Good defiance and flourishing
This chapter examines the relationship between defiance and flourishing by analyzing three cases and unpacking some of the epistemic and ontological assumptions that undergird our naïve ideas about flourishing. The aim is to clarify under what conditions a person with a mental disorder might be able to flourish, what a claim of flourishing entails, and why some defiant behavior is central to this theory of flourishing—it counts as good defiance. It argues against Aristotle’s account of human virtue as a function of excellent reasoning and against positive psychology’s conception of mental health as well-being and flourishing. Instead, it identifies features of non-ideal flourishing that are then applied to three people with diagnoses: one with schizophrenia, one with depression, and one with Borderline Personality Disorder. The author then explains how she would evaluate these three cases in terms of their defiant behavior.