scholarly journals A Simplified Modification of the AOAC Official Method for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber Using Newly Developed Enzymes

2007 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shusaku Tada ◽  
Satoshi Innami
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Corn Starch ◽  
Enzymatic Digestion ◽  
Soluble Starch ◽  
Wheat Starch ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Aoac Method

Abstract Since 1985, AOAC Method 985.29 has been globally adopted as a standard method for determination of total dietary fiber in foods. Nevertheless, an aspect of AOAC Method 985.29 that needs to be improved is the laborious process to treat 3 enzymes separately at their individual proper pH, which is quite time-consuming. Several examinations have been carried out to resolve this problem. The characteristics of newly developed thermostable -amylase, neutral protease, and amyloglucosidase were evaluated based on the pH-activity profile and the property of starch hydrolysis in comparison with those of the conventional enzyme reagents. These 3 developed enzymes were found to work under the same pH condition and to accomplish sufficient digestion for the typical 3 starches: soluble starch, corn starch, and wheat starch. The experimental results revealed that the dietary fiber determination in foods could be performed without pH adjustment in the enzymatic digestion process. The modified method will be greatly helpful in determining the total dietary fiber contents in food materials with less laborious work and with an accuracy equivalent to that of AOAC Method 985.29.

scholarly journals A Simplified Modification of the AOAC Official Method for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber Using Newly Developed Enzymes: Preliminary Interlaboratory Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Kanaya ◽  
Shusaku Tada ◽  
Bunpei Mori ◽  
Rie Takahashi ◽  
Sachie Ikegami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Enzymatic Digestion ◽  
Interlaboratory Study ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Stabilizing Agents ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A preliminary interlaboratory study was conducted to evaluate the validity of the modified AOAC method for determination of total dietary fiber by Tada and Innami, in which the 3-step enzymatic digestion process in AOAC Method 991.43 is modified to a 2-step process without pH adjustment. Total dietary fiber contents in 8 representative foodstuffs were measured using both the original AOAC Method 991.43 and the modified method in 6 research facilities in Japan. Repeatability relative standard deviations, reproducibility relative standard deviations, and Horwitz ratio values from the modified method were equivalent to those from AOAC Method 991.43, except in the rice sample. However, this exceptional case shown in the modified method was entirely dissolved by the addition of α-amylase stabilizing agents. The modified method, which shortens the process of enzymatic digestion from 3 to 2 steps and in which only reaction temperature is adjusted under the same pH, was found not only to give accurate values comparable to the original method, but also to substantially reduce the labor required by the laboratory staff in the process of routine analysis. This study revealed that the validity of the modified method was further ensured by adding α-amylase stabilizing agents to the reaction system.

scholarly journals Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Selected Foods Containing Resistant Maltodextrin by a Simplified Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method and Liquid Chromatography: Interlaboratory Study in China

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boqiang Fu ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jean Michel Roturier ◽  
Zhiyu Tang ◽  
Huan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Interlaboratory Study ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Resistant Maltodextrin ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract An interlaboratory study was conducted in China to validate the modified AOAC Official Method 2001.03 for the determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods containing resistant maltodextrin (RMD), which will be adopted as the National Standard Method of China. The kind of buffer solution, the volume of filtrate evaporation, the volume of eluent for desalting and residual solution after evaporation, etc. were modified, which had been proved to have acceptable accuracy and precision in the routine assay. TDF contents in 3 representative foods and 2 kinds of RMD ingredient (i.e., NUTRIOSE 06 and NUTRIOSE 10) were measured using the modified method in 6 eligible laboratories representing commercial, industrial, and governmental laboratories in China. The results of the interlaboratory study indicated that the intralaboratory repeatability, interlaboratory reproducibility, and precision of the modified method are adequate for reliable analysis of TDF in food containing RMD, as well as resistant dextrin. Compared to AOAC Official Method 2001.03, the modified method is time- and cost-saving.

scholarly journals Fine Tuning a Bile-Enzymatic-Gravimetric Total Dietary Fiber Method

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J Cranker ◽  
Katherine M Phillips ◽  
Maria Carmen Rita V Gonzales ◽  
Kent K Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Original Method ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Wet Weight

Abstract A recently proposed bile-enzymatic-gravimetric total dietary fiber (TDF) method was modified and the new procedure was compared with the original method, the traditional AOAC enzymatic-gravimetric determination (AOAC Official Method 985.29), and another simplified AOAC procedure by analyzing several diet composites, including National Institute of Standards and Technology 1548 total diet reference material. The original and modified bile-enzymatic-gravimetric procedures also were compared by analyzing 9 food samples from a collaborative study of the original method. The modified method consistently yielded values about 10% lower than the original method but closer to reference values and to values from AOAC Offical Method 985.29, suggesting results that are more in line with accepted TDF standard methodology. Our modified method was used to analyze 180 fresh-frozen diet composites with TDF values ranging from 0.6 to 3.2 g/100 g wet weight. Samples were from 2 multicenter feeding studies sponsored by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: DELTA (Dietary Effects on Lipoproteins and Thrombogenic Activity) and DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension). The mean relative standard deviation (RSD) for duplicate analyses was 1.1%. For 40 assays of a quality control diet composite over 9 months, the standard deviation was 0.1 g/100 g wet weight (4.9% RSD), indicating the method’s excellent precision for routine use.

Urea Enzymatic Dialysis Procedure for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber

1989 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-681
Author(s):  
Joseph L Jeraci ◽  
Betty A Lewis ◽  
J Peter ◽  
Van J Soest ◽  
James B Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Crude Protein ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
New Method ◽  
Locust Bean Gum ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Locust Bean

Abstract A method that uses urea and enzymes for determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods has been developed and compared with the AOAC enzymatic-gravimetric method (43.A14-43.A20). In the evaluation, results for crude protein and ash contamination were higher by the AOAC method, particularly for samples that form gels during ethanol precipitation. The new urea enzymatic dialysis (UED) method quantitatively recovered, with less variation, more of the purified and semipurified dietary fiber products. TDF recoveries for carboxymethylcellulose and locust bean gum were 98% (SD 3.3) and 95% (SD 6.1) by the AOAC method and 99% (SD 1.0) and 100% (SD 0.6) by the UED method, respectively. The UED method was the more effective in removing starch. For kale samples, starch recovery was 3.5 and 0.2% from TDF residues obtained using the AOAC and UED methods, respectively. Differences were not significant among replicate values for determination of TDF in foods by the UED method (P >0.01). Preliminary studies suggest that the new method can separately determine soluble and insoluble dietary fiber. The data indicate that the UED method is more precise and accurate than the AOAC method.

scholarly journals Determination of Total Dietary Fiber (CODEX Definition) by Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method and Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry V McCleary ◽  
Jonathan W De Vries ◽  
Jeanne I Rader ◽  
Gerald Cohen ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Resistant Starch ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A method for the determination of total dietary fiber (TDF), as defined by the CODEX Alimentarius, was validated in foods. Based upon the principles of AOAC Official MethodsSM 985.29, 991.43, 2001.03, and 2002.02, the method quantitates high- and low-molecular-weight dietary fiber (HMWDF and LMWDF, respectively). In 2007, McCleary described a method of extended enzymatic digestion at 37C to simulate human intestinal digestion followed by gravimetric isolation and quantitation of HMWDF and the use of LC to quantitate low-molecular-weight soluble dietary fiber (LMWSDF). The method thus quantitates the complete range of dietary fiber components from resistant starch (by utilizing the digestion conditions of AOAC Method 2002.02) to digestion resistant oligosaccharides (by incorporating the deionization and LC procedures of AOAC Method 2001.03). The method was evaluated through an AOAC collaborative study. Eighteen laboratories participated with 16 laboratories returning valid assay data for 16 test portions (eight blind duplicates) consisting of samples with a range of traditional dietary fiber, resistant starch, and nondigestible oligosaccharides. The dietary fiber content of the eight test pairs ranged from 11.57 to 47.83. Digestion of samples under the conditions of AOAC Method 2002.02 followed by the isolation and gravimetric procedures of AOAC Methods 985.29 and 991.43 results in quantitation of HMWDF. The filtrate from the quantitation of HMWDF is concentrated, deionized, concentrated again, and analyzed by LC to determine the LMWSDF, i.e., all nondigestible oligosaccharides of degree of polymerization 3. TDF is calculated as the sum of HMWDF and LMWSDF. Repeatability standard deviations (sr) ranged from 0.41 to 1.43, and reproducibility standard deviations (sR) ranged from 1.18 to 5.44. These results are comparable to other official dietary fiber methods, and the method is recommended for adoption as Official First Action.

Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Japanese Foods

1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Nishimune ◽  
Tatsuo Sumimoto ◽  
Tsumoru Yakusiji ◽  
Nobuharu Kunita ◽  
Tomio Ichikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Colorimetric Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Kjeldahl Method ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Fiber Components ◽  
Unsuitable Samples ◽  
Fiber Sample

Abstract Total dietary fiber was determined In Japanese foods by the Prosky-AOAC method. To accomplish the analyses of unsuitable samples, we Introduced a few minor modifications to the versions for (I) seaweed and fruits, (II) cereals, and (ill) fish and meats. These modified methods were used together with the standard method to obtain results with reasonably good relative standard deviation for 231 foods and 21 groups of mixed foods. In this study, dietary fiber was defined so as not to exclude the nondlgestlble polysaccharide portions of animal foods. A method was proposed which could estimate more accurately the fiber components of animal foods by measuring the "nondlgestlble protein" of the fiber sample by the Biuret colorimetric method, Instead of the Kjeldahl method, to avoid deducting the values for aminopolysaccharides. In Japanese diets, the amount of fiber obtained from animal foods was less than 5 % of the total Intake of dietary fiber.

Determination of Insoluble, Soluble, and Total Dietary Fiber (CODEX Definition) by Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method and Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 824-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry V McCleary ◽  
Jonathan W DeVries ◽  
Jeanne I Rader ◽  
Gerald Cohen ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Soluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Food Ingredients ◽  
Aoac Official

Abstract A method for the determination of insoluble (IDF), soluble (SDF), and total dietary fiber (TDF), as defined by the CODEX Alimentarius, was validated in foods. Based upon the principles of AOAC Official MethodsSM 985.29, 991.43, 2001.03, and 2002.02, the method quantitates water-insoluble and water-soluble dietary fiber. This method extends the capabilities of the previously adopted AOAC Official Method 2009.01, Total Dietary Fiber in Foods, Enzymatic–Gravimetric– Liquid Chromatographic Method, applicable to plant material, foods, and food ingredients consistent with CODEX Definition 2009, including naturally occurring, isolated, modified, and synthetic polymers meeting that definition. The method was evaluated through an AOAC/AACC collaborative study. Twenty-two laboratories participated, with 19 laboratories returning valid assay data for 16 test portions (eight blind duplicates) consisting of samples with a range of traditional dietary fiber, resistant starch, and nondigestible oligosaccharides. The dietary fiber content of the eight test pairs ranged from 10.45 to 29.90%. Digestion of samples under the conditions of AOAC 2002.02 followed by the isolation, fractionation, and gravimetric procedures of AOAC 985.29 (and its extensions 991.42 and 993.19) and 991.43 results in quantitation of IDF and soluble dietary fiber that precipitates (SDFP). The filtrate from the quantitation of water–alcohol-insoluble dietary fiber is concentrated, deionized, concentrated again, and analyzed by LC to determine the SDF that remains soluble (SDFS), i.e., all dietary fiber polymers of degree of polymerization = 3 and higher, consisting primarily, but not exclusively, of oligosaccharides. SDF is calculated as the sum of SDFP and SDFS. TDF is calculated as the sum of IDF and SDF. The within-laboratory variability, repeatability SD (sr), for IDF ranged from 0.13 to 0.71, and the between-laboratory variability, reproducibility SD (sR), for IDF ranged from 0.42 to 2.24. The within-laboratory variability sr for SDF ranged from 0.28 to 1.03, and the between-laboratory variability sR for SDF ranged from 0.85 to 1.66. The within-laboratory variability sr for TDF ranged from 0.47 to 1.41, and the between-laboratory variability sR for TDF ranged from 0.95 to 3.14. This is comparable to other official and approved dietary fiber methods, and the method is recommended for adoption as Official First Action.

scholarly journals Measurement of Sugars and Starches in Foods by a Modification of the AOAC Total Dietary Fiber Method

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L Casterline ◽  
Carolyn J Oles ◽  
Yuoh Ku
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Starch Content ◽  
Processed Food ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Nutrition Facts Panel ◽  
Refractive Index Detector

Abstract A separation scheme for the determination of sugars and starch in processed food was developed. It is based on AOAC Method 985.29 for total dietary fiber with these modifications: carbohydrate starches are separated into soluble and insoluble fractions before they are hydrolyzed; acetonitrile is used instead of ethanol to separate sugars from enzyme-resistant carbohydrates, proteins, and other macromolecules; and a solid-phase extraction filter is included to remove substances that interfere with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Recovery studies indicate a >97% sugar recovery. Twenty foods were analyzed. After enzymatic hydrolysis, fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, and lactose were extracted and determined by HPLC using a refractive index detector. Starch content was calculated from the increase in the amount of glucose. The results were compared with values listed on the “Nutrition Facts” panel for that food. The analyzed amounts of sugars and starches were 73–96% of declared values.

Adaptation of the AOAC Fluorine Method for Determining Fluoride in Fish Protein Concentrate

1970 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
R. Bruce Klemm ◽  
Mary E. Ambrose Klemm
Keyword(s):  
Steam Distillation ◽  
Silica Sand ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Protein Concentrate ◽  
Fish Protein ◽  
Direct Titration ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract The AOAC official method, 24.029–24.035, for the determination of fluorine in foods was modified slightly to o btain quantitative recoveries of fluorine from samples of fish protein concentrate (FPC). The most important alterations include the use of steam distillation, the addition of finely ground silica sand in the distillation, a decrease in the distillation temperature, and the utilization of direct titration. Recoveries of fluoride added to FPC before ashing, using this modified method, averaged 96.0 ± 3.0%. Our results are in agreement with those of several other analysts who used a variety of methods.

Determination of Total, Soluble, and Insoluble Dietary Fiber in Foods—Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, MES-TRIS Buffer: Collaborative Study

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo C Lee ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
Jonathan W De Vries
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Tris Buffer ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Heat Stable ◽  
Assay Precision

Abstract A joint AOAC/AACC (American Association of Cereal Chemists) collaborative study of methods for the determination of soluble, insoluble, and total dietary fiber (SDF, IDF, and TDF) was conducted with 11 participating laboratories. The assay Is based on a modification of the AOAC TDF method 985.29 and the SDF/IDF method collaboratively studied recently by AOAC. The principles of the method are the same as those for the AOAC dietary fiber methods 985.29 and 991.42, Including the use of the same 3 enzymes (heat-stable α-amylase, protease, and amyloglucosldase) and similar enzyme Incubation conditions. In the modification, minor changes have been made to reduce analysis time and to Improve assay precision: (1) MES-TRIS buffer replaces phosphate buffer; (2) one pH adjustment step Is eliminated; and (3) total volumes of reaction mixture and filtration are reduced. Eleven collaborators were sent 20 analytical samples (4 cereal and grain products, 3 fruits, and 3 vegetables) for duplicate blind analysis. The SDF, IDF, and TDF content of the foods tested ranged from 0.53 to 7.17, 0.59 to 60.53, and 1.12 to 67.56 g/100 g, respectively. The respective average RSDR values for SDF, IDF, and TDF determinations by direct measurements were 13.1, 5.2, and 4.5%. The TDF values calculated by summing SDF and IDF were in excellent agreement with the TDF values measured independently. The modification did not alter the method performance with regard to mean dietary fiber values, yet It generated lower assay variability compared with the unmodified methods. The method for SDF, IDF, and TDF (by summing SDF and IDF) has been adopted first action by AOAC International.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document