Effect of Milling Procedure on the Measurement of Dietary Fiber by a Gravimetric Method

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
W John Mullin ◽  
Mark S Wolynetz
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Soluble Fiber ◽  
White Potato ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Effect Of Particle Size ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Samples of white potato, sweet potato, hard red spring wheat, soft white winter wheat, and soft wheat bran were ground in a Wiley mill or a Cyclotec mill. A significantly (p < 0.0001) larger proportion of coarse material (>75μ) resulted from the Wiley mill, and a significantly (p < 0.0001) larger proportion of fine material (<45μ) was produced by the Cyclotec mill. The effect of particle size on the determination of soluble, insoluble, and total dietary fiber was less well defined. In 4 of 5 commodities tested, samples from the Cyclotec mill showed a greater amount of soluble fiber, while the reverse was true for insoluble and total fiber. The difference in total dietary fiber, with respect to the mill used in sample preparation, varied from 0.24% on a total 9.10% for potatoes to 1.00% on a total of 14.05% for hard red spring wheat.

Determination of Total, Soluble, and Insoluble Dietary Fiber in Foods—Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, MES-TRIS Buffer: Collaborative Study

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo C Lee ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
Jonathan W De Vries
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Tris Buffer ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Heat Stable ◽  
Assay Precision

Abstract A joint AOAC/AACC (American Association of Cereal Chemists) collaborative study of methods for the determination of soluble, insoluble, and total dietary fiber (SDF, IDF, and TDF) was conducted with 11 participating laboratories. The assay Is based on a modification of the AOAC TDF method 985.29 and the SDF/IDF method collaboratively studied recently by AOAC. The principles of the method are the same as those for the AOAC dietary fiber methods 985.29 and 991.42, Including the use of the same 3 enzymes (heat-stable α-amylase, protease, and amyloglucosldase) and similar enzyme Incubation conditions. In the modification, minor changes have been made to reduce analysis time and to Improve assay precision: (1) MES-TRIS buffer replaces phosphate buffer; (2) one pH adjustment step Is eliminated; and (3) total volumes of reaction mixture and filtration are reduced. Eleven collaborators were sent 20 analytical samples (4 cereal and grain products, 3 fruits, and 3 vegetables) for duplicate blind analysis. The SDF, IDF, and TDF content of the foods tested ranged from 0.53 to 7.17, 0.59 to 60.53, and 1.12 to 67.56 g/100 g, respectively. The respective average RSDR values for SDF, IDF, and TDF determinations by direct measurements were 13.1, 5.2, and 4.5%. The TDF values calculated by summing SDF and IDF were in excellent agreement with the TDF values measured independently. The modification did not alter the method performance with regard to mean dietary fiber values, yet It generated lower assay variability compared with the unmodified methods. The method for SDF, IDF, and TDF (by summing SDF and IDF) has been adopted first action by AOAC International.

Simplified Method for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Foods

1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1063-1064
Author(s):  
Betty W Li ◽  
Karen W Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Incubation Period ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Food Samples ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Studies ◽  
Simplified Method ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract A simplified method, based on the same principles as the AOAC enzymatic-gravimetric method for determining total dietary fiber (TDF) (43.A14-43.A20), has been tested on 12 food samples which had been used in other collaborative studies. TDF values obtained in our laboratory for these 2 methods were in good agreement (y = 0.96x + 0.39; r = 0.999). The simplified method uses a single incubation period and only 1 enzyme (amyloglucosidase), and thus yields smaller blank and ash corrections but a higher protein correction.

Urea Enzymatic Dialysis Procedure for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber

1989 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-681
Author(s):  
Joseph L Jeraci ◽  
Betty A Lewis ◽  
J Peter ◽  
Van J Soest ◽  
James B Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Crude Protein ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
New Method ◽  
Locust Bean Gum ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Locust Bean

Abstract A method that uses urea and enzymes for determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods has been developed and compared with the AOAC enzymatic-gravimetric method (43.A14-43.A20). In the evaluation, results for crude protein and ash contamination were higher by the AOAC method, particularly for samples that form gels during ethanol precipitation. The new urea enzymatic dialysis (UED) method quantitatively recovered, with less variation, more of the purified and semipurified dietary fiber products. TDF recoveries for carboxymethylcellulose and locust bean gum were 98% (SD 3.3) and 95% (SD 6.1) by the AOAC method and 99% (SD 1.0) and 100% (SD 0.6) by the UED method, respectively. The UED method was the more effective in removing starch. For kale samples, starch recovery was 3.5 and 0.2% from TDF residues obtained using the AOAC and UED methods, respectively. Differences were not significant among replicate values for determination of TDF in foods by the UED method (P >0.01). Preliminary studies suggest that the new method can separately determine soluble and insoluble dietary fiber. The data indicate that the UED method is more precise and accurate than the AOAC method.

scholarly journals A modified enzymatic-gravimetric method for determination of total dietary fiber.

1990 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
Seiji YANO ◽  
Hinako ISHIWATARI ◽  
Sachiko OKUDA ◽  
Tadao KOTANI ◽  
Keisuke TSUJI
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber

scholarly journals Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Selected Foods Containing Resistant Maltodextrin by Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method and Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis T Gordon ◽  
Kazuhiro Okuma ◽  
J W DeVries ◽  
K Fukuhara ◽  
W Jacob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Average Molecular Weight ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Soluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Resistant Maltodextrin ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A method was developed for determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods containing resistant maltodextrin (RMD) which includes nondigestible carbohydrates that are not fully recovered as dietary fiber by conventional TDF methods such as AOAC 985.29 or 991.43. Because the average molecular weight (MW) of RMD is 2000 daltons, lower MW soluble dietary fiber components do not precipitate in 78% ethanol; therefore, RMD is not completely quantitated as dietary fiber by current AOAC methods. The accuracy and precision of the method was evaluated through an AOAC collaborative study. Ten laboratories participated and assayed 12 test portions (6 blind duplicates) containing RMD. The 6 test pairs ranged from 1.5 to 100% RMD. The method consisted of the following steps: (1) The insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and high MW soluble dietary fiber (HMWSDF) were determined by AOAC 985.29. (2) Ion exchange resins were used to remove salts and proteins contained in the AOAC 985.29 filtrates (including ethanol and acetone). (3) The amount of low MWRMD (LMWRMD) in the filtrates were determined by liquid chromatography. (4) The TDF was calculated by summation of the IDF, HMWSDF, and LMWRMD fractions having nondigestible carbohydrates with a degree of polymerization of 3 and higher. Repeatability standard deviations (RSDr) were 1.33–7.46%, calculated by including outliers, and 1.33–6.10%, calculated by not including outliers. Reproducibility standard deviations (RSDR) were 2.48–9.39%, calculated by including outliers, and 1.79–9.39%, calculated by not including outliers. This method is recommended for adoption as Official First Action.

scholarly journals Determination of Total Dietary Fiber (CODEX Definition) by Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method and Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry V McCleary ◽  
Jonathan W De Vries ◽  
Jeanne I Rader ◽  
Gerald Cohen ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Resistant Starch ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A method for the determination of total dietary fiber (TDF), as defined by the CODEX Alimentarius, was validated in foods. Based upon the principles of AOAC Official MethodsSM 985.29, 991.43, 2001.03, and 2002.02, the method quantitates high- and low-molecular-weight dietary fiber (HMWDF and LMWDF, respectively). In 2007, McCleary described a method of extended enzymatic digestion at 37C to simulate human intestinal digestion followed by gravimetric isolation and quantitation of HMWDF and the use of LC to quantitate low-molecular-weight soluble dietary fiber (LMWSDF). The method thus quantitates the complete range of dietary fiber components from resistant starch (by utilizing the digestion conditions of AOAC Method 2002.02) to digestion resistant oligosaccharides (by incorporating the deionization and LC procedures of AOAC Method 2001.03). The method was evaluated through an AOAC collaborative study. Eighteen laboratories participated with 16 laboratories returning valid assay data for 16 test portions (eight blind duplicates) consisting of samples with a range of traditional dietary fiber, resistant starch, and nondigestible oligosaccharides. The dietary fiber content of the eight test pairs ranged from 11.57 to 47.83. Digestion of samples under the conditions of AOAC Method 2002.02 followed by the isolation and gravimetric procedures of AOAC Methods 985.29 and 991.43 results in quantitation of HMWDF. The filtrate from the quantitation of HMWDF is concentrated, deionized, concentrated again, and analyzed by LC to determine the LMWSDF, i.e., all nondigestible oligosaccharides of degree of polymerization 3. TDF is calculated as the sum of HMWDF and LMWSDF. Repeatability standard deviations (sr) ranged from 0.41 to 1.43, and reproducibility standard deviations (sR) ranged from 1.18 to 5.44. These results are comparable to other official dietary fiber methods, and the method is recommended for adoption as Official First Action.

Enzymatic-Gravimetric Determination in Foods of Dietary Fiber as Sum of Insoluble and Soluble Fiber Fractions: Summary of Collaborative Study

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 923-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Mongeau ◽  
Rene Brassard
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Wheat Bread ◽  
Soluble Fiber ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Whole Wheat ◽  
Whole Wheat Bread ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Fiber Fractions

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted on an enzymatic- gravimetric method for determination of total dietary fiber in foods, in which soluble fiber and insoluble fiber are determined separately. Ten collaborators analyzed blind duplicate test samples from 5 food products: turnip, wheat bran, beans canned with tomato sauce, rice, and whole wheat bread. Repeatability and reproducibility relative standard deviations ranged from 1.48 to 14.73% and from 4.13 to 17.94%, respectively. The method was adopted first action by AOAC International.

Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Foods and Products with Little or No Starch, Nonenzymatic-Gravimetric Method: Collaborative Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty W Li ◽  
Maria S Cardozo
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Fruits And Vegetables ◽  
Simple Procedure ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted to validate a nonenzymatic-gravimetric method for the determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) of samples containing little or no starch such as most fruits, and vegetables and many purified polysaccharides. This simple procedure involves suspension of freeze-dried, ground samples in deionized water and incubation at 37°C for 90 min, followed by pre-cipitation with 4 volumes of 95% ethanol. The weight of the dilute alcohol-insoluble residues after correcting for crude protein and ash corresponds to the TDF content of the sample. Six samples in blind duplicate (apples, apricots, cabbage, carrots, onions, and soy fiber) were sent with Celite to 10 laboratories. The reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDr) of the TDF values for 9 laboratories ranged from 2.92 to 6.25%. The repeatability standard deviation (RSDr) for the 9 laboratories ranged from 1.50 to 2.70%. The method has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

scholarly journals Problems and modifications of the neutral detergent method and enzymatic-gravimetric method for determination of total dietary fiber.

1988 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
Satoshi INNAMI ◽  
Sachie IKEGAMI ◽  
Kaoru NAKAMURA ◽  
Fumie TSUCHIHASHI ◽  
Yuko AYANO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document