Interpersonal Psychotherapy and Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 459-469
Author(s):  
Jennifer Sotsky ◽  
Hayley Pessin ◽  
John C. Markowitz

Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is an evidence-based, time-limited, and affect-focused psychotherapy that was developed 50 years ago for major depression and has now been expanded to treat other mood and nonmood disorders, including in patients with cancer, in a variety of settings worldwide. Core principles of IPT include that depression often occurs in the context of major life events and that it is a medical illness that is not the patient’s fault. This chapter will first describe the background and development of IPT, then discuss the research on efficacy of IPT in patients with cancer and other medical illnesses as well as limitations of the existing data. It will outline principles of IPT and illustrate the major phases of treatment with basic techniques through use of the case vignette of “Ms. A,” a patient with breast cancer and depression. Lastly, it will review relevant adaptations of IPT including interpersonal counseling (IPC), an abbreviated version of IPT for less psychotherapeutically trained clinicians that has been studied in psycho-oncology patients. Though data on psychotherapy in patients with cancer remain limited, IPT appears to be a practical and promising option that warrants current use and further study.

1989 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cary L. Cooper ◽  
Rachel Cooper ◽  
E. Brian Faragher

SynopsisThis study explored the incidence and perception of psychosocial stress among 1596 patients attending breast screening clinics and 567 controls attending a well women clinic. It was found that some major life events (e.g. death of husband, death of close friend) were significantly related to breast disease and severity. The implications of the results are discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 467-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyndy M. Fox ◽  
A. Patricia Harper ◽  
Gerald C. Hyner ◽  
Roseann M. Lyle

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen D. Kanner ◽  
James C. Coyne ◽  
Catherine Schaefer ◽  
Richard S. Lazarus

1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 949-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy F. M. G. Berden ◽  
Monika Althaus ◽  
Frank C. Verhulst

Author(s):  
Valentina Hlebec ◽  
Maja Mrzel ◽  
Tina Kogovšek

Some studies (e.g., Kogovšek & Hlebec, 2008, 2009) have shown that the name generator and the role relation approaches to measuring social networks are to some extent comparable, but less so the name generator and the event-related approaches (Hlebec, Mrzel, & Kogovšek, 2009). In this chapter, the composition of the social support network assessed by both the general social support approach and the event-related approach (support during 15 major life events) is analyzed and compared. In both cases, the role relation approach is used. In addition, in both approaches a more elaborate (16 possible categories ranging from partner, mother, father, friend to no one) and a more simple (6 possible categories ranging from family member, friend, neighbor to no one) response format is applied and compared. The aim of the chapter is to establish, in a controlled quasi-experiment setting, whether the different approaches (i.e. the general social support and the event-related approach) produce similar social networks regardless of the response format (long vs. short).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document