scholarly journals Current status of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy in breast cancer

Author(s):  
Emi Noguchi ◽  
Tadahiko Shien ◽  
Hiroji Iwata

Abstract Over the past 10 years, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of various cancers. However, immunotherapy in breast cancer has not been successful. Breast cancer has long been recognized as an immunologically ‘cold’ tumor, although a higher frequency of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes present in certain subtypes and an association between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and favorable prognosis have been reported. In March 2019, the combination of atezolizumab and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel was granted accelerated approval in the United States for the treatment of programmed death-ligand 1-positive advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. This finally opened the door for immune checkpoint blockade therapy for breast cancer. Several clinical trials have been conducted using different combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy or targeted agents in various treatment settings for metastatic breast cancer and early-stage breast cancer. In this review, we summarize recent advances in immune checkpoint blockade therapy and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cvetanović ◽  
Slađana Filipović ◽  
Nikola Živković ◽  
Miloš Kostić ◽  
Svetislav Vrbić ◽  
...  

SummaryIn recent years, results obtained from different studies with large cohorts have revealed a bond between the presence of extensive lymphocytic infiltration and favourable prognostic associations in the early-stage of breast cancer (BC) and high response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Examiners used tumors from large cohorts of patients who took part in randomized neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials. The importance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) appears to be subtype-specific and varies depending on the histological characteristics of the tumor. TILs have proven to be a good prognostic marker, but only in highly proliferative breast tumors such as triple negative breast tumors (TNBC) or HER 2 positive BC.In the era when standard, well-known, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are ever changing and the use of molecular profiling analyses are increasing, we are looking for techniques to improve our understanding of tumor biology and improve patient outcome. The relevance of TILs cannot be ignored but needs to be properly evaluated in larger prospective studies which must encompass the parameters set out in previous studies. The use of TILs as prognostic biomarkers in early breast cancer may represent a new dawn, and use of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, probably is the future for the breast cancer but it is not yet ready for prime time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remy Thomas ◽  
Ghaneya Al-Khadairi ◽  
Julie Decock

Immunotherapy has emerged as the fifth pillar of cancer treatment alongside surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the current superheroes of immunotherapy, unleashing a patient’s own immune cells to kill tumors and revolutionizing cancer treatment in a variety of cancers. Although breast cancer was historically believed to be immunologically silent, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been shown to induce modest responses in metastatic breast cancer. Given the inherent heterogeneity of breast tumors, this raised the question whether certain breast tumors might benefit more from immune-based interventions and which cancer cell-intrinsic and/or microenvironmental factors define the likelihood of inducing a potent and durable anti-tumor immune response. In this review, we will focus on triple negative breast cancer as immunogenic breast cancer subtype, and specifically discuss the relevance of tumor mutational burden, the plethora and diversity of tumor infiltrating immune cells in addition to the immunoscore, the presence of immune checkpoint expression, and the microbiome in defining immune checkpoint blockade response. We will highlight the current immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment options, either as monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care treatment modalities such as chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In addition, we will look into the potential of immunotherapy-based combination strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance both innate and adaptive immune responses, or to establish a more immune favorable environment for cancer vaccines. Finally, the review will address the need for unambiguous predictive biomarkers as one of the main challenges of immune checkpoint blockade. To conclude, the potential of immune checkpoint blockade for triple negative breast cancer treatment could be enhanced by exploration of aforementioned factors and treatment strategies thereby providing promising future prospects.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hina Qayoom ◽  
Umar Mehraj ◽  
Shariqa Aisha ◽  
Shazia Sofi ◽  
Manzoor Ahmad Mir

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype lacking the three hormonal receptors namely estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 receptor, and the only treatment option available for TNBC is chemotherapy. Chemotherapy lacks specificity since it acts on normal healthy cells as well resulting into secondary diseases in TNBC patients. In addition chemotherapy poses recurrence and relapse issues due to the development of chemoresistance among TNBC patients. Immunotherapy remarkably immune checkpoint inhibitors show a great therapeutic potential in TNBC. As TNBC contain an increased TILs (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes) infiltration making it more suitable as a therapeutic target anti-tumor immune strategy. Moreover, evidences have indicated that chemotherapy upregulates the anti-tumor immune response in TNBC. As a result, a combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy may increase the overall relapse and recurrence free survival of TNBC patients. Therefore, in this chapter we will focus on how the immunotherapy works in TNBC, their effects and consequences. We will further be discussing the clinical studies and the importance of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with various therapeutic agents and target. Further, we will explore the processes involved.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1655
Author(s):  
Cinzia Solinas ◽  
Debora Fumagalli ◽  
Maria Vittoria Dieci

The present commentary synthesizes the current evidence on the role of the immune response in HER2-positive breast cancer. It points out the strengths and weaknesses of the findings observed so far, particularly in the early setting, including the clinical significance of scoring tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. A figure proposing research hypotheses for the implementation of immune checkpoint blockade use for patient candidates to neoadjuvant treatment is presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuting Liu ◽  
Graham D Hogg ◽  
David G DeNardo

The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors has highlighted the central role of the immune system in cancer control. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can reinvigorate anti-cancer immunity and are now the standard of care in a number of malignancies. However, research on immune checkpoint blockade has largely been framed with the central dogma that checkpoint therapies intrinsically target the T cell, triggering the tumoricidal potential of the adaptive immune system. Although T cells undoubtedly remain a critical piece of the story, mounting evidence, reviewed herein, indicates that much of the efficacy of checkpoint therapies may be attributable to the innate immune system. Emerging research suggests that T cell-directed checkpoint antibodies such as anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) can impact innate immunity by both direct and indirect pathways, which may ultimately shape clinical efficacy. However, the mechanisms and impacts of these activities have yet to be fully elucidated, and checkpoint therapies have potentially beneficial and detrimental effects on innate antitumor immunity. Further research into the role of innate subsets during checkpoint blockade may be critical for developing combination therapies to help overcome checkpoint resistance. The potential of checkpoint therapies to amplify innate antitumor immunity represents a promising new field that can be translated into innovative immunotherapies for patients fighting refractory malignancies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Παύλος Παπακοτούλας

Το πιο συχνό είδος καρκίνου του παγκρέατος είναι το αδενοκαρκίνωμα του παγκρέατος. Το παγκρεατικό αδενοκαρκίνωμα είναι η 4η κύρια αιτία των θανάτων από καρκίνο παγκοσμίως. Περίπου 60-80% των ασθενών έχουν τη στιγμή της διάγνωσης προχωρημένη νόσο, επειδή ο καρκίνος εισβάλλει στους περιβάλλοντες ιστούς έξω από το πάγκρεας (τοπικά προχωρημένος), ή έχει δώσει μεταστάσεις έξω από το πάγκρεας (μεταστατικός). Καθώς η νόσος παρουσιάζει πολύ υψηλό ποσοστό θνητότητας, κρίνεται επιτακτική η ανάγκη ανεύρεσης νέων αποτελεσματικότερων θεραπειών. Με τη ανάπτυξη της μοριακής και βιολογικής κατανόησης της ογκογενετικής εξέλιξης, εφαρμόστηκαν νέες στρατηγικές στην αντιμετώπιση του καρκίνου και κατ’ επέκταση σε αυτόν της ανοσοθεραπείας του καρκίνου. Η κατανόηση των μοριακών μηχανισμών που διέπουν την ανοσοδιαφυγή των όγκων, αλλά και την αλληλεπίδραση των καρκινικών κυττάρων με τα κύτταρα του ανοσοποιητικού συστήματος, έχει δώσει τεράστια ώθηση στην ανοσοθεραπεία του καρκίνου την τελευταία δεκαετία. Τα κύτταρα του ανθρώπινου οργανισμού βρίσκονται υπό διαρκή ανοσιακή επιτήρηση και το ανοσοποιητικό σύστημα αποτελεί αποτρεπτικό μηχανισμό στον νεοπλασματικό μετασχηματισμό και τη δημιουργία νεοπλασιών. Κλινικό σημείο που επιβεβαιώνει τη θεωρία της ανοσοεπιτήρησης είναι η διαπίστωση της παρουσίας CD8+ T-λεμφοκυττάρων μέσα στους όγκους (Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes – TILs). Συνέπεια αυτού είναι και οι θεραπείες που βασίζονται στην καταστολή των σημείων ελέγχου του ανοσοποιητικού συστήματος (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors). Είναι γνωστό ότι φάρμακα με αντιμυκητιακές ιδιότητες συμβάλλουν στην ενίσχυση του ανοσοποιητικού συστήματος. Ένα χαρακτηριστικό παράδειγμα είναι η κυκλοπιροξολαμίνη (Ciclopirox Olamine, CPX), που χορηγείται σε άτομα που ταλαιπωρούνται από μυκητιάσεις. Σύμφωνα με την παρούσα διατριβή η συγκεκριμένη θεραπεία μπορεί να μειώσει δραστικά την ταχύτητα εξέλιξης των καρκινικών όγκων, αλλά παράλληλα ενισχύει τη δράση των κυτταροστατικών που χορηγούνται στον ασθενή. Επίσης, η τινζαπαρίνη (Ηπαρίνη Χαμηλού Μοριακού Βάρους) χρησιμοποιείται για την πρόληψη και την αντιμετώπιση της φλεβικής θρομβοεμβολής, αλλά από τα αποτελέσματα της παρούσης διατριβής φαίνεται ότι μπορεί να διαδραματίζει ρόλο στην αντιμετώπιση του όγκου. Οι μηχανισμοί στους οποίους οφείλονται τα σημαντικά in vivο αποτελέσματα, είναι η αύξηση της IFN-γ, η αύξηση των CD8+ κυττάρων, η μείωση των Tregs κυττάρων, η μείωση της έκφρασης του VEGFR-2 και η αύξηση της απόπτωσης στα καρκινικά κύτταρα. Στην παρούσα διατριβή, προτείνεται πως η συνδυαστική θεραπεία με τη συμμετοχή της ανοσοθεραπείας, έχει προφανώς υψηλότερη αντινεοπλασματική επίδραση στη μείωση της ανάπτυξης του όγκου, υποδηλώνοντας μια συνεργική δράση. Αυτή η συνεργική στρατηγική μπορεί να ανοίξει νέους δρόμους για τη θεραπεία ασθενών με καρκίνο του παγκρέατος.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Giannini ◽  
Andrea Aglitti ◽  
Mauro Borzio ◽  
Martina Gambato ◽  
Maria Guarino ◽  
...  

Despite progress in our understanding of the biology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), this tumour remains difficult-to-cure for several reasons, starting from the particular disease environment where it arises—advanced chronic liver disease—to its heterogeneous clinical and biological behaviour. The advent, and good results, of immunotherapy for cancer called for the evaluation of its potential application also in HCC, where there is evidence of intra-hepatic immune response activation. Several studies advanced our knowledge of immune checkpoints expression in HCC, thus suggesting that immune checkpoint blockade may have a strong rationale even in the treatment of HCC. According to this background, initial studies with tremelimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, and nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, showed promising results, and further studies exploring the effects of other immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or with other drugs, are currently underway. However, we are still far from the identification of the correct setting, and sequence, where these drugs might be used in clinical practice, and their actual applicability in real-life is unknown. This review focuses on HCC immunobiology and on the potential of immune checkpoint blockade therapy for this tumour, with a critical evaluation of the available trials on immune checkpoint blocking antibodies treatment for HCC. Moreover, it assesses the potential applicability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real-life setting, by analysing a large, multicentre cohort of Italian patients with HCC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117822341773156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan J Cohen ◽  
Ronald Blasberg

Immunotherapy is revolutionizing cancer care across disciplines. The original success of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma has already been translated to Food and Drug Administration–approved therapies in a number of other cancers, and a large number of clinical trials are underway in many other disease types, including breast cancer. Here, we review the basic requirements for a successful antitumor immune response, with a focus on the metabolic and physical barriers encountered by lymphocytes entering breast tumors. We also review recent clinical trials of immunotherapy in breast cancer and provide a number of interesting questions that will need to be answered for successful breast cancer immunotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document