777 Use of the PHQ-2 as a Depression Screening Tool

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S223-S223
Author(s):  
Shelley A Wiechman ◽  
Eva Keatley ◽  
Carolyn B Blayney

Abstract Introduction In 2015, the Burn Quality Improvement Program (BQUIP) guidelines recommended systematic screening of Major Depressive Disorder at all verified burn centers. Our level one trauma center rolled out a program to screen all patients entering the burn service starting in June 2018. This project evaluates the program after the first year of implementation. Methods All patients over age 12 admitted to the burn service were screened by bedside nurses using the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Exclusion for screening included those who were intubated and sedated and/or not alert or oriented. A reminder for the PHQ-2 screener automatically popped up in the nursing task list in the electronic medical record until it was given or patient was coded as not appropriate for screening. Results A total of 509 patients were admitted to the Burn Service between June 2018 and May 2019. Of those, 40 were identified as not being appropriate for screening due to prolonged mental impairment (e.g. not able to regain consciousness), and 116 (24%) were not screened for unknown reasons. The remaining patients (n=353, 77%) were screened with the PHQ-2 and 94% of these patients were screened on the same day of admit. Of the patients screened, 28 (8%) scored above the clinical cut-off for probable depression (PHQ-2 ³ 3) and 265 (75.1%) did not endorse any symptoms on the PHQ-2 (PHQ-2 = 0). Of the 28 that screened positive on the PHQ-2, 16 (57.1%) received psychological services. Of those that did not receive psychology services, the majority were admitted for less than 3 days (n=10, 76.9%). Conclusions In the first year of the program the vast majority of eligible patients were able to be screened by nursing staff with a 2-item measure within one day of admit to the burn service. This success is likely due to the automation of the task in the electronic medical record, the ease of use of the PHQ-2 and the dedication of the nursing staff. The 8% rate of a positive screen is higher than the general population. Given that most patients were screened within 24 hours of admission, we are capturing depressive symptoms that predate the injury. We know that depression can impair burn recovery (e.g. affect participation in therapy, impede wound healing) and lead to poorer long term outcomes. Systematic screening of depressive symptoms upon admission will allow us to intervene earlier and potentially reduce barriers to optimal recovery. Despite high screening rates, about 40% of patients did not receive psychological intervention. We will be discussing utilization of resources for providing inpatient services to patients with a positive screen. Applicability of Research to Practice The PHQ-2 is an effective screening tool for depressive symptoms for patients on an inpatient burn unit. These findings are important for hospital systems looking to screen for and treat the mental health needs of burn patients. Depression screening will be required for BQUIP starting in 2020.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S68-S68
Author(s):  
Eva Keatley ◽  
Carolyn B Blayney ◽  
Shelley A Wiechman

Abstract Introduction In 2015, the Burn Quality Improvement Program (BQUIP) guidelines were established with recommendations for systematic screening of Major Depressive Disorder at all verified burn centers. Our level one trauma center rolled out a program to screen all patients entering the burn service starting in June 2018. After a year of collecting data, we have been able to evaluate the program and make recommendations for other burn centers. Methods All patients admitted to the inpatient burn service who were over 12 years of age were screened by bedside nurses using the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Exclusion for screening included those who were intubated and sedated and/or not alert or oriented. A reminder automatically popped up in the nursing task list in the electronic medical record until it was given, or patient was coded as not appropriate for screening. Results A total of 509 patients were admitted to the Burn Service between June 2018 and May 2019. Of those, 40 were identified as not being appropriate for screening due to inability to regain consciousness, and 116 (24%) were not screened for unknown reasons. The remaining patients, 353 (77%) were screened with the PHQ-2 and 94% of these patients were screened on the same day of admit. Of the patients screened, 28 (8%) scored above the clinical cut-off for probable depression (PHQ-2 ³ 3) and 265 (75.1%) did not endorse any symptoms on the PHQ-2. Of the 28 that screened positive, 16 (57.1%) received psychological services. Of those that did not receive psychology services, the majority were admitted for less than 3 days (n=10, 76.9%). Conclusions In the first year of the program the vast majority of eligible patients were able to be screened by nursing staff with a 2-item measure. A 77% screening rate is high for a trauma setting. This success is likely due to the automation of the task in the electronic medical record, the ease of use of the PHQ-2 and the dedication of the nursing staff. The 8% rate of a positive screen is higher than the general population (4%) but a similar rate to what is reported in the literature of burn survivors who are 5- and 10-years post burn injury. Given that most patients were screened within 24 hours of admission, we are capturing depressive symptoms that predate the injury. We know that depression can impair burn recovery (e.g., affect participation in therapy, impede wound healing) and lead to poorer long-term outcomes. Systematic screening of depressive symptoms upon admission will allow us to intervene earlier and potentially reduce barriers to optimal recovery. We will be discussing utilization of resources for providing inpatient services to patients with a positive screen.


Author(s):  
Nancy S. Rixe ◽  
Srinivasan Suresh ◽  
Judith Martin ◽  
Sriram Ramgopal ◽  
Scott Coglio ◽  
...  

Nursing Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-38
Author(s):  
Letha M. Joseph ◽  
Diane C. Berry ◽  
Ann Jessup ◽  
Jean Davison ◽  
Brian J. Schneider ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 409-409
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Salomon ◽  
Karl Serrao ◽  
Jose Guardiola ◽  
Amanda Bonura

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lakshmi Shankar ◽  
Nicole Smith ◽  
Ken Uchino ◽  
Nicolas Thompson ◽  
Irene Katzan

Background: The importance of early recognition and treatment of post stroke depression (PSD) has led to recommendations for depression screening during the acute stroke admission. We studied the utility of PSD screening during acute stroke admissions using the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) by (a) determining the prevalence of positive depression screen during admission and (b) calculating the level of agreement between positive screens during admission and outpatient follow-up. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients discharged 1/2013 - 12/2013 with principal discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage excluding patients who died during admission. PSD screening was systematically performed using the 4-item PHQ (PHQ-4) administered to patients on the stroke service by midlevel providers. Positive screen was defined as PHQ-2 subscore ≥3. At outpatient follow up, the 9-item PHQ (PHQ-9) was administered by patient questionnaire. Results: Of 718 patients, acute phase PHQ-4 data was available for 50% (358), 14% were not assessed due to drowsiness or aphasia, 2% were both admitted and discharged on weekends, and 21% were admitted to non-stroke services. Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups with and without PHQ data with higher rates of hemorrhagic strokes, longer ICU stay, and worse discharge mRS in the group without PHQ data. The median time from admission to PHQ-4 was 3 days. The screen was positive in 4.7% (17/358, 95% CI 2.8% - 7.5%). Outpatient follow-up occurred in 55% (396/718) patients a median of 34 days postdischarge and 260 had PHQ-9 data. Of these, 20.8% (54/260, 95% CI 16.0% - 26.2%) screened positive using PHQ-2. There were 158 patients who had PHQ-2 data from both acute and follow up phases, 1.9% (3/158) of these screened positive in the acute phase and an additional 15.8% (25/158) who screened negative in the acute phase converted to positive at follow up. Conclusion: Systematic screening for PSD using PHQ-2 in acute phase of stroke identified few patients with depression and there was subsequent conversion to a positive screen at follow up. PSD screening in acute in-hospital phase does not appear to be cost efficient utilization of inpatient resources.


2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 1137-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. LaRoche ◽  
C. R. Hinkson ◽  
B. A. Thomazin ◽  
P. K. Minton-Foltz ◽  
D. J. Carlbom

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 284-284
Author(s):  
Susan Franco ◽  
Corrine Hanson ◽  
Glenda Woscyna ◽  
Jana Wells ◽  
Meghan McLarney

284 Background: The incidence of disease-related malnutrition in oncology patients ranges from 40-80%. This is the highest of all hospital patient groups. Malnutrition is associated with decreased quality of life, increased healthcare costs and intolerance to treatment. Screening for nutrition risk is often lacking in outpatient settings. Electronic health records could be utilized to improve the delivery of validated nutrition screening tools such as the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) in outpatient oncology settings. Methods: We designed a pilot project (Feb-July 2018) to administer the MST for outpatient oncology patients seen at the Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (FPBCC) using an electronic medical record system. “Best Practice Alerts” (BPAs) were used to notify the nursing staff of a patient with a screen that was positive for nutrition risk (MST score ≥3). The BPA recommended a referral to nutrition services; nursing staff could choose to “order” or “do not order" a Nutrition Consult. Results: A total of 2,672 patients received MST screening during the pilot. Out of these, 223 (8%) had a positive screen for nutrition risk; 197 of these were eligible for a nutrition services referral. A BPA “fired” 152 times out of 197 eligible patients (77%). Of the197 eligible patients, 58 (29%) were actually referred to nutrition services. Of these 58 referrals, 43 (74%) were triggered based on a BPA, while the remaining referrals were received outside of a BPA. BPAs failed to fire 45/197 times (23%). Conclusions: An EHR-based nutrition screening system to increase referrals in patients identified at nutrition risk in an outpatient oncology setting was effective for 29% of eligible patients. Barriers encountered included failures in technology as well as human factors. During the pilot it was discovered that the BPA was firing in a location in the chart where the nurse did not regularly work. There was not a consistent message as to the goals and outcomes during the pilot which resulted in lack of awareness by nurses to respond to the nutrition risk score. Utilizing an EHR-based nutrition screening tool is an effective way to identify patients at risk and refer them to appropriate resources in a timely and efficient way.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document