Legal Issues

Author(s):  
Thaddeus M. Pope

This chapter clarifies the legality of VSED for patients, families, and clinicians. Both clinicians and medical societies widely perceive VSED to be legal. While there continues to be variability, particularly in long-term care settings, legal uncertainty is generally not a significant barrier when the patient has decision-making capacity. Courts have repeatedly authorized VSED, and VSED falls squarely within broader, well-settled rights to refuse treatment and care. After establishing a patient’s right to VSED and a clinician’s correlative duty to honor that choice, the chapter explains why VSED probably does not constitute (1) the crime of assisted suicide, (2) the neglect of a vulnerable adult, or (3) a basis to invalidate life insurance policies. The chapter concludes by noting that while clinicians may have affirmative duties to discuss VSED, they also have rights to conscientiously object to participating.

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuko Mitoku ◽  
Setsu Shimanouchi

The present study assessed the decision-making and communication capacities of older adults with dementia who required assistance and care and measured the subsequent changes in these capacities. Of 845 older adults who received long-term care between April 2003 and December 2004, about half of them without dementia were excluded and the remaining 448 were finally included in the analyses. These individuals were completed follow-up for assessment for two years. The data were obtained from the Long-Term Care Insurance Certification Committee for Eligibility in Gujo City. A total of 73.7% of people with dementia were somewhat capable of making decisions (32.4% were reported as being “always capable”; 41.3% were reported as being “sometimes capable”). A total of 93.7% were somewhat capable of communicating with others (78.3% were reported as being “always capable”; 15.4% were reported as being “sometimes capable”). The results indicate that older adults with dementia can participate in their own care decisions, even if they require assistance and support in their daily lives. The present study shows, however, that baseline decision-making capacity declined to about half what they were after one year and to about one-third of what they were after two years, suggesting that earlier efforts are needed to ensure that the preferences of individuals with dementia are reflected in their care.


2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladislav Volicer ◽  
Michael D. Cantor ◽  
Arthur R. Derse ◽  
Denise Murray Edwards ◽  
Angela M. Prudhomme ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea K. Shreve-Neiger ◽  
Christi M. Houston ◽  
Kimberly A. Christensen ◽  
Frederick J. Kier

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 140-145
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Patterson

Decision-making capacity is a fundamental consideration in working with patients in a clinical setting. One of the most common conditions affecting decision-making capacity in patients in the inpatient or long-term care setting is a form of acute, transient cognitive change known as delirium. A thorough understanding of delirium — how it can present, its predisposing and precipitating factors, and how it can be managed — will improve a speech-language pathologist's (SLPs) ability to make treatment recommendations, and to advise the treatment team on issues related to communication and patient autonomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document