scholarly journals Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Yost ◽  
Elise Ruark ◽  
Ludmil B Alexandrov ◽  
Nazneen Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Allele Loss ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Uncertain Significance

Abstract Background It is often assumed any cancer in a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (collectively termed BRCA) mutation carrier was caused by that mutation. It is also often assumed the occurrence of breast or ovarian cancer in an individual with a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) suggests the VUS is pathogenic. These assumptions have profound management implications for cancer patients and healthy individuals. Methods We compared the frequency of BRCA mutations, allele loss, and Signature 3 in 7632 individuals with 28 cancers and 1000 population controls. Because only increased frequency was the focus of the study, all statistical tests were one-sided. Results Individuals with breast or ovarian cancer had increased germline BRCA pathogenic mutation frequencies compared to controls (P = 1.0x10−10 and P = 1.4x10−34, respectively). There was no increase in other cancer types. Wild-type allele loss and Signature 3 were statistically significantly higher in breast and ovarian cancers with BRCA mutations compared with other cancers with BRCA mutations (P = 5.1x10−10 and P = 3.7x10−9) and cancers without BRCA mutations (P = 2.8x10−53 and P = 1.0x10−134). There was no difference between non-breast and non-ovarian cancers with BRCA mutations and cancers without BRCA mutations. Allele loss and Signature 3 were statistically significantly higher in breast and ovarian cancers in individuals with BRCA pathogenic mutations compared to those with VUS (P = 3.8x10−17 and P = 1.6x10−8) or benign variants (P = 1.2x10−28 and P = 2.2x10−10). There was no difference between individuals with BRCA VUS and those with benign variants. Conclusions These data show that non-breast and non-ovarian cancers in individuals with germline BRCA pathogenic mutations are often not causally related to the mutation and that BRCA VUS are highly unlikely to be pathogenic. These results should reduce inappropriate management of germline BRCA information.

Spectrum of BRCA1/BRCA2 variants in 1419 Turkish breast and ovarian cancer patients: a single center study

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-90
Author(s):  
Taha Bahsi ◽  
Haktan Bağış Erdem
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Founder Mutations ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Brca1 Brca2 ◽  
Cancer Network

Abstract Objectives Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is chacterized with multiple cases of breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer on the same side of the family. BRCA1/BRCA2 genes are associated with 20–25% of all patients. For developing national health policies for genetic testing, it is important to determine the range of pathogenic mutations in susceptibility genes and to identify recurrent founder mutations. Materials and methods All the patients were provided BRCA testing criteria according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network. QIAseq multiplex amplicon panel, BRCA MASTR™ Dx and Ion AmpliSeq Panel were used for BRCA1/BRCA2 coding regions. SALSA® MLPA® was performed for negative patients. Results Of 1419 patients, 134 (9.4%) were found to carry a pathogenic and 5 (0.3%) were found to carry a likely pathogenic mutation. Of those, 58 patients were found to carry a mutation in BRCA1 and 64 in BRCA2. Variant of uncertain significance was detected in 91 patients (6.4%). Conclusion The spectrum of BRCA1/2 mutations in Turkish population has been shown in the largest patient group to date. The thesis that founder mutations show diversity in different populations has been confirmed in our study, and the mutations that are common in Turkish population have been presented in this study.

Genetic testing and referral patterns of non-BRCA mutation carriers at increased or uncertain risk of ovarian cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1585-1585
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Lee ◽  
Katherine Baumann ◽  
Bhoomi Bhuptani ◽  
Sarah Turecamo ◽  
Julia Anne Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Genetic Counselor ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Brca Mutation Carriers ◽  
Icd 10

1585 Background: While the management of BRCA1/2 is clear, management of non-BRCA mutations with increased risk or uncertain risk of ovarian cancer (OC) is not well established. Previously, we reported that referral to a gynecologic oncologist (GO) resulted in a 30-fold increased uptake of risk reducing surgery (RRS). We aimed to identify trends in genetic testing (GT) and referral to a GO of patients (pts) with such mutations. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study at 3 satellite sites within 1 institution from 2014 to 2018, pts were identified by ICD-10 codes Z15.01, Z15.02, Z15.09, Z15.89, C50.919, Q99.8, and C54.1. Pts with mutations with increased risk of OC ( MLH1, MSH2/6, PMS2, EPCAM (LS genes) , RAD51C/D, BRIP1, STK11) and uncertain risk of OC ( PALB2, ATM, BARD1, NBN) were included; BRCA1/2 and variants of uncertain significance were excluded . Outcomes of interest were patterns of GT and referral to a GO. Chi square and logistic regression were used with p < 0.05. Results: Of 20,000 pts with above ICD-10 codes, 240 pts had genes of interest. Mutations in increased risk of OC included: LS genes, 131; BRIP1, 14; RAD51D, 8; RAD51C, 5; STK11, 1. Mutations associated with uncertain risk of OC were: ATM, 43; PALB2, 23; NBN, 10; BARD1, 5. Pts with known mutations prior establishing care at our institution (N = 69) were less likely to be referred to a GO (22% vs 78%, p = 0.015). Pts with LS genes were more likely to be referred to a GO (52% vs. 25%, p < 0.001), to be tested by a GC (52% vs 25%, p < 0.001), and to be tested for family history (FH) of known mutation (69% vs 30%, p < 0.001). Provider performing GT included: genetic counselor (GC), 66 (28%); medical oncologist, 44 (18%); general obstetrician-gynecologist, 44 (18%); breast surgeon, 6 (3%), and primary care provider, 5 (2%). Of 66 pts tested by a GC, 46 (70%) were referred to GO, vs 48/105 (45%) pts who underwent GT by non-GC (p = 0.001). Reasons for GT among pts were: FH of cancer, 113 (47%); personal history of cancer, 56 (23%); known FH of a mutation, 49 (20%); and unknown indication, 22 (9%). When controlling for age, parity, race, insurance, GT provider, and reasons for GT, mutations with increased risk of OC were associated with referral to a GO (OR 3.55, 95% CI 1.88-6.72), along with pts who were tested by a GC (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.27-5.51). Conclusions: Only ~30% of pts underwent GT by a GC, which was associated with increased referral to a GO. LS genes are better known and were associated with higher uptake of GO referral. Education of OC risks of these newer mutations among providers performing GT may increase referral to a GO and uptake of RRS.

scholarly journals Reliability of Tumor Testing Compared to Germline Testing for Detecting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 593
Author(s):  
Christine Bekos ◽  
Christoph Grimm ◽  
Marlene Kranawetter ◽  
Stephan Polterauer ◽  
Felicitas Oberndorfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Concordance Rate ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Germline Testing

Background: BRCA 1/2 mutation status has become one of the most important parameters for treatment decision in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of this study was to compare tumor DNA with blood DNA sequencing to evaluate the reliability of BRCA tumor testing results. Methods: Patients who were treated for EOC between 2003 and 2019 at the Medical University of Vienna and underwent both germline (gBRCA) and tumor (tBRCA) testing for BRCA mutations were identified. We calculated the concordance rate and further analyzed discordant cases. Results: Out of 140 patients with EOC, gBRCA mutation was found in 47 (33.6%) and tBRCA mutation in 53 (37.9%) patients. Tumor testing identified an additional 9/140 (6.4%) patients with somatic BRCA mutation and negative germline testing. The comparison of germline testing with tumor testing revealed a concordance rate of 93.5% and a negative predictive value of tumor testing of 96.0%. After BRCA variants of uncertain significance were included in the analysis, concordance rate decreased to 90.9%. Conclusion: Tumor testing identified the majority of pathogenic germline BRCA mutations but missed three (2.1%) patients. In contrast, nine (6.4%) patients harboring a somatic BRCA mutation would have been missed by gBRCA testing only.

scholarly journals A Case Report of Germline Compound Heterozygous Mutations in the BRCA1 Gene of an Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 889
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Cecilia Y. S. Ho ◽  
Vivian Y. Shin ◽  
Chun Hang Au ◽  
Tsun Leung Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 Gene ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Compound Heterozygous ◽  
Strong Family History ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

The germline carrier of the BRCA1 pathogenic mutation has been well proven to confer an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Despite BRCA1 biallelic pathogenic mutations being extremely rare, they have been reported to be embryonically lethal or to cause Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we describe a patient who was a 48-year-old female identified with biallelic pathogenic mutations of the BRCA1 gene, with no or very subtle FA-features. She was diagnosed with ovarian cancer and breast cancer at the ages of 43 and 44 and had a strong family history of breast and gynecological cancers.

scholarly journals Tumour Versus Germline BRCA Testing in Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Site Institution Experience in the United Kingdom

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
Iolia Akaev ◽  
Siavash Rahimi ◽  
Olubukola Onifade ◽  
Francis John Edward Gardner ◽  
David Castells-Rufas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Epithelial Cancers ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations

The aim of this audit was to evaluate the usefulness and serviceability of testing for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. One hundred and thirty-five patients with more common histological sub-types of OC were retrospectively identified between 2011 and 2019. The fail rate of the molecular analysis was 7.4% (10/135). One hundred and twenty-five records were evaluated: 99 (79.2%) patients had wild-type BRCA (both somatic and germline); tumour BRCA1/2 (tBRCA1/2) pathogenic mutations were found in 20 (16%) patients with distribution between BRCA1 and BRCA2 being 40% and 60%, respectively; 13 (10.4%) patients with pathogenic variants had germline mutations; and tBRCA1/2 with variant of unknown significance (VUS), in the absence of pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants, was detected in 6 (4.8%) patients. Our data show that expanding the molecular service to the routine first-tumour testing for patients with OC will potentially increase the detection rate of BRCA mutations, thereby providing early benefits of PARP inhibitors therapy. The tumour testing service should continue to be offered to newly diagnosed patients with high-grade epithelial cancers, including high-grade serous carcinoma, but also with carcinosarcomas and poorly-differentiated metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin.

Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomas Associated With BRCA Mutations

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 4222-4227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Levine ◽  
Peter A. Argenta ◽  
Cindy J. Yee ◽  
David S. Marshall ◽  
Narciso Olvera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Ashkenazi Jewish ◽  
Founder Mutations ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinoma ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Mutation Carriers ◽  
Brca Mutation Carriers

Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of BRCA mutations among Ashkenazi Jewish patients with fallopian tube carcinoma (FTC) or primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC), to study the clinicopathologic features of these cancers, and to estimate the risks of these cancers in association with a BRCA mutation. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review at two institutions identified 29 Jewish patients with FTC and 22 Jewish patients with PPC. These patients were genotyped for the three Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA founder mutations (185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2). Surgical and pathologic information, family history, and survival data were obtained from hospital records. All statistical tests were two sided. Results: Germline BRCA mutations were identified in five of 29 patients with FTC (17%) and nine of 22 patients with PPC (41%). Mutation carriers had a younger mean age at diagnosis than patients without a mutation (60 v 70 years; P = .002). The overall median survival was 148 months for mutation carriers and 41 months for patients without a mutation (P = .04). For BRCA mutation carriers, the lifetime risks of FTC and PPC were 0.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Substantial proportions of Ashkenazi Jewish patients with FTC or PPC are BRCA mutation carriers. Patients with BRCA-associated FTC or PPC are younger at diagnosis and have improved survival compared with patients without a BRCA mutation. Although the lifetime risks of FTC or PPC for patients with BRCA heterozygotes are greater than those for the general population, the absolute risks seem relatively low.

Identification of Eleven Novel BRCA Mutations in Tunisia: Impact on the Clinical Management of BRCA Related Cancers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosr Hamdi ◽  
Najah Mighri ◽  
Maroua Boujemaa ◽  
Nesrine Mejri ◽  
Sonia Ben Nasr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Tunisian Population ◽  
North African ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
Genetic Components ◽  
Ovarian Cancers

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the world's most common cancer among women. It is becoming an increasingly urgent problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where a large fraction of women is diagnosed with advanced-stage disease and have no access to treatment or basic palliative care. About 5-10% of all breast cancers can be attributed to hereditary genetic components and up to 25% of familial cases are due to mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. Since their discovery in 1994 and 1995, as few as 18 mutations have been identified in BRCA genes in the Tunisian population. The aim of this study is to identify additional BRCA mutations, to estimate their contribution to the hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Tunisia and to investigate the clinicopathological signatures associated with BRCA mutations. Methods A total of 354 patients diagnosed with breast and ovarian cancers, including 5 male breast cancer cases, have been investigated for BRCA1/2 mutations using traditional and/or next generation sequencing technologies. Clinicopathological signatures associated with BRCA mutations have been also investigated. Results 16 distinct mutations were detected: 10 in BRCA1 and 6 in BRCA2, of which 11 are described for the first time in Tunisia including 3 variations that have not been reported previously in public databases namely BRCA1_c.915T>A; BRCA2_c.-227-?_7805+? and BRCA2_c.249delG. Early age at onset, family history of ovarian cancer and high tumor grade were significantly associated with BRCA status. BRCA1 carriers were more likely to be triple negative breast cancer compared to BRCA2 carriers. A relatively high frequency of contralateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer occurrence was observed among BRCA carriers and was more frequent in patients carrying BRCA1 mutations. Conclusion Our study provides new insights into breast and ovarian cancer genetic landscape in the under-represented North African populations. The prevalence assessment of novel and recurrent BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations will enhance the use of personalized treatment and precise screening strategies by both affected and unaffected North African cancer cases.

scholarly journals A case series of sporadic breast and ovarian cancers in Salentinian families with BRCA mutation-associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. iv67
Author(s):  
E. De Matteis ◽  
M.R. De Giorgio ◽  
P. Tarantino ◽  
G. Ronzino ◽  
M. Ciccarese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancers

scholarly journals Factors influencing women’s decisions to getting tested for BRCA mutation

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suha Al-Oballi Kridli ◽  
Holly Austin
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Genetic Mutations ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Internal And External Factors

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers. There are many risk factors that can increase a woman’s susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers, some of which are modifiable.  However, non-modifiable risks for breast and ovarian cancer include the presence of genetic mutations (BRCA) increase the risk of these diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify factors, reported in the literature, known to affect women’s decision to get genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A total of 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Several internal and external factors, influencing women’s decision to getting tested for BRCA mutations, were identified and explained. Implications for clinical practice were provided.

scholarly journals Tailoring Ovarian Cancer Treatment: Implications of BRCA1/2 Mutations

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainhoa Madariaga ◽  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Amit Oza
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Tumour Suppressor Genes ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Brca Mutation Carriers ◽  
Drug Efflux Pumps

High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common epithelial ovarian cancer, harbouring more than 20% germline or somatic mutations in the tumour suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. These genes are involved in both DNA damage repair process via homologous recombination (HR) and transcriptional regulation. BRCA mutation confers distinct characteristics, including an increased response to DNA-damaging agents, such us platinum chemotherapy and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). However, several mechanisms of resistance to these agents have been described, including increased HR capacity through reverse BRCA mutations, non-homologous end-joint (NHEJ) repair alterations and drug efflux pumps. Current treatments of ovarian cancer including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted treatment and maintenance strategies, as well as resistance mechanisms will be reviewed, focusing on future trends with respect to BRCA mutation carriers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document