Physician Message and Patient’s Perception of Compassion (DRAFT)

Author(s):  
Lynn A. Flint ◽  
Eric Widera

This randomized, crossover study examined advanced cancer patients’ perceptions of physician compassion when delivering a less optimistic versus more optimistic message. Patients with advanced cancer viewed two videos, each depicting actors portraying a physician and a patient discussing cancer treatment options. In one video, the physician delivers a less optimistic message and in the other, the physician delivers a more optimistic message. Participants rated their perceptions of physician compassion after viewing each video. They perceived the physician with the more optimistic message as more compassionate than the physician with the less optimistic message. The chapter describes the basics of the study, briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 3235-3242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Garrett ◽  
Christopher J. Koenig ◽  
Laura Trupin ◽  
Fay J. Hlubocky ◽  
Christopher K. Daugherty ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazue Komura ◽  
Mitsunori Miyashita ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kizawa ◽  
Shohei Kawagoe ◽  
Nobuya Akizuki ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17541-e17541
Author(s):  
Stephen John Clarke ◽  
Cindy Tan

e17541 Background: Nutritional status impacts on the outcomes of cancer treatment ( http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/supportivecare/nutrition/ HealthProfessional ). Nutrition is a concern of cancer patients. Many centres lack the resources to undertake formal nutritional assessments on cancer patients. Inflammatory markers have been shown to correlate with nutritional status and cancer treatment outcomes. The NLR is the ratio of the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts in a full blood count (FBC). Our aim was to determine if the NLR can be used to identify cancer patients needing nutritional assessment and intervention. Methods: A prospective observational study evaluated sequential new patients attending a cancer centre. All were assessed for nutritional status using the patient generated scored global assessment (PGSGA) tool and categorized as A (well nourished), or B/C (malnourished). A FBC was done in the week prior to treatment. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cut-points for NLR to predict malnutrition. Results: 234 patients were enrolled - 112 had advanced cancer. The median age was 60 years (range 25-83), 108 (46%) were male and 101 (43%) were malnourished at baseline. The mean NLR was higher in malnourished patients (4.1 vs 2.5 – p<0.001), however this was due to differences in advanced cancer patients. The optimal cut point for NLR in all patients to predict malnutrition was 5.0 (4.3 in advanced patients). In advanced patients, an NLR ≥4.3 had a sensitivity and specificity for malnutrition of 42.2% (95% CI 30.1-54.3) and 97.9% (95% CI 88.9-99.9), respectively, producing a positive predictive value of 0.96 (95% CI-0.82-1.00). Thus, NLR while strongly correlated with malnutrition is not sensitive enough alone to be used to identify malnourished cancer patients. However, as >98% of patients with a raised NLR had malnutrition, the NLR could be used to triage patients for nutritional assessment and thereby reduce the workload for clinical dieticians. Conclusions: The NLR is a useful indicator of nutritional status, which when elevated is specific for malnutrition. A low NLR should be reassuring in regard to nutritional status in advanced cancer patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9651-9651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Paul Dohan ◽  
Laura Trupin ◽  
Christopher Koenig ◽  
Fay J. Hlubocky ◽  
Christopher Daugherty

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2836-2842 ◽  
Author(s):  
F De Conno ◽  
L Groff ◽  
C Brunelli ◽  
E Zecca ◽  
V Ventafridda ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The aims of this study were to describe the analgesia, side effects, and dosage and the causes of suspension of treatment in a large sample of advanced cancer patients with pain after treatment with oral methadone from 7 to 90 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a retrospective study, data collected for 196 advanced cancer outpatients with moderate to severe pain treated at 8-hour intervals with oral methadone in solution form from February 1993 to February 1995 were analyzed at baseline (time 0) and then at 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 days. The following parameters were assessed: Karnofsky Performance Status, intensity of pain (using the Integrated Pain Score [IPS], intensity of pain, insomnia, drowsiness, confusion, dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and dyspnea (using the Therapy Impact Questionnaire [TIQ], mean daily dose of drug administered, and reasons for withdrawal from study. The period when pain was reduced by > or = 35% with respect to baseline was evaluated with the Palliation Index. The association of the degree of palliation of pain with the age of the patients, tumor site, analgesic treatment taken at baseline, and daily mean dose of methadone administered during the follow-up period was analyzed by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS A reduction in pain intensity with respect to baseline occurred at each analysis time, and in 55.1% of the patients the reduction during the follow-up period was > or = 35% according to the Palliation Index. The mean dose of oral methadone ranged from 14 mg at day 7 to 23.65 mg at day 90. There was an overall worsening of the other symptoms, but a high percentage of the patients reported an amelioration of insomnia with respect to baseline. There was a statistically significant association (P < .0001) between the Palliation Index and the analgesic therapy administered at baseline. Only 11.2% of the patients withdrew from the study due to analgesic inefficacy and 6.6% due to methadone-related side effects (10 patients with drowsiness and three with severe constipation. CONCLUSION Oral methadone administered every 8 hours was shown to be an appropriate analgesic therapy in the treatment of advanced cancer-related pain. The worsening of the other symptoms under study can be considered linked to the progression of the disease, and in fact, only a small percentage of the patients reported methadone-related side effects that warranted suspension of treatment. We consider oral methadone to be a useful analgesic therapy, and it should be considered in clinical practice for the treatment of cancer pain.


Author(s):  
Lisa M. Reynolds ◽  
Amelia Akroyd ◽  
Frederick Sundram ◽  
Aideen Stack ◽  
Suresh Muthukumaraswamy ◽  
...  

Recent clinical trials suggest that psychedelic-assisted therapy is a promising intervention for reducing anxiety and depression and ameliorating existential despair in advanced cancer patients. However, little is known about perceptions toward this treatment from the key gatekeepers to this population. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of cancer healthcare professionals about the potential use of psychedelic-assisted therapy in advanced cancer patients. Twelve cancer healthcare professionals including doctors, nurses, psychologists and social workers took part in a semi-structured interview which explored their awareness and perceptions toward psychedelic-assisted therapy with advanced cancer patients. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Four inter-connected themes were identified. Two themes relate to the role and responsibility of being a cancer healthcare worker: (1) ‘beneficence: a need to alleviate the suffering of cancer patients’ and (2) ‘non-maleficence: keeping vulnerable cancer patients safe’, and two themes relate specifically to the potential for psychedelic-assisted therapy as (3) ‘a transformative approach with the potential for real benefit’ but that (4) ‘new frontiers can be risky endeavours’. The findings from this study suggest intrigue and openness in cancer healthcare professionals to the idea of utilising psychedelic-assisted therapy with advanced cancer patients. Openness to the concept appeared to be driven by a lack of current effective treatment options and a desire to alleviate suffering. However, acceptance was tempered by concerns around safety and the importance of conducting rigorous, well-designed trials. The results from this study provide a useful basis for engaging with healthcare professionals about future research, trial design and potential clinical applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document