scholarly journals Ovarian Ablation as Adjuvant Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer--Another Step Forward

2003 ◽  
Vol 95 (24) ◽  
pp. 1811-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Pater ◽  
W. R. Parulekar
2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 339-346
Author(s):  
Zafir Murtezani ◽  
Zora Neskovic-Konstantinovic ◽  
Natasa Stanisavljevic ◽  
Vladimir Kovcin

Introduction. Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant disease in women with about 25% compared to all malignant tumours. Chemotherapy, antiestrogen and ovarian ablation/ supression present effective adjuvant approach for premenopausal women diagnosed with hormonal depended, operable breast cancer. Objective. To evaluate benefits of combined chemo/hormonal therapy that is undutiful, but optimal application has not yet been clearly determined. Methods. Thirty-six women were divided into three therapy groups. The first group (13 women) was treated with six cycles of adjuvant FAC chemotherapy followed by regular check-ups; the second group (13 women) after six cycles of adjuvant FAC chemotherapy continued treatment with a two-year application of goserelin given by subcutaneous injections (FAC-Z); the third group (10 women), after six cycles of adjuvant FAC chemotherapy continued with once per month application of gorselin for two years and a daily application of 20 mg tamoxifen for five years (FAC-Z-T). The length of overall disease free period and survival were analyzed in all three groups. Results. The benefit of LH-RH analogues in premenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer was found to be low, and probably limited to smaller subgroups of patients, possibly such as those with either both steroid receptors positive (ER and PR) or those with an extremely high level of steroid receptors. In our paper, analyses of such subgroups could not been performed due to a small sample of patients. The effect of therapy is better in patients, who developed amenorrhoea, regardless of the type of later hormonal therapy. Conclusion. Ovarial ablation, whatever the method, should be probably applied as early as possible within the treatment of early breast cancer, especially in patients in whom chemotherapy induced amenorrhoea is not expected, i.e. in very young female patients.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
I A Jaiyesimi ◽  
A U Buzdar ◽  
D A Decker ◽  
G N Hortobagyi

PURPOSE The mechanisms of antitumor activity, clinical pharmacology, toxicity, and efficacy of tamoxifen in women with early and advanced breast cancer and the drug's potential role in prevention of breast cancer were reviewed. DESIGN A comprehensive review of the literature from 1966 to 1994 was conducted; reports were identified using the Cancerline and Medline data bases. RESULTS The cellular actions of tamoxifen are not completely understood, but it appears that the drug's antiproliferative effects are mediated primarily by inhibition of the activities of estrogen through binding to estrogen receptors (ERs). Disease-free and overall survival rates have been increased in postmenopausal women with ER-positive tumors when tamoxifen has been used as adjuvant therapy (irrespective of nodal status). In premenopausal women, adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen has been associated with prolongation of disease-free survival, but its impact on survival remains to be defined. Tamoxifen is the initial hormonal treatment of choice in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women with ER-positive metastatic disease. Retrospective review of adjuvant therapy studies showed an approximately 39% reduction in the incidence of contralateral primary breast carcinoma in tamoxifen-treated women, which indicates that tamoxifen could have a role in breast cancer prevention. CONCLUSION The use of tamoxifen has resulted in a substantial modification of breast cancer's natural history, particularly in postmenopausal women. Ongoing clinical trials will examine the effects of tamoxifen therapy on lipids, coagulation proteins, bone, and endometrium, and its effectiveness as an agent in the prevention of breast cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12536-e12536
Author(s):  
Anton Oseledchyk ◽  
Mary Gemignani ◽  
Maura N. Dickler ◽  
Shari Beth Goldfarb ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
...  

e12536 Background: Ovarian ablation is increasingly used to complement endocrine therapy in select premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). It can be achieved by either medical ovarian suppression (OS) or therapeutic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). We sought to investigate trends of therapeutic BSO in premenopausal patients at our institution. Methods: Premenopausal women with HR+ primary BC diagnosed from 2010-2014 were identified in our prospectively maintained BC database. Patients with confirmed BRCA1/2 mutations were excluded. Distribution of patient and disease characteristics between treatment groups were assessed using univariate logistic regression analyses. Surgical details and complications were extracted from our surgical database. Results: We identified 2,854 eligible patients; 2,113 (74%) received endocrine therapy without ovarian ablation, 246 (9%) received endocrine therapy plus medical OS, 180 (6%) underwent additional BSO, and 315 (11%) did not receive endocrine therapy at the time of analysis. Independent predictors for undergoing ovarian ablation were younger age (OR 0.98; 95%CI, 0.96-0.99; p < 0.001), higher grade (grade 3 vs 1: OR 3.17; 95%CI, 1.70-5.90; grade 2 vs 1: OR 3.13; 95%CI, 1.64-5.95; p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (OR 1.46; 95%CI, 1.19-1.80; p < 0.001), and higher AJCC stage as well as de novo metastatic BC (II vs I: OR = 1.35; 95%CI, 1.03-1.76; III vs I: OR 2.57; 95%CI, 1.86-3.55; IV vs I: OR 19.69; 95%CI, 12.76-30.39; p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent ovarian ablation, patients of younger age (1.04; 95%CI, 1.01-1.07; p = 0.009) and with metastatic BC (stage IV vs I: OR 0.36; 95%CI, 0.20-0.68; p = 0.007) were less likely to undergo BSO than OS. In 180 patients undergoing BSO, five adverse events were noted: two grade 1, two grade 2, and one grade 3 complication. Conclusions: Premenopausal women with HR+ BC with high-risk features or metastatic disease were more likely to undergo ovarian ablation at our institution. Surgical ovarian ablation is a safe alternative, with low complication rates. Understanding patient preferences, side effects, and quality of life implications will help guide personalized treatment decisions.


2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Claire Dees ◽  
Nancy E. Davidson

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 552-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Love ◽  
N. V. Dinh ◽  
T. T. Quy ◽  
N. D. Linh ◽  
E. M. Hade ◽  
...  

552 Background: Reports of randomized trials evaluating adjuvant ovarian suppression or ablation with and without tamoxifen are limited in number, useful comparative data and long-term follow-up. Methods: From 1993–99 we recruited 709 Vietnamese and Chinese premenopausal women with clinical stage II-III operable breast cancer to a multi-site randomized prospective clinical trial of immediate pre-mastectomy adjuvant surgical oophorectomy followed by tamoxifen for 5 years (n=356) or mastectomy alone with the same combined hormonal therapy on recurrence of disease (n=353).The primary study endpoints were disease-free and overall survival.This report provides analyses for an extended follow-up period after 5 years. Results: With a median follow up of 7 years, disease-free and overall survival were significantly better with adjuvant therapy (log-rank p-values of 0.0003 and 0.0002). Ten year DFS probabilities of 62% and 51% (95%CI 4–22%), and OS probabilities of 70% and 52% (95% CI 6–34%) between adjuvant and observation groups were observed. In the estrogen receptor positive patient subset, 5 and 10 year DFS probabilities were 83% and 61%, and 66% and 47%; and 5 and 10 year OS probabilities were 88% and 74% and 82% and 74% in adjuvant and observation groups respectively. Conclusions: In women with estrogen receptor positive operable breast cancers, 5 and 10 year disease free and overall survival rates following adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen compare favorably with those from other adjuvant regimens. In estrogen receptor positive patients, the hazard function with adjuvant therapy increases after year six. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (36) ◽  
pp. 5769-5779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice M. Walshe ◽  
Neelima Denduluri ◽  
Sandra M. Swain

Chemotherapy and ovarian ablation both independently improve survival in premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Amenorrhea is a well-recognized occurrence after chemotherapy. The rate of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea varies with patient age and chemotherapy regimens administered. However, the impact of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea on prognosis is still being defined. Older studies in premenopausal women argue that the benefit with chemotherapy is a result of direct cytotoxicity alone. However, studies that restrict outcome analysis to hormone receptor–positive tumors suggest that chemotherapy has a dual mechanism in women with hormone-responsive tumors; indirect endocrine manipulation secondary to chemotherapy-induced ovarian suppression and direct cytotoxicity. The significant health ramifications involved with the induction of premature menopause as well as potential benefits necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. This review will discuss the incidence of amenorrhea with commonly-used adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens, the possible benefits of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, and the challenges of interpreting the existing data in breast cancer trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document