Analgesia, anaesthesia, and sedation

Author(s):  
David A. Mitchell ◽  
Laura Mitchell ◽  
Lorna McCaul

Contents. Indications, contraindications, and common sense. Local analgesia—tools of the trade. Local analgesia—techniques. Local analgesia—problems and hints. Sedation—relative analgesia. Sedation—benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines—techniques. Anaesthesia—drugs and definitions. Anaesthesia and the patient on medication. Anaesthesia—hospital setting. Anaesthesia—practice setting.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 937-938
Author(s):  
Richard Schwartz ◽  
Ronald G. Barsanti ◽  
William J. Rodriguez

In the June 1977 issue of Pediatrics (59:827), Dr. Tetzlaff et al. reported their important study of 59 young infants less than 11 weeks of age who were seen in a hospital setting. The infants had a diagnosis of otitis media confirmed by tympanocentesis. We have recently compiled our data on otitis media in suburban, middle-class infants seen in a private-practice setting during a similar period (28 months). With respect to the above article, we have found a number of similarities as well as some differences in our patient population.


This chapter summarizes the different techniques available for analgesia, anaesthesia, and sedation in dentistry. This includes the use of benzodiazepines while highlighting the indications and contraindications for each technique and approach. The varying methods of administration of local analgesia are outlined, with information on the commonly used preparations and techniques. The use of both oral and intravenous sedation is discussed, including important points on drug interactions and reversal agents. This chapter considers the triad of unconsciousness, muscle relaxation, and analgesia that makes up general anaesthesia and details the drugs used to achieve this in a hospital setting.


1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (09) ◽  
pp. 633-636
Author(s):  
Deborah D. Schoenhoff ◽  
Timothy W. Lane ◽  
Charles J. Hansen

AbstractObjective:To determine the knowledge of rubella immune status among practicing obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States and of rubella immunity policies covering healthcare workers in the obstetric-care office setting.Design:Mailed survey questionnaire, August through December 1994.Setting:Physicians from multiple-practice sites including private office, public institution, university or teaching hospital, and closed panel health maintenance organization settings.Participants:3,302 practicing obstetrician-gynecologists, chosen by a systematic random sample from the AMA national physician database.Main Outcome Measures:Participants were defined as rubella immune if they reported knowledge of prior rubella vaccination or positive antibody titer. Knowledge of a policy for documenting rubella immunity among employees in the office-based practice setting also was assessed.Results:Questionnaires were returned from 50% (1,666) of the 3,302 surveyed, and 96% (1,599) were evaluable. Approximately 20% (304/1,599) of the responding obstetrician-gynecologists did not have knowledge of documented rubella immunity, and the majority of office-based practices did not require documentation of rubella immunity in the following groups: physicians, 66% (723/1,094); office nurses, 62% (666/1,070); and other office staff, 69% (728/1,063). Sixty-two percent (993/1,599) of responding physicians had individual rubella serologies performed, with 916 known to be positive, 53 reported negative, and 24 reported unknown. Fifty-seven percent (918/1,599) reported receiving monovalent rubella vaccine or trivalent measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed the following to be independent predictors of positive immune status among respondents: female gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.8-3.1), medical school graduation since 1980 (OR, 2.6; CI95, 2.0-3.3), providing obstetric or fertility services (OR, 1.5; CI95, 1.2-1.9), and group practice setting ≥5 physicians; OR, 1.2; CI95, 1.1-14).Conclusions:Nationally, nearly one of every five practicing obstetricians may not have documented rubella immunity, and the majority of office-based practices have no system for assuring such immunity. Rubella immunity should extend beyond the hospital setting, with consideration for requiring rubella immunity as a condition for employment. Methods for effective implementation and documentation of current guidelines need to be addressed, particularly in the office setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Eva Seligman ◽  
Thuy Ngo

The I-PASS Handoff Program is linked to reduced medical errors. The enduring handoff practices of residency graduates trained in I-PASS, and attitudes thereof, are unknown. Our objective was to investigate how often residency graduates use I-PASS or other handoff tools, and perspectives regarding standardized handoffs beyond residency. We performed an exploratory electronic survey of residency graduates from programs who participated in the original I-PASS study. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Of the 106 respondents, 64/106 (60%) identified as “attendings” and the remainder of respondents were subspeciality fellows. The most common practice setting was the inpatient hospital setting, 42/106 (39%). Regarding handoff use, 61/106 (58%) “rarely” or “never” used standardized handoffs. Of those using handoffs, 13/76 (17%) used I-PASS and 59/76 (78%) used a personal system. Most (95/101, 94%) were unaware of any dedicated handoff training or reported it did not exist for attendings, although 77/106 (73%) endorsed their importance for attendings. Despite rigorous residency training and belief in its importance, over one third of graduates did not use standardized handoffs. System-wide requirements for standardized handoffs may improve communication among all providers including physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses, and enhance patient safety.


2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. e201-e204
Author(s):  
Robert Johnston ◽  
Sina Haeri ◽  
Richard Hale ◽  
William Lindsley ◽  
Annette McCormick ◽  
...  

Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of multidisciplinary (Multi-D) perinatal care conference (PCC) implementation in the private practice setting. Methods After the initial 12-month period following implementation of the monthly PCC by private maternal–fetal medicine and neonatology practitioners, conference attendees were asked to completed a modified version of the Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale, involving 19 questions assessing their attitudes and opinions toward Multi-D team care on a five-point Likert's scale. Results Of the 51 average attendees to the PCC, 82.3% completed the survey. A majority of respondents agreed that Multi-D team care resulted in improved care for patients and family, was not overly complex to coordinate, and resulted in significant job satisfaction and improved medical knowledge. Conclusion Multi-D care is an effective approach to the complicated needs of maternal–fetal medicine patients which may lead to improved patient and family outcomes, high provider satisfaction, and can easily be implemented and utilized within a private practice or community hospital setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 758-762
Author(s):  
Ram Kishor Sah ◽  
Andrea Straus ◽  
Deepak Sundar Shrestha ◽  
Hari Har Khanal ◽  
Bishnu Dutta Paudel ◽  
...  

Background: The prevalence of stage 2 hypertension approaches one-third in adult Nepalis and despite inexpensive effective treatment, long-term compliance is poor. World-wide, a major impediment is the incongruity between hypertension and patients’ symptom-based illness representations. The Common-Sense Model of Self-regulation was used to investigate Nepali illness representations through open-ended interviews of patients with hypertension.Methods: In a tertiary hospital setting, 50 self-identified hypertensive patients were interviewed about their representations of health, hypertension, and hypertensive treatment. Responses were analyzed with a modified Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.Results: An Ayurvedic-influenced health model appeared in illness identity and coping responses. Hypertension was identified as a serious disease having observable, wide-ranging symptoms with chronic and intermittent timelines. Concerns included side-effects and barriers to treatment. Conclusions: Further confirmation and investigation of Nepali common-sense hypertension models in a sample size sufficient for factor analysis is warranted for effective adherence interventions.Keywords: Common-sense model; hypertension adherence; illness representations; Nepal


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Poskus

Abstract The bedside swallow screen has become an essential part of the evaluation of a patient after stroke in the hospital setting. Implementing this type of tool should be simple. However, reinforcement and monitoring of the tool presents a challenge. Verifying the consistency and reliability of nurses performing the bedside swallow screen can be a difficult task. This article will document the journey of implementing and maintaining a reliable and valid nursing bedside swallow screen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document