Vascular assessment

Author(s):  
Colin Bigham

Ultrasound-guided vascular access requires knowledge of the anatomy and the ultrasound appearances of normal and abnormal vessels in all regions where vascular access may be undertaken. This chapter describes the optimal ultrasound technique for imaging vessels, how to differentiate arteries and veins, and the normal appearances of the jugular, axillary, femoral, and upper and lower limb vessels. The technique for undertaking a lower limb scan to assess for venous thrombosis is outlined.

Author(s):  
Anna Clebone

Chapter 4 discusses the dynamic use of ultrasound to guide the placement of a peripheral intravenous (IV) line. Ultrasound can be used to guide placement of multiple types of vascular access. Arteries and veins are sonographically similar in cross section: hyperechoic circles with hypoechoic interiors. Arteries are thicker walled and characteristically pulsatile. Veins are more susceptible to compression. Doppler or color flow can distinguish the amplitude and direction of flow. Skill with placing peripheral ultrasound guided IV lines in patients with difficult IV access can often help the practitioner avoid the need to place a central line, assuming the central line is not needed for other indications.


1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 008-011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric J Carter ◽  
D Lynn Doyle ◽  
Nigel Dawson ◽  
Shauna Fowler ◽  
Dana V Devine

SummaryThe serial use of non-invasive tests has been shown to be a safe method of managing outpatients who are suspected of having lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Objective testing has shown that the majority of these outpatients do not have venous thrombosis. A rapid test to exclude DVT in these patients, without the need for expensive and inconvenient serial non-invasive vascular testing, would have practical and economic advantages.Studies measuring the fibrin degradation product D-dimer using enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) in patients with veno-graphically proven DVT suggest that it should be possible to exclude this condition by the use of one of the rapid latex bead D-dimer tests.We have examined 190 patients with suspected DVT using both a latex and an EIA D-dimer assay. The latex D-dimer test used in this study was negative in 7 of the 36 proven cases of DVT. This sensitivity of only 80% is not sufficient to allow this type of assay, in its current form, to be used as an exclusion test for DVT. The same plasma samples were tested with an EIA assay. This information was used to mathematically model the effects of selecting a range of D-dimer discriminant cut off points for the diagnosis of DVT. These results indicate that 62% of suspected clinically significant DVT could have this diagnosis excluded, with a 98% sensitivity, if the rapid latex or equivalent D-dimer test could be reformulated to measure less than 185 ng/ml of D-dimer.


Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-610
Author(s):  
Masahito MINAMI ◽  
Mayu TUJIMOTO ◽  
Ayako NISHIMOTO ◽  
Mika SAKAGUCHI ◽  
Yasuhiro OONO ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahiminejad ◽  
Anshul Rastogi ◽  
Shirish Prabhudesai ◽  
David Mcclinton ◽  
Peter MacCallum ◽  
...  

Aims. Colour doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT); however, the number of scans positive for above knee DVT is low. The present study evaluates the reliability of the D-dimer test combined with a clinical probability score (Wells score) in ruling out an above knee DVT and identifying patients who do not need a CDUS. Materials and Method. This study is a retrospective audit and reaudit of a total of 816 outpatients presenting with suspected lower limb DVT from March 2009 to March 2010 and from September 2011 to February 2012. Following the initial audit, a revised clinical diagnostic pathway was implemented. Results. In our initial audit, seven patients (4.9%) with a negative D-dimer and a low Wells score had a DVT. On review, all seven had a risk factor identified that was not included in the Wells score. No patient with negative D-dimer and low Wells score with no extra clinical risk factor had a DVT on CDUS (negative predictive value 100%). A reaudit confirmed adherence to our revised clinical diagnostic pathway. Conclusions. A negative D-dimer together with a low Wells score and no risk factors effectively excludes a lower limb DVT and an ultrasound is unnecessary in these patients.


Author(s):  
Raka A. Nugraha ◽  
Hary S. Muliawan ◽  
Nyityasmono T. Nugroho ◽  
Muhammad Ikhsan ◽  
Suko Adiarto

AbstractSince its first discovery in late 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a global burden associated with significant morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 has been correlated with the development of hypercoagulable state that predisposes the patients to a higher risk of thromboembolism. Current evidence suggests higher incidence of thrombosis, particularly venous thrombosis, among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, mostly with critical illness. On the other hand, there is currently no data regarding the incidence of vivid thrombosis in ambulatory patients with mild COVID-19 and the incidence of concomitant arterial and venous thrombosis in COVID-19 is extremely rare. Herein, we describe catastrophic outcomes of concomitant lower limb arterial and venous thrombosis in a patient with mild COVID-19. This report highlights the occurrence of concomitant arterial and venous thrombosis in ambulatory setting and that this phenomenon resulted in catastrophic clinical consequences.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C.R. Rippey ◽  
Pablo Blanco ◽  
Peter J. Carr

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document