PARENTS AS ‘CONSUMERS’ OF EDUCATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES AND THE NETHERLANDS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
NEVILLE HARRIS ◽  
SOPHIE VAN BIJSTERVELD
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
England And Wales

scholarly journals Comparative analysis between the English, Dutch and French approaches to passing-on in competition cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-138
Author(s):  
Marc Barennes ◽  
Tessel Bosse ◽  
Hans Bousie ◽  
Sarah Subrémon
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Case Law ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
The Eu

Several legal topics regarding cartel damages litigation have drawn special attention over the last few years, including the passing-on defence. ‘Passing-on’ in competition cases is where overcharges caused by a cartel, which affect the customers of the cartelists (direct purchasers), are passed-on by these purchasers to buyers further down the supply chain (indirect purchasers). Cartel members regularly invoke this defence as a (partial) shield against a claim for damages. The EU Damages Directive contains two important presumptions in connection to passed-on damages. This article undertakes a comparative analysis of how the courts in the Netherlands, France and England and Wales apply these presumptions in practice in their case law.

COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN HOUSING RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Тамерлан Шайх-Магомедович Едреев
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Housing Rights ◽  
Country Differences ◽  
The Right

Каждый имеет право на жилище. Никто не может быть произвольно лишен жилища. В статье проанализированы особенности реализации универсального права человека на жилище в отдельных странах (на примере Нидерландов и ЮАР), принадлежащих к разным правовым семьям. Everyone has the right to housing. No one can be arbitrarily deprived of their home. The article analyzes the features of the implementation of the universal human right to housing in individual countries (on the example of the Netherlands and South Africa) belonging to different legal families.

The Sentence is Only the Beginning: Hiccups in the Cross-Border Execution of Judgments in the Euregion Meuse-Rhine

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 189-217
Author(s):  
Johannes Keiler ◽  
André Klip
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Member States ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Alternative Measures ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Preliminary Phase ◽  
Country Specific

Abstract The cross-border execution of judgments remains difficult in practice for European Member States. This article seeks to analyze why this may be the case with regard to four different modalities of sentences: (1) prison sentences and other measures involving deprivation of liberty, (2) conditional sentences and alternative measures, (3) financial penalties and (4) confiscation orders. Based on a comparative analysis, this article investigates the problems at stake regarding the cross-border execution of judgements in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands and identifies possible causes and explanations for these. The analysis shows that impediments to cooperation may inter alia stem from differences in national law and diverging national sentencing practices and cultures and may furthermore be related to a lack of possibilities for cooperation in the preliminary phase of a transfer. Moreover, some obstacles to cooperation may be country-specific and self-made, due to specific choices and approaches of national criminal justice systems.

scholarly journals The problematic scope of extended confiscation in comparative perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 119-133
Author(s):  
Ariadna H. Ochnio
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
European Parliament ◽  
Comparative Perspective ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Normative Framework ◽  
Proceeds Of Crime

The scope of extended confiscation is determined, inter alia, by the choice of triggering offences in Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union. The question arises whether EU law guarantees appropriate limits of extended confiscation considering its specificity and the growing range of application in national legal orders. The study compared the normative framework of extended confiscation adopted in the criminal law of Poland, Romania, Germany, Austria, France, Spain, Finland, the Netherlands, and England and Wales. The list of offences, relevant for the scope of extended confiscation, is to be assessed by the Commission by 4 October 2019. The conclusions of the study concern the need to introduce, at the level of EU law, adequate safeguards against the disproportionate application of extended confiscation.

Comparative Analysis of Salt Structures in the Southern North Sea, Dutch Offshore, the Netherlands

Geotectonics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-820
Author(s):  
M. A. F. Miraj ◽  
A. Ali ◽  
N. Ahsan ◽  
Sh. Afgan ◽  
R. F. Saleem
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
North Sea ◽  
Southern North Sea
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document