Phase ◽  
Reproducibility Standard Deviation ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation

Abstract Fourteen collaborating laboratories assayed maleic hydrazide (MH), 6-hydroxypyridazin-3(2H)-one, in technical and formulated products by reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC) with sulfanilic acid as an internal standard. The active MH in the samples (6 lots) ranged from 16% (expressed as the potassium salt) to 98% (MH in the technical). A small amount of 1 M KOH was added to the technical MH and analytical standards to create the potassium salt of the analyte which is soluble in water. Test samples and standards were extracted with water containing the internal standard before analysis by LC on a C8 column with an ion-pairing eluting solution and UV detection at 254 nm. The concentration of MH was calculated by comparing the peak area response ratios of the analyte and the internal standard with those in the analytical standard solution. Eleven laboratories weighed each test sample twice with single analysis. Three laboratories weighed each sample once and made duplicate injections on the LC system. The data were analyzed using the 11 laboratories' results. A second data analysis was done including all laboratory results using a Youden pair approach, selecting one of 2 duplicate assay values randomly for each laboratory and sample. In the first data analysis, the repeatability standard deviation ranged from 0.07 to 1.39%; reproducibility standard deviation ranged from 0.22 to 1.39%. In the second data analysis (using all laboratory data), repeatability standard deviation ranged from 0.09 to 0.86%; reproducibility standard deviation ranged from 0.22 to 1.31%.

Determination of Nitrogen in Fertilizer by Combustion: Collaborative Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald F Tate
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Copper Catalyst ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Combustion Method ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Kjeldahl Method ◽  
Repeatability Standard Deviation

Abstract Fourteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study to compare abilities of AOAC modified copper catalyst Kjeldahl method, 978.02, and the generic combustion method, 990.03, to analyze the nitrogen content of fertilizer materials. Combustion analyses are more time efficient, more accurate, and less hazardous than Kjeldahl analyses. There were 3 different types of instrumentation involved in the collaborative study: (1) Leco FP-428 Nitrogen Determinator; (2) Perkin-Elmer 2410 Series II Nitrogen Analyzer; (3) Carlo-Erba 1500 Series II Nitrogen Analyzer. Thirty samples of fertilizer containing 1–67% N included 2 ACS grade standard materials: ammonium nitrate, theory 35.00% N; and dicyandiamide, theory 66.64% N. A diammonium phosphate and urea mixture (3 + 1 ; 1.0 mm grind) and 2 ACS grade standard materials of ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate were supplied for repetitive combustion analyses. Overall method performance of the combustion method was at least as good as the modified Kjeldahl method. Repeatability standard deviation (Sr) values for the combustion method ranged from 0.09 to 0.34 vs the modified Kjeldahl method range of 0.06–0.49; reproducibility standard deviation (SR) values for the combustion method ranged from 0.13 to 1.07 vs the range of 0.09–3.57 for the modified Kjeldahl method. The grand mean was 20.78% for the combustion method, and 20.79% for the modified Kjeldahl method using various fertilizers. The average ranges of sr and SR for the methods were, respectively, 0.17 and 0.29 for the combustion method, and 0.19 and 0.54 for the modified Kjeldahl method. The method was adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document